The Rowling Record

J.K. Rowling’s trans-related posts from 2024

Page 2 of 12. Posts 101–200 of the 1,194 J.K. Rowling wrote about trans people in 2024, newest first.

21 November 2024 to 10 December 2024. Posts are reproduced in full from the archive; the stance, intensity and topic labels come from the research classifications. How the labels are defined. Search within 2024.

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @bindelj

@bindelj @johnboyne Is it true Pink News doesn't like you mentioning it? Did you, in fact, receive a legal letter from Pink News asking you to stop mentioning it? And if so, did you defy that letter and keep mentioning it? Might today be a good day to set a personal record for number of mentions?

16 replies73 retweets1,019 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Media & institutions, Free speech & cancellation

Classified neutral · Intensity 0/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Other

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Youth healthcare, Adult healthcare, Media & institutions

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals, Adult healthcare

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Minors sterilised, healthy breasts cut off teenaged girls, a total failure to address kids’ mental health problems and a major study supressed because it didn’t show what an ideologue doctor wanted it to. ‘You’re only upset because baddies brainwashed you.’ https://t.co/COddmEQtZk

976 replies6,436 retweets34,836 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Media & institutions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @Tachardiella

@Tachardiella We're watching a massive, unevidenced medical experiment unfold in real time and it's shameful that lawsuits seem the only way to stop it. The cowardice of politicians and medics who let this happen, and the hubris of the idiots who cheered it on, must never be forgotten.

126 replies944 retweets5,738 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

The doctor who chose not to publish a study on puberty blockers because it showed no improvement in participants' mental health is the very same Johanna Olsen-Kennedy who's being sued by a young woman put on blockers at 12, given testosterone at 13 and a double mastectomy at 14.

1,144 replies21,063 retweets76,819 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Specific individuals, Child safeguarding

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Free speech & cancellation

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @sally_hines

@sally_hines @Another_Berry @CantProgAll They exist as concepts, the same way religious concepts such as the Holy Spirit and the rapture exist. The thread you’re referring to was only three tweets long and yet you got no further than the first, or chose to ignore the rest. Can’t say I’m surprised. The person who took de Beauvoir’s most famous line out of context to misrepresent her beliefs is hardly going to balk at doing it to people on Twitter.

5 replies23 retweets196 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions, Other

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions, Law & gender recognition

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @sally_hines

@sally_hines @CantProgAll Is it now your position that gender identities might or might not exist? You state in your book 'gender identity refers to each person’s internal sense of being male, female, a combination of the two, or neither; it is a core part of who people know themselves to be'. You devote pages to describing the different kinds of gender identities, never once saying stating that 'gender identity' is a contested concept or questioning its validity. Your only mention (so far as I can see) of those who don't believe in 'gender identities' comes towards the end of the book when you say (I quote directly): 'Trans-exclusionary radical feminists (TERFs) is a term used to describe members of a small branch of the feminist movement who wish to exclude trans women from feminism and deny them entry to women’s spaces.' I'm quite sure you knew that by using the term 'TERF', which many feminists consider a slur, you were taking a position. You also declare trans-identified men to be women because they identify as women (have a 'female gender identity'). Is there a part of the book I've missed, in which you explain that you personally aren't taking a view on the matter?

Read the full post
16 replies51 retweets1,057 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals, Media & institutions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @sally_hines

@sally_hines @CantProgAll Sally, all this began with you loftily pronouncing that I must read and study the history of sex before I talk about sex and gender. You clearly feel (and have never been shy about telling us all) that you have a breadth and depth of knowledge and insight on these subjects that we lowly folk cannot possibly comprehend. I’ve repeatedly asked you the most basic question imaginable, given your self-proclaimed expertise: how does a person know what their gender identity is? And your considered response, drawing on all your academic expertise, is ‘I’m not your bloody therapist’.

