The Rowling Record

J.K. Rowling’s trans-related posts from 2024

Page 3 of 12. Posts 201–300 of the 1,194 J.K. Rowling wrote about trans people in 2024, newest first.

19 October 2024 to 19 November 2024. Posts are reproduced in full from the archive; the stance, intensity and topic labels come from the research classifications. How the labels are defined. Search within 2024.

Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @cyberfrontier

@cyberfrontier I’m bored of this nonsense. I have never used the term ‘real’ or ‘true’ trans, nor have I ever said any exceptions should be made for any MTFs regarding women’s spaces or sports. If you find it intolerable that I interact cordially/warmly with trans people in my mentions who have interesting points to make and are perfectly polite and friendly when they do so, I suggest hitting the unfollow button. I object to thought and speech policing wherever it occurs, so I’ll continue speaking to whoever I like, however I want.

148 replies215 retweets4,310 likes

Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Sport, Free speech & cancellation

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Weird we haven't seen a similar influx of trans-identified women into top tier male sport, isn't it? So odd that 900 men's medals and titles haven't gone to athletes born female. What could possibly explain this glaring disparity? Someone get Judith Butler on the phone.

667 replies5,626 retweets42,067 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Sport, Language & definitions

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Sport, Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @yizudien1

@yizudien1 Plenty of people have risked and lost their livelihoods for speaking this particular truth. It should shame every person who's financially secure that they're too cowardly to do what people without their means have done, at massive cost to themselves.

23 replies178 retweets2,372 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation

Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions, Other

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Nothing about this feels good, because John Oliver generously gave his time for my charity Lumos and I liked him very much when I met him, but God knows, if you ever need an example of motivated reasoning and confirmation bias, this video's for you. An undoubtedly intelligent person spouts absolute bullshit to support something he wants to be true, but isn't. According to the UN, female athletes have lost nearly 900 medals to trans-identified men competing against them in women’s sporting categories. Girls have been ousted from teams to make way for boys. Women have suffered serious injury playing against trans-identified men (see Payton McNabb, mentioned below). Again and again I've come up against men who argue exactly what Oliver does here, using the very same talking points. With a straight face, the 'believe the science' guys will say 'actually, we don't yet have enough data to say whether men and boys are stronger and faster than women and girls'. The 'be kind' crew can't see what the issue is. 'Why are you bothered, it only affects a tiny minority of females?' To prove to their progressive credentials - and (coincidentally, I'm sure) indemnify themselves against repercussions from cultural elites in the media, academia and publishing who've showed themselves more than ready to kick people to the kerb for failing to mouth the approved mantras - people with a lot to lose are currently prepared to make idiots of themselves. They'll stare unabashedly into a camera and insist that their audiences' eyeballs are incapable of seeing what's plain as day, and that there's something wrong with the great unwashed for believing that girls are being robbed of opportunities and put at physical risk. If you want to tell the world you're happy to watch females suffer injury, humiliation and the loss of sporting opportunities to bolster an elitist post-modern ideology embraced by a minute fraction of the world's population, fair enough; you're allowed your opinion. But if you've just told girls they don't deserve fair sport, maybe rethink using all too real and common sexual predation against young women as a punchline for your 'edgy' closing joke.

Read the full post
3,562 replies14,462 retweets92,144 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Sport, Specific individuals, Media & institutions, Child safeguarding

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

@heterodorx I'm loving the current spate of gender activists saying that recent setbacks can be reversed by educating us all more. Can't wait. I'm sure that if I'm called an evil, genocidal bigot just a couple more times, the light will dawn and I'll realise women can have dicks.

174 replies650 retweets6,876 likes

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @runthinkwrite

@runthinkwrite Exactly. The dominant strain of trans activism insists on total compliance and zero debate, because if forced to concede that even one man isn't a woman because he says he is, or that some men can/do capitalise on their movement for nefarious reasons, the whole thing unravels.

48 replies265 retweets3,560 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Nobody’s ‘taking’ except you. You demand that women and girls give up their rights and spaces to you. You insist there are no contexts in which a man shouldn’t be considered a woman if he says he’s one. Your aggression, entitlement and overreach brought pushback. This is on you. https://t.co/sLC4pPJtiv

1,095 replies6,299 retweets53,086 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @apmeehan

@apmeehan You appear to believe in a mystical lady essence that can get mistakenly stuck in a penised body. I not only don't share your unfalsifiable belief, I think people like you, who'll defend that religion up to the point of obvious and serious harm, are genuinely dangerous.

