Replying to @AmandaPCraig
@AmandaPCraig @HJoyceGender @Soc_of_Authors I’ll pay your legal frees if that poisonous little threat is carried through.
Page 1 of 12. Posts 1–100 of the 1,194 J.K. Rowling wrote about trans people in 2024, newest first.
10 December 2024 to 30 December 2024. Posts are reproduced in full from the archive; the stance, intensity and topic labels come from the research classifications. How the labels are defined. Search within 2024.
Replying to @AmandaPCraig
@AmandaPCraig @HJoyceGender @Soc_of_Authors I’ll pay your legal frees if that poisonous little threat is carried through.
Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals
Replying to @Raw_Toast
@Raw_Toast It's overwhelmingly MEN who denigrate athletic women by calling them 'manly'. I've literally never heard a woman say that outstanding female athletes like Martina and Serena have an 'unfair physical advantage' over other women. The only talk of unfairness in relation to women's sport I can remember before the present insanity concerned Eastern European female athletes who, decades back, were put on testosterone at massive cost to their own health. Those women certainly had an unethical advantage over their fellow females, but nowhere nearly as unethical or dangerous as letting men compete against women. The old-time dopers must be furious; it would have been so much easier to cheat these days. No need to feed young girls drugs, just field an entire squad of bearded, penis-ed athletes, some of whom call themselves women.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Sport
Replying to @KBDayFL
@KBDayFL There's a special place in hell for women who used #MeToo to enhance their public platforms in 2017, but now jeer at other women for defending single sex spaces.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces
Typically brilliant article from @KDansky 👇
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition, Language & definitions
The number of men who tell me I'm unqualified to have an opinion on whether there might be downsides to cutting healthy breasts off teenaged girls with mental health issues, yet are 100% certain they're qualified to tell women what a woman is, continues to astound.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions
That thing that never happens has happened again. https://t.co/Eyn3rlidWd
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces
Replying to @BrentJvV
@BrentJvV @I_want_a_coffee @SciFiGeek74 @Nikomis2 Puberty blockers have not been used ‘safely.’ Lupron left women who were put on it for precocious puberty with life long health issues such as bone thinning and seizures.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare
Replying to @bravopipianda
@bravopipianda @TheGeneral_0 The moment any of those things causes infertility, the loss of the ability to orgasm and a lifetime's reliance on powerful hormones your body wasn't designed to cope with they'll become relevant to the discussion.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Adult healthcare
@yrlowendtheory @TheGeneral_0 It seems to have skipped your attention that many doctors, some of them whistleblowers, are appalled by what their colleagues in ‘gender medicine’ are getting up to, but I’ll get on with becoming irrelevant now. Have a lovely day 😘
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Adult healthcare, Media & institutions
Replying to @TheGeneral_0
@TheGeneral_0 Not always. Kids are watching TikTok videos of surgeons selling the idea that bodies can be modified like Lego. Schools affirm kids’ trans identities behind parents’ backs. A certain kids’ charity in the UK sent out breast binders to pubescent girls without parental consent. Many parents are struggling to protect kids from a Zeitgeist telling them that anxieties about puberty, sexuality and growing up can be fixed by lifelong reliance on Big Pharma and by doctors who make Frankenstein look ethical.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding
Replying to @Mcbeath_on_sea
@Mcbeath_on_sea Doesn’t it trouble you that gay kids, autistic kids and those who’ve suffered trauma are massively over-represented among those who transition? What about detransitioners who believe homophobia, internalised, in their surroundings or both, led them to believe they were ‘trans’?