36 replies144 retweets1,950 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Other

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @sally_hines

@sally_hines @CantProgAll Again, you're evading my question. To quote your words in full: 'A person’s gender identity can remain fixed or can fluctuate over time; can be aligned with or be in contrast to the sex they are assigned at birth; and can be articulated through or contradicted by their gender expression. Gender identity refers to each person’s internal sense of being male, female, a combination of the two, or neither; it is a core part of who people know themselves to be.' 'It is a core part of who people know themselves to be' is a fairly definitive statement, wouldn't you agree? So I'm asking - for what feels like the thousandth time - how a person is supposed to know whether their 'internal sense' of gender is male, female, both or neither? Because you don't explain that in your book.

14 replies75 retweets1,013 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @sally_hines

@sally_hines @CantProgAll No goal posts moved. You said gender critical people can't think about gender except in the 'context of trans.' I'm pointing out to you that gender critical *do* think about gender as distinct from trans. If you don't like the word 'performance', I'll repeat your own words back to you: 'behaviours, roles and expectations.' Second wave feminism had rather a lot to say about the behaviours, roles and expectations associated with being a woman, all of it in the context of being a biological woman as opposed to being a trans-identified man. You wrote an entire book telling us that gender is 'a core part of who a person knows themselves to be', without once defining what a male/female/neutral/absent gender actually means. I've repeatedly asked you a very simple question, which isn't answered anywhere in your book: how does somebody know which gender identity they're feeling or sensing? What tells me my 'core part' is male, or absent?

Read the full post
12 replies94 retweets1,309 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @sally_hines

@sally_hines @CantProgAll I find it astonishing that you write this, given that second wave feminism does indeed address the concept of gender-as-performance at length. Radical feminism holds, as you surely know, that societally-imposed and often oppressive aspects of 'femininity' and 'masculinity' should be challenged and destroyed, not codified and reified, as your ideology proposes. You quoted de Beauvoir on this very platform: 'one is not born, but becomes a woman', and you did it to support your contention that men can become women. That's an interpretation so far removed from what de Beauvoir was arguing that I gasped out loud at your shameless misrepresentation. De Beauvoir was saying - as anyone who's actually read The Second Sex (as I have) will know - that to be considered a 'true' or 'real' woman, to be 'worthy' of the word 'woman' in the eyes of a male-dominated society, girls are pressured to learn and display 'feminine' behaviours that may not be natural to them, and which they may experience as oppressive and restrictive. You, on the other hand, were pretending she'd argued that femininity is, quite literally, what makes a person a woman, and that in consequence, women can come in both penis-ed and non penis-ed varieties.

Read the full post
18 replies209 retweets1,571 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @MischaLore

@MischaLore @sally_hines @brandwizard2 @NOfPPlus @JoPhoenix1 @salltweets And yet intangible things, too, are definable. We can't see, smell or taste thoughts or ideas, but both have definitions. If gender identity is the new basis upon which we're organising rights, safeguarding and the categories that used to be divided by sex, it's not unreasonable to ask precisely what this 'core part' of ourselves is, nor how people are supposed to distinguish between the variations male/female/neutral or absent.

14 replies79 retweets961 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @sally_hines

@sally_hines @brandwizard2 @NOfPPlus @JoPhoenix1 @salltweets The verbiage you posted isn't a definition, its a list of things that may be associated with the word 'gender'. If I asked what a cat was, I wouldn't find the answer 'some people find cats cute, other people are allergic to them' very helpful. You state that gender is 'a core part of who people know themselves to be.' I'm asking you to explain how I can tell whether my 'core part' is male, female, neither or both. I too can list things that were traditionally male or female, I too can say 'women are seen as nurturers and men as fighters', but we are constantly told that gender identity doesn't rest on stereotypes. So, how do I know?

20 replies137 retweets1,230 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @CantProgAll

@CantProgAll @sally_hines Nope. I didn't ask 'what does gender mean to different people?' Professor Hines says in her book that gender is 'a core part of who people know themselves to be.' I'm asking how I'm supposed to tell whether my 'core part' is male, female, both, neutral or absent. People like Professor Hines support the reconfiguring of laws and social practices around the concept of 'gender identity' rather than sex, so I think it's important to be clear about how people know that their gender identity is male, female, both, neutral or absent.

