The Rowling Record

J.K. Rowling’s trans-related posts from 2025

Page 1 of 11. Posts 1–100 of the 1,011 J.K. Rowling wrote about trans people in 2025, newest first.

23 September 2025 to 29 December 2025. Posts are reproduced in full from the archive; the stance, intensity and topic labels come from the research classifications. How the labels are defined. Search within 2025.

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @bindelj

@bindelj 'How To Keep Your Man Happy' by Julie Bindel What readers are saying: 'I always suspected that somewhere deep inside that man-hating harpy was a trad wife begging to get out' - Suzanne Moore 'When I told her she'd be happier if she took a husband, I didn't bloody well mean mine.' - JK Rowling 'As I am well qualified to judge, this book does not make men happy.' - India Willoughby

28 replies59 retweets943 likes

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions

Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Child safeguarding, Other

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Earlier this month, the Women’s Rights Network, who obtained police data, published a report revealing that women and girls in unisex changing rooms are being targeted by sexual predators across England and Wales. 80 sexual assaults, 16 rapes and 65 incidents of voyeurism took place in leisure centres in 2023. https://t.co/tYfJVhamOS A freedom of information request in 2024 revealed that 62% of trans-identified male inmates in UK prisons had committed at least one sexual offence. https://t.co/vNDLXGyYNL When you admit men who claim to be women into spaces where women and girls are naked or otherwise vulnerable, the risk to girls and women increases. The evidence is clear and those still determined to deny it - you, @bphillipsonMP, every trans activist determined to push their unfalsifiable ideas about gender onto the whole of society - will rightly be judged by history as having enabled harm to women and girls in service of a dangerous, quasi-religious ideology.

Read the full post
542 replies8,462 retweets37,489 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals, Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

As you’re fighting to remove our daughters’ rights to the privacy and safety of single-sex bathrooms and changing rooms, while poised to allow the unethical puberty blockers trial, perhaps children should be protected from @UKLabour.

794 replies7,066 retweets35,767 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @FinalTelegraph

@FinalTelegraph I was supposed to be an object lesson to other women. I've seen more than one person say on X, 'd'you want what happened to JK Rowling to happen to you?' This is a movement that relies on intimidation. The only possible response is to refuse to be intimidated. That said, I've always acknowledged that standing my ground was far easier for me than for women who risked losing their livelihoods. I have nothing but sympathy for those who can't speak out because they face job loss if they do. The people I despise are those who turned ostrich even though they had the financial means and standing to speak up. There are a lot of people in the arts and academia who believe exactly what I believe (and I know this because they've told me so), but chose comfort over conscience. In doing so, they condemned vulnerable youth, and women and girls without their privileges, to suffer what they themselves will never need to endure.

Read the full post
449 replies4,596 retweets26,969 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Language & definitions

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Media & institutions, Other

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @MLPTheFirst

@MLPTheFirst @legaltweetz I was born with a bleeding disorder. That doesn't make me a new variety of human. I don't feel 'less than' people without it, but nor does my bleeding disorder mean an inability to clot should be considered an innate attribute of the human species. I inherited an unusual physical anomaly. Nature made a mistake. People with DSDs aren't a strange third sex or a hybrid, they are men and women with physical anomalies. The respectful thing to do might be to stop using them as pawns in an ideological battle that has nothing whatsoever to do with their medical conditions, because I know for a fact that many of them find it demeaning and othering.

26 replies230 retweets2,194 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions, Other

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @MLPTheFirst

@MLPTheFirst @legaltweetz Nobody denies that there are biological variations. Nobody denies that there are people who may have ambiguous genitalia at birth, or possess small amounts of tissue more typically found in the opposite sex. Nobody has ever denied that nature makes mistakes. However, there is no DSD that causes a person to produce both eggs and sperm. Human beings are a dimorphic species. I doubt it will bother you, but some - perhaps most - people with DSDs (and I know this, because I've had direct correspondence with such individuals) do not appreciate people like you trying to leverage disorders of sexual development to support the idea that biological sex doesn't really exist. They find it highly offensive to see their often complex and traumatic medical conditions used as 'proof' that men can be women, and women can be men, if they say they are.

