Replying to @stingerdelux
@stingerdelux And how do we tell if a man poses a threat? Will he have ‘I like exposing myself to schoolgirls’ tattooed on his forehead?
Page 7 of 11. Posts 601–700 of the 1,011 J.K. Rowling wrote about trans people in 2025, newest first.
16 April 2025 to 30 April 2025. Posts are reproduced in full from the archive; the stance, intensity and topic labels come from the research classifications. How the labels are defined. Search within 2025.
Replying to @stingerdelux
@stingerdelux And how do we tell if a man poses a threat? Will he have ‘I like exposing myself to schoolgirls’ tattooed on his forehead?
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding
Replying to @stingerdelux
@stingerdelux So women and girls are at risk, but so what? Men must be able to enter women-only spaces even if it makes females unsafe, because males’ desires are more important than females’ right to privacy, dignity and safety. Thanks for playing, Edward. You’ve shown exactly who you are.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals
Replying to @jk_rowling
@stingerdelux All available studies show that trans-identified men commit sexual offences at the same, or higher, rates as non-trans identified men. Please explain why women and girls should let them into their spaces regardless.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Language & definitions
Replying to @stingerdelux
@stingerdelux And when are women subject to ‘fear-based exclusion’? 98-99% of sexual predators are men. 88% of victims of sex crimes are women. That’s why men are excluded from places where women are vulnerable.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding
Replying to @stingerdelux
@stingerdelux Are you proposing that all men wishing to use women’s spaces should be background checked for previous sexual crimes? This presumably those with a clean record are assessed by a psychiatrist and deemed no risk? Will this be workable, do you think?
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Free speech & cancellation
Replying to @jk_rowling
@stingerdelux And if ‘fear’ isn’t a good reason to ‘punish the wrong people’, why are women and girls being asked to give up their safety because some men are afraid of other men?
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding
Replying to @stingerdelux
@stingerdelux And there it is. How do you propose ensure the predators are kept out and only the harmless men are allowed in?
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding
Replying to @stingerdelux
@stingerdelux Creeps, voyeurs, paedophiles and rapists don’t campaign to make their predation more difficult. They tend to argue exactly what you’re arguing, ‘there’s no risk, stop pearl-clutching, don’t be a bitch, let me in.’
Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding
Replying to @stingerdelux
@stingerdelux Literally nobody on my side of this argument doesn’t want trans-identified people to be safe. They don’t want women and girls to be LESS safe. Fact: 100% of the men women have no need to fear are on my side, because they’re realistic about male violence and male sexual predation.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals
Replying to @stingerdelux
@stingerdelux When a non-trans-identified man spends days sneering and jeering at women for wanting single-sex spaces, he’s not the one being intimidated. Why are you so invested in this issue? Why have you sent hours telling women they have no right to male-free spaces?
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation
Replying to @MChill2000
@MChill2000 @stingerdelux I refer you to the question I just asked: why not campaign for third spaces if it’s genuinely everyone’s safety you’re concerned about? Why are so many non-trans-identified men so eager to see women and girls forced to accept men into their spaces?
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding
Replying to @stingerdelux
@stingerdelux @BlamKaboom So your position is, women and girls are baselessly afraid of male sexual predation and violence? There’s no real risk?
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding
Replying to @stingerdelux
@stingerdelux When women and girls are forced to accept men into their protected spaces, those spaces are no longer single-sex, which means women and girls lose a right predicated on safeguarding. You’ve spent days advocating for the removal of that right from women and girls. Why?
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Sport
'Sweetie was a spoiled, badly trained pooch... Every outburst was met with a treat and a coo, because Sweetie had learnt early on that if he made enough noise, the world would bend to his will.' On trans activism and obnoxious poodles, by @jo_bartosch. https://t.co/aYMeth3MEh
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions
Crime statistics clearly show that trans-identified men pose just as great a threat to women as other kind of men. Non-trans men attacking trans-identified men is also against the law, so, according to your own argument, there's no reason for them not to use the men's bathroom. https://t.co/aCt1ygwysK
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Language & definitions
Replying to @stingerdelux
@stingerdelux @RachelWilde13 @OhTheLies2 Trying to shame women out of maintaining their own boundaries is a debating tactic you don't often see, but let's revert to the good old hypothetical question. Which side of the women-and-girls-must-accept-males-in-their-changing-room debate do you imagine most perverts are on?
Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Free speech & cancellation
@MinnOrchia @genderskeptic @RCZyla @miffythegamer @rejserin We're admitting men might pretend to be 'trans' now, are we? This is a step forward.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions
Replying to @stingerdelux
@stingerdelux @Tibbulz_the_cat @RachelWilde13 You've literally spent days arguing for stripping women of their right to single sex spaces when you could have been reassuring trans-identified men they'd be safe in the men's facilities. Why is it so important to you that women and girls can't exclude men when undressed?
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces
Don't be gaslit into thinking this is about toilets. @carla_denyer doesn't think women deserve ANY male-free spaces: rape crisis centres, hospital wards, homeless shelters, domestic abuse refuges, prison cells or changing rooms, no matter how vulnerable or traumatised the women.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals, Child safeguarding
Replying to @stingerdelux
@stingerdelux You've spent days now arguing for all women's spaces to become mixed sex. Mixed-sex spaces are provably more dangerous for women and girls. You'd be far from the first man who had a personal motive for his pro-'trans rights' stance, as a number of convictions have proved.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals
Replying to @stingerdelux
@stingerdelux You're free to campaign for spaces for trans-identified men, yet your focus is entirely about stripping rights from women. This begs the question, is it really the safety of trans-IDed men you care about, or the removal of women's and girls' safety? What does your hard drive say?
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals
Funny, isn’t it, how women who’ve been raped or beaten are accused of ‘weaponising’ their trauma when they ask for male-free spaces, but trans-identified men who claim using the Gents has a higher mortality rate than armed combat are met with credulity and simpering concern.
Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions
@MinnOrchia @rejserin Men should never have been in women-only spaces in the first place, as the Supreme Court has just confirmed. It’s not women’s fault that men forced their way in and it’s not women’s problem if you don’t want to use male facilities.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition
Replying to @rejserin
@rejserin @MinnOrchia Women's spaces are not the appropriate place for trans-identified men to be. As the Supreme Court has confirmed, this is UK law.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition
@MinnOrchia @rejserin If you don't want to share facilities with other men, campaign for separate spaces, just as we had to. Women and girls aren't your comfort blankets, support animals or validation props.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces
Preventing women and girls from accessing their bathrooms will totally dispel the idea that your movement contains a lot of very angry, potentially unbalanced men who're currently displaying classic symptoms of narcissistic rage. https://t.co/7LdJOL1DpF
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces
Women fought for years, not to pretend they weren't women, but to seek to redress the wrongs done to their sex class because of their biology. Women and girls are coerced, persecuted and controlled all over the world by the larger, stronger male. Even in our most liberal societies, women remain subject to sex-based violence and assault, still see their reproductive rights challenged and are still threatened with rape and even death by men angry that they're sticking up for their rights. 'Womanhood' is not some quasi-mystical state into which men can identify. Pretending it is makes both studying the harms done to actual women, and enforcing women's rights, impossible. A straight man who likes wearing stockings is not a lesbian. Wanting breasts doesn't make a teenaged boy a girl. Both are male, and giving them access to women's single-sex spaces has caused proven harm to women and girls. How does taking away single-sex spaces away from vulnerable women advance feminism? How did three men occupying the medal podium at a women's sporting event help female athletes? You cannot describe what you're too frightened to admit. You cannot defend what you can't define. The last decade has seen a wholesale attack on the rights our foremothers fought for. It continues to astound me that privileged young women who've benefited from those advances all their lives are proudly urging on the dimantling of the protections and spaces that were so hard won, and pretending this is progressive.
