Replying to @Ash_Lee_IRL
@Ash_Lee_IRL @KinCali1 If a tall woman was short, she'd still be a woman. If a trans women wasn't trans, he'd be a man.
Page 1 of 11. Posts 1–100 of the 1,011 J.K. Rowling wrote about trans people in 2025, newest first.
23 September 2025 to 29 December 2025. Posts are reproduced in full from the archive; the stance, intensity and topic labels come from the research classifications. How the labels are defined. Search within 2025.
Replying to @Ash_Lee_IRL
@Ash_Lee_IRL @KinCali1 If a tall woman was short, she'd still be a woman. If a trans women wasn't trans, he'd be a man.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions
Replying to @bindelj
@bindelj 'How To Keep Your Man Happy' by Julie Bindel What readers are saying: 'I always suspected that somewhere deep inside that man-hating harpy was a trad wife begging to get out' - Suzanne Moore 'When I told her she'd be happier if she took a husband, I didn't bloody well mean mine.' - JK Rowling 'As I am well qualified to judge, this book does not make men happy.' - India Willoughby
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals
Replying to @Ash_Lee_IRL
@Ash_Lee_IRL Women are women, no matter what they look like. Men are men, even if they think they look like women.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions
Who knows, now that trans activists aren't only stalking, harassing, doxxing, threatening and physically assaulting women, our politicians might finally take the violence that's such a key feature of this totalitarian movement seriously. https://t.co/pOFewjxOSj
Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Child safeguarding, Other
If you were actually a girl or a woman, you'd know exactly why nobody's challenged you in the bathroom. https://t.co/peOzawWQSO
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces
Earlier this month, the Women’s Rights Network, who obtained police data, published a report revealing that women and girls in unisex changing rooms are being targeted by sexual predators across England and Wales. 80 sexual assaults, 16 rapes and 65 incidents of voyeurism took place in leisure centres in 2023. https://t.co/tYfJVhamOS A freedom of information request in 2024 revealed that 62% of trans-identified male inmates in UK prisons had committed at least one sexual offence. https://t.co/vNDLXGyYNL When you admit men who claim to be women into spaces where women and girls are naked or otherwise vulnerable, the risk to girls and women increases. The evidence is clear and those still determined to deny it - you, @bphillipsonMP, every trans activist determined to push their unfalsifiable ideas about gender onto the whole of society - will rightly be judged by history as having enabled harm to women and girls in service of a dangerous, quasi-religious ideology.
Read the full postClassified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals, Language & definitions
Replying to @TamsinLisa
@TamsinLisa @ajpadgett And they jettison solidarity with less powerful women because that’s the cost of doing business with the boys.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions
Replying to @SoloFlow786
@SoloFlow786 Safeguarding is necessary where there is a proven risk of harm from one group to a more vulnerable group. https://t.co/UnqO5lblIZ
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces
I want my daughters to live in a country where their right to single-sex spaces isn’t under attack from their own government.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition
As you’re fighting to remove our daughters’ rights to the privacy and safety of single-sex bathrooms and changing rooms, while poised to allow the unethical puberty blockers trial, perhaps children should be protected from @UKLabour.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding
This government tells us in one breath that it wants to stamp out misogyny, and in the next that it will be fighting in the Supreme Court to remove women’s and girls’ rights to single-sex spaces. https://t.co/3RqO4NS1BQ
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition
Replying to @DannyWxo
@DannyWxo What makes a man a woman?
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions
Replying to @FinalTelegraph
@FinalTelegraph I was supposed to be an object lesson to other women. I've seen more than one person say on X, 'd'you want what happened to JK Rowling to happen to you?' This is a movement that relies on intimidation. The only possible response is to refuse to be intimidated. That said, I've always acknowledged that standing my ground was far easier for me than for women who risked losing their livelihoods. I have nothing but sympathy for those who can't speak out because they face job loss if they do. The people I despise are those who turned ostrich even though they had the financial means and standing to speak up. There are a lot of people in the arts and academia who believe exactly what I believe (and I know this because they've told me so), but chose comfort over conscience. In doing so, they condemned vulnerable youth, and women and girls without their privileges, to suffer what they themselves will never need to endure.