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding
Replying to @MaxyZucco
@MaxyZucco But being trans isn’t a medical condition, or so we’re told.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Adult healthcare, Language & definitions
Replying to @Mcbeath_on_sea
@Mcbeath_on_sea @profjmb Wherever ‘woman’ is redefined to mean ‘female and also male who says he’s female’, women lose rights.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition
There are no trans kids. No child is 'born in the wrong body'. There are only adults like you, prepared to sacrifice the health of minors to bolster your belief in an ideology that will end up wreaking more harm than lobotomies and false memory syndrome combined. https://t.co/yyc4MxgfOk
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Language & definitions
Replying to @jk_rowling
I'm not sure I've ever read a better example of what Arendt described when analysing those determined not to break ranks, yet who felt the need to justify their participation in atrocities: 'self-deception, concealing a ruthless desire for conformity at any price.' 5/5
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions
Replying to @jk_rowling
'Yes, some young people given irreversible surgeries and hormone regimes regret it. Yes, some have complex problems that transition doesn't fix and may worsen. But hey, they wanted it and were given it. That should be the new metric of success!' 4/5
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding
Replying to @jk_rowling
But this paper breaks new ground. It acknowledges that by the usual medical standards ('old normal knowledge') transitioning minors has not been found to be the unqualified success many have claimed. The proposed solution? Jettison the old knowledge. Redefine success. 3/5
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Media & institutions
Replying to @jk_rowling
We're all used to the obfuscatory language gender activist medics and their cheerleader, insist upon. 'Gender affirming care/treatment' is so much nicer sounding than 'sterilisation, surgical mutilation and provision of toxic drugs to troubled minors'. 2/5
Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Youth healthcare, Language & definitions, Child safeguarding
This astounding paper reminds me of Hannah Arendt's The Banality of Evil: 'The net effect of this language system was not to keep these people ignorant of what they were doing, but to prevent them from equating it with their old, ‘normal’ knowledge.' 1/5 https://t.co/nPNlm033r6
Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Youth healthcare, Media & institutions
Replying to @stuartf100
@stuartf100 @glosswitch That's one of my personal faves. 'Some men and women have DSDs. It therefore follows that I can decide whether I want to be a man, a woman, neither or both.'
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Other
Replying to @AjaTheEmpress
@AjaTheEmpress @glosswitch Are you seriously trying to tell me they weren't STUNNED in ancient Africa every time a baby arrived out of a vagina rather than a penis?
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions
Replying to @MarieIsabellaB
@MarieIsabellaB @glosswitch They hear themselves and think 'my God, listen to how sophisticated and knowledgeable and completely in the right I am, why aren't these women dazzled by my intellectual brilliance and moral superiority? Think I'll try calling them stupid, evil cunts again, see if that helps.'
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals
Replying to @IanGee2023
@IanGee2023 @IndiaWilloughby I'm also holding my cigar the wrong way round.
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals
'OMG, how can JKR not know clownfish can change sex?' 'She's been brainwashed by Nazis and she's too dumb to see it!' 'If only she could meet my trans friend she'd realise there's no issue with men in women's spaces!' Excellent 🧵by @glosswitch, author of the brilliant 'Hags'.
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions, Specific individuals
Replying to @PinPoin19502075
@PinPoin19502075 @DavidPasko_OCT I don't think anyone could accuse me of hiding in the shadows on this issue, either.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals
Replying to @MagicPuddingDi
@MagicPuddingDi Needed a signature policy achievement because she had none? Could hear the siren call of a cushy post-politics job in some gender identity-ridden NGO? Had come to a point of thinking everyone who disagrees with her is actually evil? Maybe she’ll explain in her book.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Media & institutions, Specific individuals
Her ego requires her signature bill to have been opposed by something she considers a worthy adversary, rather than members of the public who don’t want cross-dressing men running rape crisis centres. Someone really should give her ‘The Women Who Wouldn’t Wheesht’ for Christmas.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals, Law & gender recognition
@PeskyFemale Such a shame they never came anywhere close to taking me down, isn't it? Merry Terfmas! ♥️❄️♀️✖️✖️
Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals
"At the close of this year, I think we can safely say there has been a “vibe shift” over gender ideology. No one wants to demean or discriminate against trans people... live how you want, love whom you wish, but don’t tell women what a woman is." https://t.co/vUiZMQ2uTz
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions, Other
Soon to rival "'Twas the Night Before Christmas" as a heartwarming Yuletide tale, I give you India Willoughby's "Mary Was An Earthworm." https://t.co/urWQ3hgGEX
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Language & definitions
Replying to @mqyxf
@mqyxf @Cockyolliebird @transwidows @theneonrequiem Fetish, by definition, is a very specific erotic interest in something that lies outside typical sexual behaviour or stimuli. Women wearing form-fitting clothes falls very much within the arena of conventional heterosexual behaviour. We can certainly critique it, and analyse why straight men like to see women in revealing and sometimes constrictive clothing, but it isn't fetishistic behaviour on either of their parts; socially speaking, there's nothing remotely unusual about it. When a man dons the same clothing, he's transgressing social norms. That's where the 'fetish' comes in. Wearing tightly-fitting dresses and high heels isn't something men typically do. To don this specific kind of female clothing (when there's plenty of clothing designed for women that's practical and not revealing) the man is usually seeking a specific response, which is often shock. He might be deliberately looking to provoke a discussion around gender, he might be looking to upset the staid and conventional, or he might get an erotic thrill out of doing it. The latter is fetish.