Read the full postClassified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Sport, Language & definitions, Law & gender recognition
Replying to @rejserin
@rejserin 'Sex' in the Equality Act means biological sex, women have a legal right to single-sex public changing rooms, bathrooms and crisis centres, and a Gender Recognition Certificate doesn't make a man a woman under the law. I really don't know how much clearer they could make it.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition, Language & definitions
Replying to @bencooper
@bencooper "But it's very hard for me to relinquish my baseline assumption that hysterical women have been making a fuss about nothing, so let's tell women to be nicer and continue pandering to men who've lost no rights, but feel as though they have, which is what really counts."
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions
Replying to @juleshomes31
@juleshomes31 @DianaCostello13 @stingerdelux If I understand you correctly, you’re saying some predatory men might claim to be trans to get into a women’s changing room, while also arguing that no predatory man would claim to be trans to get into a changing room.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding
It really hasn’t become more confusing, though, has it?
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition, Specific individuals
Men who’ve finally woken up to the fact that women might have had a point when they pointed out their rights were being stripped away from them have arrived to tell those who won without their assistance to compromise. Thanks, lads. Women would never have thought of that.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Sport, Child safeguarding, Free speech & cancellation
Replying to @singer_joseph
@singer_joseph @charlesarthur @EnarialP @grayizzyz @Maidinamerica3 Only a biological male could ask how much sex matters.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces
On the contrary, women have sex-based rights in the UK, as was just confirmed by the Supreme Court. Hope that helps. Just typing that made me want another cigar. https://t.co/3DhxmIkf0e
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Law & gender recognition, Single-sex spaces
'Trans women' are male. If they weren't male they wouldn't be 'trans'. Prejudice is an irrational fear or dislike. It is entirely rational to state that a man is a man. Only totalitarians and religious zealots insist that others parrot falsehoods on pain of retribution. https://t.co/xTVJ9SVSlU
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions
Replying to @msjlindsay
@msjlindsay I'm in the mood to buy another TERF a bag. We can even personalise it for you 😘 https://t.co/jrV6si6DR2
Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals
Replying to @Swarajit
@Swarajit Who said trans people are all misogynists? Not me. Plenty of trans-identified people support women's rights.
Classified defensive · Intensity 0/4 · Specific individuals, Language & definitions
I hate to point this out*, but accusing me of hating men because I don't think trans women should be given access to all women-only spaces does rather suggest that (in spite of your feverish assertions to the contrary) you're well aware that these are, in fact, men. *I don't.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces
Replying to @grayizzyz
@grayizzyz Men like you, who don’t think women are allowed to say ‘no’, are the reason I’ve spent 25 years funding rape crisis centres and domestic abuse shelters. Blocking you now, because you’re nearly as tedious as you’re misogynistic.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals
🙄I'm married to a man, George. I do not hate men. I simply live in reality where men - however they identify - commit 98% of sexual assaults, and 88% of victims are female. Trans-identified men are no less likely than other kinds of men to pose a risk to women or girls.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces
Replying to @jk_rowling
*ideological
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions
Replying to @jk_rowling
Beira's Place doesn't expect service users to adopt or abandon any ideologicall position. Unlike the Edinburgh Rape Crisis Centre, we do not believe there is any place for 're-education' in therapy. Seeking to impose personal beliefs on a vulnerable person is abuse.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Media & institutions, Child safeguarding
Replying to @grayizzyz
@grayizzyz With every sentence you utter, you prove yourself a committed misogynist who wants to deny women and girls the most basic sex-based rights and protections.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions
Beira's Place has accepted trans-identified women who've suffered sexual assault from its inception, and the only thing I want to do about it is reassure them they're welcome. They're biological women and they're consequently as welcome as any other woman. https://t.co/n8LNl6lHbc
Classified neutral · Intensity 0/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding
Replying to @Burkysmirkey
@Burkysmirkey @grayizzyz I've seen the prison stats in the UK and yes, at first glance that's what they seem to show, but I think one would need to be an informed statistician/academic or scientific researcher to properly analyse that data. When did the trans-identification occur, before or after conviction? Is the trans-identified individual androphilic, gynephilic or both? Do they have a proven history of gender dysphoria or is this evidence of a cross-dressing paraphilia? Such analysis is well above my pay grade. All I know for sure is that trans-identified men have never been proven to be less of a threat to women than other men, and the evidence we have to date suggests that they are, at the most conservative estimate, at least as much of a risk.
Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Other
Replying to @grayizzyz
@grayizzyz I have never framed all trans women as threats. The evidence shows that trans women commit sexual offences at the same rate as other males. You seem incapable of understanding that women, too, are human beings worthy of dignity and respect.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals
Replying to @nietzsche258918
@nietzsche258918 A woman is an adult human female. A female belongs to the sex category whose bodies are organised to produce large gametes. I have just described all women, omitting not a single one of them.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions
It seems literally impossible for certain trans activists to grasp that not everything is about them. The only rape crisis centre in Edinburgh prior to the opening of Beira’s Place was run by a trans-identified man who publicly told potential service-users they would be ‘challenged on their bigotry’ if they didn’t agree he was a woman. Meanwhile a ‘non-binary’ man subsequently convicted of rape, and found by the sentencing judge to harbour serious hostility towards women, was permitted to access the centre’s services. Trans-identified men in Edinburgh were better served than women when it came to accessing support after rape or sexual assault. Beira’s Place, which I founded and fund in its entirety, gives women a choice. The female-led, female-centred model of support is provably preferred by most female survivors. We know for a fact that some of our service-users didn’t seek help before we opened, because they didn’t want a male providing their therapy, or for men to be accessing what they needed to feel was a completely safe space. However, if a woman was happy with a male support worker, or with males also using the service, she could of course choose the alternative rape crisis centre. Some men, trans-identified and not, disagree that even the most vulnerable and traumatised women should be allowed to exclude men from rape crisis centres, yet many women see a male-free space and service as the last or only chance of putting their lives back together. It takes immense courage even to pick up the phone to access help after rape. Yet, even at their worst moment, these women told by activists like Willoughby that their priority should be centering his feelings, pandering to his ‘identity’ and pretending that they don’t recognise his narcissism and aggression as a quintessentially male response to not being given what he wants, by women. The simple truth is that no decent male, however they identify, would ever seek to breach the boundaries of women whose sense of self and safety has been shattered by their experience of male violence or rape. 98% of sexual predators are male. 88% of sexual crime victims are female. Beira’s Place exists because I saw an unmet need and the fact that we’ve been so busy since we’ve opened proves, not that women hate trans-identified men, but that this is where women feel safe enough to deal with trauma they might otherwise have had to carry with them forever.
Read the full postClassified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals, Language & definitions
Replying to @VinceWinstanley
@VinceWinstanley I'm so sorry. You're right: the damage done can last a lifetime.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding
Replying to @AlexSchaumburg
@AlexSchaumburg She's @joannaccherry, the blonde is @RosieDuffield1, both are friends of mine and their reactions are way more restrained than mine would have been.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Specific individuals
Footage like this must be preserved for posterity, or future generations will never believe how many idiots paraded their stupidity in the sincere belief that they were being clever. 'I have an assumption that my chromosomes are probably XY but I don't know.'
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Media & institutions
This is so, so cathartic to read. Absolutely brilliant piece from @msjlindsay, on those who've hounded women, those who've enabled the hounding, and the uptick in abuse and threats since the Supreme Court confirmed that women have sex-based rights 🔥🔥🔥 https://t.co/liOqyjybKl
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition, Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions
Replying to @micha82834
@micha82834 @Femi_Sorry There are no human hermaphrodites. None. Zero. No human being has ever been born who could produce both eggs and sperm.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions
Replying to @SteilVerch
@SteilVerch The reason India doesn't and never will be able to menstruate is that India is male. Only females menstruate and only females go through menopause or need a hysterectomy. No man can have those female-specific experiences. Get it now?
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals
Every time you think @IndiaWilloughby can't go any lower he hits a deeper layer of subsoil. Rapists and woman-killers tend not to 'love' legal restrictions on where and how they can access vulnerable females. If you're capable of feeling shame, India, now would be the moment. https://t.co/sSCTNjyzGi
Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals, Child safeguarding
Replying to @GenderReceipts
@GenderReceipts @GirlScout27 @suzanne_moore 100% of their frustration is that not only have they failed to destroy my life, they've made it better. They don't understand female solidarity and their egoism is such that they genuinely thought the loss of their approval would be the worst thing that could ever happen to me.
Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Specific individuals, Free speech & cancellation
What does he think a cheek swab tests for? Presence of a bra? https://t.co/BvcrOdeWN1
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Sport, Language & definitions
Replying to @glosswitch
@glosswitch @GirlScout27 @suzanne_moore Truly, how can female prisoners locked in with rapists ever understand the agony of going to a private all-girls' school? Thank God women like Zoe are here to explain to state-educated plebs like me how male sexual predation is NOTHING to Lavinia pulling your pony tail in Latin.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals
Once more for the people at the back: Trans-identified men may experience prejudice but never misogyny, which is the specific hatred of females. An easy way to spot a misogynist is to see if he's demanding women prioritise men's desires above fairness and safety for themselves. https://t.co/uqdzEp8EXD
Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions, Sport
Replying to @CurmudgeonRPG
@CurmudgeonRPG Easy. The proper attitude for women who've been fighting for years to get their sex-rights clarified in law and finally win is to find the nearest man who says he's a woman and mop his tears. Luckily, the BBC and ITV had that covered, so I chose an Old Fashioned and a cigar.
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Law & gender recognition, Single-sex spaces, Media & institutions
Replying to @kittysull1
@kittysull1 I'm hoping sanity returns in the wake of the Supreme Court judgement and guaranteed female-only services will resume wherever they're needed. (Beira's Place is sticking around no matter what). Thanks so much both for taking the time to visit and for raising this in parliament.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition
Replying to @GirlScout27
@GirlScout27 @suzanne_moore Merely by being related to such men, single-sex-educated posh girls in cushy jobs are far better qualified to speak about the risks to women in allowing men to identify into their spaces than any nurse, female prison guard or disadvantaged domestic abuse survivor could ever be.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Language & definitions
@THETRANSLOBBY1 @suzanne_moore Fred, I've seen footage of you arguing your case. If you want to sit in front of another camera and explain why a paedophile's narcissistic rage makes him more vulnerable than the woman whose difficult job it was to give him medical care, be my guest.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Adult healthcare, Child safeguarding
@THETRANSLOBBY1 @suzanne_moore A female nurse correctly gendered a convicted male paedophile, for which she was racially abused and has had her career threatened. She's not the public liability here. Believe me, I'd have called him a damn sight worse than 'sir.'
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals, Language & definitions
I founded Beira's Place because no single-sex service for female rape survivors existed in my home city. Every women, no matter where she lives, should be able to access female-only support. Many thanks to @kittysull1 for visiting and seeing the difference such centres make.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces
Absolutely spot on by @suzanne_moore, who eviscerates two men whose classism has never been more in evidence than on this issue. Why listen to Keira Bell, Sandie Peggie or the Darlington nurses when women inside your hyper-privileged bubble agree with you? https://t.co/OuGoiUOSSC
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Youth healthcare, Specific individuals, Media & institutions
It isn’t @RosieDuffield’s or any woman’s fault if a trans-identified man is upset because the Supreme Court told him he’s not a woman. Sections of the media that have been reassuring him he became a woman the moment he said he was one could do with some self reflection, though.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition, Media & institutions, Language & definitions
Blindly tribal leftists who STILL haven't realised what a spectacular own goal it is to frame the defence of women's rights as 'MAGA' are dumber than house bricks.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation
School girls' right to privacy and dignity has been reclaimed in Scotland🎉 https://t.co/yNA3MLsw4f
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding
Replying to @asophiething
@SophieXY44 @IndiaWilloughby I think I'm supposed to be distraught that my femaleness has been Literally Erased™️
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions
.@IndiaWilloughby, for years you've argued that men claiming to be women should use female bathrooms and changing rooms because predators can harm women anywhere. Take comfort in your own logic. If a man wants to murder you, he's just as likely to do it outside the Gents. https://t.co/hSTZRsOLMu
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals
What @IndiaWilloughby calls 'nothing,' other people call 'the same human rights as everyone else, plus specific protections in law against discrimination for being trans-identified.' https://t.co/p1TJKzpjQd
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Law & gender recognition, Specific individuals
Replying to @NadiaWhittomeMP
@NadiaWhittomeMP You're happy to remove single-sex changing rooms from nurses, take the right to choose same sex intimate care from women who need them, to take female only services from female survivors of rape and domestic abuse, and remove all safeguarding for girls. Utterly despicable.
Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Adult healthcare
Women have fought (and are still fighting) the single biggest land grab on their rights in my lifetime. Some have sacrificed their livelihoods and safety to combat a pernicious ideology that has infiltrated elite institutions, including government. Women have been persecuted, harassed, smeared, roughed up and forced to take employers to court for discrimination. They've suffered severe detriments purely for believing what the Supreme Court has ruled to be reasonable and correct: that women are a definable biological class that has specific rights under the law to which males, however they identify, are not entitled. Do these politicians have any shame? They sided with the persecutors, the issuers of death and rape threats, the violent men demanding access to women's and girls' protected spaces, including domestic abuse shelters, rape crisis centres and prison cells. Will any of them issue an apology or admit that they made a serious error in siding with well-funded activist groups lying about what the law actually said, and which had measurable, severe impact on some of society's most vulnerable women? As another public wave of death threats is issued against women because of the Supreme Court ruling, their silence has become deafening. I'm just one of millions of women disgusted by the lack of accountability or remorse. We will not forget.
Read the full postClassified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition, Language & definitions, Child safeguarding, Media & institutions, Specific individuals
Replying to @BettsCaro
@BettsCaro @HJoyceGender Let's be frank: that lot are already driving a stake so deeply into the heart of their own cause they don't need to go to the Supreme Court to do it.
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions
Imagine being such a coward you can only muster the courage to tell the truth once the Supreme Court has ruled on what the truth is.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Law & gender recognition, Language & definitions, Specific individuals
Replying to @HJoyceGender
@HJoyceGender @BettsCaro She's never had any arguments, just an apparently insatiable need for applause from what she thinks is the cool gang. There's a lot of it about.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions
Replying to @HJoyceGender
@HJoyceGender She's deeply stupid. Eye-wateringly dense. Monomaniacally deluded. Offering Chapman indisputable facts is like trying to feed a shark broccoli.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions
@mightyduckley @JIPTranslation Trans-identified men haven’t had any rights revoked. Under the terms of the 2010 Equality Act, they didn’t have the right to use single sex spaces. That’s precisely what the Supreme Court has just clarified. Trans-identified men’s presence in women-only spaces is illegal.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition
'The most dangerous moment in a woman’s life is when she stands up to an abusive man. Some [trans activists] appear to be itching for a confrontation; it is clear that someone could get seriously hurt... Refusing to speak is taking sides.'✍️@polblonde https://t.co/qHGTpKDy2R
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Child safeguarding, Free speech & cancellation, Single-sex spaces
You people really need to pick a lane. I'm told I only speak out for women's rights because I'm sad, bitter and have no joy in my life, or that it's indecent for me to speak out because my happy, contented life means the issue doesn't affect me personally. It can't be both. https://t.co/jVw0UWahWX
Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation
Can you see this for what it is yet? Or do you still think the vulnerable people in this scenario are those enjoying themselves by trying to intimidate girls and women as they go in and out of a public bathroom? https://t.co/UcOy0tZ9ff
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding
Really important thread on what the Supreme Court Ruling actually means ⬇️
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Law & gender recognition, Single-sex spaces
I knew what I was getting into when I entered this debate and compared to what others have suffered, I've got off lightly. Even so, it continues to astound that Kemi Badenoch remains the only UK political leader offering unequivocal solidarity to women defending their rights.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals
Every word.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions
So vulnerable. So oppressed. So determined to break the law by continuing to invade women's spaces. And being cheered on by Maggie Chapman MSP of the Scottish Greens, who is one of our most enthusiastic anti-women legislators. Mind you, the worst crime here is that skirt.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals, Law & gender recognition