Read the full postClassified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals
Replying to @damekatydenise_
@damekatydenise_ Speedos? Is your identity slipping? What happened to your Liz Hurley string bikini?
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Language & definitions
Replying to @TAFKAMacM
@TAFKAMacM Personally I prefer Boxing Terfmas, when all the hard work’s done and you can put your feet up and watch re-runs of classics like ‘what about clownfish?’ and ‘you are committing literal genocide.’
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Media & institutions, Other
Replying to @DreyfusJames
@DreyfusJames @PinkNews If I were Cohen or James, actors acting would be the least of my worries. https://t.co/r7bZLQFMAQ
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions
Replying to @damekatydenise_
@damekatydenise_ You've omitted certain key facts from this story. What did you say you were sending me, in the spirit of seasonal reconciliation? 'The one thing every REAL woman wants for Christmas.' Please tell me the fox was already dead when you cut it off.
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Language & definitions
Replying to @MLPTheFirst
@MLPTheFirst @legaltweetz With respect, this conversation began with two women talking about women's bodies, ie, our own. You were the one who rushed to bring up people with DSDs.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions
Replying to @MLPTheFirst
@MLPTheFirst @legaltweetz I was born with a bleeding disorder. That doesn't make me a new variety of human. I don't feel 'less than' people without it, but nor does my bleeding disorder mean an inability to clot should be considered an innate attribute of the human species. I inherited an unusual physical anomaly. Nature made a mistake. People with DSDs aren't a strange third sex or a hybrid, they are men and women with physical anomalies. The respectful thing to do might be to stop using them as pawns in an ideological battle that has nothing whatsoever to do with their medical conditions, because I know for a fact that many of them find it demeaning and othering.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions, Other
Replying to @MLPTheFirst
@MLPTheFirst @legaltweetz Nobody denies that there are biological variations. Nobody denies that there are people who may have ambiguous genitalia at birth, or possess small amounts of tissue more typically found in the opposite sex. Nobody has ever denied that nature makes mistakes. However, there is no DSD that causes a person to produce both eggs and sperm. Human beings are a dimorphic species. I doubt it will bother you, but some - perhaps most - people with DSDs (and I know this, because I've had direct correspondence with such individuals) do not appreciate people like you trying to leverage disorders of sexual development to support the idea that biological sex doesn't really exist. They find it highly offensive to see their often complex and traumatic medical conditions used as 'proof' that men can be women, and women can be men, if they say they are.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Other
Replying to @MLPTheFirst
@MLPTheFirst @legaltweetz People with DSDs are still provably either male or female (with bodies demonstrably organised to produce one gamete or the other, even if infertile) and many of them have a great dislike of being called 'intersex'. There are no human hermaphrodites. No human being has ever produced both eggs and sperm.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions
Replying to @jk_rowling
The Swedish study found that trans-identified men have the same pattern of criminality as other men regarding violence and sexual offending. However, Kemp claims these men are no more likely to be violent or predatory than women. 3/4
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals
Replying to @jk_rowling
Kemp used at least one completely bogus quote in his ruling. It's also being suggested, per the Times, that he 'used AI to research other cases.' But there's worse. Kemp misrepresents a Swedish study that looked at the pattern of criminality among trans-identified men. 2/4
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions, Other
This is plain disturbing. Judge Alexander Kemp, who presided over the Sandie Peggie tribunal, 'has been urged... to withdraw his findings and consider his position after it emerged that his ruling was “riddled” with errors and inaccuracies.' 1/4 https://t.co/LSCVukvspb
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition, Specific individuals
Replying to @legaltweetz
@legaltweetz It never ends. 'What about post-menopausal women?' 'What about women who've had mastectomies?' 'What about women with PCOS?' What about women who've had hysterectomies?' 'What about women with MRKH syndrome?' These are all things that can only happen TO WOMEN.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions
Yes, I'm aware that some women have facial hair and that some men don't have facial hair. No, you're not a woman because you're smooth shaven. It's unclear whether you think your argument or mine is 'based on stupidity and heavily flawed', so let's put that one to a vote. https://t.co/hCytinm3Ar
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions
Replying to @madnadfit
@madnadfit So a woman is anybody who conforms to a stereotypical view of what a woman should look like?