27 replies222 retweets1,824 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Other

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @jk_rowling

The Swedish study found that trans-identified men have the same pattern of criminality as other men regarding violence and sexual offending. However, Kemp claims these men are no more likely to be violent or predatory than women. 3/4

120 replies945 retweets10,141 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @jk_rowling

Kemp used at least one completely bogus quote in his ruling. It's also being suggested, per the Times, that he 'used AI to research other cases.' But there's worse. Kemp misrepresents a Swedish study that looked at the pattern of criminality among trans-identified men. 2/4

15 replies532 retweets6,362 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions, Other

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition, Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @legaltweetz

@legaltweetz It never ends. 'What about post-menopausal women?' 'What about women who've had mastectomies?' 'What about women with PCOS?' What about women who've had hysterectomies?' 'What about women with MRKH syndrome?' These are all things that can only happen TO WOMEN.

427 replies2,110 retweets35,160 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Yes, I'm aware that some women have facial hair and that some men don't have facial hair. No, you're not a woman because you're smooth shaven. It's unclear whether you think your argument or mine is 'based on stupidity and heavily flawed', so let's put that one to a vote. https://t.co/hCytinm3Ar

1,222 replies1,967 retweets25,962 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Please explain what differentiates a trans woman from 'a man in a dress and make up', because I've been playing close attention to trans activists for a decade now and the most common explanation I've been given is 'he says he's a woman, so play along or you're evil.' Runner up explanations: A man is a trans woman if he's put in a lot of effort into looking like a woman. However, a man who's made no such effort is just as valid a trans woman as one who does. Trans women with beards and penises are completely valid. The existence of men and women with differences of sexual development ('intersex' people) prove that a completely different group of people who don't have such disorders are trans if they say they are. The true mark of who's a man or a woman isn't biological sex, but the untestable gender identity that resides in all human beings, whether or not they believe in it. At the same time, trans people must be given easy, automatic access to cross-sex hormones and surgeries so they can alter themselves to more closely resemble the opposite biological sex.

Read the full post
2,159 replies6,668 retweets73,783 likes

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Adult healthcare, Law & gender recognition

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Judge Sandy Kemp and the Judicial Office need to explain exactly how this bogus quote made its way into the ruling. Misrepresentations of the Forstater ruling are commonplace in the trans activist community, but for this to turn up in an actual court ruling is truly shocking.

330 replies2,872 retweets15,325 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Law & gender recognition, Media & institutions, Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Man assumes his fellow men won’t take ‘no’ for an answer, will break the law, will transgress women’s boundaries unless physical force is used against them, and wants to make it clear that he’s entirely on the men’s side.

307 replies2,461 retweets18,164 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Bless these girls for their courage and shame on every cowardly adult and every faux feminist who told them they should give up their own rights to pander to boys' feelings.

521 replies9,225 retweets63,594 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Sport, Single-sex spaces

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @FFS_WhatNow

@FFS_WhatNow Celebrities who stampeded to cheerlead for experimental procedures on minors will find it extremely difficult to pretend they were inwardly sceptical all along, especially after rushing to smear as hateful and bigoted anyone questioning the evidence base for handing out puberty blockers, irreversible surgeries and hormones to children. If it were up to me, the doctors involved would all be in jail, but an honest assessment of how these children have been harmed must also examine the culture in which the scandal took place. Deviation from ethical standards of care has become not only acceptable, but laudable, and that's because large parts of elite professions, including medicine, had fallen for a dangerous, incoherent, quasi-religious ideology that's done widespread harm. Gender identity ideology only spread as far and as widely as it did because so many people in positions of power and influence fell over themselves to champion it in the belief that this proved they were super-progressive and sophisticated. I can only hope the photo ops and social media likes were worth it. Personally, if I'd publicly fundraised and advocated for child transition and then read @LeorSapir's article, I'd never sleep again.

Read the full post
204 replies2,235 retweets14,913 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Media & institutions, Free speech & cancellation

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Every useful idiot who's used their platform to glamorise and normalise child transition, especially those with a young fanbase, should be made to read this horrifying article. 'One of the biggest revelations from the recordings is how these clinicians acknowledge performing unproven, seemingly experimental treatments—only it appears there is often no protocol being followed, no formal research being conducted, and no ethics-board approval being sought... '[One clinician] said that she sometimes felt like saying that both she and other WPATH clinicians were making it up as they went along: “Because I feel like we’re all just winging it, you know? And which is okay, you’re winging it too. But maybe we can just, like, wing it together.”' https://t.co/dW4xXKUzOY

709 replies7,421 retweets30,661 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Media & institutions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Answer: it helps girls. It tells girls they have the right to things of their own. It tells girls they have the right to say 'no'. It reminds girls that the desires of boys do not supersede their feelings, their rights, their discomfort or their safety.