Janice isn't claiming to speak for all women, @PennyRed, but given that you aren't one ('the category of "woman" does not fully describe my lived experience') it's hard to see why you should be speaking for any women at all. Literally nobody thinks the Supreme Court ruling 'legislates trans people out of existence.' Trans people have exactly the same rights and protections they had before the ruling, and unless they've mass combusted while I wasn't paying attention, I'm fairly sure they continue to exist. If some trans-identified people in the UK are currently experiencing rage and disappointment because the Supreme Court clarified that they don't have rights they believed they had, the responsibility lies firmly with activist groups and sections of the media who've persistently argued, falsely, that gender transition turned a person into the opposite sex for all practical purposes in the eyes of the law. You can personally take some responsibility for that state of affairs, of course, because you've spent the last few years enthusiastically championing the removal of single-sex spaces for women and girls. Indeed, you went so far as to tell the mother of a fifteen-year-old who asked how her daughter was supposed to feel on discovering a penised stranger in the girls' changing rooms, 'I'd tell her it's rude to stare at other people's genitals.' That anti-woman, anti-safeguarding quip puts you right up there with every male creep who's spent recent years insisting women and girls have no right to privacy, dignity or safety. You'll undoubtedly continue to offer your contributions to the debate, but don't be too surprised if a lot of old-school women (the boring kind who've been deprived of the fascinating experiences that make you non-binary and genderqueer) find it supremely easy to disregard anything you've got to say on the subject.
Read the full postClassified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals, Media & institutions
The pictures in this thread really do paint a thousand words about the male-centric movement to which large sections of the media continue to pander. ⬇️
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Media & institutions, Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions
Good🧵on false assertions being made by the usual suspects. #SupremeCourt
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Law & gender recognition, Media & institutions
Replying to @BibiVidiVici
@BibiVidiVici I have no idea why he adopted India, but I'm glad he did. His first trans name was Joanne 😬
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals, Language & definitions
‘The Supreme Court ruled I’m not a woman because women envy my gorgeousness.’ He truly is the gift that keeps on giving. https://t.co/r1p9HNXYWN
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Law & gender recognition, Specific individuals
1. I don’t live in Merchiston. 2. I have never met Lord Hodge. 3. It really isn’t the 1950s. 4. India remains the funniest thing in my mentions. 5. India remains a man. #Entertainment https://t.co/7LRPCRFWQF
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Language & definitions
This, by @glosswitch, is brilliant. https://t.co/F04ENwH7Zn
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions, Media & institutions
Yes, what better message to teach a young girl that if a strange man gets out his dick in front of her, she shouldn't be afraid, but enjoy it. @HelenWebberley is a pro-puberty blocker doctor who runs an online gender clinic. https://t.co/gVc0mQsBH6
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals, Youth healthcare
Many women are waiting to hear the Prime Minister's views on the Supreme Court ruling. After all, he's the man who decreed: 'A woman is a female adult, and in addition to that trans women are women, and that is not just my view, that is actually the law.' https://t.co/ZbVYVo1JEf
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Law & gender recognition, Language & definitions, Specific individuals
In case it wasn't clear: don't fuck with Scottish women 💜🤍💚🏴 https://t.co/ozxXk1QNo6
Classified neutral · Intensity 0/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition
To those celebrating the fact that I'm smoking a blunt: it's a cigar. Even if it decided to identify as a blunt for the purposes of this celebration, it would remain objectively, provably and demonstratively a cigar.
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Law & gender recognition
Males with 5ARD are not female. Trans-identified people remain protected under UK law. The Supreme Court has confirmed that trans-identified men are not entitled to women's sex-based rights. I'm sorry you don't have better talking points. https://t.co/ulYG15MgUt
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Law & gender recognition, Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions
Replying to @radishes4ever
@radishes4ever Sorry to hear women defending their rights scares you. Maybe go fuck yourself?
Classified defensive · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation
I love it when a plan comes together. #SupremeCourt #WomensRights https://t.co/agOkWmhPgb
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Law & gender recognition, Single-sex spaces
These are the posts classified trans-related. Search all 16,714 collected tweets, read the year-by-year analysis, or read the report on her campaign against trans rights.