The Rowling Record

J.K. Rowling’s trans-related posts from 2023

Page 1 of 2. Posts 1–100 of the 156 J.K. Rowling wrote about trans people in 2023, newest first.

1 April 2023 to 7 November 2023. Posts are reproduced in full from the archive; the stance, intensity and topic labels come from the research classifications. How the labels are defined. Search within 2023.

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

I’ve been contacted by innumerable doctors, nurses, therapists, teachers, social workers & academics who believe we’re living through a socio-medical scandal. Please give examples of my lies and proof I have all the money in the world, because my accountant says differently. https://t.co/XWyS06r0dt

2,658 replies4,854 retweets48,729 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Free speech & cancellation

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions

Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Law & gender recognition, Single-sex spaces, Media & institutions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

The Honourable Chris Kourakis has issued a statement referring to my 'anxiety' about the use of female pronouns for men standing trial for violence against women and rape. He states that 'a victim of crime would never be asked to address an accused person in a way which caused the victim distress.' That assurance is welcome, although I note that he’s addressed the matter only after it was raised publicly. No such exemption is mentioned in the Practice Note, which takes the ideological position that the ‘use of preferred gender pronouns is a matter of respect’. The natural inference is that a woman would be considered guilty of disrespect if she, alone in the courtroom, described her male attacker as a man, while all court officials were addressing and describing him as a woman. This is not a hypothetical situation. The judge will be aware, if he's informed himself – as he implies I have not - that I've already cited an example where a 60-year-old woman was violently assaulted by a 26-year-old trans-identified male. She was chided by the judge for displaying 'bad grace' by not using her attacker's preferred pronouns. The Practice Note does not acknowledge that in sexual and violent crimes committed by men against women, there is a clear clash of rights. The woman has a right - indeed, a legal duty - to speak truthfully about the male violence/sexual violence to which she was subjected. Meanwhile the Practice Note says that court officials should respectfully use female pronouns for the attacker if he says he identifies as a woman. The likely effect on a traumatised woman of hearing her attacker addressed and described as a female by the court is neither mentioned nor addressed in the Practice Note. Respect, it seems, goes only one way. Millions of women are losing confidence in judicial systems that have adopted an ideological position with which they do not agree. In the very place where they go to seek justice, a woman may now be obliged to listen to court officials asserting they were raped or beaten by a fellow woman. Such women are not merely ‘anxious’, they are furious, about the apparent inability of certain men, judges or not, to understand how dystopian this situation seems to those of us who have suffered male sexual violence.

Read the full post
1,232 replies5,985 retweets27,973 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Law & gender recognition, Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Media & institutions, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions, Law & gender recognition

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Sport, Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @WVSoccerdad

@WVSoccerdad @TheVikingDane @sueveneer @fickleskittle By all means, let's be rational. Let's look at the facts. You've now called the battery (legal term for 'assault by beating') of a 60-year-old woman by a 26-year-old male, for which the man was convicted and fined, a minor offence. You've lol-ed while minimising. You entered my timeline to police my language when I made reference to this violent male assault in a conversation you weren't part of. You denied that Maria MacLachlan was punched, even though it was stated clearly in the headline of the article you yourself posted. You were shown video of said assault, but continued to jeer, asserting that the victim suffered 'a light slap', in a Tweet you've now deleted. These are not the pronouncements of a man who takes male violence against women seriously. On the contrary, with every denial of plain fact and minimisation of the offence, every 'lol', every airy reference to 'ACTUAL' beatings, you reveal yourself as a man who's indifferent at best to women being physically intimidated or hit. Out of interest, how many punches does a woman have to take for it to qualify as a @WVSoccerdad-approved, actual beating? What would you want to see - broken bones? Decent bit of blood? Now let's examine your own approach to rational debate. All of this began when you thrust your way onto my timeline to tell me I was lying. With your 'come down from the cross' comment, which was made two Tweets in, you whipped out the standard 'playing the victim' card against the woman you were calling in a liar. Some might not see this as rational debate. Some might even say you've been offensive from the start: to me, to Maria MacLachlan, and to every person disgusted by what happened to her. Now you're huffy because people have called you a misogynist. Violent assault of a woman: lol-worthy. Your hurt feelings: very serious business. 'You should be better than this', you say. Try and grasp - it'll be hard, I know - that my interest in your opinion of me is roughly equivalent to my interest in how much dust is currently under my fridge. I know you think you're a heckuva great guy, and it's come as a shock to get feedback that suggests not everyone agrees, so here's some unsolicited advice, in exchange for all you've given me. In future, try mocking women being knocked around in the privacy of your own house, instead of 'lol'-ing about it on the internet.

