The Rowling Record

J.K. Rowling’s trans-related posts from 2024

Page 11 of 12. Posts 1,001–1,100 of the 1,194 J.K. Rowling wrote about trans people in 2024, newest first.

1 April 2024 to 13 April 2024. Posts are reproduced in full from the archive; the stance, intensity and topic labels come from the research classifications. How the labels are defined. Search within 2024.

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Media & institutions, Specific individuals, Free speech & cancellation

Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @jk_rowling

Politicians have snuggled up to Stonewall and Mermaids, given them privileged places at the table and adopted their talking points, to the detriment of very vulnerable children, young people and women. When are we going to see this fully investigated? When will this end? 3/X

192 replies1,694 retweets12,172 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Child safeguarding, Media & institutions, Single-sex spaces

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Child safeguarding, Youth healthcare, Media & institutions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Media & institutions, Child safeguarding

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Child safeguarding

Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Media & institutions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Adult healthcare, Media & institutions

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Other

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Youth healthcare, Media & institutions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

What proportion of patients treated do we have data for? We don’t know, because six of the seven medical trusts who held it refused to hand it over. How many of the Tavistock’s patients were lost to follow up? We don’t know, because they didn’t keep track of them. How many people never told their treatment teams they’d stopped taking their hormones and simply disappeared off the radar? Some detransitioners say they did exactly that; their stories are available online for anyone who cares enough to read them. Troubled young people appear to have been given life-changing surgeries and powerful drugs with less oversight and accountability in place than you’d expect when buying a lawnmower.

1,008 replies4,775 retweets32,029 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Media & institutions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Media & institutions

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @jk_rowling

This is still on your website, today. What is this, if not medical advice? You're knowingly pushing the use of puberty blockers, even after the recent Mayo Clinic report that said they can cause 'mild-to-severe sex gland atrophy' - ie, withering testicles - fertility problems and even cancer.

315 replies3,411 retweets19,143 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Media & institutions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Absolute, total, shameless lies. Your ex-CEO referred children to the Tavistock gender clinic. Mermaids has repeatedly claimed puberty blockers are reversible, sent out breast binders to girls as young as thirteen and insisted publicly that unless children are affirmed in their trans identities they'll kill themselves. Your fingerprints are all over the catastrophe of child transition, and those who funded you, campaigned for you and allowed you to embed yourselves in healthcare systems need to be held to account.

1,257 replies10,907 retweets51,000 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals, Media & institutions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @jk_rowling

Now the tide's turning, you want to ride up on your white horse and show us all how to have respectful, mature discussion? You were missing in action when it might have made a difference. Don't you dare lecture us how we should've fought the battle you avoided. 2/2

419 replies1,869 retweets21,029 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Exactly this. I won't be lectured on the 'toxicity' of the debate by men who believe exactly what I believe, but have been too cowardly to speak out. The truth is, they didn't fancy taking the hits I've taken, and don't want to admit it. 1/2

566 replies3,501 retweets30,554 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Media & institutions, Free speech & cancellation

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Adult healthcare, Media & institutions, Child safeguarding

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

'Inevitably, [those who played it safe]... will pretend that the evidence of harm contained in the Cass Report is a shocking revelation. The truth, of course, is that the evidence has been there all along. To those new converts now pretending otherwise: we see you.' ✍️@bindelj

218 replies1,548 retweets10,656 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Youth healthcare, Media & institutions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Deleted my tweet about the trans woman who said gender critical people don't care about kids getting run over, because people in my mentions said how much they hated the original post, having lost young people on the roads. I'm so sorry. That post didn't need amplifying 💔

314 replies341 retweets16,487 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Language & definitions

Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Other

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Adult healthcare, Youth healthcare, Media & institutions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @StAustellAdam

@StAustellAdam Not safe, I'm afraid. Celebs who cosied up to a movement intent on eroding women's hard-won rights and who used their platforms to cheer on the transitioning of minors can save their apologies for traumatised detransitioners and vulnerable women reliant on single sex spaces.

