The Rowling Record

J.K. Rowling’s trans-related posts from 2024

Page 1 of 12. Posts 1–100 of the 1,194 J.K. Rowling wrote about trans people in 2024, newest first.

10 December 2024 to 30 December 2024. Posts are reproduced in full from the archive; the stance, intensity and topic labels come from the research classifications. How the labels are defined. Search within 2024.

Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @Raw_Toast

@Raw_Toast It's overwhelmingly MEN who denigrate athletic women by calling them 'manly'. I've literally never heard a woman say that outstanding female athletes like Martina and Serena have an 'unfair physical advantage' over other women. The only talk of unfairness in relation to women's sport I can remember before the present insanity concerned Eastern European female athletes who, decades back, were put on testosterone at massive cost to their own health. Those women certainly had an unethical advantage over their fellow females, but nowhere nearly as unethical or dangerous as letting men compete against women. The old-time dopers must be furious; it would have been so much easier to cheat these days. No need to feed young girls drugs, just field an entire squad of bearded, penis-ed athletes, some of whom call themselves women.

22 replies306 retweets2,586 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Sport

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition, Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

The number of men who tell me I'm unqualified to have an opinion on whether there might be downsides to cutting healthy breasts off teenaged girls with mental health issues, yet are 100% certain they're qualified to tell women what a woman is, continues to astound.

3,339 replies13,747 retweets125,062 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Adult healthcare

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Adult healthcare, Media & institutions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @TheGeneral_0

@TheGeneral_0 Not always. Kids are watching TikTok videos of surgeons selling the idea that bodies can be modified like Lego. Schools affirm kids’ trans identities behind parents’ backs. A certain kids’ charity in the UK sent out breast binders to pubescent girls without parental consent. Many parents are struggling to protect kids from a Zeitgeist telling them that anxieties about puberty, sexuality and growing up can be fixed by lifelong reliance on Big Pharma and by doctors who make Frankenstein look ethical.

325 replies550 retweets9,235 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @Mcbeath_on_sea

@Mcbeath_on_sea Doesn’t it trouble you that gay kids, autistic kids and those who’ve suffered trauma are massively over-represented among those who transition? What about detransitioners who believe homophobia, internalised, in their surroundings or both, led them to believe they were ‘trans’?

177 replies508 retweets11,928 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Adult healthcare, Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

There are no trans kids. No child is 'born in the wrong body'. There are only adults like you, prepared to sacrifice the health of minors to bolster your belief in an ideology that will end up wreaking more harm than lobotomies and false memory syndrome combined. https://t.co/yyc4MxgfOk

8,104 replies27,194 retweets226,927 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @jk_rowling

I'm not sure I've ever read a better example of what Arendt described when analysing those determined not to break ranks, yet who felt the need to justify their participation in atrocities: 'self-deception, concealing a ruthless desire for conformity at any price.' 5/5

106 replies521 retweets6,162 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @jk_rowling

'Yes, some young people given irreversible surgeries and hormone regimes regret it. Yes, some have complex problems that transition doesn't fix and may worsen. But hey, they wanted it and were given it. That should be the new metric of success!' 4/5

50 replies350 retweets4,846 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @jk_rowling

But this paper breaks new ground. It acknowledges that by the usual medical standards ('old normal knowledge') transitioning minors has not been found to be the unqualified success many have claimed. The proposed solution? Jettison the old knowledge. Redefine success. 3/5

21 replies335 retweets4,115 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Media & institutions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @jk_rowling

We're all used to the obfuscatory language gender activist medics and their cheerleader, insist upon. 'Gender affirming care/treatment' is so much nicer sounding than 'sterilisation, surgical mutilation and provision of toxic drugs to troubled minors'. 2/5

34 replies539 retweets5,109 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Youth healthcare, Language & definitions, Child safeguarding

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Youth healthcare, Media & institutions

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Other

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

'OMG, how can JKR not know clownfish can change sex?' 'She's been brainwashed by Nazis and she's too dumb to see it!' 'If only she could meet my trans friend she'd realise there's no issue with men in women's spaces!' Excellent 🧵by @glosswitch, author of the brilliant 'Hags'.

