‘She/her/or/else’ ✍️ Victoria Smith https://t.co/HBYG4bgtUp
1 April 2023 to 7 November 2023. Posts are reproduced in full from the archive; the stance, intensity and topic labels come from the research classifications. How the labels are defined. Search within 2023.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Language & definitions
I’ve been contacted by innumerable doctors, nurses, therapists, teachers, social workers & academics who believe we’re living through a socio-medical scandal. Please give examples of my lies and proof I have all the money in the world, because my accountant says differently. https://t.co/XWyS06r0dt
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Free speech & cancellation
'...women’s rights are being destroyed in the name of a parody of social justice... politics and policymaking are turning towards ideology and away from evidence... a socio-medical scandal is being played out on the bodies of children.' ✍️by @HJoyceGender https://t.co/HgQtZKgKsl
Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions
Replying to @taradublinrocks
@taradublinrocks When 'somebody else' used their male strength and male genitalia to rape or beat a woman or a girl.
Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Language & definitions
Replying to @Jigger639
@Jigger639 @glosswitch I know you're all out there, John, because lots of men, gay and straight, have contacted me to say they agree with women on this. Thank you for saying it, though x
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions
This thread, written by lawyer Dennis Kavanagh, clearly lays out the implications of the South Australia Practice Note.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Law & gender recognition, Single-sex spaces, Media & institutions
The Honourable Chris Kourakis has issued a statement referring to my 'anxiety' about the use of female pronouns for men standing trial for violence against women and rape. He states that 'a victim of crime would never be asked to address an accused person in a way which caused the victim distress.' That assurance is welcome, although I note that he’s addressed the matter only after it was raised publicly. No such exemption is mentioned in the Practice Note, which takes the ideological position that the ‘use of preferred gender pronouns is a matter of respect’. The natural inference is that a woman would be considered guilty of disrespect if she, alone in the courtroom, described her male attacker as a man, while all court officials were addressing and describing him as a woman. This is not a hypothetical situation. The judge will be aware, if he's informed himself – as he implies I have not - that I've already cited an example where a 60-year-old woman was violently assaulted by a 26-year-old trans-identified male. She was chided by the judge for displaying 'bad grace' by not using her attacker's preferred pronouns. The Practice Note does not acknowledge that in sexual and violent crimes committed by men against women, there is a clear clash of rights. The woman has a right - indeed, a legal duty - to speak truthfully about the male violence/sexual violence to which she was subjected. Meanwhile the Practice Note says that court officials should respectfully use female pronouns for the attacker if he says he identifies as a woman. The likely effect on a traumatised woman of hearing her attacker addressed and described as a female by the court is neither mentioned nor addressed in the Practice Note. Respect, it seems, goes only one way. Millions of women are losing confidence in judicial systems that have adopted an ideological position with which they do not agree. In the very place where they go to seek justice, a woman may now be obliged to listen to court officials asserting they were raped or beaten by a fellow woman. Such women are not merely ‘anxious’, they are furious, about the apparent inability of certain men, judges or not, to understand how dystopian this situation seems to those of us who have suffered male sexual violence.
Read the full postClassified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Law & gender recognition, Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Media & institutions, Specific individuals
A very small sampling of what happens when you say on Twitter that compelling a woman to call her rapist or violent male attacker ‘she’ in court is state-sanctioned abuse. https://t.co/HhuPz4igz2
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions, Law & gender recognition
Replying to @Martina
@Martina @dylanann @RosieDuffield1 @JenniferLahl In fairness, none of us will ever forget the world-beating achievements of @dylanann, and I mean that most sincerely.