1,882 replies10,664 retweets86,940 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Sport

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @rejserin

@rejserin Of course trans-identified men have the right to exist. They have the same rights to employment, housing, the vote and personal safety as every other citizen. However, they aren't entitled to enter women's reserved spaces or sports, because they are male.

68 replies1,188 retweets8,359 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Sport

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @RunPrey

@RunPrey @legaltweetz I don't think anything I say will persuade young people not to hate me if that's the online culture in which they're submerged. Learning to question narratives or sources (or deciding not to) is part of growing up. I've written extensively about why I've stood up on this issue, and recorded an entire podcast (The Witch Trials of JK Rowling). If your daughter's interested, she can read/listen to me in my own words. There are links on my website.

52 replies99 retweets915 likes

Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions, Specific individuals

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @Christina_Lee04

@Christina_Lee04 @legaltweetz AGP is literally arousal from envisioning oneself as/dressing as a woman. It is the word sexologist Ray Blanchard coined to describe men who derive sexual pleasure from the fantasy of being female, and it encompasses transvestic disorder. If you'd rather use the latter term, do please explain how a woman or girl is supposed to know whether the cross-dressing male who just entered the locker room is 'transgender and/or dysphoric', which I assume you imagine makes him harmless, or sexually excited by wearing women's clothing and being in spaces reserved for women.

39 replies78 retweets790 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @legaltweetz

@legaltweetz Years ago, I had a private conversation with a woman younger than me about the single sex space issue. She's very bright, well-educated, liberal, and absolutely could not understand why I wouldn't be comfortable undressing, or knowing my daughters were undressing, in front of a trans-identified man. As we talked, I realised she had no understanding of a feminine-presenting man who wasn't gay. I said to her, 'what about autogynephiliacs?' She said 'what's that?' Had literally never heard the word. And when I explained, she just looked blank. To this day I don't know whether that was because she'd never heard of cross-dressing as a paraphilia, or thought I was making it up.

51 replies107 retweets1,383 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Language & definitions

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @legaltweetz

@legaltweetz It's one of the very few debates where there's hardly any middle ground, other than general agreement that nobody should be persecuted for wanting to dress or look a certain way (within obvious limits. Thinking of that Canadian teacher with the enormous fake breasts. I am not pro-adults parading fetishes in front of kids). Most of it's straightforward either/or - freedom to speak the truth versus pretending to believe in a fiction, defence of women's rights versus removing them to please a subset of men, prove there's medical benefit to transitioning kids or stop doing it.

109 replies506 retweets8,156 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

'He has a point, but he's too blunt.' From the start, a key tactic of the gender identitarians has been linguistic prescription, and it's proved shockingly successful. Trans activists' shibboleths and euphemisms have been allowed to penetrate the upper echelons of our culture with devastating consequences to freedom of speech and belief. Huge swathes of liberal media, the arts, academia and publishing have thrown themselves with gusto into the defence of a quasi-religious belief causing provable real world harm, and in their arrogance they've been outraged when people they assumed were part of their In Group have refused to march meekly along in lock step. Time and again, I've seen and heard well-educated people who consider themselves critical thinkers and bold truth-tellers squirm when put on the spot. 'Well, yes, maybe there's something in what you're saying, but it's hateful/provocative/rude not to use the approved language/pretend people can literally change sex/keep drawing attention to medical malpractice or opportunistic sexual predators. Why can't you be nice? Why won't you pretend? We thought you were one of us! Don't you realise we have sophisticated new words and phrases these days that obviate the necessity of thinking any of this through?' As the vibe shifts, and a lot of people in the elite professions start trying to reposition themselves, the obvious place to start is, 'it's not that I couldn't see your point, but did you have to say it that way?' We dissenters were supposed to find a way of questioning the chemical castration of children while calling it 'gender affirming care.' We were meant to defend the rights of vulnerable women while also using female pronouns for male rapists. We should have found a way to discuss fairness for women and girls in sport, while pretending that the ineradicable physical advantage men have over women doesn't exist. Either a man can be a woman, or he can't. Either women deserve rights, or they don't. Either there's a provable medical benefit to transitioning children, or there isn't. Either you're on the side of a totalitarian ideology that seeks to impose falsehoods on society through the threat of ostracisation, shaming and violence, or you're not. The alternative to being 'blunt' - using accurate, factual language to describe what was going on - was to surrender freedom of speech and espouse ideological jargon that obfuscated the issues and the harms caused. We've always needed blunt people, but we need them most of all when being asked to bow down to a naked emperor.

