The Rowling Record

J.K. Rowling’s trans-related posts from 2025

Page 5 of 11. Posts 401–500 of the 1,011 J.K. Rowling wrote about trans people in 2025, newest first.

24 May 2025 to 11 June 2025. Posts are reproduced in full from the archive; the stance, intensity and topic labels come from the research classifications. How the labels are defined. Search within 2025.

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Divert even 1 ° from the approved line - trans-identified men must be considered women in absolutely all situations, no mattter the cost to women and girls - and you’ll pay. Don’t think for yourself, don’t look at concrete evidence, never apologise, just comply. https://t.co/6oj01TBunn

362 replies1,331 retweets14,708 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation, Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Than freedom of speech and belief? Than the rights of women and girls to privacy, dignity and safety? Than irreversible procedures performed on vulnerable minors? Than elites and institutions trying to impose a quasi-religious ideology on the rest of society? No. https://t.co/RfvU00rhBG

1,160 replies6,338 retweets50,419 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Child safeguarding, Youth healthcare, Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation, Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

High achieving women who pull up the ladder behind them are owed no fealty from other women. You can be a useful idiot for male cosplayers and cheats, or you can fight to ensure that girls who follow in your footsteps have a fair shot. You can't do both.

1,026 replies8,941 retweets79,591 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Sport, Single-sex spaces

Classified mocking · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

All who recognise the injustice of boys taking these girls' opportunities and honours must become the cavalry. We have to support these girls, amplify their voices and keep pressure on sporting bodies to reinstate the sex-based rights that have been taken from them.

419 replies4,299 retweets30,843 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Sport, Single-sex spaces

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Sport, Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions

Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Media & institutions

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Law & gender recognition, Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

The misrepresentation in certain sections of the media of what the UK Supreme Court's recent ruling actually means is outrageous. The ruling clarified that women and girls have sex-based rights under British law, and that those rights haven't changed since women gained them. Trans activist lobby groups lied about what the law said. They claimed trans-identified men were entitled to everything women were entitled to, under the law. This false interpretation, which removed sex-based rights from women and girls and gave trans-identified men additional rights, may have been imposed upon large sections of society, but it was always illegal, as countless legal experts and grassroots women's groups fought to have recognised. The Supreme Court restored to women rights they'd lost in practice. Trans-identified men lost nothing in law, because they'd never had the rights they claimed they had. The media types now hyperventilating in print because trans people's rights have been 'reduced' are still lying. Nothing has been taken from trans-identified people except a false belief, and women have simply regained what they should have had all along.

Read the full post
495 replies5,554 retweets31,168 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition, Language & definitions, Media & institutions

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Sport, Child safeguarding

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Sport, Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Sport, Single-sex spaces

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

We aren’t “‘judging female athletes’ looks” by taking cheek swabs to find out if any of them are actually men. Boxing matches aren’t won or lost on who looks most like Barbie, ffs.

497 replies1,746 retweets16,201 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Sport, Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Sport, Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Sport

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Sport, Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Sport, Language & definitions, Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

I never said and never believed Khelif was trans. I knew* he was a man. The gender activists who created a political climate in which sex testing was seen as 'bigoted' are as culpable as the IOC for the travesty that ensued. *via a highly credible source who saw his test results https://t.co/c9fcPRxwSf

1,463 replies10,466 retweets86,561 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Sport, Language & definitions, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Sport

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

It’s a win for women because they won’t be battered to death in the ring by men. If you had any idea what physical tests women go through routinely in their lives you’d know a cheek swab is no bigger deal than flossing your teeth. Any more moronic questions, wing them over.

1,655 replies6,793 retweets57,876 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Sport, Single-sex spaces

Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions, Other

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions, Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @lazuliSith

@lazuliSith @TedMoondust It isn't the ability to produce eggs and sperm that defines biological sex, but the fact that our bodies are organised to produce one or the other, and this applies even if an individual has a DSD (difference of sexual development). If, as has been suggested by experts, Khelif has 5-ARD, he's a man with typically male muscle mass and XY chromosomes. 5-ARD affects only men. The very condition that may have caused him to be wrongly classified as female at birth would prove beyond doubt that he is male.