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces
Replying to @babybeginner
@babybeginner @boswelltoday If a trans-identified male commits a sexual crime against a woman or girl in a formerly single sex space, he was never really trans. However, some male rapists, voyeurs and pedophiles are really trans which is why they must be housed in a women's prison.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Language & definitions
Please explain what differentiates a trans woman from 'a man in a dress and make up', because I've been playing close attention to trans activists for a decade now and the most common explanation I've been given is 'he says he's a woman, so play along or you're evil.' Runner up explanations: A man is a trans woman if he's put in a lot of effort into looking like a woman. However, a man who's made no such effort is just as valid a trans woman as one who does. Trans women with beards and penises are completely valid. The existence of men and women with differences of sexual development ('intersex' people) prove that a completely different group of people who don't have such disorders are trans if they say they are. The true mark of who's a man or a woman isn't biological sex, but the untestable gender identity that resides in all human beings, whether or not they believe in it. At the same time, trans people must be given easy, automatic access to cross-sex hormones and surgeries so they can alter themselves to more closely resemble the opposite biological sex.
Read the full postClassified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Adult healthcare, Law & gender recognition
Bear with me here, but it's almost as though girls and women who want female-only spaces aren't scaremongering, hysterical, lying bigots after all. https://t.co/xVeHv53d3p
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces
It's interesting that you aren't in jail. https://t.co/u2cEX9XEOW
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions
Judge Sandy Kemp and the Judicial Office need to explain exactly how this bogus quote made its way into the ruling. Misrepresentations of the Forstater ruling are commonplace in the trans activist community, but for this to turn up in an actual court ruling is truly shocking.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Law & gender recognition, Media & institutions, Specific individuals
Man assumes his fellow men won’t take ‘no’ for an answer, will break the law, will transgress women’s boundaries unless physical force is used against them, and wants to make it clear that he’s entirely on the men’s side.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals
"Why do so many girls in Blackpool want to become boys?" ✍️ @bindelj My friend Julie Bindel on the connection between sexual trauma and the wish to escape a female body. https://t.co/HcRHjIOc4G
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding
Bless these girls for their courage and shame on every cowardly adult and every faux feminist who told them they should give up their own rights to pander to boys' feelings.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Sport, Single-sex spaces
Replying to @FFS_WhatNow
@FFS_WhatNow Celebrities who stampeded to cheerlead for experimental procedures on minors will find it extremely difficult to pretend they were inwardly sceptical all along, especially after rushing to smear as hateful and bigoted anyone questioning the evidence base for handing out puberty blockers, irreversible surgeries and hormones to children. If it were up to me, the doctors involved would all be in jail, but an honest assessment of how these children have been harmed must also examine the culture in which the scandal took place. Deviation from ethical standards of care has become not only acceptable, but laudable, and that's because large parts of elite professions, including medicine, had fallen for a dangerous, incoherent, quasi-religious ideology that's done widespread harm. Gender identity ideology only spread as far and as widely as it did because so many people in positions of power and influence fell over themselves to champion it in the belief that this proved they were super-progressive and sophisticated. I can only hope the photo ops and social media likes were worth it. Personally, if I'd publicly fundraised and advocated for child transition and then read @LeorSapir's article, I'd never sleep again.
Read the full postClassified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Media & institutions, Free speech & cancellation
Every useful idiot who's used their platform to glamorise and normalise child transition, especially those with a young fanbase, should be made to read this horrifying article. 'One of the biggest revelations from the recordings is how these clinicians acknowledge performing unproven, seemingly experimental treatments—only it appears there is often no protocol being followed, no formal research being conducted, and no ethics-board approval being sought... '[One clinician] said that she sometimes felt like saying that both she and other WPATH clinicians were making it up as they went along: “Because I feel like we’re all just winging it, you know? And which is okay, you’re winging it too. But maybe we can just, like, wing it together.”' https://t.co/dW4xXKUzOY
Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Media & institutions
Answer: it helps girls. It tells girls they have the right to things of their own. It tells girls they have the right to say 'no'. It reminds girls that the desires of boys do not supersede their feelings, their rights, their discomfort or their safety.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Sport
Replying to @rejserin
@rejserin Of course trans-identified men have the right to exist. They have the same rights to employment, housing, the vote and personal safety as every other citizen. However, they aren't entitled to enter women's reserved spaces or sports, because they are male.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Sport
Replying to @RunPrey
@RunPrey @legaltweetz I don't think anything I say will persuade young people not to hate me if that's the online culture in which they're submerged. Learning to question narratives or sources (or deciding not to) is part of growing up. I've written extensively about why I've stood up on this issue, and recorded an entire podcast (The Witch Trials of JK Rowling). If your daughter's interested, she can read/listen to me in my own words. There are links on my website.
Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions, Specific individuals
Replying to @legaltweetz
@legaltweetz @_lliesl_ @CleverclogsNina Congratulations, you've just qualified for your platinum card (unfortunately, currently valid only on TERF Island).
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals
Replying to @_lliesl_
@_lliesl_ @CleverclogsNina @legaltweetz Are you even a real feminist if you aren't supporting the right of cross-dressing straight men to call themselves lesbians?
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces
Replying to @Christina_Lee04
@Christina_Lee04 @legaltweetz AGP is literally arousal from envisioning oneself as/dressing as a woman. It is the word sexologist Ray Blanchard coined to describe men who derive sexual pleasure from the fantasy of being female, and it encompasses transvestic disorder. If you'd rather use the latter term, do please explain how a woman or girl is supposed to know whether the cross-dressing male who just entered the locker room is 'transgender and/or dysphoric', which I assume you imagine makes him harmless, or sexually excited by wearing women's clothing and being in spaces reserved for women.
Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Language & definitions
Replying to @CleverclogsNina
@CleverclogsNina @legaltweetz It's already entered the room, but there remain people who simply refuse to see the elephant. Or they accuse you of having an irrational hatred of side tables because you've pointed out that one of them's got tusks and a trunk and is moving.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation
Replying to @JM_OG_authentic
@John_A_Meier @legaltweetz There are many different kinds of creep. Autogynephiliac refers to a very specific kind of man who's highly relevant to this particular debate.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals
Replying to @legaltweetz
@legaltweetz Years ago, I had a private conversation with a woman younger than me about the single sex space issue. She's very bright, well-educated, liberal, and absolutely could not understand why I wouldn't be comfortable undressing, or knowing my daughters were undressing, in front of a trans-identified man. As we talked, I realised she had no understanding of a feminine-presenting man who wasn't gay. I said to her, 'what about autogynephiliacs?' She said 'what's that?' Had literally never heard the word. And when I explained, she just looked blank. To this day I don't know whether that was because she'd never heard of cross-dressing as a paraphilia, or thought I was making it up.
Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Language & definitions
Replying to @brown421762
@brown421762 @legaltweetz Does it seem to cruel to you that women and girls should have to give up their right to privacy, safety and dignity to solve that problem? Or do you see it as women's natural role to take care of the men who find their fellow men intimidating, no matter the cost to themselves?
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding
Replying to @legaltweetz
@legaltweetz AGP remains the elephant in the room we're all supposed to pretend is a hat stand.