340 replies884 retweets10,393 likes

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Media & institutions, Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Her ego requires her signature bill to have been opposed by something she considers a worthy adversary, rather than members of the public who don’t want cross-dressing men running rape crisis centres. Someone really should give her ‘The Women Who Wouldn’t Wheesht’ for Christmas.

245 replies1,405 retweets10,090 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals, Law & gender recognition

Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions, Other

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @mqyxf

@mqyxf @Cockyolliebird @transwidows @theneonrequiem Fetish, by definition, is a very specific erotic interest in something that lies outside typical sexual behaviour or stimuli. Women wearing form-fitting clothes falls very much within the arena of conventional heterosexual behaviour. We can certainly critique it, and analyse why straight men like to see women in revealing and sometimes constrictive clothing, but it isn't fetishistic behaviour on either of their parts; socially speaking, there's nothing remotely unusual about it. When a man dons the same clothing, he's transgressing social norms. That's where the 'fetish' comes in. Wearing tightly-fitting dresses and high heels isn't something men typically do. To don this specific kind of female clothing (when there's plenty of clothing designed for women that's practical and not revealing) the man is usually seeking a specific response, which is often shock. He might be deliberately looking to provoke a discussion around gender, he might be looking to upset the staid and conventional, or he might get an erotic thrill out of doing it. The latter is fetish.

Read the full post
13 replies24 retweets263 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Other

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @SnydeNotSnarky

@SnydeNotSnarky @transwidows @theneonrequiem I've said countless times that I disagree with trans-identified men using single-sex spaces reserved for women, but I was responding to a very specific point about sport, which I do respect. I think we all know how X works, don't we? Here, as in life, it's possible to agree with somebody on one point and not on others. We can all play the 'gotcha' game: 'you agreed with this person on this issue, therefore you must agree with literally everything they've ever said or done.' Plenty of people interact with me on here who'll disagree with a ton of things I believe or have said in the past and I'm not deluded enough to think one friendly message means the person I'm talking to thinks I'm infallible or faultless. The absolute irony of me having to say this after the past few years is more apparent to me than to anybody, but several times recently I've been chided for being too nice to trans-identified people. A few comments have implied or even stated outright that I shouldn't interact respectfully or warmly with people who've been perfectly nice, or empathetic, or reasonable, or polite, when talking to me. As I despise authoritarianism and compelled speech wherever they occur, I'll keep talking to people however I want. After all, if I was that afraid of other people misrepresenting, misinterpreting or misreporting what I've said, written or believe, I'd have spent the last quarter of a century in an underground bunker with no internet access.

Read the full post
19 replies48 retweets541 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Sport, Free speech & cancellation

Classified neutral · Intensity 0/4 · Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Sport, Law & gender recognition, Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Media & institutions, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Other

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @Cockyolliebird

@Cockyolliebird @transwidows @theneonrequiem I think a lot of women are now so battle weary and have taken so much abuse they have a visceral reaction to men in dresses they never used to have. For me, the key isn't so much 'everyone can be what they want', because, you know, some people want to be serial killers. I do believe in people having the freedom to dress and present themselves however they like in their private lives (I don't apologise for thinking it outrageous that any man should be allowed to wear fetish gear to teach kids, for example). However, a lot of people in positions of power are squeamish about acknowledging the very different motivations people may have for testing social boundaries around dress and presentation. Kink is the great unmentionable for many of those who're desperate to be seen as kind and tolerant and liberal, but until we're honest about it, some very dubious individuals will continue to exploit this movement, which is already harming LGB people, who're getting blowback for the actions of heterosexual men, and women and kids, especially the most vulnerable, continuing to be put in harm's way.

Read the full post
31 replies135 retweets973 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces, Sport, Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals, Media & institutions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @transwidows

@transwidows @theneonrequiem You might have missed it, but I said on here the other day that I personally know very well that declaring himself a sex realist doesn't mean a man isn't getting a kick out of cross-dressing. I've never seen you argue for banning gender non-conformity, but Rudy isn't wrong in saying women (and many men) some are critical of it no matter where, how or why it's done.