Read the full post
1,691 replies10,348 retweets54,832 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Sport, Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation, Language & definitions, Child safeguarding

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Sport, Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Media & institutions, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Sport, Specific individuals, Free speech & cancellation

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Media & institutions, Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

It is not ‘hate’ to speak the truth. It is not ‘hate’ to defend the rights of women and girls. It is not ‘hate’ to be deeply worried about an unevidenced medical experiment on minors. Rationality goes out of the window when you pretend men can be women.

4,014 replies19,473 retweets126,317 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Language & definitions

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @TheatreSpoonie

@TheatreSpoonie De Beauvoir, as you’d know if you’d actually read her, was noting that to be accorded the status of a ‘real’ woman in a male dominated society, girls are pressured to adopt and display behaviours that might feel inauthentic and restrictive. You, meanwhile, are siding with women’s oppressors in stating a woman is anyone who performs an often pornified male idea of what a woman should look or behave like. It is not only highly regressive to decree that femininity is the true measure of femaleness, it is precisely what de Beauvoir was arguing against.

337 replies1,065 retweets17,037 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Other

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Other

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Law & gender recognition, Other

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Law & gender recognition, Single-sex spaces, Media & institutions

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Other

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @jk_rowling

@bindelj The basics: never mention your own needs without emphasising that ours are more important. Ideally, stop mentioning yours at all. Learn to use our triple pronouns. For those Thirders who are innumerate, this may stretch to fifteen or sixteen pronouns. Also, check the daily list to discover which lesbian heroes are/were really Thirders. We're having Martina, but you can keep all the ones with dicks.

36 replies40 retweets1,041 likes

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

I'm seeing quite a bit of comment about this, so I want to make a couple of points. I'm not owed eternal agreement from any actor who once played a character I created. The idea is as ludicrous as me checking with the boss I had when I was twenty-one for what opinions I should hold these days. Emma Watson and her co-stars have every right to embrace gender identity ideology. Such beliefs are legally protected, and I wouldn't want to see any of them threatened with loss of work, or violence, or death, because of them. However, Emma and Dan in particular have both made it clear over the last few years that they think our former professional association gives them a particular right - nay, obligation - to critique me and my views in public. Years after they finished acting in Potter, they continue to assume the role of de facto spokespeople for the world I created. When you've known people since they were ten years old it's hard to shake a certain protectiveness. Until quite recently, I hadn't managed to throw off the memory of children who needed to be gently coaxed through their dialogue in a big scary film studio. For the past few years, I've repeatedly declined invitations from journalists to comment on Emma specifically, most notably on the Witch Trials of JK Rowling. Ironically, I told the producers that I didn't want her to be hounded as the result of anything I said. The television presenter in the attached clip highlights Emma's 'all witches' speech, and in truth, that was a turning point for me, but it had a postscript that hurt far more than the speech itself. Emma asked someone to pass on a handwritten note from her to me, which contained the single sentence 'I'm so sorry for what you're going through' (she has my phone number). This was back when the death, rape and torture threats against me were at their peak, at a time when my personal security measures had had to be tightened considerably and I was constantly worried for my family's safety. Emma had just publicly poured more petrol on the flames, yet thought a one line expression of concern from her would reassure me of her fundamental sympathy and kindness. Like other people who've never experienced adult life uncushioned by wealth and fame, Emma has so little experience of real life she's ignorant of how ignorant she is. She'll never need a homeless shelter. She's never going to be placed on a mixed sex public hospital ward. I'd be astounded if she's been in a high street changing room since childhood. Her 'public bathroom' is single occupancy and comes with a security man standing guard outside the door. Has she had to strip off in a newly mixed-sex changing room at a council-run swimming pool? Is she ever likely to need a state-run rape crisis centre that refuses to guarantee an all-female service? To find herself sharing a prison cell with a male rapist who's identified into the women's prison? I wasn't a multimillionaire at fourteen. I lived in poverty while writing the book that made Emma famous. I therefore understand from my own life experience what the trashing of women's rights in which Emma has so enthusiastically participated means to women and girls without her privileges. The greatest irony here is that, had Emma not decided in her most recent interview to declare that she loves and treasures me - a change of tack I suspect she's adopted because she's noticed full-throated condemnation of me is no longer quite as fashionable as it was - I might never have been this honest. Adults can't expect to cosy up to an activist movement that regularly calls for a friend's assassination, then assert their right to the former friend's love, as though the friend was in fact their mother. Emma is rightly free to disagree with me and indeed to discuss her feelings about me in public - but I have the same right, and I've finally decided to exercise it.