12 replies29 retweets393 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Sport, Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Specific individuals, Youth healthcare

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @TedMoondust

@TedMoondust I don't think Khelif can be classed as trans, because his claim has always been that he's biologically female, not that he 'identifies' as a woman. Imo, the only relevance of trans issues to Khelif's case is that the IOC fudged the sex testing requirements because they thought taking that would keep them safe from the ire of gender activists, and screw the consequences for female boxers. I've said this before: I have nothing but sympathy for anyone who sincerely believes they're one sex, because that's what they've been told all their life, and then finds out they're the other. That must be a truly shattering moment and I can see why said person would take refuge in denial. Some have argued 'but once puberty hit, how could he not know?' but I think that underestimates how much social conditioning and wishful thinking can blind a person to the truth. All of that said: I have no sympathy for the people surrounding a male boxer who keep pretending, to him and to others, that he's female after seeing the test results, nor for a fully-fledged adult man who's able to comprehend that he's male and has an insurmountable physical advantage when facing a female opponent. At that point, he and everyone else involved in promulgating the lie is knowingly risking the possibility that a female opponent will suffer brain damage or death, just so he can keep winning medals. That's an outrage that far surpasses any harm done to Khelif by taking a cheek swab and accepting facts. He's free to keep boxing, just in the proper sex category. All he loses is the opportunity to cheat.

Read the full post
62 replies359 retweets3,099 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Sport, Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals, Language & definitions

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Sport, Language & definitions, Specific individuals

Classified mocking · Intensity 1/4 · Sport

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Sport, Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals

Classified mocking · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions, Media & institutions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @bindelj

@bindelj The funny thing is that by saying ‘men men’ she outs herself as knowing perfectly well that trans women are a different category of men. Get people like Yasmin hot under the collar and they slip up faster than you can say ‘but you’ve got a gender neutral bathroom in your house.’

56 replies400 retweets5,301 likes

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

@brenspole @gwpurnell @ShannonMcA34899 @bindelj Some are afraid of standing up against the institutions that have been captured, of job loss and being monstered and losing friends. Then there are women who’re keen to be seen as hip to the Zeitgeist, whose priority is appearing super progressive and maintaining their holier-than-thou brand. And some women just don’t like other women very much and will always run towards the place where they’ll get most male approval, within their particular tribe.

31 replies35 retweets419 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition, Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Sport, Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Sport, Language & definitions

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @Casewithscience

@Casewithscience Women are human beings with bodies organised to produce eggs. There is no liberation for women and girls in pretending they aren't the very thing that leads to their oppression, their discrimination and the fact that they make up nearly 90% of victims of sex crimes. Nothing about the lot of women and girls is improved by pretending human beings with bodies organised to produce sperm, who also happen to make up 98% of sexual predators, are the same as they are. It does not advance women to redefine their sex class as a construct or a costume any man can adopt. There's a reason why it's overwhelmingly extremely privileged and protected women who're currently pretending sex differences don't matter. Disadvantaged and vulnerable women are at the rough end of your social experiment, and they're suffering most of all from the pretence that men are not only women, but the most vulnerable women of all. You think you can change reality through language alone. You're wilfully ignoring hard facts in favour of sophistry and unfalsifiable mystical beliefs. Your ideology has done immense real world harm to which you seem entirely indifferent, which is why I'm entirely indifferent to your opinion of mine.

Read the full post
38 replies292 retweets1,927 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions, Child safeguarding, Other

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Sport, Language & definitions

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions, Child safeguarding

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @SaraHigdon

@sarahigdon I feel huge sympathy for anyone receiving genetic information they didn't expect; I can imagine how traumatising that would be. However, if a male chooses to keep boxing girls, I have zero sympathy. His hurt feelings don't justify meting out potentially fatal injuries to women.