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Sport, Specific individuals
Replying to @WVSoccerdad
@WVSoccerdad @TheVikingDane @sueveneer @fickleskittle By all means, let's be rational. Let's look at the facts. You've now called the battery (legal term for 'assault by beating') of a 60-year-old woman by a 26-year-old male, for which the man was convicted and fined, a minor offence. You've lol-ed while minimising. You entered my timeline to police my language when I made reference to this violent male assault in a conversation you weren't part of. You denied that Maria MacLachlan was punched, even though it was stated clearly in the headline of the article you yourself posted. You were shown video of said assault, but continued to jeer, asserting that the victim suffered 'a light slap', in a Tweet you've now deleted. These are not the pronouncements of a man who takes male violence against women seriously. On the contrary, with every denial of plain fact and minimisation of the offence, every 'lol', every airy reference to 'ACTUAL' beatings, you reveal yourself as a man who's indifferent at best to women being physically intimidated or hit. Out of interest, how many punches does a woman have to take for it to qualify as a @WVSoccerdad-approved, actual beating? What would you want to see - broken bones? Decent bit of blood? Now let's examine your own approach to rational debate. All of this began when you thrust your way onto my timeline to tell me I was lying. With your 'come down from the cross' comment, which was made two Tweets in, you whipped out the standard 'playing the victim' card against the woman you were calling in a liar. Some might not see this as rational debate. Some might even say you've been offensive from the start: to me, to Maria MacLachlan, and to every person disgusted by what happened to her. Now you're huffy because people have called you a misogynist. Violent assault of a woman: lol-worthy. Your hurt feelings: very serious business. 'You should be better than this', you say. Try and grasp - it'll be hard, I know - that my interest in your opinion of me is roughly equivalent to my interest in how much dust is currently under my fridge. I know you think you're a heckuva great guy, and it's come as a shock to get feedback that suggests not everyone agrees, so here's some unsolicited advice, in exchange for all you've given me. In future, try mocking women being knocked around in the privacy of your own house, instead of 'lol'-ing about it on the internet.
Read the full postClassified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Child safeguarding
Replying to @WVSoccerdad
@WVSoccerdad @darewecan You need to stop exaggerating and being so hysterical, mate. I never said *everyone* who disagrees with me defends violence against women. Just you. Btw, you've just misgendered the assailant, almost as though you know he's a fellow man, after all. Now, that's worth a lol.
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals, Single-sex spaces
Replying to @darewecan
@darewecan It has happened. Here's one UK example, where a judge told a woman who was beaten up by a trans-identified male that she showed 'bad grace' by refusing to call her attacker 'she' in court. https://t.co/2MRITnaSJK
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions, Law & gender recognition
Replying to @JenniferLahl
@JenniferLahl Personally, I wouldn't be compelled, I'd take contempt of court. It's time for mass non-compliance with this bullshit.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Law & gender recognition, Free speech & cancellation
Asking a woman to refer to her male rapist or violent assaulter as 'she' in court is a form of state-sanctioned abuse. Female victims of male violence are further traumatised by being forced to speak a lie. https://t.co/W0pvsyZctx
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions, Child safeguarding
Replying to @Ansleigh_mma
@Ansleigh_mma @Da_Nasty_Man You've done nothing wrong. This isn't, and never was, about hate, it's about fairness and safety for women and girls. You stood up to protect your fellow athletes, which makes you a heroine in all sane people's eyes. I know backlashes aren't fun (believe me, I know) but there are things far more important than pleasing all the people, all the time. All power to you x
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Sport, Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces
Hang on. When far-right groups eager for publicity/violence agitate near women's rallies, that makes all the women sticking up for their rights fascists. However, when Nazis join a protest YOU agree with, they're opportunists who mustn't be allowed to besmirch a righteous cause.
Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation
"Gender-Affirming Care Is Dangerous. I Know Because I Helped Pioneer It." A massive medical scandal has been unfolding in plain sight. All who've tried to shout down whistleblowers like Dr. Riittakerttu Kaltiala deserve the reckoning that's coming. https://t.co/bbKFzwH1UR
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals, Media & institutions
@xyandyouknowit @Fontybits1 @TheGayChrist @Kim56137428 @IndiaWilloughby I forgot that one. Willoughby truly is a delight.