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals
Replying to @legaltweetz
@legaltweetz It's one of the very few debates where there's hardly any middle ground, other than general agreement that nobody should be persecuted for wanting to dress or look a certain way (within obvious limits. Thinking of that Canadian teacher with the enormous fake breasts. I am not pro-adults parading fetishes in front of kids). Most of it's straightforward either/or - freedom to speak the truth versus pretending to believe in a fiction, defence of women's rights versus removing them to please a subset of men, prove there's medical benefit to transitioning kids or stop doing it.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals
'He has a point, but he's too blunt.' From the start, a key tactic of the gender identitarians has been linguistic prescription, and it's proved shockingly successful. Trans activists' shibboleths and euphemisms have been allowed to penetrate the upper echelons of our culture with devastating consequences to freedom of speech and belief. Huge swathes of liberal media, the arts, academia and publishing have thrown themselves with gusto into the defence of a quasi-religious belief causing provable real world harm, and in their arrogance they've been outraged when people they assumed were part of their In Group have refused to march meekly along in lock step. Time and again, I've seen and heard well-educated people who consider themselves critical thinkers and bold truth-tellers squirm when put on the spot. 'Well, yes, maybe there's something in what you're saying, but it's hateful/provocative/rude not to use the approved language/pretend people can literally change sex/keep drawing attention to medical malpractice or opportunistic sexual predators. Why can't you be nice? Why won't you pretend? We thought you were one of us! Don't you realise we have sophisticated new words and phrases these days that obviate the necessity of thinking any of this through?' As the vibe shifts, and a lot of people in the elite professions start trying to reposition themselves, the obvious place to start is, 'it's not that I couldn't see your point, but did you have to say it that way?' We dissenters were supposed to find a way of questioning the chemical castration of children while calling it 'gender affirming care.' We were meant to defend the rights of vulnerable women while also using female pronouns for male rapists. We should have found a way to discuss fairness for women and girls in sport, while pretending that the ineradicable physical advantage men have over women doesn't exist. Either a man can be a woman, or he can't. Either women deserve rights, or they don't. Either there's a provable medical benefit to transitioning children, or there isn't. Either you're on the side of a totalitarian ideology that seeks to impose falsehoods on society through the threat of ostracisation, shaming and violence, or you're not. The alternative to being 'blunt' - using accurate, factual language to describe what was going on - was to surrender freedom of speech and espouse ideological jargon that obfuscated the issues and the harms caused. We've always needed blunt people, but we need them most of all when being asked to bow down to a naked emperor.
Read the full postClassified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Sport, Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation, Language & definitions, Child safeguarding
Replying to @1633Fangirl
@1633Fangirl @suzanne_moore This ruling won’t affect any women with DSDs (‘intersex’ women, in your outdated terminology). It will stop men with DSDs competing in the female category. I don’t hate anyone who has a DSD. I do despise those who allowed men to punch women in the face for entertainment.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Sport, Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions
Every single word, by @suzanne_moore https://t.co/Jhij5nt5LQ
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Media & institutions, Specific individuals
.@Riley_Gaines_ doesn’t defend women’s rights for attention or money, any more than I do. We fight because it’s the only thing to do if you’re not a coward, a pick me or a living doormat.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Sport, Specific individuals, Free speech & cancellation
I grew up in an era when mainstream women’s magazines told girls they needed to be thinner and prettier. Now mainstream women’s magazines tell girls that men are better women than they are. https://t.co/ybEFr8XdSv
Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Media & institutions, Language & definitions
It is not ‘hate’ to speak the truth. It is not ‘hate’ to defend the rights of women and girls. It is not ‘hate’ to be deeply worried about an unevidenced medical experiment on minors. Rationality goes out of the window when you pretend men can be women.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Language & definitions
Replying to @damekatydenise_
@damekatydenise_ Yet again, the joke's on you. I was in Morrisons. It was probably India Willoughby you saw; I heard he had a stand up row with the Lidl butcher about the price of square sausage.
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals
Cool argument. Men aren't women, though. https://t.co/3ZoYpUcE3r
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions
Replying to @MindVsMyth
@MindVsMyth @LancsNobby @AllianceLGB A woman is an adult human female. Female is the sex class observably organised to produce large gametes.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions
Replying to @Theleftorwright
@Theleftorwright @TheatreSpoonie You’re shilling for a men’s sexual rights movement that pushes the medieval idea that one can be ‘born in the wrong body’ on kids.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Language & definitions
Replying to @TheatreSpoonie
@TheatreSpoonie De Beauvoir, as you’d know if you’d actually read her, was noting that to be accorded the status of a ‘real’ woman in a male dominated society, girls are pressured to adopt and display behaviours that might feel inauthentic and restrictive. You, meanwhile, are siding with women’s oppressors in stating a woman is anyone who performs an often pornified male idea of what a woman should look or behave like. It is not only highly regressive to decree that femininity is the true measure of femaleness, it is precisely what de Beauvoir was arguing against.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Other
A woman is someone who doesn't need to put in any work to become a woman, because she's already a woman. https://t.co/Br6CO6lw5F
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions
Replying to @ForWomenScot
@ForWomenScot Well, let's just hope this doesn't backfire on them in any way.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Other
Replying to @bindelj
@bindelj @ForWomenScot I don’t like the colour, I wanted Barbie pink, so I’m entitled to leave you out of pocket. Some might call this petty and vengeful, but if it’s good enough for the Scottish government, it’s good enough for me.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Law & gender recognition, Other
SNP ministers have failed to pay their £250k bill, six months after the Supreme Court ruling. The rumour is that they’re trying to stop @ForWomenScot taking further action against the government, but that plan has a rather large flaw. Me. https://t.co/xvZ7Pq7f1Y
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Law & gender recognition, Single-sex spaces, Media & institutions
Replying to @BlancheMinerva
@BlancheMinerva Trans people are provably one of the safest demographics in the UK. There is no 'crusade of hate' or campaign to eliminate you. You fetishise victimhood while being one of the most pandered to groups in society.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions
Replying to @bindelj
@bindelj Oh yeah, I'd forgotten @damekatydenise_ offering you a personal sizing.
