It's important to stress that the evil TERFs who've been saying for years that predatory men would capitalise on lack of single-sex protections were completely wrong, except in the ever expanding number of rogue cases that will always be too low for trans activists to care about.
11 February 2025 to 12 March 2025. Posts are reproduced in full from the archive; the stance, intensity and topic labels come from the research classifications. How the labels are defined. Search within 2025.
Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals
Replying to @damekatydenise_
@damekatydenise_ Now I understand why stained glass windows of St Anusola, patron saint of chairless trans women, always show her squatting on a log pile while being gnawed to death by squirrels. #DameKatyFacts
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Other
🎯"Voters aren't stupid. They see this and think: 'If The Green Party can't even be honest about what a woman is, why trust them with anything else?'"
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals
Replying to @Aja1764741Aja
@Aja1764741Aja Well, at least you’re honest about not caring if more women or girls are harmed.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding
Replying to @KDansky
@KDansky I suffer from an overdeveloped vicarious embarrassment gland, which is why I can’t watch shows like X Factor, but when it comes to gender identitarians I just reach for the popcorn.
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation
This is what happens when you ask a gender ideologue to explain one of their cherished clichés. Incredulity at being challenged, repetition of the cliché as though its meaning is obvious, then helpless floundering. But she’ll still leave the studio certain she’s the clever one.
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation
Replying to @Aja1764741Aja
@Aja1764741Aja How much additional voyeurism, harassment and sexual assault is acceptable to you, in this whole picture?
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding
‘Let us in your gym or we’ll kill you’ say men who pose no risk to women whatsoever.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals
Replying to @CClarkwoodson
@CClarkwoodson India, of course, is perfectly entitled to speak for lesbians.
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals, Language & definitions
I quite agree that it would be ludicrous for me to claim to be something I very clearly am not, India. I think you can probably guess where I’m going with this. https://t.co/TAkYbMM3BZ
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals
Replying to @bindelj
@bindelj I’ve heard the only people who disagree with her on gender are serial killers and cat stranglers. It’s not too late to be on the right side of history, Julie.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions, Media & institutions
Replying to @bindelj
@bindelj But she’s ‘feminist down to her fingertips,’ Julie.
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals, Language & definitions
Replying to @thelucentcomic
@thelucentcomic It's already happening. Lesbian friends of mine say they're literally organising in secret to avoid trans activists and paraphiliac men.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Sport, Specific individuals
Replying to @KristofferPhilp
@KristofferPhilp Let's be honest, androphilic trans-identified men aren't going to fight to get into lesbian spaces. We all know what kind of man wants to be there.
Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals
Either you think lesbians should be allowed to exclude heterosexual men from their meetings, or you are a homophobe who thinks the desires of fetishistic straight male cross-dressers trump the rights of same-sex attracted women. There is no third option. https://t.co/p5eFe2F7mm
Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions
Replying to @jackianpownall
@JIPTranslation @speakoutsister @shularises @sally_hines @Gender_Journal It’s the Andrea Long Chu line, isn’t it? ‘Fucked is what a female is.’
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals
Replying to @speakoutsister
@speakoutsister @shularises @sally_hines @Gender_Journal A female has a body observably organised to produce large rather than small gametes.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions
Replying to @colwight
@colwight @speakoutsister And why are these social categories 'gendered', if they have nothing to do with 'gender norms' or sex?
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions
.@speakoutsister OK, let's assume we all belong in 'social gender categories' which don't map directly to reproductive sex but aren't just gendered norms/stereotypes. How can we tell which gender category we belong in? https://t.co/nChAw1YCOl
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions
Replying to @ThePenExcalibur
@ThePenExcalibur @Helenkeenan121 @IndiaWilloughby They're all amazing and very funny. The Pink News thing has become a whole bit. Sometimes they argue about which of them is supposed to be leaking to Pink News and which to Buzzfeed.
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Media & institutions, Specific individuals
Replying to @jedimacc
@jedimacc @gnomeo5000brat @IndiaWilloughby That made me lol
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals
Replying to @hermionegingol1
@hermionegingol1 @gnomeo5000brat @IndiaWilloughby Exactly. We were to have a 'typical girls' day' and, as we women know, virtually every day is spa-and-manicure day.
