I wonder what it is about a movement campaigning to allow men into protected spaces for women and girls that might attract sexual predators. A mystery for the ages.
7 August 2025 to 23 September 2025. Posts are reproduced in full from the archive; the stance, intensity and topic labels come from the research classifications. How the labels are defined. Search within 2025.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals
Feminism fought for women's sex-based rights. Pretending males can also be female erases sex-based rights. Calling women and girls 'transphobic' for wanting sex-based rights is misogyny. #LibDemMisogyny https://t.co/jLP0fzit6l
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation
Graham Linehan was arrested for saying that if a man refused to leave a women only space he should be punched in the balls. This woman exhorts her followers to kill those she disagrees with politically and suffers no consequences at all. Make it make sense.
Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals
Replying to @PicsbyAnneMarie
@PicsbyAnneMarie @babybeginner You're 'certain' you could provide proof that I support or advocate violence against those who disagree with me, am anti-debate and don't acknowledge that people other than women have rights, yet won't provide proof unless I DM you. Well, good luck at the debating society.
Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation
Replying to @PicsbyAnneMarie
@PicsbyAnneMarie @babybeginner So you're happy to accuse without proof, but don't want to give the proof because people on X would be mean to you? You'd be a heroine to trans activists everywhere if you did this. Surely you can dredge up just one quote, proving I'm pro-violence and anti-debate?
Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Specific individuals, Free speech & cancellation
Replying to @tombo9090
@tombo9090 If you don't like people pointing out that many trans activists use precisely the tactics advocated by the world's most famous fascist, try persuading them to a) debate, b) accept women, too, have rights and c) not to try and force compliance by threats of death and violence.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Single-sex spaces
@leftysceptic @Tom_V_P @babybeginner If only we could find a way of converting gender activists' hypocrisy and double standards into electricity, the climate crisis would have been solved yesterday.
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Other
Replying to @KenRDKAB
@KenRDKAB Hurt feelings do not justify violence. Abusive men justify beating their female partners because the women made them unhappy. Trans activists advocate punching women who won't validate men's self-proclaimed identities. Broken hearts mend. Severed arteries don't.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation, Language & definitions
@Tom_V_P @babybeginner If I cared about what people with half a brain cell thought of me I’d be a gender ideologue.
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation
Words are not violence. When you pretend that views that oppose your own are violence, you are justifying the use of actual violence towards the speaker. Gender ideology’s reliance on tropes and slogans like ‘words are violence’, its constant rationalisation and justification of using force against opponents and its preference for enforcing compliance through fear rather than permitting debate, are straight out of fascism’s playbook. ‘The function of propaganda is . . . not to weigh and ponder the rights of different people, but exclusively to emphasize the one right which it has set out to argue for. Its task is not to make an objective study of the truth, in so far as it favors the enemy, and then set it before the masses with academic fairness; its task is to serve our own right, always and unflinchingly.’ The words are Hitler’s, but I must have seen trans activists say the same thing, barely rephrased, a thousand times. Your movement seeks to remove rights from others. It is anti-truth and critical thinking, pro-violence, pro-dehumanisation of those who disagree with you, and you are so lacking in self-awareness you cannot see that you are precisely what you pretend to hate.
Read the full postClassified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Language & definitions, Media & institutions
Replying to @euanmccolm
@euanmccolm 'You rode roughshod over women's rights.' 'OMG, why are you so obsessed with me.'
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals
Replying to @schuice
@schuice @DessieVendee I agree. I'm just being honest about my own changing mind. I'll always struggle with something that can't be reasoned about, even if I feel an emotional pull towards it.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Other
Replying to @r0astB3ef
@r0astB3ef Please name the groups I've funded whose goal is to 'erase trans people in public spaces.'
Classified defensive · Intensity 0/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Single-sex spaces
Replying to @TheFamousArtBR
@TheFamousArtBR @johnboyne @IndiaWilloughby Sometimes I left them. Accidentally, on trains etc.