486 replies1,641 retweets13,847 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @jk_rowling

I thought the last tweet was going to be my last, but I just burst into tears. The #CassReview may be a watershed moment, but it comes too late for detransitioners who've written me heartbreaking letters of regret. Today's not a triumph, it's the laying bare of a tragedy. 7/7

505 replies2,689 retweets24,106 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @jk_rowling

The consequences of this scandal will play out for decades. You cheered it on. You did all you could to impede and misrepresent research. You tried to bully people out of their jobs for opposing you. Young people have been experimented on, left infertile and in pain. 6/6

119 replies1,810 retweets18,655 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Free speech & cancellation

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @jk_rowling

And if I sound angry, it's because I'm bloody angry. I read Cass this morning and my anger's been mounting all day. Kids have been irreversibly harmed, and thousands are complicit, not just medics, but the celebrity mouthpieces, unquestioning media and cynical corporations. 5/6

121 replies2,265 retweets19,198 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Media & institutions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @jk_rowling

Even if you don't feel ashamed of cheerleading for what now looks like severe medical malpractice, even if you don't want to accept that you might have been wrong, where's your sense of self-preservation? The bandwagon you hopped on so gladly is hurtling towards a cliff. 4/6

41 replies1,048 retweets13,377 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Media & institutions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @jk_rowling

I understand that the review's conclusions will have come as a seismic shock to those who've hounded and demonised whistleblowers and smeared opponents as bigots and transphobes, but trying to discredit Hilary Cass's work isn't merely misguided. It's actively malign. 3/6

30 replies1,072 retweets13,388 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Media & institutions, Free speech & cancellation

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @jk_rowling

These are people who've deemed opponents 'far-right' for wanting to know there are proper checks and balances in place before autistic, gay and abused kids - groups that are all overrepresented at gender clinics - are left sterilised, inorgasmic, lifelong patients. 2/6

66 replies1,187 retweets13,983 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Free speech & cancellation

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Over the last four years, Hilary Cass has conducted the most robust review of the medical evidence for transitioning children that's ever been conducted. Mere hours after it was released to the press and public, committed ideologues are doubling down. 1/6

782 replies7,493 retweets36,140 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Media & institutions

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Child safeguarding, Specific individuals, Language & definitions

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @glosswitch

@glosswitch I read Long Chu, Serrano, Tobia, Dawson, Butler, Fausto-Sterling, plus innumerable blogs and articles by the trans-identified and genderists, and I’m still told daily to educate myself by people who insist avocado trees prove a woman can have a penis.

89 replies462 retweets4,784 likes

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

So you saw masked men threatening opponents with violence and death, claiming oppression while trampling the rights of others, depicting non-believers as tyrants, traitors and vermin and thought ‘if those books taught me anything, it’s that people like this are the good guys.’

909 replies3,166 retweets31,414 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Child safeguarding

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

It still amazes me that wanting safety and fairness for girls and women is your idea of hate. It still amazes me that people are cheering on a medical scandal, despite mounting evidence of harm. It still amazes me how cowardly and complicit so many, including you, have been. https://t.co/kbbiy5lfwD

2,421 replies8,259 retweets65,934 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

They're like people looking at an elephant's knee through a microscope. 'Could be a moon crater, crumpled felt or a mouse's scrotum. No way of telling.' It's an elephant. We can all see the elephant. You're not clever for pretending you can't see the huge fucking elephant. https://t.co/CJLtjIXxDt

906 replies3,398 retweets26,281 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition, Child safeguarding

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

@teamocill @Dr_RonMoore XXY means Klinefelter syndrome, in which boys or men have an extra X chromosome. Klinefelter syndrome might be said to prove the individual who has it is a man, because it's a condition that only affects males. Nature isn't infallible, but just as people born with only nine fingers aren't a new species, men with Klinefelter syndrome aren't a new sex.

