The Rowling Record

J.K. Rowling’s trans-related posts from 2024

Page 12 of 12. Posts 1,101–1,194 of the 1,194 J.K. Rowling wrote about trans people in 2024, newest first.

16 January 2024 to 21 March 2024. Posts are reproduced in full from the archive; the stance, intensity and topic labels come from the research classifications. How the labels are defined. Search within 2024.

Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

You’re painting a target on people who have no connection with me, who aren’t my relatives. You surely know what you’re doing, but persist. Hate me all you like, but your actions are having real world consequences for people I don’t even know.

208 replies566 retweets8,968 likes

Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals

Classified neutral · Intensity 0/4 · Specific individuals

Classified neutral · Intensity 0/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals, Media & institutions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

The number of people who feel compelled to tell me that if they had my money they wouldn’t give a damn about the rights of women and children never ceases to amaze me. I believe you, of course, I’m just surprised that’s something you like to boast about.

1,841 replies4,491 retweets51,112 likes

Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation

Classified defensive · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals, Free speech & cancellation

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Law & gender recognition, Language & definitions

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Law & gender recognition, Free speech & cancellation, Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Law & gender recognition, Single-sex spaces

Classified defensive · Intensity 0/4 · Specific individuals, Free speech & cancellation

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Free speech & cancellation

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Media & institutions, Free speech & cancellation

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Media & institutions

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Specific individuals, Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Adult healthcare, Media & institutions, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Adult healthcare, Media & institutions, Other

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Media & institutions, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Youth healthcare

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Don’t forget the abject cowardice of many politicians, sections of the press and certain members of the medical profession, all of whom allowed themselves to be intimidated by a loud, angry mob that capitalised on their fear of not looking progressive and sophisticated enough. https://t.co/EshJL63JcD

404 replies2,493 retweets15,901 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Media & institutions, Free speech & cancellation

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Media & institutions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Media & institutions, Youth healthcare, Free speech & cancellation

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions, Child safeguarding

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Adult healthcare

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Media & institutions

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Free speech & cancellation

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Media & institutions, Free speech & cancellation

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

“Given paucity of evidence, the off-label use of drugs […] in gender dysphoria treatment largely means an unregulated live experiment on children.” Professor Carl Heneghan, director of the Centre of Evidence-Based Medicine at Oxford, 2019.

501 replies4,399 retweets25,734 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Free speech & cancellation

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Devastated and bewildered that my embrace of inclusive language has angered its most enthusiastic devotees, so let's just say: Happy Mother's Day to all females who've raised children. 💐❤️

1,881 replies5,911 retweets70,567 likes

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

❤️💐Happy Birthing Parent Day to all whose large gametes were fertilised resulting in small humans whose sex was assigned by doctors making mostly lucky guesses ❤️💐

4,714 replies9,144 retweets96,305 likes

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Law & gender recognition, Media & institutions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

The word ‘transphobic’, as used here, does not mean an irrational fear or dislike of trans people. It means refusing to use gender identity ideology’s jargon, refusing to parrot its slogans, refusing to accept that sex doesn't matter when it comes to sport and single-sex spaces, refusing to believe a bearded heterosexual man becomes a lesbian when he declares himself one, and refusing to believe an abusive, misogynistic male is a woman because he likes to wear mini-dresses and pout in selfies. Like every other gender critical person I know, I believe everyone should be free to express themselves however they wish, dress however they please, call themselves whatever they want, sleep with any consenting adult who wishes to sleep with them, and that trans-identified people should have the same protections regarding employment, housing, freedom of speech and personal safety every other citizen is entitled to. But this isn’t nearly enough for the dominant strain of trans activism, which asserts that unless freedom of speech is removed from dissenters, unless trans-identified men are permitted to strip away women’s rights, with particular reference to single sex spaces like rape crisis centres, prison cells, hospital wards, changing rooms and public bathrooms, until we all bow down to their neo-religion, accept their pseudo-scientific claims and embrace their circular reasoning, trans people are more oppressed, and more at risk, than any other group in society. This is nonsense. 99.9% of the world knows it's nonsense. The emperor is naked. He might be wearing lipstick, but his balls are swinging in plain sight.