37 replies389 retweets3,130 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Child safeguarding, Youth healthcare

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @apmeehan

@apmeehan What 'innocent people'? Men who really want their nipples sucked by babies? Do you genuinely believe a man who's been given a ton of drugs produces a fluid identical to breast milk, which is literally designed for the individual baby the woman's carried, and adapts to its needs?

21 replies247 retweets2,395 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Adult healthcare, Other

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @apmeehan

@apmeehan Why are you so keen (second day and counting) to normalise the idea of babies suckling from men? What is it about feeding babies a fluid that leaks from the nipples of men who've been given a powerful cocktail of drugs and artificial hormones that makes you think 'good idea'?

16 replies179 retweets2,210 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Adult healthcare, Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding

Classified neutral · Intensity 0/4 · Other

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Adult healthcare, Language & definitions

Classified mocking · Intensity 4/4 · Adult healthcare, Child safeguarding, Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

I know this sounds crazy, but bear with me. How about we agree, as a society, that if watching women breastfeed, or pretending to breastfeed yourself, gives you a boner, you are the last fucking person who should be in the breastfeeding support group.

233 replies903 retweets5,618 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Child safeguarding, Youth healthcare, Single-sex spaces

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces

Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Media & institutions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @FreyBennet

@HomoLittlest ‘How do you know the world’s round, have you been to space?’ ‘Try and define a globe, it’s literally impossible.’ ‘Planetary identity is a social construct.’ ‘The Inuit have 856 words for “sphere” and half of them also mean “triangle”, you ignorant fucking bigot.’

70 replies183 retweets2,379 likes

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals

Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

You can keep telling yourself this, but you're simply wrong. I'm a left-leaning liberal who's fiercely anti-authoritarian, and if you couldn't deduce that from my work you haven't understood a word of it. I'm not an ideologue. I mistrust ideologies. I've never met an ideologue who wasn't prepared to deny a bit of inconvenient truth to keep their world view intact and I include ideologies with which I find myself in broad sympathy. On the other hand, I am an idealist. I believe in human beings. We are undeniably capable of terrible acts, but the evidence is that we are astoundingly collaborative and mutually supportive, especially when times are hard. My values haven't changed; what's changed is the political landscape. What was once my natural home (a pragmatic centre-left party focused on dealing with economic disparity, championing social liberalism and equal rights) is now dominated by an illiberal, identity-based strain of politics I consider elitist, harmful and out of touch with the day-to-day concerns of regular people, particularly women (and I've still lived more than half of my life as a non-wealthy woman, and some of that time was spent in poverty). There are women with whom I make common cause in the TERF wars I disagree with on other things. Within obvious limits (sucking up to literal Nazis) I don't particularly care about their personal politics. The reality is that there's currently an assault on women's rights unparalleled in my lifetime, and it's coming from both left and right. If ever there was a time for women across the political spectrum to come together, it is now.

Read the full post
3,465 replies8,069 retweets80,649 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation, Other

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @slainefeanor

@slainefeanor Ironically, I can't see Marx having any truck with gender ideology at all. He believed women were oppressed on the basis of their sex and I doubt he'd embrace a highly individualistic ideology that offers fertile new marketing opportunities for the capitalists of Big Pharma.

73 replies110 retweets1,077 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Adult healthcare, Other

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions

Classified neutral · Intensity 0/4 · Sport, Media & institutions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

I wrote the words below in April, about the UK left, and I'm retweeting them today for the benefit of some of the numbskulls in my mentions. Women like me, and there are a lot of us, aren't and never have been far-right. We simply want the left to wake the hell up, because we're watching it do its utmost to alienate people it used to represent. I'm not saying Trump's win was down to the gender stuff - I'm not an American voter, so can't judge. In any case, the Labour Party won the last UK election and they've embraced gender identity ideology whole-heartedly (although they won against a Tory government so enfeebled and unpopular it would have been miraculous if they hadn't, and their popularity since gaining office has plummeted.) What I do know is that millions of women in the UK and across the developed world are extremely angry about men in women's sport, men in women's jails and the erosion of single-sex spaces. Parents are angry at being demonised because they don't want their troubled kids to undergo irreversible medical treatments of extremely questionable benefit. People are sick to the back teeth of being bullied and threatened for refusing to embrace an elitist, academia-generated ideology that's having severe real world consequences. Large swathes of the left continue to be threatening and abusive to anybody who resists their attempts to impose ideological language or bully them out of wrongthink. Leftist activists jeer and sneer at erstwhile female allies for the crime of believing biological sex is real and matters. And leftist leaders still appear more interested in sucking up to gender activists than - to take a topical example in the UK - female nurses whose crime is not wanting to undress in front of a fully intact male. So to those screaming 'bigot' and 'fascist' at me, you should know two things. Firstly, I'm completely indifferent to your disapproval, as I'd have thought you'd have realised by now. Secondly, and far more importantly, the only thing more harmful to your cause than your pseudo-religious belief in gender identities is your astounding, self-righteous arrogance.