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals
Replying to @MusicbyScott
@MusicbyScott I'll happily do two years if the alternative is compelled speech and forced denial of the reality and importance of sex. Bring on the court case, I say. It'll be more fun than I've ever had on a red carpet.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Language & definitions
Replying to @TheGayChrist
@TheGayChrist @Kim56137428 @IndiaWilloughby So if only I were more sophisticated, I'd see that dragging in her race, telling her she's a 'talentless, nasty bitch' who 'wouldn't be anywhere without woke' isn't racist and misogynistic, but an attempt to initiate a polite discussion on linguistics? Well, you live and learn.
Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Specific individuals, Free speech & cancellation
Replying to @Kim56137428
@Kim56137428 @IndiaWilloughby You must show me some of this filth I post. Was it anything like this? https://t.co/crbRSKHz9I
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions
Replying to @AmandaPCraig
@AmandaPCraig @rowlingmore @FiLiA_charity They are. I made that point at the event. Women have been bullied out of jobs, silenced out of fear of losing livelihoods, harassed and assaulted. That makes it even more important that those of us who can, stand up for those who can't.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Single-sex spaces
That elected officials from the Greens stood proudly beside protestors screaming 'fuck you' at women, including those from Afghanistan and Africa, who were meeting in Glasgow to discuss sex-specific harms such as FGM, disgraces them and their party.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions
Replying to @HeadWarriorTWM
@HeadWarriorTWM Wonder whether @Harlowboylesque could let us know the identity of the fascists he spotted among the women at whom he was bellowing 'fuck you'? Asking for a friend. Well, I say friend. Lawyer.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals
Saved by the host, but at some point one of them is going to have to answer the question. 'Over 52% of this country are women. Are we sure that Labour is ready to govern when it's spent four years denying that a woman is an adult human female... and punishing women?' 👏🔥
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals
Replying to @AjaTheEmpress
@Aja02537920 @Upsy_Daisy666 No uniform, we aim to blend in, but you will be given passwords, emergency contacts and a complimentary bottle of gin. Beware: many sail through training only to fall at the last hurdle - corpsing when presented with planetary-based neopronouns. Good luck and God speed.
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation
@Vanessa17253550 @SonyaDouglas @WylesLaura These fools do not represent Scotland. There's been strong public pushback against gender ideology here, and Scottish women have led the charge. #WomenWontWheesht
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition
Not raging: amused. To prove his point that the female fear of male harassment is groundless, he got up early to bellow ‘fuck you’ at a group of peacefully assembling women. Is he genuinely that thick? Or are we talking #TERFblackops?
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals
Inside the venue: women from 35 different countries discuss their sex-based issues and concerns, including the harassment and intimidation they face from men. Outside the venue, this prick. https://t.co/Z2V1SRXwP0
Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals
Replying to @HnschenKlein81
@HnschenKlein81 @Parsleymael @ReadyBurge @lisanandy What do you mean 'started being trans during the trial'? Are you implying there are men who would identify as women for nefarious reasons? We're constantly told that's another thing that could never happen. Here's another for your collection: https://t.co/FmSy2Fj2h8
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals
Replying to @jk_rowling
@HnschenKlein81 @ReadyBurge @lisanandy Then there's this one. But no biggie, right? https://t.co/bB0Kygipg3
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Child safeguarding, Specific individuals
Replying to @HnschenKlein81
@HnschenKlein81 @ReadyBurge @lisanandy The usual progression from 'it never happens' to 'it doesn't matter if it happens'. Not just a Scottish thing, by the way. https://t.co/0RvTidTcf6
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding
Replying to @lisanandy
@lisanandy You said rapists should be transferred to women's prisons if they self-identify as women. You called Women's Place UK a hate group. Given that you're one of the biggest reasons many women on the left no longer trust Labour to defend their rights, do you stand by those comments?
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals, Law & gender recognition
Replying to @Martina
@Martina @Dublinate @DreyfusJames I’m really sorry, Martina. To the vast majority of us you are a heroine and an icon.
Classified neutral · Intensity 0/4 · Specific individuals
The gentleman might want to supply examples of the horrendous, horrifying, disgusting things I’ve said about trans people. Sounds as though there are loads, so he should have plenty to choose from. Hopefully he won’t suffer the usual attack of delete-itis when challenged.