15 replies12 retweets513 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @theneonrequiem

@theneonrequiem I agree with you, Rudy. I sometimes catch flack for that line from women who were with AGPs. I happen to totally understand where they’re coming from. In my 20s I knew a woman who was older than me and married to a highly abusive AGP and literally nothing was hers as far as he was concerned. Stealing her underwear, cosmetics, shoes etc was routine, as was coercive control, and she lived with a huge amount of shame and trauma before finally divorcing him. The parodic, highly sexualised and often degrading presentation of female dress and styling when adopted by certain men (sometimes drag queens, sometimes men who call themselves ‘trans lesbians’) conveys an association of femaleness with humiliation and objectification that has its roots in true misogyny, which some (straight) men find erotic and many women find demeaning and offensive. There’s also a very real fear response. Of course not all men in lipstick are a danger to women, but there’s ample evidence that men who want to parade themselves/photograph themselves in fetish or fetish-adjacent gear designed for females get an erotic charge out of other people seeing them that way, and often from violating women’s literal and metaphorical boundaries. Women know that such men can be dangerous to them and, again, only those who’ve led an unusually sheltered life won’t be aware that where there’s one paraphilia there are usually more. All of that said, I do not want to live in a world where my lesbian friends can’t rock a three-piece suit, where a beautiful boy can’t wear eyeliner, and where Prince and Bowie and Annie Lennox wouldn’t have been free to play with style and dress in ways that liberated a lot of us. A return to ‘dresses and make up are only for girls’ immeasurably weakens our ability to argue against ‘if you want to wear a dress and make up, you’re really a girl.’ So I stand by what I wrote. Wear what you like - but that doesn’t mean society’s not allowed a view on where you wear it, and whether you’re entitled to new rights because you’re wearing it.

Read the full post
57 replies244 retweets2,322 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals, Other

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Green is one of those who'll go down with the Trans Titanic, taking as many kids as she's allowed to take with her. This woman will never stop voluntarily. To do so would mean admitting doubts about what she did to her own son.

219 replies1,638 retweets11,907 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Specific individuals, Child safeguarding

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Who could possibly have foreseen this?* *Women who attended mixed sex schools. For years, we've warned unisex facilities made voyeurism and harassment laughably easy, and argued that girls deserved privacy and dignity. In return, we were called pearl-clutchers, bigots and Nazis.

393 replies3,673 retweets18,494 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals, Language & definitions

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals, Language & definitions

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @canhabsfan

@canhabsfan The majority of women I know personally through this issue are left wing. A few are centre right, but socially liberal (pro-gay marriage, women's right to choose etc.) Til my dying day I'll never understand why so many on the left couldn't see gender identity ideology was homophobic, misogynistic, dangerously authoritarian, quasi-religious and anti-science, or how they could shrug off real world consequences such as vulnerable young people being subject to unevidenced and irreversible medical interventions, single sex spaces being decimated, women's rights rolled back. Living through this insanity has made me truly understand how things like lobotomies and witch hunts, which we look back on in disbelief, not only started but persisted.

101 replies452 retweets2,519 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition, Language & definitions, Child safeguarding, Media & institutions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @JohnBoyne

@johnboyne Exactly. I'm still sympathetic to and genuinely fond of certain trans individuals, but when you've received as many death and rape threats as I have from people flying the trans flag it's hardly surprising the sight of men in make-up triggers a response I never used to have.