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals
Replying to @Def_Not_Dan
@Def_Not_Dan @RosieDuffield1 They/them were wrong.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions
An elected representative of your own party, @RosieDuffield1, was advised by police not to attend Labour conference because of the physical risk to her from trans activists. You did nothing. You showed her no support, You criticised her for stating biological facts. https://t.co/TzoXTic62Q
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals, Free speech & cancellation, Child safeguarding
'Blonde woman' = adjective + noun. Remove 'blonde' from 'woman', you've still got a woman. 'Trans woman' = compound noun. Remove 'trans' from 'woman', you've got a man. If the man was actually a woman, he wouldn't be trans. https://t.co/oAKgSNUsJ0
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions
Replying to @JohnBoyne
@johnboyne @IndiaWilloughby He gets more lunatic by the hour.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals
Replying to @LyleClown
@LyleClown Right? The trans furry community are usually spot on with their hot takes.
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Other
'...it is not defamatory to refer to a man by his biological sex, to mention his coarse language towards and about others, or to show images from a few of the many fetish-pornographic videos that he himself had published on various open porn platforms.' Bravo @lotteingerslev 🇩🇰🔥
Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Specific individuals, Language & definitions
Replying to @bindelj
@bindelj @JIPTranslation FFS, not having a head isn’t a disability, it just proves head-havingness is on a spectrum. You’re so ableist, Julie.
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions
Replying to @CharlesSteadman
@CharlesSteadman @bindelj This is trinaphobia.
Classified mocking · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions, Media & institutions
Replying to @jackianpownall
@JIPTranslation @bindelj I hereby demand that single occupancy bathrooms reserved for my sole use are installed in every public building I visit. These should include jacuzzis, gold-plated fittings and Andrex Supreme Quilted. Failure to provide these facilities means I’ll probably be murdered and stuff.
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Free speech & cancellation
Replying to @bindelj
@bindelj That’s us banned for another decade.
Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Media & institutions, Free speech & cancellation
Replying to @bindelj
@bindelj How dare you? My identity is evolving. I am merely becoming more authentic. Moreover, being non-trinary is in no way incompatible with being a thirder. Educate yourself, Bindel.
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Language & definitions
Replying to @jk_rowling
@bindelj Forgot to say: pronouns are three/threm.
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions
Replying to @bindelj
@bindelj I hereby publicly announce that I am non-trinary. I identify as not man, not woman and not non-binary, because Laurie Penny just trashed that brand. I will be treating all questions on my new identity as though the asker is demanding nudes. You have been warned.
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation
Tell me again how gender identity ideology isn’t homophobic. Would you trust this UK doctor, who was suspended from practicing by the medical council and now heads up quasi-medical trans advocacy group GenderGP, to be sympathetic to a young girl who’s attracted to other girls? https://t.co/yDRZL6DrcL
Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals, Language & definitions
This is a man. A man who exposed his penis to children. Journalism is supposed to accurately report reality. Media organisations that brazenly push the quasi-religious belief that men are women if they say so cannot be trusted.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Media & institutions, Child safeguarding
Replying to @TaterLatke681
@TaterLatke681 I've never blamed those who genuinely face job loss for not speaking out. What I'm saying is that those of us who didn't have to fear becoming poor/jobless had an obligation to speak for those who couldn't. I can't imagine Gladwell's backtracking making any regular person braver if they're in danger of losing their livelihoods because the management class remains in thrall to gender identity ideology.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions
Every word of this 🧵👇It's been clear for a long time that Police Scotland have taken an ideological position, which is that women defending their rights are in the wrong and must pay the penalty by having their legal right to assemble and protest disrupted by trans activists.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions
Rattle India Willoughby's cage and the furious, narcissistic, abusive male reveals himself, every single time. https://t.co/D2kSIplu5L
Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Specific individuals, Language & definitions
Replying to @VanceFry
@1RedPen @GadSaad @Gladwell I find it very interesting which aspect of this scandal breaks through first in different countries. In the US it appears to have been sport. In Scotland, it was prisons.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Sport, Single-sex spaces, Media & institutions
Replying to @TaterLatke681
@TaterLatke681 He brings nothing new. Many, many people have talked about the perils of speaking out on this issue, but they still spoke. Gladwell admits he was one of those who knew they were lying but didn't dare challenge the in crowd. There's nothing groundbreaking in that admission.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions
I honour anyone who was a true believer and changed their mind when they saw new evidence or thought more deeply. That’s a mark of integrity. I do not honour people who feel the vibe shift and only then feel safe to admit they always knew they were lying.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions, Other
Replying to @NABurkinshaw
@NABurkinshaw I knew exactly what I was getting into and if nobody ever bought another of my books I’d have been just fine, but I cannot forgive wealthy liberals prepared to watch in silence as women with everything to lose were flayed alive by vicious activists and captured institutions.
Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions
Gladwell’s career wouldn’t have been destroyed if he’d spoken out against the glaring unfairness, not to mention dangers, of allowing men to compete in women’s sport. He’d have faced loss of approval from the cultural elite and received activist blowback, and even that wouldn’t have come with the tsunami of death and rape threats women face when they speak. Non-famous people, mostly women, girls and gay people, have genuinely had their careers and indeed lives destroyed for saying what Gladwell was too pusillanimous to say, and Gladwell didn’t lift a finger in their defence. Like many well-known liberals, he was happy to watch members of the great unwashed bullied, traduced and defamed, fine with the erosion of freedom of speech, comfortable with young women being robbed of sporting honours and facing serious injury, because he valued his own standing and security more highly than acting on the feeble promptings of his conscience. A rash of condescending men will swarm my mentions when I post this to tell me I should be pleased about Gladwell’s cautious backtracking. No. He hasn’t changed. He’s merely sensed a shift in what it’s acceptable to say and feels safe to align himself with the new consensus, excuses for his previous behaviour to the fore. He isn’t an ally, he’s a weathervane. Changing sides years late, and only after you’ve realised the non-elite opposition is winning, isn’t a mark of integrity but of arse-covering. Those whose overriding focus is remaining in good odour with the in crowd can never be trusted. Gender identity ideology has been the modern arts world’s McCarthyism, and all Gladwell’s done is reveal himself as a man who’d have named names, but felt a bit uncomfortable about it afterwards.
Read the full postClassified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Sport, Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals, Media & institutions
I’m hearing that India Willoughby is a strange man who invents easily disproven stories. https://t.co/7rp75aPRih
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Language & definitions
Context: this trans-identified man and public fetishist has been illegally entering women's single-sex spaces, gleefully posting pictures of himself doing it and remains untroubled by police visits. https://t.co/iSBPqdG176
Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals, Child safeguarding
Replying to @MrsRatters
@MrsRatters No police action was taken against any of these men. Men publicly threatening to kill women is white noise to law enforcement in this country and trans activists know it. https://t.co/ajYUVPuDmA
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Child safeguarding, Free speech & cancellation, Other
The UK: where a comedy writer is met with armed police because he tweeted that if a man refuses to leave a woman-only space he should get kicked in the balls, and elected politician @IanRBristow is free to publicly tell a woman to shut the fuck up with a picture of a gun. https://t.co/3EYgByY88T
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation
What Sir Mark Rowley calls a 'toxic culture war,' I call a mass campaign of intimidation against women for standing up for their rights, and police turning a blind eye to the men publicly calling for women to be beaten, raped, hanged and decapitated. https://t.co/ArpZNV9Lfj
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions
What @AidanComerford means by 'if all else has failed' is that if threats of death, rape and violence, attempts to take away a person's livelihood, campaigns of defamation and relentless bullying have failed to silence a sex realist, wheel out armed police and lock them up. https://t.co/Xyki1pXaLL
Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals
🧵👇
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals, Media & institutions
Replying to @damekatydenise_
@damekatydenise_ I know you’re still bitter you weren’t cast as Robin in the TV show, but your unofficial audio ‘reading’ is now in the hands of my legal team. Strike is not non-binary, he does not have a secret yen for a charity worker called Daty Louise and I am not the murderer.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Specific individuals, Language & definitions
The police are only interested in tweets threatening or inciting violence against women if the ‘women’ in question have dicks.