Classified defensive · Intensity 0/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals
A retraction and apology has been issued by iNews for the baseless accusation made by journalist @PatrickStrud against Kellie-Jay Keen, aka @ThePosieParker. Mr Strudwick has forgotten to share this on Twitter, so it would be nice if people could help him out. https://t.co/jc6Qg0bTVK
Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions
The unsophisticated might think Jolyon has had his arse handed to him on a plate, but it's important to remember that losing is on a spectrum, and Jolyon identifies as someone who would have won if only his side weren't trying to exercise legal rights they didn't have. #binary https://t.co/jPxCSDVGbA
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals
Congratulations to @AllianceLGB! 🎉
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions, Specific individuals
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater @CrowdJustice @anyabike @OldSqChambers @peter_daly @Doyle_Clayton @EHRC @IndexCensorship @SexMattersOrg Congratulations, you star. It's the husband's birthday, so I've got two reasons to crack open the champagne this evening 😘
Classified neutral · Intensity 0/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals
Congratulations to @MForstater, who receives over £100k in compensation from @cgdev, who were found to have discriminated against her due to her gender critical beliefs, which, as her case established, are worthy of respect in a democratic society. #SexMatters
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals
Replying to @snippedwing
@snippedwing @Gimpuslegend ‘MtF transitioners were over 6 times more likely to be convicted of an offence than female comparators and 18 times more likely to be convicted of a violent offence.’ https://t.co/H5NmGkTLe9
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals
An exceptionally privileged woman (inherited wealth, private security from childhood) made that very argument to me. I asked whether she lets strange men wander into her house to use her bathroom. Answer came there none.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces
Replying to @jk_rowling
Girls’ safety, privacy and dignity is being sacrificed to an incoherent ideology pushed by lobby groups, which gives predatory males easy access to victims. 2/2 https://t.co/jrMr1KmmXb
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Language & definitions
This was entirely foreseeable and preventable. A Sunday Times investigation in 2028 found 88% of sexual offences committed in changing rooms and public bathrooms take place in those that are unisex. 1/2 https://t.co/goMSBxKAEP
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding
Replying to @wundt_vil
@wundt_vil ❤️ Oh, Sam. I've been following your story. You're so brave and you'll have helped many others by being as courageous as you have. I'm just sorry you get this kind of vileness thrown at you x
Classified neutral · Intensity 0/4 · Specific individuals
Replying to @Yvonne_Biology
@Yvonne_Biology @sally_hines @Sor_XX_ @elonmusk This goes way beyond shooting fish in a barrel. It’s more like bludgeoning them when they’re already on the barbecue.
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Media & institutions
'Cis' is ideological language, signifying belief in the unfalsifiable concept of gender identity. You have a perfect right to believe in unprovable essences that may or may not match the sexed body, but the rest of us have a right to disagree, and to refuse to adopt your jargon.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions
Never forget: it's far too unsafe for trans women to use men's bathrooms/changing rooms, because they might get assaulted. However, it's completely fine for any man who identifies as a woman to use women's bathrooms/changing rooms, because rapists will rape women anyway. https://t.co/7pVPRGh6pI
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions
Threatening to murder women: completely fine. Accurately sexing rapists: hate crime.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Child safeguarding, Free speech & cancellation
Man: no definition needed. Non-man (formerly known as woman): a being definable only by reference to the male. An absence, a vacuum where there's no man-ness. https://t.co/cpSaSR2Vfg
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions
Replying to @Jozinhagirl
@Jozinhagirl @cazadams58 @francesweetman I hear some women saying 'they don't understand' - five minutes ago a lot of these men understood enough to parrot feminist lines about consent and rape culture. Now they're telling women they don't have the right to male-free spaces or female-only care. The masks have dropped.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Adult healthcare, Child safeguarding
Replying to @dobleplusungood
@dobleplusungood @francesweetman This has been a litmus test for decency in men like none I've ever seen before.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces
Replying to @RTHG82
@RTHG82 You don’t think females needing intimate care should feel safe receiving it? Or that women self-excluding themselves from medical care, on religious grounds of because of past trauma, is any kind of issue? And the 6500 rapes that have happened in UK hospitals over a 4 year period - not a biggie? It’s overly idealistic to care about these things, is it?