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals
Replying to @RestW1tchFace
@RestW1tchFace @Helenkeenan121 @IndiaWilloughby @bindelj I heard that too! She'd have mentioned it, though, so it can't be true.
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals
Replying to @gnomeo5000brat
@gnomeo5000brat @IndiaWilloughby It's been going on for years. When he's not asking me to make TV programmes with him, which in one case would have included getting manicures/massages together, he sends me endless abuse. It's all very odd.
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions
Replying to @Helenkeenan121
@Helenkeenan121 @IndiaWilloughby If I say something TERFy in front of them, one or other of my kids will sometimes pick up an imaginary phone. 'Pink News? Hold the front page.'
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Media & institutions, Free speech & cancellation
Flattered though I am by your assumption that I'm behind every women's crisis centre in Scotland, @IndiaWilloughby, I don't run Edinburgh Women's Aid. I do applaud their decision to keep their service woman-only, though, so your frothing at the mouth wasn't entirely pointless. https://t.co/OUiz6i20y7
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals
🙄The fringe idea that we all have a 'gender identity' that may or may not match our biological sex is the whole point of this discussion. Trans activists act as though the existence of 'gender identity' is a settled, self-evident point, when to the vast majority of the world it's unevidenced, quasi-religious, pseudoscientific nonsense, which has been imposed top down on our society with serious consequences for vulnerable women and troubled youth in particular. Meaningful discussion about competing needs and rights cannot happen inside an elitist ideological bubble where everyone is forced to adopt gender ideology's approved jargon, accept its self-contradicting slogans as fact and pretend fact-light assertions and feeble sophistry are critical thinking. You tell us to 'educate' ourselves, by which you mean, 'adopt our beliefs unquestioningly,' but at this point, most of us know your arguments off by heart. These include, but are not limited to: feelings trump facts and unless we agree we're 'erasing people from existence'; women and girls aren't definable entities, so why should they be entitled to their own sports and single-sex spaces; clownfish and people with DSDs mean sex is 'on a spectrum' and 'woman' is a set of stereotypes associated with the female sex class, so it doesn't matter if you've got a penis, if you identify with those stereotypes you're 'valid'. The reason we haven't been won over by these talking points and remain so tragically 'uneducated' isn't that we've failed to grasp the sophistication of your world view. It's that we think you're talking unadulterated bullshit and making fools of yourselves.
Read the full postClassified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces, Sport, Child safeguarding, Youth healthcare, Free speech & cancellation
Replying to @ThomasWillett9
@ThomasWillett9 Your ideology crumbles to dust if you concede that the difference between what you call ‘cis’ women and trans-identified men is that the former are female and the latter are male. You can’t explain what makes some men women without invoking the ideological concept of ‘gender identity’, an ineffable, unfalsifiable concept in which most people don’t believe. Good faith argument is not possible if one side demands submission to two unevidenced beliefs before discussion can begin. I’m afraid that when you arm yourself with trans activist clichés and regurgitate whichever one seems most appropriate in the moment, then fall back on ad hominem attacks if you meet resistance, you don’t need anyone else’s help to become to ‘some kind of caricature.’
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Law & gender recognition, Free speech & cancellation
I’m more than happy to engage critically with your argument ‘men aren’t the same as women but some men are women’. It’s self-contradictory idiocy, @ThomasWillett9.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals
Replying to @DeeJarv34798927
@DeeJarv34798927 There are very young people caught up in this, and genuinely well-intentioned people who didn’t think through all the consequences of the mantras, towards whom I feel no animosity at all. Changing your mind when the data changes is honourable and nobody should be shamed for saying ‘I called this wrong, I’ve rethought my position.’ I’m talking about a very specific cohort of people who’ve enabled, cheered on and perpetrated real and sometimes irreversible harm, tried to suppress inconvenient statistics and evidence, demonised the vulnerable and whose authoritarian tactics have included threats of violence, defamation, harassment and censorship. They deserve no free pass.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Free speech & cancellation
Replying to @RooneyRachel
@RooneyRachel A woman is anyone who identifies as a woman, Rachel. You should know this by now. https://t.co/NX4OeBZyh9
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces
Replying to @ashawolves
@ashawolves People like Willett are attempting a subtle rebrand because they sense a turning tide, but full recantation would mean the loss of all their carefully nurtured personal clout. Those who cultivated a personal platform off the back of gender ideology aren’t going to give up easily.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions, Specific individuals
Replying to @ashawolves
@ashawolves The worst bullies in the genderist movement have done their utmost to intimidate and smear women with legitimate concerns and have caused very real damage to people’s lives. Those who’ve delighted in leading public lynch mobs shouldn’t expect to slip quietly away into the crowd.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals
For years now, you and your ilk have jackbooted around demanding that trans-identified men be treated in all respects and in all circumstances as identical to biological women. Even to mention physical difference was ‘transphobic’, so spare us the panicked attempts to backtrack. https://t.co/Sm7CmkHyVW
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation
Replying to @ShahrarAli
@ShahrarAli This is a huge loss to the men's rights movement, but we might actually get a minister for women now.