39 replies94 retweets1,926 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals, Free speech & cancellation

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

What you call the GC movement hasn’t ever been a monolith, but a loose collection of separate political movements and individuals, some of whom have literally nothing in common but the belief that sex is real and matters. This has been both blessing and curse. On the positive side, real, lasting solidarity has been forged between women in different political parties who’ve worked collaboratively to fight back against the massive assault on their rights. On the negative, left-wing feminists are being lumped together with people whose attitude towards gender expression is as regressive as that of hardened trans activists (‘if you want to wear lipstick and a dress, you’re a woman’/‘dresses and lipstick are only for women’). I will say this, though. Many, many women who wouldn’t have thought twice ten years ago about asking for help from a gorgeous young man in lipstick working at the MAC counter have now been on the receiving end of so much aggression and so many direct threats from men in lipstick that they’ve developed a conditioned response, an instinctive wariness, where formerly there was complete indifference. I’ve experienced this personally. I was approached in the street by a pink-haired young man with what I’ll call very exuberant dress sense and my adrenaline shot through the roof. For a second I thought, ‘this is where I finally get punched.’ And he couldn’t have been sweeter, wanted to talk Harry Potter and get a selfie. Ten years ago my immediate response to somebody with his style would have been purely appreciative, but no longer, sadly, and the change in me, and in a lot of other women, has been brought on by a tsunami of threats and rage, not because we think there’s anything innately wrong with men wearing make up.

Read the full post
393 replies1,290 retweets8,919 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation, Other

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals, Media & institutions

Classified neutral · Intensity 0/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @jk_rowling

@benryanwriter You may well go to your grave mouthing gender ideology talking points. I could well be dead before this medical scandal ends, but til my dying day, I'll believe this calamity was avoidable, if not for the cowardice and blind zealotry of those who should have known better.

134 replies647 retweets8,054 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Media & institutions, Child safeguarding

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @jk_rowling

@benryanwriter Autistic kids, those who've suffered sexual trauma, same-sex attracted youths, all are wildly over-represented among those seeking to transition. Why? The horrifying complications of those who hack off healthy body parts and dose themselves on cross-sex hormones: all fine by you?

56 replies436 retweets5,711 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Adult healthcare, Child safeguarding

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @HonsCupboard

@HonsCupboard I've said it countless times, because it's true: while the volume of hate I got was undeniably substantial, I'll always be able to feed my family. The real heroines were those who stood up when their livelihoods were on the line. Some risked nearly everything and I revere them.

60 replies593 retweets5,828 likes

Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals

Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Language & definitions

Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation

Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Specific individuals, Free speech & cancellation

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Other

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

In 2019 a crack commando unit was imprisoned for the crime of knowing women don’t have dicks. They immediately escaped their Twitter bans and survive today as soldiers of fortune. If you have a problem, if no one else can help, and if you can find them, maybe you can hire the https://t.co/fwM4gCGJol

781 replies1,561 retweets16,138 likes

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals

Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Specific individuals, Free speech & cancellation

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Specific individuals, Free speech & cancellation

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Media & institutions

Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals

Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals

Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Specific individuals, Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Other

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Law & gender recognition, Single-sex spaces

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Youth healthcare, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals, Child safeguarding

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

So the Cass Review finding 'remarkably weak' evidence for the benefit of puberty blockers isn't enough? We should keep sterilising children until people like Stella 'Women Can Have Penises' Creasy finally decide this might not be a culture war, but massive medical malpractice?

232 replies1,002 retweets7,058 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals

Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Law & gender recognition

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @damekatydenise_

@damekatydenise_ Just to clarify once and for all: I am NOT @damekatydenise_. I don't have back hair so thick it requires horse clippers. I am not now, nor have I ever been, a WPATH consultant on non-binary ungulates. I don't have to tape up my 'hanging ovaries' to fit into my pink lurex leggings. I am not in a long distance relationship with a polyamorous furry called Basil. I haven't been banned from Alton Towers because my shenis slipped out of my shorts on the Wicker Man.

429 replies405 retweets9,580 likes

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals, Free speech & cancellation

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Only one gay rights group had the courage to campaign against the use of puberty blockers for gender-confused children: @AllianceLGB. They fought for the right of gender-questioning kids to grow up with their bodies and fertility intact. Blockers have now been banned in the UK.

422 replies2,598 retweets20,850 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Media & institutions, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Child safeguarding, Media & institutions, Specific individuals

These are the posts classified trans-related. Search all 16,714 collected tweets, read the year-by-year analysis, or read the report on her campaign against trans rights.