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Adult healthcare
Replying to @francesweetman
@francesweetman Every man who supports this should be asked, ‘have you always been keen on removing safeguarding for women and girls, or did you get interested when an ideology came along that gave you cover?’ IMO, most are in the first group. They just couldn’t say it.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions
Replying to @RTHG82
@RTHG82 And how does women’s safety, privacy and dignity impact any of those things? Will there be more beds if women are forced to accept intimate care from men? Will more lives be saved if all wards are mixed? https://t.co/rDWVxNKbf9
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding
Replying to @RTHG82
@RTHG82 Are you more upset that I’m not currently in need of hospitalisation, or that I care about women having safety, privacy and dignity when they’re at their most vulnerable, Ross?
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces
How did NHS body get the law so badly wrong over its rules on same-sex care? | Sonia Sodha https://t.co/ACJwhmcAgF
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Media & institutions
I hadn’t realised it was three years until I saw this tweet! Here’s hoping a few more people will give it an anniversary read. 😘
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions
Replying to @CJMurrumbeena
@CJMurrumbeena @solveig283 @ISangHolyHoly @toddtempleman @billybragg And what are these 'female attributes'?
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions
"I will defend free speech for all views : post-colonial theory as much as gender critical feminism. Free speech for just one side is not free speech at all. Free speech for all sides benefits all sides." https://t.co/O6hnIar3Pn
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation
This is said constantly of women who’ve paid a heavy price for speaking out. ‘She can’t have suffered, she’s still speaking.’ What they mean, of course, is ‘suffered enough.’ https://t.co/JjdPdkLX0Z
Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals
Replying to @toddtempleman
@toddtempleman @billybragg You deserve an honest answer to that question (and thank you for the nice comments). When a man asserts that lesbianism is ‘a sensibility at odds with women’s biological reality’, what does that say about his view of women’s bodies? That the ‘biological reality’ of the female body is dependent on its owner having sex with men? Are we less real, or less female, if men aren’t reaping sexual pleasure from our bodies? That’s profoundly offensive to any woman who hasn’t signed up to the idea that women aren’t definable except by the most regressive stereotypes ever seen outside a Busby Berkley musical. (I suspect, though, that Bragg couldn’t really explain what he was saying. He just thought it sounded clever and pressed send.)
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals
Saying lesbians have 'a sensibility at odds with their biological reality' may be the most homophobic and misogynist thing @billybragg's tweeted yet, which is a high bar. But in answer to your question, Billy: If a man can be a woman, there's no such thing as a woman. https://t.co/suhZUGR3Pi
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals
I’m so proud to call the brave and brilliant @Docstockk a friend. https://t.co/nNG3tWMEQG
Classified neutral · Intensity 0/4 · Specific individuals, Free speech & cancellation
Replying to @francesweetman
@francesweetman If the left's ever scored a bigger own goal than saying child safeguarding, women's rights and free speech are far-right issues, I've never seen it. The idiots pushing this line are going to find it takes a lot of living down.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation
Replying to @Dotdarling68
@Dotdarling68 They say karma's a bitch, but I hear she's a TERF.
Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation
@tomboytalia Face it, being called a Nazi by this crowd is like being called a lizard mutant from the plant Zorb. Let's both be careful to keep hiding our imaginary tails from those who're onto us.