Read the full post
4,013 replies16,465 retweets100,937 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Sport, Single-sex spaces, Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Law & gender recognition, Free speech & cancellation, Language & definitions, Media & institutions

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions, Other

Classified neutral · Intensity 0/4 · Other

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Other

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

This is where a ton of well-off leftist intellectuals are stuck. Insulated from and often ignorant of the real world consequences of the position they've taken, they conclude the masses have been manipulated by influences to which they are too clever and righteous to fall prey.

1,453 replies6,547 retweets50,011 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Media & institutions, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Sport, Single-sex spaces, Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

A loud, elitist part of the left demonises all who have questions about transitioning kids, bullies women for standing up for their rights and condescends to people whose immediate concerns don't include pronouns. You may think that's how hearts and minds are won. I don't.

238 replies917 retweets9,547 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Free speech & cancellation, Language & definitions

Classified defensive · Intensity 0/4 · Free speech & cancellation

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @jk_rowling

“Ian McFatridge, the judge, ordered the centre to publish a statement and to refer survivors of sexual assault to Beira’s Place, the women’s refuge established by the author JK Rowling as an alternative source of support for female victims of sexual violence.” At last.

106 replies588 retweets6,533 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals, Media & institutions

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Specific individuals, Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @simpforasi

@simpforasi I never thought, and never said, Khelif was a trans woman. I said Khelif is male. I believe the IOC took the cowardly decision not to insist on sex testing (ie, a cheek swab) because they didn't want to rile gender activists. That decision placed women in serious danger.

112 replies410 retweets6,963 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Sport, Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @Danosaur1

@Danosaur1 And I bet you hate them for reporting on all the things women are supposed to pretend aren’t happening. Reduxx speedily and correctly identified a man who’d sent me a particularly nasty death threat, leading to his arrest and conviction, so yes, it’s fair to say I love them.

57 replies494 retweets8,215 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Media & institutions, Specific individuals, Child safeguarding

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

I really don't know how much clearer I can be on this point, because I've said it several times already. If it's an imprisonable offence to accurately describe sex, or to stand up for the importance and reality of sex, I'm prepared to go to jail.

885 replies4,834 retweets40,822 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Law & gender recognition, Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Sport, Specific individuals, Language & definitions

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @adammcarter

@adammcarter Thank you 😘 but other people have lost their livelihoods and suffered appalling personal harms, including violence. Compared to those people (even before we get to raped women denied single-sex services, women incarcerated with males etc) my stuff’s been a stroll in the park.

5 replies15 retweets172 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation, Child safeguarding

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

On the contrary, I’m delighted a woman who’ll stand up for sex-based rights is now leading the opposition and while there are definitely things we disagree about politically, I admire her brains and her bravery.

400 replies1,842 retweets24,774 likes

Classified neutral · Intensity 0/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals

Classified mocking · Intensity 1/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Sport

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

It will never stop being extraordinary to me that men who think of themselves as good guys stampeded to support males invading women’s reserved spaces and sports, then threw hissy fits when women didn’t eulogise them as progressive superheroes.

1,575 replies7,163 retweets60,722 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Sport, Language & definitions

Classified neutral · Intensity 0/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Other

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @TheOnlyGuru

@TheOnlyGuru I agree. I've met women from that kind of background who get it, who have sufficient empathy to understand what loss of single-sex spaces and an inability to define a woman as an adult human female means for women without their advantages, above all the poor/vulnerable. But there's something particularly nauseating about watching female celebrities with big fat bank balances (and, in some cases, private security) asking why the hoi polloi are being so dreadfully unkind. 'Why aren't these ghastly, bigoted little women throwing open the doors of their hospital wards and rape crisis centres to any man who wants to identify his way inside?' they ask, from the safety of their single occupancy hospital rooms and expensive private therapist's office.

36 replies172 retweets1,633 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Other

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

I could write you a long list, many well-known, all wealthy, all more protected than 99% of womankind, often since girlhood, all priding themselves on the luxury beliefs for which they'll never pay the price.

114 replies695 retweets6,864 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

I don't blame any woman for having been privately educated at an all-girls school. I don't blame any woman for having enough money never to rely on state-run services. I do blame them when they support the removal of single-sex spaces from women and girls without their privilege.