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals, Language & definitions
It’s crazy how many dangerous, unbalanced, violent women have started wearing Obvious Man masks to carry out their crimes. Someone really needs to track down the supplier.
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals
Explain what makes them trans.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions
Replying to @dannyvblane
@dannyvblane As @francesweetman once so brilliantly said, line up to be told who you are by the Sorting Twat.
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Other
Man: 'I'm a woman'. Jones: 'I not only agree, I'd be honoured to hold your coat while you help yourself to women's rights.' Woman: 'I'm not truly English'. Jones: 'Don't be so fucking ridiculous.' https://t.co/a8oyJ3UQr7
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions, Sport
Replying to @NWACMoore
@NWACMoore Look, if that guy can believe women have dicks, you can believe in wizards, and honestly, your delusion would be a damn sight less harmful than his.
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions
OK, I didn't realise I needed to explain this, but wizards aren't real. In that respect, they greatly resemble women with penises. Hope this helps. https://t.co/Cr6obQAVOa
Classified mocking · Intensity 4/4 · Language & definitions
Replying to @Ricardolz75
@Ricardolz75 What could be more good and caring than to support male rapists in women's jails, a thousand odd sporting honours taken from female athletes, rape crisis shelters under attack for wanting to keep single-sex spaces and women and girls being forced to share changing rooms with men?
Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Single-sex spaces, Sport, Child safeguarding, Language & definitions
Replying to @steviestysteve
@steviestysteve There can't be many stupider ways of keeping a secret hidden than trying to force an entire country to accept a fiction.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Law & gender recognition, Language & definitions
Let's be honest: he doesn't really believe trans-identified men are biological women. Literally nobody does. The real question for politicians like this is, are you pretending to believe it out of fear of telling the truth, or because you think it's personally advantageous?
Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals
@suzanne_moore @RooneyRachel You're right, of course. Without a PhD in gender studies and a doctorate in queer theory, I have no right to comment. As you were.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation
@RooneyRachel I had this crazy idea the other day: someone should write books kids actually want to read as opposed to barely-fictionalised manifestos written to appeal to fellow adult activists.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Media & institutions, Language & definitions
Incoming in 3… 2… 1… ‘She probably has to pee in bottles because she’s frightened a TERF would attack her in the ladies, and what about cis men who sexually harass shop girls, and you never mention it when cis women spray piss at kids, do you, bigot?’ https://t.co/YCjZH76hg5
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation
Replying to @DarrenDonaldson
@DarrenDonaldson @bindelj @damekatydenise_ I would like to revise my previous comment. A lifelong love of Mancunians, minus Dame Katy.
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals
Replying to @DianeCarolRoy1
@DianeCarolRoy1 @ottawalady @SVPhillimore @terrafically It's worth a shot, surely? Just explain how a person knows whether their gender identity is male, female, both or neither. We know it can change (genderflux) or be absent (agender) too. How do we tell which one we have? I hear it's not about sex stereotypes, so what is it?
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions
Replying to @DianeCarolRoy1
@DianeCarolRoy1 @ottawalady @SVPhillimore @terrafically I've literally never been told how I can tell whether my gender identity is male, female, both or neither, which is why I'm asking you to explain.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions
Replying to @DianeCarolRoy1
@DianeCarolRoy1 @ottawalady @SVPhillimore @terrafically How do I tell whether my innate gender is male, female, neither or both? Please explain, as nobody has ever been able to clarify this for me.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions
'My arse is my elbow, and my elbow's my arse. I have no further comment.'