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals
Replying to @damekatydenise_
@damekatydenise_ I met Top Left when I walked in on him photocopying his balls at the Chairs 4 Trans Christmas party. When I asked who he was he said 'mother of the bride.' You were engaged to that Texan bloke on death row at the time, so what was I supposed to think?
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Other
Strange, I know, but I find myself completely untroubled by the fact that total strangers don't understand why I think women's rights are worth defending. https://t.co/spcsoB4z2h
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation
Replying to @suzanne_moore
@suzanne_moore But they waved Union Jacks, Suzanne. Reform is vanquished, the working class will vote for them in droves, and all that bigoted women’s rights stuff can be shoved safely in the bin.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation
Replying to @jk_rowling
@bindelj The basics: never mention your own needs without emphasising that ours are more important. Ideally, stop mentioning yours at all. Learn to use our triple pronouns. For those Thirders who are innumerate, this may stretch to fifteen or sixteen pronouns. Also, check the daily list to discover which lesbian heroes are/were really Thirders. We're having Martina, but you can keep all the ones with dicks.
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals
Will this include working class women fighting to regain their legal right to single sex spaces? Or are they the wrong kind of working class? https://t.co/McTIo7duWz
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces
I'm seeing quite a bit of comment about this, so I want to make a couple of points. I'm not owed eternal agreement from any actor who once played a character I created. The idea is as ludicrous as me checking with the boss I had when I was twenty-one for what opinions I should hold these days. Emma Watson and her co-stars have every right to embrace gender identity ideology. Such beliefs are legally protected, and I wouldn't want to see any of them threatened with loss of work, or violence, or death, because of them. However, Emma and Dan in particular have both made it clear over the last few years that they think our former professional association gives them a particular right - nay, obligation - to critique me and my views in public. Years after they finished acting in Potter, they continue to assume the role of de facto spokespeople for the world I created. When you've known people since they were ten years old it's hard to shake a certain protectiveness. Until quite recently, I hadn't managed to throw off the memory of children who needed to be gently coaxed through their dialogue in a big scary film studio. For the past few years, I've repeatedly declined invitations from journalists to comment on Emma specifically, most notably on the Witch Trials of JK Rowling. Ironically, I told the producers that I didn't want her to be hounded as the result of anything I said. The television presenter in the attached clip highlights Emma's 'all witches' speech, and in truth, that was a turning point for me, but it had a postscript that hurt far more than the speech itself. Emma asked someone to pass on a handwritten note from her to me, which contained the single sentence 'I'm so sorry for what you're going through' (she has my phone number). This was back when the death, rape and torture threats against me were at their peak, at a time when my personal security measures had had to be tightened considerably and I was constantly worried for my family's safety. Emma had just publicly poured more petrol on the flames, yet thought a one line expression of concern from her would reassure me of her fundamental sympathy and kindness. Like other people who've never experienced adult life uncushioned by wealth and fame, Emma has so little experience of real life she's ignorant of how ignorant she is. She'll never need a homeless shelter. She's never going to be placed on a mixed sex public hospital ward. I'd be astounded if she's been in a high street changing room since childhood. Her 'public bathroom' is single occupancy and comes with a security man standing guard outside the door. Has she had to strip off in a newly mixed-sex changing room at a council-run swimming pool? Is she ever likely to need a state-run rape crisis centre that refuses to guarantee an all-female service? To find herself sharing a prison cell with a male rapist who's identified into the women's prison? I wasn't a multimillionaire at fourteen. I lived in poverty while writing the book that made Emma famous. I therefore understand from my own life experience what the trashing of women's rights in which Emma has so enthusiastically participated means to women and girls without her privileges. The greatest irony here is that, had Emma not decided in her most recent interview to declare that she loves and treasures me - a change of tack I suspect she's adopted because she's noticed full-throated condemnation of me is no longer quite as fashionable as it was - I might never have been this honest. Adults can't expect to cosy up to an activist movement that regularly calls for a friend's assassination, then assert their right to the former friend's love, as though the friend was in fact their mother. Emma is rightly free to disagree with me and indeed to discuss her feelings about me in public - but I have the same right, and I've finally decided to exercise it.