47 replies131 retweets2,968 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Sport, Single-sex spaces

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions, Other

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions, Media & institutions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals, Free speech & cancellation

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @rejserin

@rejserin Where did I attack your looks? You willingly posed for that picture, which is in the public domain. If you feel 'attacked' when people are able to correctly identify your sex by means of the nifty new inventions we call 'eyes', that isn't my fault.

71 replies169 retweets4,342 likes

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Sport, Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

I've never attacked any woman for not being 'woman enough.' That's a concept I don't recognise. You either are, or you aren't, a woman. What I've done is say 'you are a man' to men like you, who're angry because you believe you're owed my participation in your fantasy life. 1/ https://t.co/PdIKfRwI75

1,656 replies6,223 retweets72,924 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

The new trans activist 'Be Afraid' slogan is simply their most honest to date. They've always wanted women scared, which is why they routinely make physical threats. The more interesting point is, why does a violent ex-con feel so untouchable that he can do this in public?

916 replies5,947 retweets32,593 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Child safeguarding, Specific individuals, Free speech & cancellation

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

This is a lie, and an easily provable lie. I’ve spent the best part of three decades funding initiatives and donating to charities serving vulnerable women, including domestic violence shelters. The charitable trust I set up in 2000 focuses on alleviating social deprivation, with a focus on women and children, including female refugees. I’ve funded an initiative to help female ex-prisoners secure jobs, I helped fly professional women out of Afghanistan because they were in danger from the Taliban, I’ve publicly voiced my support for women’s reproductive rights, I founded and fund a women-only rape crisis centre and I’ve campaigned for and funded projects to help single mothers. I myself am a survivor of domestic abuse and sexual assault, as trans activists never tire of reminding me, whether to hope it happens to me again, or assert, as Maugham has, that I was left with unresolved trauma that leaves me irrational on the subject of physical risk to women. Maugham is imploding in real time because he’s furious the Supreme Court decision put him back in his box. He was wrong on the law. He pretended it said what it doesn’t. The court reaffirmed the sex-based rights of women, but Maugham’s vanity and delusion make it impossible for him to accept (yet another) loss. So his grift continues, his lies grow bigger and more obvious, and now might be a good time for him to reread the myth of Icarus, because nobody needs clairvoyant powers to foresee how this is going to end.

Read the full post
1,038 replies4,008 retweets29,787 likes

Classified defensive · Intensity 2/4 · Law & gender recognition, Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals, Free speech & cancellation

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Sport

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @ShutUpJudeD

@ShutUpJudeD 🤣 Do you think I’m Andrea Chu Long? I’ve NEVER said being female (which I am, and you’re not) means you want to be degraded or submissive. I showed you a quote by a trans-identified man who says that a female is an object that is fucked, and who also says ‘sissy porn made me trans.’ That might not have been your journey, but a lot of trans-identified men provably associate femininity with humiliation and degradation. We’ve all seen the videos and photos (in my case, very much against my will.)

9 replies25 retweets528 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Specific individuals, Language & definitions, Other

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces, Media & institutions

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Jolyon, calm down. You're getting testerical. Over the last 48 hours you've publicly alleged that I'm on an 'anti-trans crusade', that I'm 'gleefully weaponising' sexually threatening messages that are 'likely false flag', that I'm an 'amoral' person and a 'bigot' who's 'waging war' against trans people. You said all of this because I set up a legal fighting fund for women who don't have the financial means to defend their legal rights, rights they were confirmed as having by the Supreme Court ruling which you, of course, allege was the result of misconduct and bias by the judges. As a top notch legal brain primarily known for defending an attempted tax dodge (Icebreaker), and losing, and for his many crowdfunded losses in court, including the case where you tried to shut down an LGB rights charity, I assumed you'd take it for granted that my lawyers would be keeping a close eye out for comments that stray into defamation. If we ever end up facing each other in court, my only qualm will be that it seems such a huge waste of taxpayers' money to have to construct a courtroom large enough to accommodate your ego.

Read the full post
2,081 replies4,975 retweets52,967 likes

Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Law & gender recognition, Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Alan 'Sarah Jane' Baker, served 30 years in prison for violent crimes. Initially convicted of kidnap and torture, he was given extra time after trying to murder a cellmate. At a Trans+ Pride event in 2023, Baker told the crowd: 'If you see a TERF, punch them in the f****** face.'