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition, Language & definitions
Replying to @zaqrider
@zaqrider Look at who stands to gain by stripping women and girls of their rights, removing basic safeguarding for the vulnerable and turning troubled young people into lifelong medical experiments and you've got your answer.
Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces, Youth healthcare
Trans-identified man who was appointed as head of an endometriosis charity compares a female nurse who doesn't want to take her clothes off in front of a male colleague to a convicted child killer.
Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals, Child safeguarding
'We have no regrets about trying to impose gender self-ID in Scotland.' https://t.co/qZakvunOoB
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Law & gender recognition
Replying to @SlightPeeve
@SlightPeeve @AtaraxiaGoal @AviBittMD @heikateryna This 'argument' has been made a million tedious times. Even if it malfunctions, stops working or isn't currently producing an egg, all the necessary equipment for ova production continues to exist inside a woman, while the equipment for sperm production continues to be absent.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions
To paraphrase: 'Have you no sense of decency, madam? At long last, have you left no sense of decency?'
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Sport, Specific individuals
Replying to @Lulu_197
@Lulu_197 When I accidentally incur the approval of misogynist cowards who're prepared to sacrifice women's rights on the altar of tribally sanctioned luxury beliefs, I'll be worried.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation
Women are organising. Now is the time for every political party to decide whether it wishes to protect the rights of 51% of the population, or continue to pander to gender activists. https://t.co/jh2WDyR12O
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition, Free speech & cancellation
@voicereason3467 @Beuford2Beuford @_Lady__Lilith_ The kind of man who tries to shame/intimidate female rape survivors by accusing them of being obsessed with dicks isn't missing any kind of point. He doesn't want women to have anywhere to go that he's not allowed, too, and DARVO's the way he tries to argue for it.
Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals
Replying to @robertdorazi
@robertdorazi Are you saying there are human individuals who've produced both eggs and sperm?
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions
One day kids will learn about the time when intelligent liberals were too scared to say 'women don't have penises' and they'll roll around laughing. I'd find it quite funny myself if I could forget how much harm those people's shameless cowardice and self-interest have enabled.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Child safeguarding, Free speech & cancellation
Replying to @jk_rowling
More Batshit Take of 2025 contenders flooding in. Coming up strongly on the inside we have ‘a higher percentage of trans-identified men are imprisoned for sex crimes, compared to men in general, because transphobes are mean to them.’ https://t.co/B74yiAslNA
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Child safeguarding, Other
Replying to @Beuford2Beuford
@Beuford2Beuford I’ve literally never heard this mind blowingly clever attack line before. Intimidated by being called weird and weak, I have decided to pledge allegiance to your pseudoscientific quasi-religion and hereby urge all women, girls and non-compliant gay people to embrace it, too.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation, Single-sex spaces
Now do men in women’s changing rooms, hospital wards, rape shelters and prison cells, @stellacreasy.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals
If a human being has testicles, internal or not, they cannot produce large gametes (eggs) and they are male. Everyone with a DSD is objectively classifiable as male and female. There are no human hermaphrodites. https://t.co/ugplZxdn6Z
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions
Woman: adult human female. Female: a member of the sex class whose body is organised to produce large gametes. Hope that helps. https://t.co/L8rfVbPBhJ
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions
I can't remember any other 'civil rights' movement where the people involved were so keen on hiding their faces, but then, what if someone from Daddy's law firm recognised them? Internships don't grow on trees.
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions
Replying to @WillyWoofter
@GreatBritishGay @salltweets I hate to say it, because of the beetroot stuff, but they come for Bindel, they come for me, too ⚔️
Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Specific individuals, Free speech & cancellation
Replying to @WillyWoofter
@GreatBritishGay @salltweets You and I both need to remember that surviving rape and sexual assault is absolutely nothing compared to being misgendered in a sushi restaurant. As for @bindelj, obviously the woman's a monster, but my hatred for her is mostly negroni and beetroot-related.
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals, Language & definitions
It's only February, but this will take some beating at the 2025 Batshit Take of the Year Awards. "It's women's fault if trans-identified men commit sexual assault in previously women-only spaces, because by saying that's a thing that happens, women put the idea in men's heads." https://t.co/MEoDAmzBZX
Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding
Replying to @FFS_WhatNow
@FFS_WhatNow Craving attention He painted his arms To tell all the world Of the woes and the harms Inflicted on trans folk By Labour and me Without whom he'd be A celebrity (D). https://t.co/NhkwZVWA08
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions
Replying to @FFS_WhatNow
@FFS_WhatNow Roses of crimson And silvery stars I do love her videos Ranting in cars. Give her a diamond Or snowy white pearl It won't make her happy She's still not a girl. I'd find it quite tragic I'd be quite heartsick If only dear India Wasn't a prick.