Read the full postClassified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions, Specific individuals, Free speech & cancellation
Replying to @fizzyfroggy0
@fizzyfroggy0 'Dress however you please. Call yourself whatever you like. Sleep with any consenting adult who'll have you.'
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions
Replying to @fizzyfroggy0
@fizzyfroggy0 You'd have a far happier life if you stopped pretending people like me want trans people 'erased'.
Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals
Replying to @KProtein19
@KProtein19 @KatieDR96 And some rapists make the effort to perform femininity. https://t.co/M7cAw1GQOM
Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding
Replying to @JudgeOfPassing
@coreyallegory_ @KatieDR96 So if I understand correctly, saying 'I identify as a woman' means you're really trans, but some people who say they identify as a woman aren't trans. I'm really struggling to understand the difference.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions
At last, @KatieDR96, you can clear this up for me! What is the difference between 'an actual trans woman' and a sexual predator who says he's a woman? How can we tell? What are the hallmarks of the 'actual' trans woman? https://t.co/uozwLQTgqC
Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions, Child safeguarding
It’s quite extraordinary how many people think a crocodile will be so grateful you’ve fed it red meat for years that it’ll let you stroll away unharmed when you decide you want a break.
Classified defensive · Intensity 2/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals, Media & institutions
It’s such a massive question that it can be answered with a single word: ‘yes.’ What’s truly massive is the chicanery of members of the commentator class who’re too scared of ideologues both inside and outside their workplace to permit that single word to be uttered.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Media & institutions, Free speech & cancellation
Replying to @boswelltoday
@boswelltoday That stylist is a TERF.
Classified mocking · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions
Replying to @Rebecca_SPaul
@Rebecca_SPaul Maybe he’s waiting for all their cervixes to grow in. https://t.co/fe7cJmmlqH
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Adult healthcare, Language & definitions
@evergeenwings @fabia_moraes The trans umbrella stretches over a wide array of people who have virtually nothing in common with each other, eg, trauma-experienced and often same-sex attracted teenagers who believe transition is the route to happiness and are undergoing irreversible surgeries and drug treatments (extremely vulnerable) and adult straight men with a cross-dressing fetish who retain their genitalia and are demanding access to all women’s protected spaces (not remotely vulnerable, but thoroughly pandered to, at the expense of women and girls.)
Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Language & definitions
Remember: there is no evidence whatsoever that a sexual predator would claim to be a woman so he could enter female changing rooms and public bathrooms. It literally never happens.
Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals
Replying to @fabia_moraes
@fabia_moraes Trans people already have all the rights everyone else in society has, but some (not all) trans people demand that women give up rights: the right to single-sex spaces, to fair sport and to freedom of speech. No marginalised group has ever demanded that rights be stripped from other protected group, and no other supposedly marginalised group has ever been indulged by politicians, police and elite institutions to the extent the trans lobby has.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Sport, Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions
Every word.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions, Specific individuals
Replying to @OldeWorldOrder
@OldeWorldOrder The answer is far more complicated than smartphones. Plenty of people have smartphones and haven’t adopted gender identity ideology.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions, Other
A little reminder for anyone who may be regretting their very public sprint to the front of the mob and is now trying to discreetly shove their pitchfork out of sight.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions, Specific individuals, Youth healthcare, Language & definitions
I don't find the contents of this article by @HJoyceGender surprising, but it's probably significant that ten years ago I'd have found them both sinister and shocking.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Child safeguarding, Media & institutions, Free speech & cancellation
Replying to @JournalistJill
@JournalistJill Yes, Jill, it's not that they can't acknowledge the subject may be complex, for they are reasonable men. They'd just rather it was said less shrilly. Also, we should be nicer and kinder. And stop making arguments they have no answers to.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions
Never in my lifetime have so many people tried to signal their intellectual and moral superiority by playing stupid. https://t.co/quTjSIWlOo
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation
Replying to @JonathanWiltsh7
@JonathanWiltsh7 As you feel qualified to declare that fighting to protect women's rights and spaces is transphobic, I'm entitled to conclude that you are, as suggested by your very first post, a rather cowardly and uninformed misogynist who runs away because he can't argue beyond clichés.
Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation
Replying to @jk_rowling
@JonathanWiltsh7 Just in case anyone's wondering what the deleted tweet I'm answering said, it was 'no, because I'm not a sexual predator.' I have to assume he panicked when he realised what trans activists might make of that, if they saw it. https://t.co/l45ys3Fx4V
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation
Replying to @jackianpownall
@JIPTranslation @JonathanWiltsh7 @FridaRadFem General dislike of women who aren't being nice to men, dopamine hit from being patronising and offensive online, joy of regurgitating talking points that need no deeper thought - the usual.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Other
Replying to @MrMagspie
@MrMagspie @JonathanWiltsh7 @FridaRadFem Sorry, I forgot the rule. Man super-confident of his uninformed opinion on an issue that doesn't affect him in the slightest > woman who's got evidence, facts and has actually considered the issue from all angles.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Other
Replying to @JonathanWiltsh7
@JonathanWiltsh7 @FridaRadFem You are wrong. There are proportionally more trans-identified men currently in UK prisons for sex crimes than among the incarcerated male population as a whole. https://t.co/UnqO5laNTr
Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces, Other
Replying to @JonathanWiltsh7
@JonathanWiltsh7 I have never said that men transition to predate on women and girls. I have said, because there's ample evidence to prove it, that some men who claim a trans identity have committed acts of voyeurism and sexual assault against women and girls in supposedly single sex spaces. You've just said you wouldn't enter a girls' or women's single sex space because you're 'not a sexual predator.' Could you explain how women and girls are supposed to tell which trans-identified men are predators and which aren't? Because a proportion, provably, are. Determined predators, as anyone who knows anything about safeguarding will tell you, go where the pickings are easy. If all it takes to get inside a woman's locker room is to say 'I identify as a woman', predators will do that. We know this, because they've already done it, multiple times. A speed sign doesn't magically make cars slow down. A No Trespassers sign doesn't make the field inaccessible. Such signs are there to warn people that there will be consequences if they're disobeyed. A sign that excludes men from a space, so that women and girls can have safety, privacy and dignity has no power except the one you yourself have just acknowledged. When men who don't seek to transgress females' boundaries stay away, women can tell who the suspicious ones are, because they ignored the sign. This gives women the right to complain or protest. Men waiting outside have the right to point out to the intruder that he's going into the wrong space. I understand that you think some of your fellow men should be allowed to use women's facilities and spaces because you think those men's feelings are more important than the safety, privacy and dignity of women and girls. That's where we disagree.
Read the full postClassified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals
Replying to @gllamphar
@gllamphar @WaltyOf @JonathanWiltsh7 So they're safe all the way from leaving home to reaching the door of a public bathroom, but are suddenly at risk of assault the moment they enter? This seems contradict the popular trans activist argument against women-only spaces: 'you could get raped anywhere.'
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Free speech & cancellation
Replying to @JonathanWiltsh7
@JonathanWiltsh7 Would you, personally, disregard a sign saying 'women only' and enter the space?
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces
‘Women on the left warned men like me that we were handing the right an open goal by embracing gender identity ideology. Now the right’s running with the ball we handed them I’m blaming the women, because I have the same capacity for accountability as your average house brick.’ https://t.co/Uan4EZPk6x
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions
Replying to @Gelandin1
@Gelandin1 @sourpatchlyds Where did I say it was a natural consequence? Women’s oppression is sex-based. Men have discriminated against the female sex class, who they recognise by virtue of their anatomy.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces
These are the posts classified trans-related. Search all 16,714 collected tweets, read the year-by-year analysis, or read the report on her campaign against trans rights.