Read the full post
2,525 replies8,199 retweets47,120 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Single-sex spaces, Sport, Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation, Law & gender recognition

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Adult healthcare, Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @jk_rowling

Aware as I am that it's an offence to lie to law enforcement, I'll simply have to explain to the police that, in my view, India is a classic example of the male narcissist who lives in a state of perpetual rage that he can't compel women to take him at his own valuation. 5/5

825 replies2,250 retweets35,259 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals, Law & gender recognition

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @jk_rowling

Surprisingly for such an eminent legal authority, he appears to have forgotten that the Forstater ruling established that gender critical views can be protected in law as a philosophical belief. No law compels anyone to pretend to believe that India is a woman. 4/5

160 replies1,285 retweets22,902 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Law & gender recognition, Free speech & cancellation, Language & definitions

Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Specific individuals, Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Some time ago, lawyers advised me that not only did I have a clearly winnable case against India Willoughby for defamation, but that India's obsessive targeting of me over the past few years may meet the legal threshold for harassment. 1/5

3,211 replies8,751 retweets76,422 likes

Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Specific individuals, Free speech & cancellation

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

"It will go down as one of the worst medical scandals in history." The #wpathfiles put it beyond doubt that surgeries and drugs of unproven benefit are being given to those who cannot give informed consent. If you're still cheering this on, you are complicit.

839 replies8,849 retweets38,597 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Adult healthcare, Child safeguarding, Media & institutions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

For reference, this is the individual whose precious feelings are more important than truth, according to some of his fellow men. If you think women calling this person a man is more offensive than him publicly fantasising about kidnapping women, I can't help you. https://t.co/mrqIC8jbtL

1,001 replies4,759 retweets32,755 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Child safeguarding, Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Sport, Language & definitions

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

We don't leave our doors and windows wide open when we go out because 'thieves will find a way in, anyway.' Strangely, I've never heard anyone say 'let's stop background checking teachers, because paedophiles will always find a way to interfere with kids.' When men - all men, however they identify - are banned from women's spaces, those who disregard the ban can be challenged, inside the space and out. They mark themselves out as suspicious by breaking a rule decent men respect. Nobody claims the rule has successfully kept out every single man who wants to commit voyeurism or sexual assault. What we're saying is that allowing males into female only spaces on the basis of their claim to be a women removes an obstacle that has hitherto been *proven* to increase women and girls' safety. 88% of sexual crimes committed in changing/locker rooms happen in those that are unisex. Why? Because malign men don't have to justify their presence near unclothed women and girls. They can't be challenged. They don't stand out. This is obvious to all but the terminally naive. It is too seldom noted that every single man arguing for the removal of single sex spaces is arguing for his *own* right to enter those spaces. I know from experience that they feign outrage when this point is put to them, gibbering that they're just being good, virtuous progressives who're standing up for trans women, that they *personally* won't be availing themselves of the new opportunities afforded them. The fact remains that instead of calling out male violence against trans women, and working to make male spaces safer, these men have thrown their energy into the fight to remove women's and girls' rights to safety, privacy and dignity. And if anyone genuinely believes none of these enthusiastic heterosexual, non-trans-identified male 'allies' aren't personally enthralled by the idea of women and girls losing basic protections, I have several bridges to sell you.

Read the full post
1,600 replies11,675 retweets64,769 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

For years now, women have been saying that self-ID will be exploited by predators and we’ve been told ‘no predator would bother to pretend to be a woman.’ Yet here we are - again. This paedophile didn’t receive the leniency he hoped for because he claimed to be a woman, but plenty have, including Katie Dolotowski, who, in a very similar case, filmed a 12-year-old in a bathroom cubicle and attempted to rape a 10-year-old in a women’s bathroom, and served his sentence in a women’s prison. The wilfully blind continue to insist that what is already happening couldn’t possibly happen. They wriggle like eels trying to find a loophole through which they can escape with their precious ideology intact. ‘He wasn’t really trans, though.’ ‘All groups have bad apples.’ ‘You can’t blame all trans people because some of them are rapists.’ So determined are you to cling to your absolutist slogans and your circular reasoning, you’re indifferent to the proven increased risk to women and girls. I watch you lying, equivocating and contorting yourself into knots trying to justify the unjustifiable, and I wonder when, if ever, shame will finally find you.

Read the full post
888 replies6,831 retweets38,668 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Law & gender recognition

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Language & definitions

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Law & gender recognition

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @jk_rowling

Telling women and girls they must accept increased risk to themselves to appease male feelings is the very definition of the patriarchy you claim to stand against. Vulnerable women are paying the price for a fashionable fallacy that has serious, real world consequences. 3/3

324 replies3,183 retweets23,525 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @jk_rowling

The statistics don't lie. Some - not all - trans-identified males have committed sexual and violent offences against women and girls. Some male predators have capitalised on gender identity activism to claim a trans identity they never espoused pre-conviction or assault. 2/3

117 replies1,386 retweets15,464 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

It is possible to want trans people to be safe and happy while recognising that there are risks to women and girls in eradicating single sex spaces. Women and girls are being pressured to surrender their hard-won rights to a group that poses a proven danger to them. 1/3 https://t.co/MJGbUtgReP

1,008 replies6,639 retweets52,103 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals, Language & definitions, Child safeguarding

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

@chris69403377 @1MikeFairclough What you're describing is what happens AFTER institutional capture. People take the path of least resistance - pretend not to see, as you put it - because they don't want to deal with the consequences of dissent. I have enormous sympathy for those who risk their livelihoods in speaking up, but none for those in positions of power who throw the most vulnerable under the bus, because it's easier/more lucrative to go with the flow.

