The Rowling Record

J.K. Rowling’s trans-related posts from 2025

Page 7 of 11. Posts 601–700 of the 1,011 J.K. Rowling wrote about trans people in 2025, newest first.

16 April 2025 to 30 April 2025. Posts are reproduced in full from the archive; the stance, intensity and topic labels come from the research classifications. How the labels are defined. Search within 2025.

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @stingerdelux

@stingerdelux So women and girls are at risk, but so what? Men must be able to enter women-only spaces even if it makes females unsafe, because males’ desires are more important than females’ right to privacy, dignity and safety. Thanks for playing, Edward. You’ve shown exactly who you are.

4 replies23 retweets244 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Free speech & cancellation

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding

Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @stingerdelux

@stingerdelux Literally nobody on my side of this argument doesn’t want trans-identified people to be safe. They don’t want women and girls to be LESS safe. Fact: 100% of the men women have no need to fear are on my side, because they’re realistic about male violence and male sexual predation.

36 replies68 retweets1,337 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Sport

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Crime statistics clearly show that trans-identified men pose just as great a threat to women as other kind of men. Non-trans men attacking trans-identified men is also against the law, so, according to your own argument, there's no reason for them not to use the men's bathroom. https://t.co/aCt1ygwysK

571 replies1,736 retweets13,294 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Free speech & cancellation

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Don't be gaslit into thinking this is about toilets. @carla_denyer doesn't think women deserve ANY male-free spaces: rape crisis centres, hospital wards, homeless shelters, domestic abuse refuges, prison cells or changing rooms, no matter how vulnerable or traumatised the women.

506 replies3,388 retweets18,226 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals, Child safeguarding

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @stingerdelux

@stingerdelux You've spent days now arguing for all women's spaces to become mixed sex. Mixed-sex spaces are provably more dangerous for women and girls. You'd be far from the first man who had a personal motive for his pro-'trans rights' stance, as a number of convictions have proved.

28 replies153 retweets2,792 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @stingerdelux

@stingerdelux You're free to campaign for spaces for trans-identified men, yet your focus is entirely about stripping rights from women. This begs the question, is it really the safety of trans-IDed men you care about, or the removal of women's and girls' safety? What does your hard drive say?

25 replies260 retweets3,799 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Funny, isn’t it, how women who’ve been raped or beaten are accused of ‘weaponising’ their trauma when they ask for male-free spaces, but trans-identified men who claim using the Gents has a higher mortality rate than armed combat are met with credulity and simpering concern.

821 replies8,772 retweets52,515 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Women fought for years, not to pretend they weren't women, but to seek to redress the wrongs done to their sex class because of their biology. Women and girls are coerced, persecuted and controlled all over the world by the larger, stronger male. Even in our most liberal societies, women remain subject to sex-based violence and assault, still see their reproductive rights challenged and are still threatened with rape and even death by men angry that they're sticking up for their rights. 'Womanhood' is not some quasi-mystical state into which men can identify. Pretending it is makes both studying the harms done to actual women, and enforcing women's rights, impossible. A straight man who likes wearing stockings is not a lesbian. Wanting breasts doesn't make a teenaged boy a girl. Both are male, and giving them access to women's single-sex spaces has caused proven harm to women and girls. How does taking away single-sex spaces away from vulnerable women advance feminism? How did three men occupying the medal podium at a women's sporting event help female athletes? You cannot describe what you're too frightened to admit. You cannot defend what you can't define. The last decade has seen a wholesale attack on the rights our foremothers fought for. It continues to astound me that privileged young women who've benefited from those advances all their lives are proudly urging on the dimantling of the protections and spaces that were so hard won, and pretending this is progressive.

Read the full post
603 replies3,598 retweets20,570 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Sport, Language & definitions, Law & gender recognition

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @rejserin

@rejserin 'Sex' in the Equality Act means biological sex, women have a legal right to single-sex public changing rooms, bathrooms and crisis centres, and a Gender Recognition Certificate doesn't make a man a woman under the law. I really don't know how much clearer they could make it.

32 replies106 retweets974 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition, Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @bencooper

@bencooper "But it's very hard for me to relinquish my baseline assumption that hysterical women have been making a fuss about nothing, so let's tell women to be nicer and continue pandering to men who've lost no rights, but feel as though they have, which is what really counts."

18 replies118 retweets1,162 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition, Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Men who’ve finally woken up to the fact that women might have had a point when they pointed out their rights were being stripped away from them have arrived to tell those who won without their assistance to compromise. Thanks, lads. Women would never have thought of that.

216 replies1,160 retweets9,515 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Sport, Child safeguarding, Free speech & cancellation

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Law & gender recognition, Single-sex spaces

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

'Trans women' are male. If they weren't male they wouldn't be 'trans'. Prejudice is an irrational fear or dislike. It is entirely rational to state that a man is a man. Only totalitarians and religious zealots insist that others parrot falsehoods on pain of retribution. https://t.co/xTVJ9SVSlU

3,411 replies8,206 retweets63,281 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions

Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals

Classified defensive · Intensity 0/4 · Specific individuals, Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

I hate to point this out*, but accusing me of hating men because I don't think trans women should be given access to all women-only spaces does rather suggest that (in spite of your feverish assertions to the contrary) you're well aware that these are, in fact, men. *I don't.