Read the full postClassified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Other
Replying to @mqyxf
@mqyxf @Cockyolliebird @transwidows @theneonrequiem I didn't say dresses are 'fetish gear'. I'm saying that for some male individuals, wearing dresses is a fetish. Big difference.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals
Replying to @SnydeNotSnarky
@SnydeNotSnarky @transwidows @theneonrequiem I've said countless times that I disagree with trans-identified men using single-sex spaces reserved for women, but I was responding to a very specific point about sport, which I do respect. I think we all know how X works, don't we? Here, as in life, it's possible to agree with somebody on one point and not on others. We can all play the 'gotcha' game: 'you agreed with this person on this issue, therefore you must agree with literally everything they've ever said or done.' Plenty of people interact with me on here who'll disagree with a ton of things I believe or have said in the past and I'm not deluded enough to think one friendly message means the person I'm talking to thinks I'm infallible or faultless. The absolute irony of me having to say this after the past few years is more apparent to me than to anybody, but several times recently I've been chided for being too nice to trans-identified people. A few comments have implied or even stated outright that I shouldn't interact respectfully or warmly with people who've been perfectly nice, or empathetic, or reasonable, or polite, when talking to me. As I despise authoritarianism and compelled speech wherever they occur, I'll keep talking to people however I want. After all, if I was that afraid of other people misrepresenting, misinterpreting or misreporting what I've said, written or believe, I'd have spent the last quarter of a century in an underground bunker with no internet access.
Read the full postClassified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Sport, Free speech & cancellation
Replying to @transwidows
@transwidows @theneonrequiem Very annoying indeed.
Classified neutral · Intensity 0/4 · Specific individuals
Replying to @faellie2
@faellie2 @Cockyolliebird @transwidows @theneonrequiem The starting point has to be legislating around sex rather than gender identity. It would be interesting to see how many 'trans lesbians' would still wear skirts and lipstick if female changing rooms, prison cells and sporting categories were definitively closed to them.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Sport, Law & gender recognition, Language & definitions
Replying to @zjbusch
@zjbusch @Lungbarrow1 @theneonrequiem That's happening in the UK, too, which is one of the reasons I'm so glad @AllianceLGB was created. It will take a concerted effort to disentangle gender ideology from the gay rights movement, but it has to be done, because the blowback against gay people is deeply unfair.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Media & institutions, Specific individuals
Replying to @Lungbarrow1
@Lungbarrow1 @theneonrequiem I believe the damage can be undone (not for certain individuals, unfortunately, but in terms of societal attitudes). Sounds to me like you just need some shore leave ♥️
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Other
Replying to @theraggedwood
@paneditorial I disagree. Some are definitely in it for the money, but some parents of trans children will never admit the slightest doubt about the basis on which they they encouraged or enabled their children to have surgery and take blockers or hormones. To do so would shatter them.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding
Replying to @Cockyolliebird
@Cockyolliebird @transwidows @theneonrequiem I think a lot of women are now so battle weary and have taken so much abuse they have a visceral reaction to men in dresses they never used to have. For me, the key isn't so much 'everyone can be what they want', because, you know, some people want to be serial killers. I do believe in people having the freedom to dress and present themselves however they like in their private lives (I don't apologise for thinking it outrageous that any man should be allowed to wear fetish gear to teach kids, for example). However, a lot of people in positions of power are squeamish about acknowledging the very different motivations people may have for testing social boundaries around dress and presentation. Kink is the great unmentionable for many of those who're desperate to be seen as kind and tolerant and liberal, but until we're honest about it, some very dubious individuals will continue to exploit this movement, which is already harming LGB people, who're getting blowback for the actions of heterosexual men, and women and kids, especially the most vulnerable, continuing to be put in harm's way.