Read the full post
720 replies1,647 retweets10,301 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Child safeguarding

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals, Single-sex spaces

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions, Law & gender recognition

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Law & gender recognition, Free speech & cancellation

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions, Child safeguarding

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @Ansleigh_mma

@Ansleigh_mma @Da_Nasty_Man You've done nothing wrong. This isn't, and never was, about hate, it's about fairness and safety for women and girls. You stood up to protect your fellow athletes, which makes you a heroine in all sane people's eyes. I know backlashes aren't fun (believe me, I know) but there are things far more important than pleasing all the people, all the time. All power to you x

31 replies459 retweets5,348 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Sport, Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Hang on. When far-right groups eager for publicity/violence agitate near women's rallies, that makes all the women sticking up for their rights fascists. However, when Nazis join a protest YOU agree with, they're opportunists who mustn't be allowed to besmirch a righteous cause.

1,717 replies7,118 retweets43,961 likes

Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals, Media & institutions

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Language & definitions

Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Specific individuals, Free speech & cancellation

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Single-sex spaces

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

That elected officials from the Greens stood proudly beside protestors screaming 'fuck you' at women, including those from Afghanistan and Africa, who were meeting in Glasgow to discuss sex-specific harms such as FGM, disgraces them and their party.

340 replies2,418 retweets14,127 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Saved by the host, but at some point one of them is going to have to answer the question. 'Over 52% of this country are women. Are we sure that Labour is ready to govern when it's spent four years denying that a woman is an adult human female... and punishing women?' 👏🔥

399 replies2,854 retweets16,566 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals

Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Child safeguarding, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @lisanandy

@lisanandy You said rapists should be transferred to women's prisons if they self-identify as women. You called Women's Place UK a hate group. Given that you're one of the biggest reasons many women on the left no longer trust Labour to defend their rights, do you stand by those comments?

394 replies3,267 retweets20,147 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals, Law & gender recognition

Classified neutral · Intensity 0/4 · Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

The gentleman might want to supply examples of the horrendous, horrifying, disgusting things I’ve said about trans people. Sounds as though there are loads, so he should have plenty to choose from. Hopefully he won’t suffer the usual attack of delete-itis when challenged.

2,568 replies4,392 retweets44,757 likes

Classified defensive · Intensity 0/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals

Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions, Specific individuals

Classified neutral · Intensity 0/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

An exceptionally privileged woman (inherited wealth, private security from childhood) made that very argument to me. I asked whether she lets strange men wander into her house to use her bathroom. Answer came there none.

212 replies914 retweets7,625 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding

Classified neutral · Intensity 0/4 · Specific individuals

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Media & institutions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

'Cis' is ideological language, signifying belief in the unfalsifiable concept of gender identity. You have a perfect right to believe in unprovable essences that may or may not match the sexed body, but the rest of us have a right to disagree, and to refuse to adopt your jargon.

9,936 replies32,753 retweets198,895 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Never forget: it's far too unsafe for trans women to use men's bathrooms/changing rooms, because they might get assaulted. However, it's completely fine for any man who identifies as a woman to use women's bathrooms/changing rooms, because rapists will rape women anyway. https://t.co/7pVPRGh6pI

1,775 replies9,440 retweets46,746 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Child safeguarding, Free speech & cancellation

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Adult healthcare, Child safeguarding

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @RTHG82

@RTHG82 You don’t think females needing intimate care should feel safe receiving it? Or that women self-excluding themselves from medical care, on religious grounds of because of past trauma, is any kind of issue? And the 6500 rapes that have happened in UK hospitals over a 4 year period - not a biggie? It’s overly idealistic to care about these things, is it?

35 replies285 retweets1,760 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Adult healthcare

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Media & institutions

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation

Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @toddtempleman

@toddtempleman @billybragg You deserve an honest answer to that question (and thank you for the nice comments). When a man asserts that lesbianism is ‘a sensibility at odds with women’s biological reality’, what does that say about his view of women’s bodies? That the ‘biological reality’ of the female body is dependent on its owner having sex with men? Are we less real, or less female, if men aren’t reaping sexual pleasure from our bodies? That’s profoundly offensive to any woman who hasn’t signed up to the idea that women aren’t definable except by the most regressive stereotypes ever seen outside a Busby Berkley musical. (I suspect, though, that Bragg couldn’t really explain what he was saying. He just thought it sounded clever and pressed send.)