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces, Media & institutions, Specific individuals
What the fuck has the UK become? This is totalitarianism. Utterly deplorable.
Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals
Replying to @VictorNewsie
@VictorNewsie Of course being gay isn't a mental health problem. We know that gay, autistic and trauma-experienced kids are overrepresented at gender clinics. These groups often have vulnerabilities I believe should be addressed before they're prescribed cross sex hormones, puberty blockers or subjected to irreversible surgeries. I'm in direct contact with detransitioners who are gay and who feel that if they'd been supported in their sexual orientation - if they hadn't been bullied for it, or experienced homophobia in their own families - they wouldn't have transitioned.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding
Replying to @RosieDuffield1
@RosieDuffield1 @JournalistJill Thanks for the warning, Rosie. I almost said #TheoUpton but then I remembered I shouldn't be saying #TheoUpton even though I'm not quite sure which law it breaks to use the name #TheoUpton for the man who was born #TheoUpton.
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Law & gender recognition, Specific individuals, Free speech & cancellation
My husband just marched into the kitchen to tell me he thinks the first of September should mark ‘open season on these cunts’ and only people who know Neil can possibly grasp how funny that sounded 🤣🤣🤣
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals, Media & institutions
Replying to @salltweets
@salltweets The fallback, which I’ve already heard several times, will be, ‘I didn’t disagree, I just didn’t like the way you were saying it.’ This, from men who publicly supported a movement threatening women with job loss, violence, rape and death for daring to defend their rights.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Child safeguarding, Other
Replying to @Tachardiella
@Tachardiella Oh, these men are capable of thinking, but it’s easier to mouth platitudes from the back of a comfortable bandwagon.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Language & definitions
As another man who once worked with me declares himself saddened by my beliefs on gender and sex, I thought it might be useful to compile a list for handy reference. Which of the following do you imagine makes actors and directors who aren’t involved with the HBO reboot of Harry Potter so miserable? Is it my belief that women and girls should have their own public changing rooms and bathrooms? That women should retain female-only rape crisis centres? That men don’t belong in women’s sport? That female prisoners shouldn’t be incarcerated with violent men and male sex offenders? That women should remain a protected class in law, because they have sex-specific needs and issues? That language should reflect reality rather than ideological jargon, especially in a medical context? That women shouldn’t be harassed, persecuted or fired for refusing to pretend humans can change sex? That women should not be threatened with violence and rape when they assert their rights? That freedom of speech and belief are essential to a pluralistic democratic society? That troubled minors, especially those who are gay, autistic and trauma-experienced, should be given mental health support instead of irreversible surgeries and drug treatments on non-existent evidence of benefit? That gay people shouldn’t be pressured to include the opposite sex in their dating pools, nor should they be smeared as ‘genital fetishists’ when they don’t? That cross-dressing heterosexual male fetishists aren’t actually oppressed, but having the time of their lives piggybacking off gender identity ideology? That said ideology, and the privileged, blinkered fools pushing it because they suffer zero consequences themselves, have done more damage to the political left’s credibility than Trump and Farage could have achieved in a century? Let me have your thoughts.
Read the full postClassified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Sport, Child safeguarding, Youth healthcare, Law & gender recognition, Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions
I’ll never understand why a movement intent on removing protected spaces for women and children attracts so many men who appear to wish or enact harm on women and children.
Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals
A woman whose salary is funded by tax payers is attacking @ForWomenScot, who haven’t earned a penny from their defence of women’s rights. SNP politicians, government employees and activist hacks, all furious FWS won in the Supreme Court, now throw baseless allegations at them.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition, Media & institutions, Specific individuals
Replying to @HJoyceGender
@HJoyceGender Naturally, but we're living through a cultural moment where well-paid Scottish functionaries seem to think they can slur and defame without consequences, and journalists like @NeilMackay are delighted to broadcast their accusations without any fact checking.
Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Media & institutions, Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals
Dr Rebecca Don Kennedy has made very serious accusations here. Given her position, she needs to explain who, specifically, she's talking about and what her evidence is for them being in the pay of the far right/MAGA.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Child safeguarding, Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions, Specific individuals
Replying to @liekitisnot
@liekitisnot @HeidiBriones Unless I'm told I'm a woman on the hour I become a genderless blancmange.
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Other
Replying to @HeidiBriones
@HeidiBriones He was amused when I showed him this tweet. Naturally I've requested that he shouts 'I'm a man' before we get down to it because, as we all know, many totally valid women have a heavy beard and the ability to father children.
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces
Imagine being in labour with twins and hearing the father of your children telling your midwife his pronouns. https://t.co/5JwY9Omxpi
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces
The man who witnessed me giving birth to his children might find it a tad odd that I keep announcing that I'm a woman before we have sex, but fine, I accept your terms. https://t.co/J4jmrz4KUh
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Sport
.@MrTCHarris nails something here that I cut from my review of Frankly for reasons of space. Whether trying to have the last public word against her dead predecessor, defaming feminist campaigners or taking snide potshots at fellow politicians, Sturgeon comes across as spiteful.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions
People have written tweets, worn T-shirts and carried placards not only calling me a transphobe, but calling for my death. A horror novel gleefully celebrated my imagined death. I neither sued any of these individuals, nor did I whine about any of them while doing book promotion.
Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals
Replying to @rejserin
@rejserin The 'actual reality' is he's a man. Saying 'he's a man' isn't dehumanising, because men are human. Other than that, excellent argument.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals
I see Nicola Sturgeon is once again complaining that I posted a picture of myself wearing a T-shirt with her name on it and the legend 'Destroyer of Women's Rights.' Apparently this didn't 'elevate the debate.' Is there a clinical term for an individual who has extreme thinness of skin when it comes to their own perceived hurts, coupled with a rhino-hide when it comes to the fear and suffering of others? I'm thinking in particular of the two women Isla Bryson raped, who had to watch their First Minister squirm and smirk on TV as she tried to avoid admitting he was a man; of the five survivors of male violence who were ready to give evidence to Sturgeon's committee on gender self-ID, but were told to put their concerns in writing while seventeen trans-identified people appeared in person; of the mother of a young girl with a learning disability who campaigned against self-ID because she wanted her daughter to be guaranteed same sex intimate care, should she need it (the mother was presumably one of those female opponents Sturgeon calls 'shrill' and 'hysterical' in her memoir); of the ten-year-old girl sexually assaulted in a public bathroom by a 6'5" paedophile who served his jail sentence in a women's prison because he called himself 'Katie'; of Sandie Peggie, forced to discuss her own menstrual history in public to justify not wanting to undress in view of a 6ft straight cross-dresser in the nurses' changing room; of Marion Millar, dragged into court because she tweeted a picture of suffragette ribbons; of the Scottish rape crisis centres reliant on government funding who were pressured to admit trans-identified males into their services if they wanted funding to continue. When Sturgeon refers to an 'elevated debate', she means a discussion that takes place within a tiny, smug bubble from which regular women suffering real life consequences of her policies are firmly excluded. These faceless ants are loftily dismissed as bigots, or, to be more precise: 'transphobic, misogynistic, homophobic, maybe racist as well.' Nicola, you hated the T-shirt picture because you couldn't ignore it, as you'd ignored so many other women trying to make you understand their concerns. Appeals to your empathy, your intelligence and your compassion all failed. Apparently the only way to get through to you is through your vanity.