Read the full postClassified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces, Sport, Language & definitions
Replying to @jk_rowling
@transwidows @theneonrequiem that should say 'some women (and a lot of men)', not 'women (and a lot of men) some', but I'm guessing you knew that.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions
Replying to @Lungbarrow1
@Lungbarrow1 @theneonrequiem That is the point, and the fact that gay men wearing eyeliner and lippy are now being conflated with straight male fetishists is deeply depressing and the direct result of the forced-teaming trans activists love so much.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals, Media & institutions
Replying to @transwidows
@transwidows @theneonrequiem You might have missed it, but I said on here the other day that I personally know very well that declaring himself a sex realist doesn't mean a man isn't getting a kick out of cross-dressing. I've never seen you argue for banning gender non-conformity, but Rudy isn't wrong in saying women (and many men) some are critical of it no matter where, how or why it's done.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals
Replying to @theneonrequiem
@theneonrequiem I agree with you, Rudy. I sometimes catch flack for that line from women who were with AGPs. I happen to totally understand where they’re coming from. In my 20s I knew a woman who was older than me and married to a highly abusive AGP and literally nothing was hers as far as he was concerned. Stealing her underwear, cosmetics, shoes etc was routine, as was coercive control, and she lived with a huge amount of shame and trauma before finally divorcing him. The parodic, highly sexualised and often degrading presentation of female dress and styling when adopted by certain men (sometimes drag queens, sometimes men who call themselves ‘trans lesbians’) conveys an association of femaleness with humiliation and objectification that has its roots in true misogyny, which some (straight) men find erotic and many women find demeaning and offensive. There’s also a very real fear response. Of course not all men in lipstick are a danger to women, but there’s ample evidence that men who want to parade themselves/photograph themselves in fetish or fetish-adjacent gear designed for females get an erotic charge out of other people seeing them that way, and often from violating women’s literal and metaphorical boundaries. Women know that such men can be dangerous to them and, again, only those who’ve led an unusually sheltered life won’t be aware that where there’s one paraphilia there are usually more. All of that said, I do not want to live in a world where my lesbian friends can’t rock a three-piece suit, where a beautiful boy can’t wear eyeliner, and where Prince and Bowie and Annie Lennox wouldn’t have been free to play with style and dress in ways that liberated a lot of us. A return to ‘dresses and make up are only for girls’ immeasurably weakens our ability to argue against ‘if you want to wear a dress and make up, you’re really a girl.’ So I stand by what I wrote. Wear what you like - but that doesn’t mean society’s not allowed a view on where you wear it, and whether you’re entitled to new rights because you’re wearing it.
Read the full postClassified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals, Other
Replying to @ThatWillWeirdo
@ThatWillWeirdo I really hope her kid's happy. I hope every single kid who's transitioned is happy. Unfortunately, we know that's not the case.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding
Replying to @PentecostJesse
@PentecostJesse Not true. I know a couple of fabulous male hairdressers who're definitely still men.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions
Never forget: gender identity isn't about sex stereotypes, but playing around with your hair proves you're not a man. https://t.co/UHHMtxwpBS
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions
Green is one of those who'll go down with the Trans Titanic, taking as many kids as she's allowed to take with her. This woman will never stop voluntarily. To do so would mean admitting doubts about what she did to her own son.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Specific individuals, Child safeguarding
Replying to @Joellambert
@Joellambert This 👏 is 👏what👏happens👏to👏girls👏when👏facilities👏become 👏mixed👏sex👏
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding
Who could possibly have foreseen this?* *Women who attended mixed sex schools. For years, we've warned unisex facilities made voyeurism and harassment laughably easy, and argued that girls deserved privacy and dignity. In return, we were called pearl-clutchers, bigots and Nazis.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding
Replying to @PrishaMosley
@detransaqua @IndiaWilloughby Yes, you can be Churchill too, but I warn you now, I'm not sharing my navy.
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals, Language & definitions
Replying to @transwidows
@transwidows Indeed. I know a man who's clear about the fact that he knows he's not a woman AND says openly he has a cross-dressing fetish. I'm well aware sex realism doesn't mean the person concerned isn't getting a kick out of wearing women's clothes.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals
Replying to @transwidows
@transwidows I understand that completely and sympathise. I think the transgression of boundaries by AGPs, including 'borrowing' female partners' clothes, is bound to result in people who've experienced that denigration really disliking seeing it, no matter the context.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals, Language & definitions
Replying to @seungmaru_js
@seungmaru_js @IndiaWilloughby I think he had a budgie, didn't he?
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals
Replying to @slicebrigade
@slicebrigade We will fight on the beaches of TERF Island etc etc
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals
The thing is, @IndiaWilloughby, I really do enjoy cigars, whisky and facing down totalitarians, so by the same arguments that make you a woman, I am indeed Winston Churchill.