2,576 replies7,857 retweets89,346 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

🙄I'm married to a man, George. I do not hate men. I simply live in reality where men - however they identify - commit 98% of sexual assaults, and 88% of victims are female. Trans-identified men are no less likely than other kinds of men to pose a risk to women or girls.

1,260 replies4,922 retweets47,780 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @jk_rowling

Beira's Place doesn't expect service users to adopt or abandon any ideologicall position. Unlike the Edinburgh Rape Crisis Centre, we do not believe there is any place for 're-education' in therapy. Seeking to impose personal beliefs on a vulnerable person is abuse.

39 replies332 retweets4,421 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Media & institutions, Child safeguarding

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions

Classified neutral · Intensity 0/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @Burkysmirkey

@Burkysmirkey @grayizzyz I've seen the prison stats in the UK and yes, at first glance that's what they seem to show, but I think one would need to be an informed statistician/academic or scientific researcher to properly analyse that data. When did the trans-identification occur, before or after conviction? Is the trans-identified individual androphilic, gynephilic or both? Do they have a proven history of gender dysphoria or is this evidence of a cross-dressing paraphilia? Such analysis is well above my pay grade. All I know for sure is that trans-identified men have never been proven to be less of a threat to women than other men, and the evidence we have to date suggests that they are, at the most conservative estimate, at least as much of a risk.

17 replies37 retweets664 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Other

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

It seems literally impossible for certain trans activists to grasp that not everything is about them. The only rape crisis centre in Edinburgh prior to the opening of Beira’s Place was run by a trans-identified man who publicly told potential service-users they would be ‘challenged on their bigotry’ if they didn’t agree he was a woman. Meanwhile a ‘non-binary’ man subsequently convicted of rape, and found by the sentencing judge to harbour serious hostility towards women, was permitted to access the centre’s services. Trans-identified men in Edinburgh were better served than women when it came to accessing support after rape or sexual assault. Beira’s Place, which I founded and fund in its entirety, gives women a choice. The female-led, female-centred model of support is provably preferred by most female survivors. We know for a fact that some of our service-users didn’t seek help before we opened, because they didn’t want a male providing their therapy, or for men to be accessing what they needed to feel was a completely safe space. However, if a woman was happy with a male support worker, or with males also using the service, she could of course choose the alternative rape crisis centre. Some men, trans-identified and not, disagree that even the most vulnerable and traumatised women should be allowed to exclude men from rape crisis centres, yet many women see a male-free space and service as the last or only chance of putting their lives back together. It takes immense courage even to pick up the phone to access help after rape. Yet, even at their worst moment, these women told by activists like Willoughby that their priority should be centering his feelings, pandering to his ‘identity’ and pretending that they don’t recognise his narcissism and aggression as a quintessentially male response to not being given what he wants, by women. The simple truth is that no decent male, however they identify, would ever seek to breach the boundaries of women whose sense of self and safety has been shattered by their experience of male violence or rape. 98% of sexual predators are male. 88% of sexual crime victims are female. Beira’s Place exists because I saw an unmet need and the fact that we’ve been so busy since we’ve opened proves, not that women hate trans-identified men, but that this is where women feel safe enough to deal with trauma they might otherwise have had to carry with them forever.

Read the full post
1,353 replies7,229 retweets44,878 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals, Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Footage like this must be preserved for posterity, or future generations will never believe how many idiots paraded their stupidity in the sincere belief that they were being clever. 'I have an assumption that my chromosomes are probably XY but I don't know.'

1,700 replies5,576 retweets33,036 likes

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Media & institutions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition, Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals

Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals, Child safeguarding

Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Specific individuals, Free speech & cancellation

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Sport, Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Once more for the people at the back: Trans-identified men may experience prejudice but never misogyny, which is the specific hatred of females. An easy way to spot a misogynist is to see if he's demanding women prioritise men's desires above fairness and safety for themselves. https://t.co/uqdzEp8EXD

494 replies3,475 retweets26,390 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions, Sport

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Law & gender recognition, Single-sex spaces, Media & institutions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @kittysull1

@kittysull1 I'm hoping sanity returns in the wake of the Supreme Court judgement and guaranteed female-only services will resume wherever they're needed. (Beira's Place is sticking around no matter what). Thanks so much both for taking the time to visit and for raising this in parliament.

9 replies43 retweets640 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Language & definitions

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Adult healthcare, Child safeguarding

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals, Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

I founded Beira's Place because no single-sex service for female rape survivors existed in my home city. Every women, no matter where she lives, should be able to access female-only support. Many thanks to @kittysull1 for visiting and seeing the difference such centres make.