147 replies369 retweets4,373 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals

Classified neutral · Intensity 0/4 · Specific individuals, Free speech & cancellation

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation

Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Free speech & cancellation

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

As @PatrickStrud has blocked me on here (we've never, to my knowledge, interacted on Twitter or anywhere else) I can't challenge him directly about the claim he published in iNews (see below) that a Let Women Speak event in Australia 'staged a mass Nazi salute'. This is a lie so brazen, so easily disprovable and so libellous, I'm amazed it was allowed into print by a supposedly reputable news source. For years now, women and gay people concerned about the erosion of their rights, the dismantling of safeguarding and the escalating threats and violence of trans activists have been called 'fascists' and 'Nazis' by people like Strudwick for holding what, until five minutes ago, were solidly left-wing/feminist political positions. Nobody but useful idiots can be genuinely surprised that REAL fascists have spotted a glorious opportunity in trans activism. The homophobic, anti-feminist far-right has long held that the left is degenerate, foolish, immoral and authoritarian, and now they can point to the incoherent arguments of the gender ideologues, the bullying tactics of the no-platformers and the swarms of masked men threatening violence against women for wanting to retain single-sex spaces, and crow 'we told you so'. Actual Nazis have turned up on the fringes of Let Women Speak events for exactly the same reason aggressive, narcissistic trans activists are there. These groups closely resemble each other. Both are rife with misogynistic opportunists who're using a clash of rights to push their own agendas, both are there in the hope of violence, and neither gives a damn about the women who're there to speak out in their own voices, about their own lives, on their own behalf. It's high time those peddling lies like Strudwick's are held accountable and I sincerely hope @ThePosieParker takes action.

Read the full post
1,132 replies4,431 retweets21,743 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions, Specific individuals, Child safeguarding

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals, Media & institutions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Media & institutions, Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

James owns one of the best Italian restaurants in London. He hosted a dinner last year to raise funds for my charity @lumos's work in Ukraine, for which he's been targeted by trans activists ever since. The next bit's for Strike fans (see below the line) @ilporticolondon features in the next Strike novel, #TheRunningGrave (James didn't know this; it was supposed to be a surprise, but hey ho). Tweet me your most entertaining (or accurate, or insightful, or amusingly bonkers) predictions for what happens in #TheRunningGrave and I'll buy the author of the winning tweet dinner at @ilportico for themselves and three guests. I'll also pay for your travel if you're outside London. And you're allowed to buy all the most expensive stuff, including champagne (even though Strike doesn't like it.) Let the games begin. Deadline will be 10pm UK time.

1,023 replies2,086 retweets16,401 likes

Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces

Classified mocking · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

My one-year-old son just looked up from Twitter and said, 'Mummy, why have you made these very real children sad with your heinous yet unevidenced bigotry?' Then he ran upstairs and burned all his Potter books. I was so damn ashamed I almost forgot the kid was imaginary. https://t.co/de2KQCRz9o

8,038 replies9,937 retweets116,821 likes

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Free speech & cancellation

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions, Media & institutions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

An important win for @joannacherry and a warning that venues may not discriminate against those who hold gender critical beliefs, which, as the Forstater v CGD case has already established, 'are worthy of respect in a democratic society'. Bravo Jo!

232 replies1,458 retweets10,485 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @jk_rowling

Overnight I've been sent many versions of A) Not all dogs bark. B) Cats don't bark. C) Therefore a cat can be a dog because D) there's more to being a dog than barking. Thank you very much. This sheds an entirely new light on the matter.

402 replies532 retweets9,122 likes

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Other

Classified defensive · Intensity 0/4 · Other

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Funnily enough, quite a few people have told me they were peaked by this old piece in Vox. So thanks, Vox, I suppose, but thank you, too, to @Rob_ThaBuilder for his eloquent dissection of the way clickbaity sites like this seek to mislead and misrepresent.

148 replies513 retweets4,013 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Media & institutions, Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Jo Cherry's completely right about modern McCarthyism. One of the most depressing things in this whole mess has been finding out how many people I formerly admired would have named names in a heartbeat.

504 replies2,309 retweets13,150 likes

Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition, Media & institutions

Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions, Media & institutions, Specific individuals

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Other

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Law & gender recognition, Media & institutions

Classified defensive · Intensity 0/4 · Specific individuals

Classified neutral · Intensity 0/4 · Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Dreadful news, which I feel duty bound to share. Activists in my mentions are trying to organise yet another boycott of my work, this time of the Harry Potter TV show. As forewarned is forearmed, I've taken the precaution of laying in a large stock of champagne.

11,194 replies11,516 retweets151,618 likes

Classified mocking · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces, Other

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Adult healthcare

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals

Classified defensive · Intensity 0/4 · Media & institutions, Specific individuals

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Entertained by the idea that women who assert the importance of biological sex are talking in ‘largely academic terms.’ Isn’t ‘lived experience’ the gold standard before which all other data must bow? Or is it only possible for a woman to experience her life if she’s got a penis?

1,152 replies2,507 retweets21,070 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Media & institutions, Free speech & cancellation

These are the posts classified trans-related. Search all 16,714 collected tweets, read the year-by-year analysis, or read the report on her campaign against trans rights.