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Free speech & cancellation
As @PatrickStrud has blocked me on here (we've never, to my knowledge, interacted on Twitter or anywhere else) I can't challenge him directly about the claim he published in iNews (see below) that a Let Women Speak event in Australia 'staged a mass Nazi salute'. This is a lie so brazen, so easily disprovable and so libellous, I'm amazed it was allowed into print by a supposedly reputable news source. For years now, women and gay people concerned about the erosion of their rights, the dismantling of safeguarding and the escalating threats and violence of trans activists have been called 'fascists' and 'Nazis' by people like Strudwick for holding what, until five minutes ago, were solidly left-wing/feminist political positions. Nobody but useful idiots can be genuinely surprised that REAL fascists have spotted a glorious opportunity in trans activism. The homophobic, anti-feminist far-right has long held that the left is degenerate, foolish, immoral and authoritarian, and now they can point to the incoherent arguments of the gender ideologues, the bullying tactics of the no-platformers and the swarms of masked men threatening violence against women for wanting to retain single-sex spaces, and crow 'we told you so'. Actual Nazis have turned up on the fringes of Let Women Speak events for exactly the same reason aggressive, narcissistic trans activists are there. These groups closely resemble each other. Both are rife with misogynistic opportunists who're using a clash of rights to push their own agendas, both are there in the hope of violence, and neither gives a damn about the women who're there to speak out in their own voices, about their own lives, on their own behalf. It's high time those peddling lies like Strudwick's are held accountable and I sincerely hope @ThePosieParker takes action.
Read the full postClassified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions, Specific individuals, Child safeguarding
Replying to @JohnJamesNI
@JohnJamesNI @PatrickStrud The women who call rape survivors Nazis for wanting penis-free spaces make my skin crawl, too. This whole debacle has been a fiesta of skin crawling.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces
Replying to @_Partta_
@_Partta_ @Mermaids_Gender Looks a lot like it.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions
Replying to @rules_of_izzy
@rules_of_izzy @Mermaids_Gender Usual well-reasoned counterarguments, Izzy.
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions
Re-upping this thread, now we're finding out the extent of the unprecedented influence and access @Mermaids_Gender has been given at the Tavistock Gender Identity Development Service. https://t.co/JnPoVrPHap
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals, Media & institutions
The Inclusion Delusion https://t.co/S2L0zZgWTF via @YouTube
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Media & institutions, Language & definitions
James owns one of the best Italian restaurants in London. He hosted a dinner last year to raise funds for my charity @lumos's work in Ukraine, for which he's been targeted by trans activists ever since. The next bit's for Strike fans (see below the line) @ilporticolondon features in the next Strike novel, #TheRunningGrave (James didn't know this; it was supposed to be a surprise, but hey ho). Tweet me your most entertaining (or accurate, or insightful, or amusingly bonkers) predictions for what happens in #TheRunningGrave and I'll buy the author of the winning tweet dinner at @ilportico for themselves and three guests. I'll also pay for your travel if you're outside London. And you're allowed to buy all the most expensive stuff, including champagne (even though Strike doesn't like it.) Let the games begin. Deadline will be 10pm UK time.
Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals
Replying to @VineMissde
@VineMissde Ah, I wish I could tell you. Just be careful down there. You never know who - or what - you might meet.
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces
Replying to @Casualnaming
@Casualnaming My all-time favourite, which I wish I'd saved, was one where the sender had ill-advisedly strayed from the template, and called his imaginary child (who cries for ten minutes every time I tweet) a son and then a daughter within the same tweet. #transphobic
Classified mocking · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals
My one-year-old son just looked up from Twitter and said, 'Mummy, why have you made these very real children sad with your heinous yet unevidenced bigotry?' Then he ran upstairs and burned all his Potter books. I was so damn ashamed I almost forgot the kid was imaginary. https://t.co/de2KQCRz9o
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals
"For voicing my concerns about gender-affirming care for minors, I have been called a transphobic bigot. If that’s what speaking out against the medicalisation of homosexuality makes me, then so be it." @benappel, on the new homophobia. https://t.co/AsM4qMPoZK
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Free speech & cancellation
‘We are caught in an age of political egocentricity, of hyperindividualism, where who I am matters more than who we are.’ Great piece by @SimonFanshawe https://t.co/pHRUpzcKae
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions, Media & institutions
An important win for @joannacherry and a warning that venues may not discriminate against those who hold gender critical beliefs, which, as the Forstater v CGD case has already established, 'are worthy of respect in a democratic society'. Bravo Jo!