467 replies4,226 retweets20,284 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Child safeguarding, Free speech & cancellation

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Language & definitions, Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Feminism: a woman can be whatever she likes. Genderism: Any man can be a woman if he likes. Feminism: a woman does not have to be feminine. Genderism: a woman is a person who performs femininity. Feminism: misogyny is hatred of females. Genderism: gag on my fat trans cock, TERF.

461 replies2,571 retweets17,394 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions

Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Apparently a woman’s proper response to strange men telling her to suck their entire dick is ladylike silence. She’s probably lying about it happening, because she’s a manipulative bitch. Or the men sending her sexualised threats aren’t even men, but people who want to smear men. https://t.co/EJCblbsm7B

189 replies632 retweets7,093 likes

Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @salltweets

@salltweets We had it when we set up Beira's Place, too. 'I am a woman with PCOS and have a full beard, will you still let me come for rape counselling?' one man told a support worker over the phone, in his bass baritone. Strangely, on learning he was being recorded, he hung up.

42 replies193 retweets3,223 likes

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Language & definitions

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals, Language & definitions

Classified mocking · Intensity 4/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

In fairness to the former tax lawyer/self-identified Gandhi, there's no tax write off doing it my way, and when you lose as often as he does you can see why he prefers to waste other people's money.

114 replies765 retweets7,298 likes

Classified mocking · Intensity 1/4 · Law & gender recognition, Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

The only people who consider it 'anti-feminist' to point out that a woman is a woman by virtue of her biology are those who think female-specific anatomy or bodily functions are inferior in some way, that bearing young is a lowly, worthless occupation, or that misogynist social stereotypes are a worthier measure of who's a real woman. Possessing the equipment for egg production should neither tie you to any particular destiny, nor diminish the human being who has it; the female reproductive system is neither shameful nor lesser, but it's certainly treated that way in too many parts of the world. Indeed, it's treated that way by plenty of misogynists in supposedly liberal democracies, which might partially explain why so many young women have come to believe that, if they want to be accorded full personhood rather than becoming a pornified sex object, they'll only be able to do it by erasing all physical signs of femaleness. The problem is not their anatomy, it's the society, or indeed the family, that made them feel that way. Pretending sex differences don't matter does nothing to advance the lot of women and girls. Promoting the idea that men can become women by performing their idea of what a woman is - which, funnily enough, often turns out to be a pornified sex object - does not liberate women and girls. The attempt to redefine the word 'woman' by dismissing female biology benefits only the men who've been eagerly helping themselves to women's protected spaces, sport, opportunities and honours - or, in the Fox Batterer's case, who've jumped eagerly onto the movement's coattails because they're spotlight addicts and believe they'll go down in history as Genderism's Gandhi.

Read the full post
746 replies4,307 retweets31,862 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces, Sport, Specific individuals

Classified defensive · Intensity 0/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation, Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

I'm enchanted to announce that since news of my legal fighting fund for women's sex-based rights spread on social media, the website has received a rush of wonderful applications. Standouts include 'suck my entire dick', 'fuck you stupid terfs' and 'JK Rowling is a dumb Nazi cunt.' Trantasist, TerfAnnihilator, SeancjCasey (loving the KillYourselves handle!), the always wittily-named PhilMcCracken, JulieNoted and friends, I know you're eager to hear whether your applications have succeeded, but please be patient. You'll definitely be dealt with😘

685 replies1,618 retweets14,545 likes

Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals, Single-sex spaces

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

A woman is an adult human whose body is organised to produce large gametes. One easy way to tell if you're a woman is to ask yourself: have I ever produced sperm? If, as in your case, the answer is 'yes', you are a surgically altered man enacting a male idea of femaleness. https://t.co/b5hqQZsJnk

1,988 replies6,678 retweets64,083 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals

These are the posts classified trans-related. Search all 16,714 collected tweets, read the year-by-year analysis, or read the report on her campaign against trans rights.