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Language & definitions
Replying to @canhabsfan
@canhabsfan The majority of women I know personally through this issue are left wing. A few are centre right, but socially liberal (pro-gay marriage, women's right to choose etc.) Til my dying day I'll never understand why so many on the left couldn't see gender identity ideology was homophobic, misogynistic, dangerously authoritarian, quasi-religious and anti-science, or how they could shrug off real world consequences such as vulnerable young people being subject to unevidenced and irreversible medical interventions, single sex spaces being decimated, women's rights rolled back. Living through this insanity has made me truly understand how things like lobotomies and witch hunts, which we look back on in disbelief, not only started but persisted.
Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition, Language & definitions, Child safeguarding, Media & institutions
Replying to @JohnBoyne
@johnboyne Exactly. I'm still sympathetic to and genuinely fond of certain trans individuals, but when you've received as many death and rape threats as I have from people flying the trans flag it's hardly surprising the sight of men in make-up triggers a response I never used to have.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals, Free speech & cancellation
What you call the GC movement hasn’t ever been a monolith, but a loose collection of separate political movements and individuals, some of whom have literally nothing in common but the belief that sex is real and matters. This has been both blessing and curse. On the positive side, real, lasting solidarity has been forged between women in different political parties who’ve worked collaboratively to fight back against the massive assault on their rights. On the negative, left-wing feminists are being lumped together with people whose attitude towards gender expression is as regressive as that of hardened trans activists (‘if you want to wear lipstick and a dress, you’re a woman’/‘dresses and lipstick are only for women’). I will say this, though. Many, many women who wouldn’t have thought twice ten years ago about asking for help from a gorgeous young man in lipstick working at the MAC counter have now been on the receiving end of so much aggression and so many direct threats from men in lipstick that they’ve developed a conditioned response, an instinctive wariness, where formerly there was complete indifference. I’ve experienced this personally. I was approached in the street by a pink-haired young man with what I’ll call very exuberant dress sense and my adrenaline shot through the roof. For a second I thought, ‘this is where I finally get punched.’ And he couldn’t have been sweeter, wanted to talk Harry Potter and get a selfie. Ten years ago my immediate response to somebody with his style would have been purely appreciative, but no longer, sadly, and the change in me, and in a lot of other women, has been brought on by a tsunami of threats and rage, not because we think there’s anything innately wrong with men wearing make up.
Read the full postClassified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation, Other
One of the highlights of 2023 for me ❤️
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals, Media & institutions
Replying to @KBtheYoungOG
@KLBfax I’ve done nothing compared to what you did, Keira. Your name will be in every book written about the pushback in the UK xxx
Classified neutral · Intensity 0/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions
Replying to @jk_rowling
@benryanwriter You may well go to your grave mouthing gender ideology talking points. I could well be dead before this medical scandal ends, but til my dying day, I'll believe this calamity was avoidable, if not for the cowardice and blind zealotry of those who should have known better.
Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Media & institutions, Child safeguarding
Replying to @jk_rowling
@benryanwriter Autistic kids, those who've suffered sexual trauma, same-sex attracted youths, all are wildly over-represented among those seeking to transition. Why? The horrifying complications of those who hack off healthy body parts and dose themselves on cross-sex hormones: all fine by you?
Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding
Replying to @jk_rowling
@benryanwriter I've hidden your name because I don't want a pile on. The evidence is mounting daily. Detransitioners are coming forward in greater numbers. Medical research proves an unconscionable, activist-driven experiment has been performed on very vulnerable people. https://t.co/E3xcz2A9an
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Adult healthcare, Child safeguarding
Replying to @HonsCupboard
@HonsCupboard I've said it countless times, because it's true: while the volume of hate I got was undeniably substantial, I'll always be able to feed my family. The real heroines were those who stood up when their livelihoods were on the line. Some risked nearly everything and I revere them.
Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals
Replying to @my_real_name
@my_real_name I know it. Even in my darkest hours (and there have been many, mostly when my family has been threatened) I've drawn strength from women and girls who've stood up in the face of dreadful threats against their physical safety and their livelihoods.
Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation
Replying to @benryanwriter
@benryanwriter Nothing. It's all there. I love gender non-conformity, I always have and always will. At the same time, sex is real, sex-based offending is real, and I'll always stand with the vulnerable against an elitist ideology that has caused untold damage.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Language & definitions
Replying to @Tachardiella
@Tachardiella There are so many women who can't speak, so many women who'd lose their jobs if they did. I've heard from hundreds of you and I feel for every single one of you. You're the reason those of us who can't have our livelihoods taken from us must stand up.
Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation
Replying to @fem_mb
@fem_mb Women like you have been everything to me in the past five years. For every death threat, fifty women sending me love and strength. I'll never forget it x
Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Specific individuals, Free speech & cancellation
Replying to @WomenReadWomen
@WomenReadWomen I've drawn strength from women all my life. This particular battle has given me a sense of sisterhood beyond any I've known before. I hope we get to hug each other before too long x
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Other
In 2019 a crack commando unit was imprisoned for the crime of knowing women don’t have dicks. They immediately escaped their Twitter bans and survive today as soldiers of fortune. If you have a problem, if no one else can help, and if you can find them, maybe you can hire the https://t.co/fwM4gCGJol
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Language & definitions
Father of one advises parents to buy harmful drugs online which could render their children infertile, lower their IQ and lead to bone thinning. https://t.co/LHZ1mqjwm3
Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding
Replying to @sally_hines
@sally_hines @CChinneide @JoPhoenix1 While you don't think you should have used the precise language you used, you still think complaining to her employer is fine and dandy. https://t.co/PJ63DumASe
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals
Replying to @sally_hines
@sally_hines @CChinneide @JoPhoenix1 Sally, you dragged me into this. You talked about ‘JKR’s’ personal comments. It is not unreasonable, I think, to point out that I have never threatened any individual’s livelihood because they’ve disagreed with me on Twitter.
Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals
Replying to @sally_hines
@sally_hines @CChinneide @JoPhoenix1 I know you have immense difficulty sticking to the point, but you told this woman you’d ’pull rank’ and create an ‘absolute nightmare’ for her by contacting her employer. Care to show me where either Jo Phoenix or I have made such a threat to anyone?
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Specific individuals, Free speech & cancellation
‘Puberty blockers were developed for end-stage prostate cancer and are used to chemically castrate sex offenders. Side effects include bone density loss, impacted fertility and lowered IQ. Despite this, they were widely prescribed to children off-label.’ https://t.co/XfthLWoY09
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding
@BionicSparkle @sally_hines @CChinneide @JoPhoenix1 Sally has a much bigger influence than the care worker she's bullying. As Qui-Gon so rightly said: 'there's always a bigger fish.'
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Specific individuals, Free speech & cancellation
Replying to @sally_hines
@sally_hines @CChinneide @JoPhoenix1 Because I'm disgusted that you're threatening a care worker who, I have no doubt at all, has made a significantly higher contribution to British society than a gender studies professor who can't define 'gender identity'.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Media & institutions
Replying to @sally_hines
@sally_hines @CChinneide @JoPhoenix1 I've seen that picture multiple times. Both the individuals featured in it are masked. I couldn't say with any confidence what country they're in, let alone identify who either or them are. For this, you're making public threats against a woman's livelihood.
Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals
Replying to @sally_hines
@sally_hines @CChinneide @JoPhoenix1 As I don't accuse you of being able to control those who share your views on transgenderism and who regularly threaten to beat, rape and murder me, I'm not sure why you hold me accountable for people saying you should be sacked.
Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals
Replying to @sally_hines
@sally_hines @CChinneide @JoPhoenix1 As it’s equal treatment you want, and as you continue to make threats to complain to the individual’s employer, I’ll be happy to make sure that goes both ways.
Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals
Replying to @sally_hines
@sally_hines @CChinneide @JoPhoenix1 You’re still justifying the threat you made. You didn’t delete the post saying she’d violated DEI policies, did you? As for ‘personal photographs,’ she posted a picture that’s been in the public domain a long time. I’ve seen it multiple times without ever looking for it.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Specific individuals, Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions
‘Queer theory’s challenging of norms and boundaries can be benign, and sometimes interesting, but it can also lead to monstrous ethical positions. The queering of boundaries cannot be an organising principle for society’ — Jonny Best | The Critic Magazine https://t.co/TsBhS9FMfr
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Other
Replying to @sally_hines
@sally_hines @DreyfusJames What’s the glib mantra to explain away all the scarring from her cutting herself?