Read the full post
19,847 replies66,136 retweets426,383 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions, Specific individuals, Free speech & cancellation

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions

Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals

Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions, Child safeguarding

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

It’s quite extraordinary how many people think a crocodile will be so grateful you’ve fed it red meat for years that it’ll let you stroll away unharmed when you decide you want a break.

1,003 replies3,465 retweets39,231 likes

Classified defensive · Intensity 2/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals, Media & institutions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

It’s such a massive question that it can be answered with a single word: ‘yes.’ What’s truly massive is the chicanery of members of the commentator class who’re too scared of ideologues both inside and outside their workplace to permit that single word to be uttered.

515 replies2,590 retweets17,957 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Media & institutions, Free speech & cancellation

Classified mocking · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Adult healthcare, Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

@evergeenwings @fabia_moraes The trans umbrella stretches over a wide array of people who have virtually nothing in common with each other, eg, trauma-experienced and often same-sex attracted teenagers who believe transition is the route to happiness and are undergoing irreversible surgeries and drug treatments (extremely vulnerable) and adult straight men with a cross-dressing fetish who retain their genitalia and are demanding access to all women’s protected spaces (not remotely vulnerable, but thoroughly pandered to, at the expense of women and girls.)

39 replies124 retweets843 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Remember: there is no evidence whatsoever that a sexual predator would claim to be a woman so he could enter female changing rooms and public bathrooms. It literally never happens.

1,271 replies9,209 retweets52,971 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @fabia_moraes

@fabia_moraes Trans people already have all the rights everyone else in society has, but some (not all) trans people demand that women give up rights: the right to single-sex spaces, to fair sport and to freedom of speech. No marginalised group has ever demanded that rights be stripped from other protected group, and no other supposedly marginalised group has ever been indulged by politicians, police and elite institutions to the extent the trans lobby has.

40 replies438 retweets2,008 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Sport, Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions, Other

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions, Specific individuals, Youth healthcare, Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Child safeguarding, Media & institutions, Free speech & cancellation

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation

Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Other

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Other

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces, Other

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @JonathanWiltsh7

@JonathanWiltsh7 I have never said that men transition to predate on women and girls. I have said, because there's ample evidence to prove it, that some men who claim a trans identity have committed acts of voyeurism and sexual assault against women and girls in supposedly single sex spaces. You've just said you wouldn't enter a girls' or women's single sex space because you're 'not a sexual predator.' Could you explain how women and girls are supposed to tell which trans-identified men are predators and which aren't? Because a proportion, provably, are. Determined predators, as anyone who knows anything about safeguarding will tell you, go where the pickings are easy. If all it takes to get inside a woman's locker room is to say 'I identify as a woman', predators will do that. We know this, because they've already done it, multiple times. A speed sign doesn't magically make cars slow down. A No Trespassers sign doesn't make the field inaccessible. Such signs are there to warn people that there will be consequences if they're disobeyed. A sign that excludes men from a space, so that women and girls can have safety, privacy and dignity has no power except the one you yourself have just acknowledged. When men who don't seek to transgress females' boundaries stay away, women can tell who the suspicious ones are, because they ignored the sign. This gives women the right to complain or protest. Men waiting outside have the right to point out to the intruder that he's going into the wrong space. I understand that you think some of your fellow men should be allowed to use women's facilities and spaces because you think those men's feelings are more important than the safety, privacy and dignity of women and girls. That's where we disagree.

Read the full post
32 replies341 retweets2,553 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Free speech & cancellation

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

‘Women on the left warned men like me that we were handing the right an open goal by embracing gender identity ideology. Now the right’s running with the ball we handed them I’m blaming the women, because I have the same capacity for accountability as your average house brick.’ https://t.co/Uan4EZPk6x

398 replies1,403 retweets12,317 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces

These are the posts classified trans-related. Search all 16,714 collected tweets, read the year-by-year analysis, or read the report on her campaign against trans rights.