39 replies323 retweets2,068 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Child safeguarding, Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions, Child safeguarding

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

From recording murderers' and rapists' preferred gender identities rather than their sex, to accusing women who want basic safeguarding of having 'flawed unconscious bias', certain police forces are signalling loudly that vulnerable women deserve neither protection nor justice.

367 replies3,782 retweets20,011 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces, Media & institutions, Language & definitions

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

1. Crime statistics are rendered useless if violent and sexual attacks committed by men are recorded as female crimes. 2. Activists are already clamouring for this sadistic killer to be incarcerated in a women's prison. 3. Ideologically-driven misinformation is not journalism. https://t.co/9hnBBAY6eH

1,005 replies7,381 retweets44,450 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions, Media & institutions, Other

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Media & institutions, Child safeguarding

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals

Classified mocking · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Other

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Other

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

The trans activist outrage that ensues on here whenever I share my belief that jailed women shouldn't be used as validation tools or emotional support props for trans-identified male sex offenders is as revealing as it's predictable. Such activists can't bring themselves to concede that a man who was convicted of harming women/girls ought not to be incarcerated with the demographic to whom he is a proven danger, because if they do, all their stock arguments ('no sexual predator would bother to pretend to be trans', 'no trans woman has ever harmed a woman in a women's only space', 'there is no danger in making all single sex spaces unisex') are exposed as the lies they are. If they admit that even a single man isn't a woman because he says he is, the entire edifice of gender identity ideology crumbles. This leaves activists who rely on bullying and slogans with nowhere to go but 'you hate all trans people', 'so you're saying all trans people are rapists' and, of course, 'you are causing a trans genocide.' I think this particular issue also causes conniptions because it threatens the activists' self image. These are people who preen themselves on their kindness and virtue, so acknowledging the truth - that they're indifferent to vulnerable women being assaulted or traumatised - threatens the idea they have of themselves. They therefore double down. The prisoners complaining aren't really afraid of rape or voyeurism or violence at all, they say. They're 'not exactly delicate flowers', as one self-identified empath put it. If you support putting violent and sexually predatory men into women's prisons, you are knowingly forcing those women to live in fear of, and, in some proven cases, to suffer abuse that many of them will have endured pre-incarceration. You are not kind. You are not righteous. Women have the basic human right not to suffer cruel and unusual punishment. #WomensRightsAreHumanRights

Read the full post
3,272 replies14,288 retweets86,824 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals, Law & gender recognition, Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Law & gender recognition, Other

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Law & gender recognition

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation, Other

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Sport, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Media & institutions, Child safeguarding

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @yourisolde

@yourisolde I'm asking why a *Women's Library* has chosen to display a comic which centres the desires of straight men, is focused on shaming lesbians for their sexual orientation and has a cover depicting a protected group dying out. This is not a feminist book, or one that deals with women's issues. It's a book telling lesbians they're wrong/bad for not having sex with the male-bodied.

46 replies533 retweets3,623 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions, Media & institutions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions, Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @yourisolde

@yourisolde Given the ever-expanding definition of 'hate crime', which in Scotland has included taking a woman to court for tying suffragette ribbons on a tree, I think a library CHOOSING to display profoundly homophobic material in what appears to be a celebratory context is worth comment.

31 replies483 retweets3,727 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Media & institutions, Free speech & cancellation, Language & definitions

Classified defensive · Intensity 0/4 · Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Glasgow Women's Library has chosen to display a delightful penis-centred work (read the whole thread) designed to shame and coerce lesbians out of same-sex orientation. If anyone can think of a more appropriate name for the Glasgow Women's Library, do let me know.

853 replies2,616 retweets11,354 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions, Media & institutions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Female-only support services can be life saving for women who've suffered domestic abuse and sexual violence. This report exposes the current silencing of sector leaders and the dire consequences for victims.

423 replies4,080 retweets22,600 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Law & gender recognition, Media & institutions

These are the posts classified trans-related. Search all 16,714 collected tweets, read the year-by-year analysis, or read the report on her campaign against trans rights.