10 replies58 retweets836 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions, Law & gender recognition

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @sally_hines

@sally_hines @brandwizard2 @NOfPPlus @JoPhoenix1 @salltweets Then why doesn’t the intro define its central concept? Your title asks if gender is fluid. What is gender? You list bits of jargon like ‘genderflux’ (experiences their gender more or less intensely at different times) without ever explaining what is the thing the person is experiencing. Why isn’t there an entry-level explanation of how we can tell whether our gender is male, female, both, neither, absent, flux or fluid? How does this important ‘core thing’ manifest internally? Do we compare the picture of Skinningrove blast furnace and the one of the Miss America pageant and choose where we’d rather be? I imagine not, as we’re told endlessly that gender doesn’t rest on sex stereotypes. Your book, written for a lay audience, explains terms like ‘post-colonial’ but not the concept featured in its actual title. Incidentally, it’s the nouns that are gendered in French. The adjectives merely agree with them. I’m qualified to tell you that; I have a French degree.

Read the full post
9 replies79 retweets1,129 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Media & institutions, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Media & institutions, Specific individuals

Classified mocking · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions, Other

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Other

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @JoPhoenix1

@JoPhoenix1 @salltweets @sally_hines You didn't miss the 'How To Read' bit at the front, did you? 'Paragraphs are prioritized using different font sizes. The larger the font size the more important the words are to the overall concept or argument... So, if you only have half an hour to spare, just read the paragraphs set in the two largest font sizes and you’ll still get a basic overview of the subject.' Half an hour to get a basic grasp on a subject Hines thinks is too complex and overwhelming for those of us with teeny brains to comprehend. But possibly my favourite bit of the whole book is her explanation of why it's bulging with photos (other than padding it out to look slightly less like a pamphlet): 'Images are as much a part of the debate as the text itself. Juxtaposed in a thought-provoking way, or used to expand on the argument, they offer additional insights throughout.' Examples of the pictures that offer additional insights: Some female soldiers. Some male midwives. Marilyn Monroe. Some eighteenth century men wearing corsets. Seahorses. A head shot of Andy Warhol. Skinningrove blast furnace plant (which closed in 1971.)

Read the full post
38 replies88 retweets1,339 likes

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Media & institutions, Specific individuals, Language & definitions

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Media & institutions, Language & definitions

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @sally_hines

@sally_hines 'Gender identity refers to each person’s internal sense of being male, female, a combination of the two, or neither; it is a core part of who people know themselves to be.' However, this core of what we know ourselves to be may change, possibly several times in a single afternoon: 'Genderfluid people experience their gender identity as changing over time or between different situations.' And some people have a partially missing core, or a core part so feeble we can't know whether it's male or female: 'Agender people identify as having no gender, or feel that their gender is absent or neutral.' Imagine writing those words and not once defining how it feels to have an internal sense of being male/female, not having a gender at all, or having a neutral gender. Other groundbreaking things I learned from your book: 'Not all bodies are biologically male or female – they are both, or neither.' 'French adjectives are grammatically gendered.' 'Post-colonial is sometimes used to describe the period of time after colonial rule.' 'Aristotle was a philosopher and scientist living in ancient Greece.' 'Historically, women have often been associated with nurturing behaviour.' 'Traditional male labour is typical in heavy industries, such as Skinningrove blast furnace plant, which closed in 1971.'

Read the full post
181 replies473 retweets5,041 likes

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Adult healthcare, Youth healthcare

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Adult healthcare, Law & gender recognition

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

@SkylarGwynn @BuckAngel The word 'extremists' in my original post referred to trans activists who've relentlessly bullied sex realist trans people like Buck. You misunderstood me, took it personally, announced I disappointed you and now tell me you 'guess I'll figure it out.' Can you hear yourself?