141 replies2,176 retweets15,362 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Youth healthcare, Specific individuals, Media & institutions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

It isn’t @RosieDuffield’s or any woman’s fault if a trans-identified man is upset because the Supreme Court told him he’s not a woman. Sections of the media that have been reassuring him he became a woman the moment he said he was one could do with some self reflection, though.

341 replies1,894 retweets12,585 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition, Media & institutions, Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Law & gender recognition, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Adult healthcare

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Women have fought (and are still fighting) the single biggest land grab on their rights in my lifetime. Some have sacrificed their livelihoods and safety to combat a pernicious ideology that has infiltrated elite institutions, including government. Women have been persecuted, harassed, smeared, roughed up and forced to take employers to court for discrimination. They've suffered severe detriments purely for believing what the Supreme Court has ruled to be reasonable and correct: that women are a definable biological class that has specific rights under the law to which males, however they identify, are not entitled. Do these politicians have any shame? They sided with the persecutors, the issuers of death and rape threats, the violent men demanding access to women's and girls' protected spaces, including domestic abuse shelters, rape crisis centres and prison cells. Will any of them issue an apology or admit that they made a serious error in siding with well-funded activist groups lying about what the law actually said, and which had measurable, severe impact on some of society's most vulnerable women? As another public wave of death threats is issued against women because of the Supreme Court ruling, their silence has become deafening. I'm just one of millions of women disgusted by the lack of accountability or remorse. We will not forget.

Read the full post
1,578 replies10,784 retweets48,812 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition, Language & definitions, Child safeguarding, Media & institutions, Specific individuals

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Law & gender recognition, Language & definitions, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Child safeguarding, Free speech & cancellation, Single-sex spaces

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

You people really need to pick a lane. I'm told I only speak out for women's rights because I'm sad, bitter and have no joy in my life, or that it's indecent for me to speak out because my happy, contented life means the issue doesn't affect me personally. It can't be both. https://t.co/jVw0UWahWX

714 replies1,246 retweets16,842 likes

Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Law & gender recognition, Single-sex spaces

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

I knew what I was getting into when I entered this debate and compared to what others have suffered, I've got off lightly. Even so, it continues to astound that Kemi Badenoch remains the only UK political leader offering unequivocal solidarity to women defending their rights.

1,170 replies10,310 retweets63,454 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

So vulnerable. So oppressed. So determined to break the law by continuing to invade women's spaces. And being cheered on by Maggie Chapman MSP of the Scottish Greens, who is one of our most enthusiastic anti-women legislators. Mind you, the worst crime here is that skirt.

3,063 replies6,362 retweets56,856 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals, Law & gender recognition

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Janice isn't claiming to speak for all women, @PennyRed, but given that you aren't one ('the category of "woman" does not fully describe my lived experience') it's hard to see why you should be speaking for any women at all. Literally nobody thinks the Supreme Court ruling 'legislates trans people out of existence.' Trans people have exactly the same rights and protections they had before the ruling, and unless they've mass combusted while I wasn't paying attention, I'm fairly sure they continue to exist. If some trans-identified people in the UK are currently experiencing rage and disappointment because the Supreme Court clarified that they don't have rights they believed they had, the responsibility lies firmly with activist groups and sections of the media who've persistently argued, falsely, that gender transition turned a person into the opposite sex for all practical purposes in the eyes of the law. You can personally take some responsibility for that state of affairs, of course, because you've spent the last few years enthusiastically championing the removal of single-sex spaces for women and girls. Indeed, you went so far as to tell the mother of a fifteen-year-old who asked how her daughter was supposed to feel on discovering a penised stranger in the girls' changing rooms, 'I'd tell her it's rude to stare at other people's genitals.' That anti-woman, anti-safeguarding quip puts you right up there with every male creep who's spent recent years insisting women and girls have no right to privacy, dignity or safety. You'll undoubtedly continue to offer your contributions to the debate, but don't be too surprised if a lot of old-school women (the boring kind who've been deprived of the fascinating experiences that make you non-binary and genderqueer) find it supremely easy to disregard anything you've got to say on the subject.

Read the full post
564 replies3,594 retweets25,530 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals, Media & institutions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Media & institutions, Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Law & gender recognition, Media & institutions

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals, Language & definitions

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Law & gender recognition, Specific individuals

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions, Media & institutions

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals, Youth healthcare

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Law & gender recognition, Language & definitions, Specific individuals

Classified neutral · Intensity 0/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

To those celebrating the fact that I'm smoking a blunt: it's a cigar. Even if it decided to identify as a blunt for the purposes of this celebration, it would remain objectively, provably and demonstratively a cigar.

9,696 replies15,529 retweets256,991 likes

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Law & gender recognition

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Law & gender recognition, Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions

Classified defensive · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Law & gender recognition, Single-sex spaces

These are the posts classified trans-related. Search all 16,714 collected tweets, read the year-by-year analysis, or read the report on her campaign against trans rights.