451 replies4,361 retweets41,798 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Sport

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Sport

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals, Language & definitions

Classified neutral · Intensity 0/4 · Single-sex spaces, Media & institutions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Media & institutions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @jk_rowling

It's too soon to tell whether sanity is returning re: protection of vulnerable minors in the UK, but the reining in of Mermaids, which I believe to be one of the most dangerous organisations ever to receive celebrity, corporate and government backing, is a bloody good start. 6/X

195 replies1,168 retweets13,204 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Media & institutions

Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Child safeguarding, Specific individuals, Media & institutions

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Child safeguarding, Media & institutions, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Media & institutions

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Youth healthcare, Media & institutions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Media & institutions

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Media & institutions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

@Isaac_de_Tormes Don’t imagine I didn’t hear that dog whistle. No Nont has ever harmed a child. Nobody would go to all the trouble of pretending to be a Nont just to get into a primary school and teach the kids about astrological fluidity. Why aren’t you worried about ass-predators, Nontphobe?

28 replies34 retweets677 likes

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Child safeguarding, Language & definitions, Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @NABurkinshaw

@NABurkinshaw Very sorry to hear about your shitty days, but delighted to help with your cusp dilemma. I'm copying in @Freerangescots, who sent me a similar query. To quote leading astro-biologist Fanny-Annie Whirling: 'Some people enter the world on the "cusp" of two adjacent astrological signs, making them zodiacal hermaphrodites, neither fish nor fowl, black nor white, Ben nor Jerry. ‘However, thanks to my ground-breaking research, the world is beginning to realise that there is far more complexity across the astrological spectrum than previously thought. As many as 8% of the population are cusp-born, so I've coined the terms “halfsies" and "cuspoids”, the better to discuss them when they’re not around.' Some people think it's offensive to use cuspoids in an attempt to bolster Nont ideology, but of course it isn't. These ill-informed critics are known within the Nont community as Celestial Unbelieving Non-Tolerants. You can recognise a Celestial Unbelieving Non-Tolerant by arguments such as 'but she's still a Leo, she was born within the dates, look' and also 'I don't believe in astrology.' Not believing in astrology doesn't give you the right to deny my existence as a Nont and if I end up stabbing someone in the eye with a pencil, it will be entirely some CUNT's fault.

Read the full post
66 replies79 retweets1,144 likes

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Sport

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Free speech & cancellation

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @adammcarter

@adammcarter It's clear to me you haven't done the work, Adam. Let me explain the correct jargon. Unless you use this language when describing me, any other Nont or yourself, you want me to die horribly in a gas explosion and it will be your fault if I do. To start with the basics: those whose innate astrological identity matches the star sign assigned to them at birth are what we call ‘astro-synchronised’ – ‘ass’ for short. An ass-man assigned Aries at birth would identify as Aries throughout his life. He’d most likely dress head-to-toe in red, enjoy sports and might look a bit like a sheep. An ass-woman assigned Libra at birth would identify as Libra. She’d be a lover of beauty, a graceful dancer and probably really like weighing things. The term ‘ass’ derives from the Latin for star, ‘astra’. Some groups consider the prefix ‘ass’ offensive, but of course that isn’t so. Words derived from Latin are always proper science, which proves that ‘ass’ isn’t a slur. Just because some people are offended by a term doesn’t mean it’s actually offensive! What’s important to understand is that when the astro-synchronised community use the prefix ‘ass’, they help normalise Nont identities and experiences, which makes for a more inclusive and welcoming workplace – and world. However, should you not identify as ass, there are many other exciting possibilities to choose from, including astro-fluid, non-astro and, of course, the “thirteeners”, who consider themselves to be part of a mysterious thirteenth sign. This is an exciting new field of research. So far, the only characteristic of Sign Thirteen we’ve identified is pathological narcissism. Stand by for more Nont information the next time I'm trying to get enough caffeine into myself to start work.

Read the full post
164 replies325 retweets2,274 likes

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Other

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

As the Scottish Endarkenment gathers pace, star signs will follow. As a Nont*, I expect all 336** astro-identities to be recognised. * Person whose astro-identity doesn’t match the sign they were assigned at birth (NON-Twelver) ** Number may change *** *** Upwards, obviously https://t.co/454FSIMryo

623 replies1,308 retweets8,571 likes

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Law & gender recognition, Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

There are predators among the trans-identified as there are among the rest of society. You might think there should be an omertà about rapes and assaults committed by trans-identified men, but I don't. Good to know I'm 'a few months off' calling for mass trans suicides, though. https://t.co/o78gdFbe2I

213 replies643 retweets7,010 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Child safeguarding, Specific individuals, Free speech & cancellation

Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Other

These are the posts classified trans-related. Search all 16,714 collected tweets, read the year-by-year analysis, or read the report on her campaign against trans rights.