13 replies11 retweets407 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Specific individuals, Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

@SkylarGwynn @BuckAngel I've said multiple times that I don't believe in 'true trans' and I don't believe anyone is 'born in the wrong body.' I use the word trans to mean 'person who wishes to present/be seen as the opposite sex,' which is how 99% of people use it. Other than giving you a rush, what do you imagine you're achieving with this kind of carping? Let me be clear: you don't have the right to police my language any more than trans activists do, I'll interact with trans people I like and admire in whatever way I want and when I'm interested in whether I'm disappointing you or not, I'll be sure to let you know. Don't hold your breath, though.

37 replies67 retweets971 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @lheal

@lheal That's very kind, but so many people have been fighting and risking far more than me. I knew I'd always be able to feed my family. Others lost their careers and livelihoods. I've met individuals who were bullied into suicidality. Whistleblowers have been shamefully persecuted.

51 replies247 retweets4,164 likes

Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Child safeguarding, Media & institutions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Child safeguarding

Classified neutral · Intensity 0/4 · Specific individuals, Free speech & cancellation

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Media & institutions, Child safeguarding

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

The rewriting of history begins. Opponents of gender ideology haven't merely 'endured unsparing criticism'. I haven't simply been told I 'betrayed real feminism' or received a few book-burning videos. I've been sent thousands of threats of murder, rape and violence. A trans woman posted my family's home address with a bomb-making guide. My eldest child was targeted by a prominent trans activist who attempted to doxx her and ended up doxxing the wrong young woman. I could write a twenty thousand word essay on what the consequences have been to me and my family, and what we've endured is NOTHING compared to the harm done to others. By standing up to a movement that relies on threats of violence, ostracisation and guilt-by-association, all of us have been smeared and defamed, but many have lost their livelihoods. Some have been physically assaulted by trans activists. Female politicians have been forced to hire personal security on the advice of police. The news that one of the UK's leading endocrinologists, Dr Hillary Cass, was advised not to travel by public transport for her own safety should shame everyone who let this insanity run amok. Lest we forget, gender apostates have been targeted for crimes such as doubting the evidential basis for transitioning children, for arguing for fair sport for women and girls, for wanting to retain single sex spaces and services, especially for the most vulnerable, and for thinking it barbaric to lock in female prisoners with convicted male sex offenders. Now the political landscape has shifted, and some who've been riding high on their own supply are waking up with a hell of a hangover. They've started wondering whether calling left-wing feminists who wanted all-female rape centres 'Nazis' was such a smart strategy. Maybe parents arguing that boys ought not to be robbing their daughters of sporting opportunities might, sort of, have a point? Possibly letting any man who says 'I'm a woman' into the locker room with twelve-year-old girls could have a downside, after all? Mealy-mouthed retconning of what has actually happened over the past ten years is predictable but will not stand. I don't doubt those who've turned a blind eye to the purges of non-believers, or even applauded and encouraged them, would rather minimise what the true cost of speaking out was, but 'yes, maybe trans activists went a little over the top at times' takes are frankly insulting. A full reckoning on the effects of gender ideology on individuals, society and politics is still a long way off, but I know this: the receipts will make very ugly reading when that time comes, and there are far too many of them to sweep politely under the carpet.

Read the full post
2,992 replies20,292 retweets82,859 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Sport, Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Youth healthcare, Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals, Media & institutions

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Youth healthcare

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @AlastairMcA30

@AlastairMcA30 The fact that you think I 'like' a review that concludes irreversible treatments are being given to children on extremely questionable evidence of their efficacy is hugely revealing. It puts you in the same category as trans activists who claim I 'celebrate' when trans-identified males harm women. How about the recent Mayo Clinic research that found 'mild-to-severe sex gland atrophy' in minors taking puberty blockers? What about the 'appearance of microlithiasis', linked to testicular cancer, found in one boy? Is that study 'methodologically flawed', too?