53 replies319 retweets3,069 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions, Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

How do I know the earth's a globe, when I've never seen it from space? How do I know I can't fly, when I've never jumped off a skyscraper? How do I know I'm not immortal, if I haven't died yet? Never in human history have so many people decided pretending to be stupid is clever. https://t.co/Obp1BD2ioa

2,314 replies9,312 retweets64,665 likes

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Other

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation

Classified neutral · Intensity 0/4 · Other

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

You’ve asked me several questions on this thread and accused me of avoiding answering, so here goes. I believe a woman is a human being who belongs to the sex class that produces large gametes. It’s irrelevant whether or not her gametes have ever been fertilised, whether or not she’s carried a baby to term, irrelevant if she was born with a rare difference of sexual development that makes neither of the above possible, or if she’s aged beyond being able to produce viable eggs. She is a woman and just as much a woman as the others. I don’t believe a woman is more or less of a woman for having sex with men, women, both or not wanting sex at all. I don’t think a woman is more or less of a woman for having a buzz cut and liking suits and ties, or wearing stilettos and mini dresses, for being black, white or brown, for being six feet tall or a little person, for being kind or cruel, angry or sad, loud or retiring. She isn't more of a woman for featuring in Playboy or being a surrendered wife, nor less of a woman for designing space rockets or taking up boxing. What makes her a woman is the fact of being born in a body that, assuming nothing has gone wrong in her physical development (which, as stated above, still doesn't stop her being a woman), is geared towards producing eggs as opposed to sperm, towards bearing as opposed to begetting children, and irrespective of whether she's done either of those things, or ever wants to. Womanhood isn't a mystical state of being, nor is it measured by how well one apes sex stereotypes. We are not the creatures either porn or the Bible tell you we are. Femaleness is not, as trans woman Andrea Chu Long wrote, ‘an open mouth, an expectant asshole, blank, blank eyes,’ nor are we God’s afterthought, sprung from Adam’s rib. Women are provably subject to certain experiences because of our female bodies, including different forms of oppression, depending on the cultures in which we live. When trans activists say 'I thought you didn't want to be defined by your biology,' it’s a feeble and transparent attempt at linguistic sleight of hand. Women don't want to be limited, exploited, punished, or subject to other unjust treatment because of their biology, but our being female is indeed defined by our biology. It's one material fact about us, like having freckles or disliking beetroot, neither of which are representative of our entire beings, either. Women have billions of different personalities and life stories, which have nothing to do with our bodies, although we are likely to have had experiences men don't and can't, because we belong to our sex class. Some people feel strongly that they should have been, or wish to be seen as, the sex class into which they weren't born. Gender dysphoria is a real and very painful condition and I feel nothing but sympathy for anyone who suffers from it. I want them to be free to dress and present themselves however they like and I want them to have exactly the same rights as every other citizen regarding housing, employment and personal safety. I do not, however, believe that surgeries and cross-sex hormones literally turn a person into the opposite sex, nor do I believe in the idea that each of us has a nebulous ‘gender identity’ that may or might not match our sexed bodies. I believe the ideology that preaches those tenets has caused, and continues to cause, very real harm to vulnerable people. I am strongly against women's and girls' rights and protections being dismantled to accommodate trans-identified men, for the very simple reason that no study has ever demonstrated that trans-identified men don't have exactly the same pattern of criminality as other men, and because, however they identify, men retain their advantages of speed and strength. In other words, I think the safety and rights of girls and women are more important than those men's desire for validation. I sincerely hope that answers your questions. You may still disagree, but as I hope this shows, I’m more than happy to have this debate.

Read the full post
12,073 replies32,958 retweets176,874 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions, Sport, Child safeguarding, Adult healthcare

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Other

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @cmo303

@cmo303 None of that gross biological stuff matters. The only true test of a woman is whether she has magical lady feelings that make her submissive and cute and frilly and pink. Where's your anime avatar? Do you even take selfies while pouting and wearing kitten ears? I despair.

147 replies505 retweets7,355 likes

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Other

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Yep. I'm still amazed all three of our kids chose to gestate inside me, because I thought it was 50/50 they'd come to term inside one of Neil's testicles. By coincidence, my father never gave birth out of his balls, either. Random luck or ancestral curse? I doubt we'll ever know. https://t.co/g0pmCUURJ7

3,351 replies8,444 retweets73,541 likes

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

There's no difference between those who hushed up paedophile priests to protect the church and those trying to make it unsayable that some trans-identified men are sex offenders. Both prize an ideology more highly than acknowledging risk and preventing harm to women and children.

1,810 replies11,154 retweets67,609 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @LuxuryMoon

@LuxuryMoon And if a non-trans-identified man with a high profile had ‘joked’ about kidnapping women, dubbed lesbians wannabe men or called a black broadcaster a ‘nasty bitch’ who ‘wouldn’t be anywhere without woke’, we all know exactly what would have happened to his career.