Classified mocking · Intensity 4/4 · Specific individuals
Roses are red, Violets are blue, Upton's a man And you're a bloke, too. #Valentinesday2025 India🌹 https://t.co/DB1ZMq1ITV
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Language & definitions
Replying to @mike_lime_
@mike_lime_ @damekatydenise_ I doubt it. We not only have restraining orders against each other, so do our pets. She tried to transition one of my Westies without my consent and she claims I 'misgendered' the pansexual furry she sometimes takes for walks round the office on a lead.
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Other
Replying to @damekatydenise_
@damekatydenise_ I'm amazed you can't spot India Willoughby's work by now, what with the cheap ribbon and the obvious lack of roughage.
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals
*Man appears in court accused of raping and sexually assaulting two children. No, I don't respect his fucking 'identity'.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Child safeguarding, Specific individuals, Language & definitions
@ruzzfeed @Anne_on_gd @DPJHodges @Naeluckmate @helenstaniland @DanniBrener @JoolsJuevans I appreciate the apology. Thank you. I can only say that I don't consider this debate simple in the slightest. What some see as an inconsequential matter - use preferred pronouns, it's just polite, what's the harm? - others see (in my view, rightly) as a means of abusing and encroaching upon other people's rights. As I don't doubt you know, Sandie Peggie, a nurse, has just been forced to talk publicly in court about her menstruation and a sexual assault she endured to justify her discomfort at pretending Dr Beth Upton is a fellow woman and sharing changing room facilities and a bathroom with him. It starts with pronouns, one small white lie. It ends, far too often, in women being forced to abandon rights for which our foremothers fought, and never dreamed would be removed once won.
Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions, Specific individuals, Law & gender recognition
@ruzzfeed @Anne_on_gd @DPJHodges @Naeluckmate @helenstaniland @DanniBrener @JoolsJuevans You told me you expected me to extend good will towards you, after asking whether I hadn't considered that the pronouns issue might be more complicated than I realised. Do you think there's the slightest, most remote chance that you're coming across as deeply patronising here?
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation
@ruzzfeed @Anne_on_gd @DPJHodges @Naeluckmate @helenstaniland @DanniBrener @JoolsJuevans My days of pretending to be grateful to men who want to explain to me why I'm almost, but not quite, right about women's rights are long gone. And if I'm honest, those 'days' comprised a single afternoon with a very pompous temporary boss I placated so he'd sign my timesheet.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals
@ruzzfeed @Anne_on_gd @DPJHodges @Naeluckmate @helenstaniland @DanniBrener @JoolsJuevans This isn't about purity, it's about men like you and Dan Hodges choosing to wade into a discussion to tell women what accommodations you - two men, whose rights are entirely unaffected - deem it reasonable for women to make. You act as though you have an equal stake in this matter. You don't. Your rights are entirely unaffected. You aren't under duress from people threatening to rape and kill you. Jobs, sporting records and honours are not being taken from you by women who identify as men. Men are not being dragged to court because they refuse to play along with women's identities. What's staggering to me is that you both genuinely think you're adding something groundbreaking to the discussion by saying 'just be nice and use an individual's pronouns, what's the harm?' This is not the hot take you both think it is. It's the fons e origo of the entire mess, the root of the problem, not the bloody solution.
Read the full postClassified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions, Sport, Free speech & cancellation
Replying to @Anne_on_gd
@Anne_on_gd @ruzzfeed @DPJHodges @Naeluckmate @helenstaniland @DanniBrener @JoolsJuevans It's clear they've studied the matter deeply, grasp both the big picture and the finer nuances, and thanks to them I've finally realised that my freedom of speech and allegiance to objective truth are sacrifices worth making if I can make just one man's day a little brighter 🩷
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Language & definitions
@ruzzfeed @DPJHodges @Naeluckmate @helenstaniland @DanniBrener @JoolsJuevans If you want to call a trans-identified woman 'he/him', that's your choice. You won't have been subjected to the threats of rape and violence that women have endured from trans-identified men, of course. You aren't a member of the sex class that constitutes 88% of sex crime victims, which is being asked to let members of the sex class that committed 99% of sex offences into their protected spaces. Your 'genuine question' mentions the issue being 'more complicated' than I seem to realise. What complication are you referring to?