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals
Replying to @jk_rowling
Overnight I've been sent many versions of A) Not all dogs bark. B) Cats don't bark. C) Therefore a cat can be a dog because D) there's more to being a dog than barking. Thank you very much. This sheds an entirely new light on the matter.
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions
Logic a nine-year-old could demolish. A) Dogs bark B) This isn't barking, therefore C) This isn't a dog https://t.co/WnTGtfqRKX
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Other
Replying to @Charlot93029442
@Charlot93029442 @BillColeman106 @d4ds4g4inst I'm not quite sure where you're coming from on this, because radical feminists have stood with me throughout, and I with them. If you imagine I want feminism defeated, you've grossly misunderstood my position.
Classified defensive · Intensity 0/4 · Other
Funnily enough, quite a few people have told me they were peaked by this old piece in Vox. So thanks, Vox, I suppose, but thank you, too, to @Rob_ThaBuilder for his eloquent dissection of the way clickbaity sites like this seek to mislead and misrepresent.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Media & institutions, Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals
Jo Cherry's completely right about modern McCarthyism. One of the most depressing things in this whole mess has been finding out how many people I formerly admired would have named names in a heartbeat.
Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals
"Part of Keen’s genius is that she doesn’t just allow women to speak; she forces pusillanimous politicians to." Fantastic piece by @HJoyceGender https://t.co/dZd1I7pg7T
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition, Media & institutions
Replying to @jk_rowling
For those confused as to why Ian Banham was fired and publicly lambasted by @bandwildyouth, here’s one of his ‘horrifying’ tweets. His crime is standing against the insanity of pretending knife-wielding rapists are women if they say they are. https://t.co/tknScvYPyv
Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals
The re-traumatisation of female rape survivors, including this man’s victims, on seeing him called a woman by the press counts for nothing, naturally. The so-called kindness and inclusivity of @bandwildyouth is preening, self-satisfied misogyny. #IStandWithIanBanham https://t.co/CuILreP7cC
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions, Media & institutions, Specific individuals
Say what you like about gender identity ideology, you can't deny it's attracted some of the world's greatest thinkers. https://t.co/AaP9fQ89w4
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Other
Replying to @JournoStephen
@JournoStephen Not sure what they mean by 'de facto', though. I mean, the Global Transphobic Cult isn't the SNP. I'm sure there's a proper process.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Law & gender recognition, Media & institutions
Replying to @KristofferPhilp
@KristofferPhilp @BuckAngel Who cares. You know I think you're fabulous too, Kristoffer x
Classified defensive · Intensity 0/4 · Specific individuals
Replying to @BuckAngel
@BuckAngel And I love many transexuals. Crazy, huh? Stay strong, Buck x
Classified neutral · Intensity 0/4 · Specific individuals
Dreadful news, which I feel duty bound to share. Activists in my mentions are trying to organise yet another boycott of my work, this time of the Harry Potter TV show. As forewarned is forearmed, I've taken the precaution of laying in a large stock of champagne.
Classified mocking · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals
Black Women’s Caucus Statement Against Gender Ideology https://t.co/073rhjpaX3
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces, Other
Our hospitals are not safe for women https://t.co/wDcIIyLKAw
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Adult healthcare
🧵
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals
@matitone_ @LittleBrownUK I know. That’s why I said it in my essay. https://t.co/YjTfVmfKiA
Classified defensive · Intensity 0/4 · Media & institutions, Specific individuals
In the interests of balance, someone should now ask women how they define Chris Hipkins.
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals
Entertained by the idea that women who assert the importance of biological sex are talking in ‘largely academic terms.’ Isn’t ‘lived experience’ the gold standard before which all other data must bow? Or is it only possible for a woman to experience her life if she’s got a penis?
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions
“We cannot possibly adjust enough to please the fanatics, and it is degrading to make the attempt.” Christopher Hitchens
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Media & institutions, Free speech & cancellation
These are the posts classified trans-related. Search all 16,714 collected tweets, read the year-by-year analysis, or read the report on her campaign against trans rights.