91 replies33 retweets332 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Youth healthcare

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Free speech & cancellation

Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @AlastairMcA30

@AlastairMcA30 The evidence on it ‘saving lives’ is incredibly weak, although those on the butchery-and-blockers gravy train naturally tell a different story. They’re similarly silent on the clear and well-documented evidence of harmful health outcomes and mounting numbers of detransitioners. There are places I’m not allowed to go, eg, inside other people’s houses when they’re not home, operating theatres because I fancy watching an appendectomy, inside the penguin enclosure at the zoo because I want to cuddle a penguin. This does not mean I don’t have freedom of movement. I do indeed oppose self-ID, because it represents a massive safeguarding risk and removes sex-based rights. You think ‘rhetoric’ kills trans people, but if you do a small amount of research you’ll find it’s violent men who do that. If feminist rhetoric could prevent male violence, we’d probably have managed to stop them raping, beating and murdering women and girls by now.

Read the full post
52 replies291 retweets2,014 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Law & gender recognition, Single-sex spaces

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Adult healthcare, Law & gender recognition

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Law & gender recognition, Single-sex spaces

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Media & institutions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

I can’t stress how ludicrous it is to assert that Europeans created the concept of binary sex when centuries worth of other continents’ myths, art, literature and cultural and religious practices prove beyond doubt they didn’t need Whitey’s help to tell a man from a woman.

1,186 replies4,770 retweets42,548 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition, Media & institutions

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Adult healthcare, Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition, Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Sport, Language & definitions

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

It’s perfectly logical. A group of people - women and girls - currently have rights and protections predicated on their biological sex. If the group’s definition is altered in law to include men, surgically altered or not, women and girls lose all rights predicated on their sex.

508 replies4,297 retweets25,621 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Law & gender recognition, Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Other

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Adult healthcare, Language & definitions, Specific individuals

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Media & institutions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Sport, Media & institutions, Single-sex spaces

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

A truly despicable move from a once-respected human rights organisation, which now openly champions the elitist, first world notion of 'gender identity' over biological sex, the basis on which females across the globe are oppressed.

1,056 replies6,965 retweets42,295 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Law & gender recognition, Language & definitions, Media & institutions

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @SirSardonic

@SirSardonic Some are so removed from real life they can't see what the problem is (eg, women who've never lived without private security.) A few are too dim to think beyond slogans. In my experience, the rest might have doubts, but cancellation scares them, so they capitulate.

19 replies54 retweets968 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Single-sex spaces

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Zero. However, there's certainly a benefit to simpering that you're completely fine with it, can't see what the issue is and calling women who disagree fascists, or we wouldn't be seeing so many wealthy, famous, protected women throwing vulnerable women under the bus.

276 replies1,554 retweets13,134 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Media & institutions

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Quite something to watch people who were keen to hitch their wagons to #MeToo a few years ago defend this kind of thing, isn't it? Then: 'male sexual predation is far more widespread than society admits!' Now: 'of course strange men should be able to shower with little girls.'

884 replies6,719 retweets34,626 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Sport

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Law & gender recognition, Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

This is such a clever, original argument! I get it now! I've got a gender-neutral bed in my house too, so anyone should be able to come sleep in it with me! I've got a gender-neutral front door and gender-neutral windows, too - henceforth I'll leave them open! Thank you!🤯 https://t.co/F0ZQ1B3tpc

3,238 replies5,500 retweets58,984 likes

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals, Child safeguarding

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

If a man is a woman, there's no such thing as a woman. You're desperate to be categorised as female, but by entering the category, you destroy it. You know that, which must suck for you, but not as much as it sucks for the women & girls fighting to retain their rights and spaces. https://t.co/pn0qxVNbJd

6,295 replies20,687 retweets181,374 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

He's just one more person working backwards from the slogan he's got to embrace to stay in the gang: 'trans women are women'. They'll abandon everything - empirical evidence, self-respect, basic ethics - rather than face the consequences of repudiating that idiotic mantra.

194 replies1,205 retweets8,574 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Sport, Language & definitions, Specific individuals

These are the posts classified trans-related. Search all 16,714 collected tweets, read the year-by-year analysis, or read the report on her campaign against trans rights.