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Language & definitions
Replying to @DPJHodges
@DPJHodges @Naeluckmate @helenstaniland @DanniBrener @JoolsJuevans It makes no difference how politely the person who wishes to compel my speech makes the request. The very making of the request tells me the man in question thinks he has the right to control my language, and thereby, to control me. He is asking me to acquiesce in a lie, to pretend, implicitly, that he and I are the same. It is an act of dominance, which is why the women discussing this with you keep using the word 'demand', as opposed to your preferred 'request'. In the current political climate, any request to use opposite sex pronouns when talking about a trans-identified man carries a threat. It is highly disingenuous to pretend you don't know that many women and girls have been put through absolute hell over the past few years, either for refusing to pretend men can be women, or for hurting an individual trans-identified man's vanity, even unintentionally. I'm assuming that if someone put a gun to your head and told you to hand over all your money you wouldn't much care how sweetly they'd asked. That's where increasing numbers of women are on this issue. They're sick of having a metaphorical gun held to their head, of the ever-present threat of being investigated, reported, harassed, sacked, defamed and dragged into court - simply because they won't pretend men are women. All you've been doing for the past two days is prove exactly how shallow your understanding is, not only of this issue, but of what women have already lost and endured. This makes your patronising 'just be nice, ladies,' lectures even more offensive.
Read the full postClassified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation, Single-sex spaces
Turns out threatening and enacting violence, trying to get opponents sacked from their jobs, fighting to remove women’s rights, expecting to be treated as a holy victim caste and screaming ‘bigot’ at all who disagree isn’t the most effective form of activism. Who’d have thought.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions
Replying to @DPJHodges
@DPJHodges @BohemianHarpy @Hollyjeeny @KatieKmucha @DanniBrener @fallawanna @apmeehan @JoolsJuevans Awfully transphobic of you to use the words 'man' and 'him' when reprimanding a woman for calling said individual 'sir'. https://t.co/3WTJkwDGGI
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals
Replying to @DPJHodges
@DPJHodges @KatieKmucha @DanniBrener @fallawanna @apmeehan @JoolsJuevans I've just answered that, above. I'll repeat it: If an adult feels they can only exist comfortably and authentically in this world by dressing in the opposite sex's clothes, having surgeries and taking hormones, or in adopting one of the many gender labels, I wish them safety, happiness and health, as long as they're not harming anyone else. You, however, seem to think that for a trans-identified man to be 'comfortable' and 'authentic', everyone in the vicinity must abandon their freedom of speech and belief to accommodate his 'identity'. Women are not validation props, comfort blankets or support animals. We aren't a rest home for men who don't like being men. If a person's happiness and self-esteem resides entirely in whether or not they can compel everyone around them to lie, whether out of fear or pity, I would respectfully suggest they are unlikely to have a very comfortable life, and are about as far from being 'authentic' as it is possible to be.
Read the full postClassified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation, Single-sex spaces
Replying to @jk_rowling
@DPJHodges @KatieKmucha @DanniBrener @fallawanna @apmeehan @JoolsJuevans If an adult feels they can only exist comfortably and authentically in this world by dressing in the opposite sex's clothes, having surgeries and taking hormones, or in adopting one of the many gender labels, I wish them safety, happiness and health, as long as they're not harming anyone else. You, however, seem to think that for a trans-identified man to be 'comfortable' and 'authentic', everyone in the vicinity must abandon their freedom of speech and belief to accommodate his 'identity'. Women are not validation props, comfort blankets or support animals. We aren't a rest home for men who don't like being men. If a person's happiness and self-esteem resides entirely on whether or not they can compel everyone around them to lie, whether out of fear or pity, I would respectfully suggest they are unlikely to have a very comfortable life, and are about as far from being 'authentic' as it is possible to be.