56 replies381 retweets2,285 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions

Classified mocking · Intensity 1/4 · Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Women don't require fellow females to serve as flattering mirrors, human shields or surrogate mothers, but a certain kind of man expects such services as a right. Petulant demands for women's coddling and compliance don't prove you're female, they reveal outsize male entitlement.

1,114 replies5,383 retweets44,922 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions

Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Again, I trust everyone will be treated the same way if they express themselves similarly. Nobody should have a 'Hate Incident' logged against them for accurately describing, or asserting the importance and reality, of biological sex. We must all be equal under the law.

978 replies5,008 retweets37,370 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Sport, Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Sport, Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals, Media & institutions

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

So if trans-identified men are pretty enough (as judged by you, a man) women ought to agree they're women? Femaleness has no relation whatsoever to how well an individual - man or woman - performs femininity to male standards. This is the very definition of misogyny.

1,973 replies6,972 retweets57,846 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Wrong. Bergdorf had asked emotionally distressed children to contact him online “which we felt would mean that she was in breach of our own risk assessments and undermine what we are here to do,” said NSPCC CEO Peter Wanless.

161 replies1,668 retweets12,907 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Child safeguarding, Specific individuals, Media & institutions

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Law & gender recognition, Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

You were asking for it. Stop complaining, you’re not hurt. It’s your mouth that’s the problem. Men like this watch women threatened with death, rape and mutilation for the crime of defending their rights and the only problem they can see is that we’re still speaking out. https://t.co/4leKLyzUMV

1,555 replies5,068 retweets45,464 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Child safeguarding

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals, Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Law & gender recognition

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Free speech & cancellation

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @jk_rowling

🎉🌼🌸April Fools! 🌸🌼🎉 Only kidding. Obviously, the people mentioned in the above tweets aren't women at all, but men, every last one of them. In passing the Scottish Hate Crime Act, Scottish lawmakers seem to have placed higher value on the feelings of men performing their idea of femaleness, however misogynistically or opportunistically, than on the rights and freedoms of actual women and girls. The new legislation is wide open to abuse by activists who wish to silence those of us speaking out about the dangers of eliminating women's and girls’ single-sex spaces, the nonsense made of crime data if violent and sexual assaults committed by men are recorded as female crimes, the grotesque unfairness of allowing males to compete in female sports, the injustice of women’s jobs, honours and opportunities being taken by trans-identified men, and the reality and immutability of biological sex. For several years now, Scottish women have been pressured by their government and members of the police force to deny the evidence of their eyes and ears, repudiate biological facts and embrace a neo-religious concept of gender that is unprovable and untestable. The re-definition of 'woman' to include every man who declares himself one has already had serious consequences for women's and girls’ rights and safety in Scotland, with the strongest impact felt, as ever, by the most vulnerable, including female prisoners and rape survivors. It is impossible to accurately describe or tackle the reality of violence and sexual violence committed against women and girls, or address the current assault on women’s and girls’ rights, unless we are allowed to call a man a man. Freedom of speech and belief are at an end in Scotland if the accurate description of biological sex is deemed criminal. I'm currently out of the country, but if what I've written here qualifies as an offence under the terms of the new act, I look forward to being arrested when I return to the birthplace of the Scottish Enlightenment. If you agree with the views set out in this tweet, please retweet it. #ArrestMe #AprilFools #HateCrimeActScotland 11/X

Read the full post
4,098 replies29,519 retweets93,781 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Law & gender recognition, Single-sex spaces, Sport, Child safeguarding, Free speech & cancellation, Language & definitions

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions, Language & definitions

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Child safeguarding, Language & definitions, Media & institutions

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals, Law & gender recognition

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Sport, Specific individuals, Single-sex spaces

Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions

Classified mocking · Intensity 4/4 · Child safeguarding, Specific individuals, Language & definitions

Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals, Law & gender recognition

Classified mocking · Intensity 4/4 · Specific individuals, Law & gender recognition, Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Law & gender recognition, Media & institutions, Specific individuals

These are the posts classified trans-related. Search all 16,714 collected tweets, read the year-by-year analysis, or read the report on her campaign against trans rights.