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Specific individuals
Replying to @sally_hines
@sally_hines @AnakinDryTalker @DreyfusJames Jesus Christ, just once could you answer a straightforward question? What was the person 'hyping'?
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals
Replying to @TheSickDork
@TheSickDork Actual women aren't given unduly lenient sentences. It's only men pretending to be women whose supposed vulnerability is meant to melt stony judicial hearts.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Law & gender recognition, Single-sex spaces
Replying to @sally_hines
@sally_hines @AnakinDryTalker @DreyfusJames What exactly was the detransitioner 'hyping'?
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Youth healthcare, Specific individuals
Replying to @DreyfusJames
@DreyfusJames @sally_hines She's an absolute disgrace and in a just world, she'd be the one in danger of losing her job, not the carer she threatened.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals, Child safeguarding
Replying to @sally_hines
@sally_hines @DreyfusJames You lose your shit every single time you're confronted with evidence of what your ideology's doing out in the real world. Photos of forearms like mutilated kebabs, girls covered in self-harm scars: all a bit too real, eh? Back to circular definitions and photos of seahorses.
Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Language & definitions
So the Cass Review finding 'remarkably weak' evidence for the benefit of puberty blockers isn't enough? We should keep sterilising children until people like Stella 'Women Can Have Penises' Creasy finally decide this might not be a culture war, but massive medical malpractice?
Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals
Replying to @BreckCountyGOP
@BreckCountyGOP In Scotland, a 6'5" male paedophile convicted of sexual assault of a 10-year-old girl in a public bathroom served his sentence in a women's prison that had a mother and baby unit, because he claims to be a woman.
Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Law & gender recognition
Translation: 'Dangerous, violent man who subjected a woman to terrible sexual and physical abuse is now pretending to be a woman in the hope of garnering sympathy and leniency from the judicial system.' https://t.co/27QqMRE6XW
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions
Replying to @damekatydenise_
@damekatydenise_ You know that out of court settlement we reached, where you swore to stop claiming I'm always high on Tippex, I told you where I'd hidden your India Willoughby 'Cervix of the Month' calendar, and we split the petty cash? I'm rescinding it. I want the full tribunal.
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals
Replying to @damekatydenise_
@damekatydenise_ Your memory's faulty, as ever. Nemesis is where one of your falsies flew off and landed in the face of a man right behind us. That poor man's souvenir photo appeared to show his kids screaming in terror because daddy's face was suddenly devoid of all features bar a latex nipple.
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals
Replying to @damekatydenise_
@damekatydenise_ Just to clarify once and for all: I am NOT @damekatydenise_. I don't have back hair so thick it requires horse clippers. I am not now, nor have I ever been, a WPATH consultant on non-binary ungulates. I don't have to tape up my 'hanging ovaries' to fit into my pink lurex leggings. I am not in a long distance relationship with a polyamorous furry called Basil. I haven't been banned from Alton Towers because my shenis slipped out of my shorts on the Wicker Man.
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions
Lupron has severe side effects even when used on-label. Studies show girls who were given it for precocious puberty suffered serious issues as a result of the drug, including bone thinning and chronic pain. https://t.co/gx8xNObMh3
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare
The ‘right side of history’ is racking up a hell of a lot of losses recently, isn’t it? Congratulations @MoiraDeemingMP 👏👏👏
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals, Free speech & cancellation
Only one gay rights group had the courage to campaign against the use of puberty blockers for gender-confused children: @AllianceLGB. They fought for the right of gender-questioning kids to grow up with their bodies and fertility intact. Blockers have now been banned in the UK.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals
‘Long a deeply misogynistic publication, PinkNews has also managed to become homophobic. This, on top of the alleged newsroom atmosphere he oversaw, will be Cohen’s legacy.’ ✍️@bindelj https://t.co/OQ3JSRr7jD
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Media & institutions, Specific individuals
Every word of this 🧵
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions
Replying to @adammcarter
@adammcarter @bindelj @johnboyne Yes, I'm fairly sure the CEO's husband, an ex-trustee of trans children's charity, Mermaids, is accused of sexually assaulting a junior member of staff and also that this is the same Pink News @bindelj successfully sued, but I might be wrong. I'll wait til she's confirmed it.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Child safeguarding, Media & institutions, Specific individuals
These are the posts classified trans-related. Search all 16,714 collected tweets, read the year-by-year analysis, or read the report on her campaign against trans rights.