Read the full postClassified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation, Single-sex spaces
Replying to @happymonkey1874
@happymonkey1874 @DPJHodges @KatieKmucha @DanniBrener @fallawanna @apmeehan @JoolsJuevans You're making me feel positively nostalgic for the good old days where the people threatening to punch me had saltires in their bios instead of trans flags.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals, Free speech & cancellation
Replying to @jarralass14
@jarralass14 @DPJHodges @KatieKmucha @DanniBrener @fallawanna @apmeehan @JoolsJuevans I respect the right of every person to believe whatever they want believe about themselves, but when it comes to the individual, respect has to be earned. If a man wishes to intimidate me, compel my speech and infringe on my rights, I don't respect him and I refuse to humour him.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions
Replying to @DPJHodges
@DPJHodges @KatieKmucha @DanniBrener @fallawanna @apmeehan @JoolsJuevans Either women are allowed to speak the truth about sex, or they aren't. It isn't up to you to decide when a woman's allowed to say 'you are male' and when she's not. All of this began with you loftily decreeing when you deem it acceptable for women to name sex. Truth is truth.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation
Replying to @DPJHodges
@DPJHodges @KatieKmucha @DanniBrener @fallawanna @apmeehan @JoolsJuevans 'Man' and 'sir' aren't insults or slurs. Like many other lefty misogynists, what you're asking is for women to indulge male fantasy, to own own detriment. I respect the right of every human being to wear what they like, call themselves whatever they like and believe whatever they like about themselves, so long as none of that infringes on the rights of others. You've demonstrated very clearly that you do not respect women's right to name sex accurately, without which we can have no serious conversation about sex-based rights and safeguarding. Your 'respect' goes only one way. You want women to pretend men can be women so as to spare trans-identified men's feelings, but you appear not to have considered in the slightest the psychological toll it takes on women and girls, being compelled to speak a lie because it's their job to be 'kind'. You, personally, suffer no detriment whatsoever in calling a man a woman, to be 'nice.' You think it makes you a Really Good Guy and walk away feeling good about yourself, having lectured women on their 'bigotry'. You've spent many hours now proving you don't understand why using factual language is important to us. Again and again, you return to the poor hurt feelings of those born with penises. Nothing proves more conclusively that trans women are men than the instinctive, unquestioning sympathy men like you feel for them.
Read the full postClassified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Free speech & cancellation
@MinnOrchia Thought experiment. For a moment, make contact with reality. A six foot tall, heterosexual bloke wants to be in the ladies' changing room. How does the scenario look now?
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces
Replying to @TwisterFilm
@TwisterFilm That's how I feel about certain supposed 'feminists'. 'Of course you should be in the Ladies now you've put on lippy, Gareth, I'm intersectional! Urgh, those basic rape survivor bitches, boring on about single-sex spaces, all I want is a dress with pockets, giggle simper giggle.'
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals, Language & definitions
.@Sihodges You said I’m ignorant for not knowing that trans women are women, not men pretending to be women, so you clearly know the difference yourself. Explain it to me. Help me understand. https://t.co/wGOkgEpwcy
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals
“Of course trans rights are human rights, but when they’re pursued at the expense of women’s rights then they can become diktats to be wielded against working-class women who have neither the power, nor the material resources to resist.” Every word. https://t.co/RvQA6lmXHS
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition, Other
“What Sandie Peggie has done by withdrawing from the changing room when you were there is opted out of immersive role play. That’s why you were angry... That one voice saying you’re a man will break the spell.” 👏🔥👏🔥👏🔥👏🔥👏🔥👏🔥👏🔥👏🔥👏🔥👏🔥 https://t.co/wMbWuKAXmZ
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals, Language & definitions
@SeeRedWoman1 @Sihodges I really think lefty mansplainers who can't see why women balk at calling a man 'she' if he's gone to all the trouble of putting on lipstick should be known as 'Hodges' going forwards. Eg: 'There's no point explaining women's rights to him. He's a Hodge.'
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces
@Sihodges What distinguishes a trans woman from a man pretending to be a woman, Simon?
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals
Replying to @MoronicHeadline
@MoronicHeadline @5uffragette 'Unless I'm permitted to transgress all women's physical boundaries, and make them uncomfortable and scared, and force them to agree I'm one of them, and take them to court if they won't, I, a white heterosexual male, am the most oppressed person in the whole wide world.'
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions, Specific individuals
These are the posts classified trans-related. Search all 16,714 collected tweets, read the year-by-year analysis, or read the report on her campaign against trans rights.