Read the full postClassified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Law & gender recognition, Specific individuals, Sport, Media & institutions, Free speech & cancellation
The message to girls everywhere: you are a costume that any man can put on. Once he’s wearing it, he gets to take your rights. https://t.co/BlQvL8bbyR
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions, Sport
The BBC calls a male neo-Nazi ‘she’, because their absolutist belief in gender identity ideology means any man - rapist, voyeur, terrorist, murderer or paedophile - must be described as a woman the moment he says he’s one. https://t.co/NfTKo5PkSJ
Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Media & institutions, Child safeguarding
When this madness ends, which it will, one of the ugliest things to look back on will be how women weren't even allowed to the dignity of owning their sex-specific trauma. The misogyny is simply breathtaking. https://t.co/sCe8YP5cVw
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions, Other
If you don’t agree he’s found his authentic self and is valid, brave and exceptionally vulnerable, you are transphobic. https://t.co/0WN8GZQ9Lm
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Media & institutions
"Nandy’s fashion statement is merely the latest proof that when it comes to trans ideology, Labour really hasn’t learned a thing." 🎯 https://t.co/kIVqRyIGlV
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Media & institutions
Replying to @DuncanHenry78
@DuncanHenry78 @bindelj There is literally nothing trans-identified men do that Aidan isn’t prepared to excuse, minimise, normalise or defend.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals
This makes me both sad and angry. An incredibly talented writer and a thoroughly decent human being (the two are by no means synonymous, as we know) traduced by tinpot tyrants without an ounce of his talent or integrity. https://t.co/RsZW1kUsUK
Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Specific individuals, Free speech & cancellation
When Peter survives jumping off the roof flapping his arms, I'll believe human beings can change sex.
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals
Thinking of setting up an annual prize to celebrate the most craven, bootlicking capitulation to the Gender Taliban by a supposedly liberal organisation. @PolariPrize a strong contender for 2025, but @edfringe and the National Library running them close. Nominations still open.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions
@SavvySomerset Like ‘trans women are women. Period’? I don’t do my thinking in four word slogans, I’m afraid.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions
It’s so weird how they could be mistaken for threatening, misogynistic incels if you didn’t know they’re the most vulnerable, marginalised group™️ in the world.
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals, Media & institutions
Replying to @micahsb
@micahsb You're quite right, I apologise. A lot of cheating men started with cross-dressing fetishes and proceeded from there. While neither of us can say whether this was the case for Hannah Mouncey, I should have made that clear.
Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Sport, Specific individuals
Replying to @ItsThomAnt
@ItsThomAnt Precisely. The problem is the people who won’t pretend he’s a woman, not the bloke who looks like he could crack a woman’s skull with a single throw.
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Sport, Single-sex spaces
Man fears he won’t be allowed to cheat his way to the Olympics by playing against women. Man says anti-cheat sentiment is being ‘weaponised’ against men like him, who cheat. Read more here about why the cheating man is sad and why the women he might injure just don’t matter.
Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Sport, Specific individuals
Replying to @ForWomenScot
@ForWomenScot @johnboyne @GoodLawProject @damekatydenise_ Dame Katy is constantly in litigation. It’s the only way she can meet men now she’s banned from every known dating app.
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals
Replying to @jk_rowling
@ForWomenScot @johnboyne @GoodLawProject Wow, it’s unanimous. 100% of the room says yes, he has such a friend, and even better, the friend is actually present and has stated her willingness to do that very thing! Serendipity or what?
Classified mocking · Intensity 1/4 · Specific individuals, Free speech & cancellation
Replying to @ForWomenScot
@ForWomenScot @johnboyne @GoodLawProject Be awful if @johnboyne sued. I wonder if he’s got a friend who’d be delighted to fund him if he did? I’ll ask around in this room where I’m sitting alone.
Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals
‘[the gender debate] has been hijacked and weaponised by people who are transphobic and homophobic and racist’ -- Nicola Sturgeon, appearing at the Edinburgh Book Festival, doubles down on her demonisation of women who oppose gender self-ID. https://t.co/R3divUw2Qh
Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Law & gender recognition, Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals
Replying to @jk_rowling
Pages 108-9, in which our heroine opines on the need to make the ‘public sphere’ safe for women and girls. https://t.co/3sI9NtlRLq
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding
'We've lost all sense of rationality in [the gender] debate,' said Nicola Sturgeon. Only one side has lost rationality. Only one side pretends there's more than two sexes. Only one side lets male rapists into women's prisons. Only one side supports child sterilisation. Yours.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals, Language & definitions
Replying to @zoverions
@zoverions Changing opinions about the sky do not alter the sky’s innate nature. You do not recreate the sky every time you change your mind about it. I don’t share the fashionable, anti-scientific, narcissistic belief that perceptions are more important than observable reality.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions
Replying to @rejserin
@rejserin I was female from the moment of my conception. I was correctly observed to be female at birth. I no more decided to be a woman than I decided to have ten fingers. I could pretend to be a man but I’d still be a woman.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions
Oh, fuck off. I hope everyone buys twice as many @johnboyne, a) because he’s brilliant, and b) to piss off the Gender Taliban. https://t.co/FrTs424kAs
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions
We’re been told endlessly by trans activists that no minors have been given irreversible surgeries or drug treatments, that it’s a lie, a scare story, a moral panic, a myth. 🧵👇
Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Media & institutions
'What a woman means has changed over time' makes as little sense as 'what the sky means has changed over time.' No amount of fashionable jargon, pseudo-science or religious belief will alter the nature of women or the sky. You are not God. Reality exists independently of you.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions
Replying to @ChoralSymphony
@ChoralSymphony @fofo475 Puberty, as I said above, is when it typically becomes obvious that a mistake has been made in classification. To take the examples you chose - Semenya and Khelif - both clearly and observably underwent male-typical androgenization at puberty. Both have male-typical muscular development and neither developed breasts or menstruated. I certainly think the only fair way to ensure fairness in sport is a cheek swab, but for ordinary purposes - because we didn't start out talking about sport - I find it doubtful that anyone looking at either of these men could, in good faith, mistake them for a woman once they'd passed through puberty.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Sport, Language & definitions, Specific individuals
Replying to @ChoralSymphony
@ChoralSymphony @fofo475 No, I'm arguing what I've argued all along, that the reality of sex lies in observable, verifiable physical anatomy, and that sex-specific features, even if atypical, determine whether a person is male or female. This remains true even if a mistake is made in classification.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions
Replying to @ChoralSymphony
@ChoralSymphony @fofo475 I've just answered this above. Yes, I know men with DSDs have been presented as 'female' athletes by corrupt sporting bodies. Are you arguing that every baby should be tested for the SRY gene at birth?
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Sport, Language & definitions
Replying to @ChoralSymphony
@ChoralSymphony @fofo475 I doubt anyone has deliberately mis-recorded a baby's sex in the hope they'll grow up to be an Olympic athlete. If duplicity occurs, it's when puberty hits, it becomes obvious that the mis-recorded girl is actually a boy, and people around the individual start lying for profit.
Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Sport, Language & definitions, Specific individuals
@GraceUP563663 @ChoralSymphony @fofo475 No female has the SRY gene. There are men who have XX chromosomes plus the SRY gene (de la Chapelle, produces sperm if fertile) and females with XY and XXY who are female by virtue of its absence (Swyer syndrome - no ovaries but uterus - and 47:XXY SRY, respectively.)
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions
Replying to @ChoralSymphony
@ChoralSymphony @fofo475 I'm really struggling to understand your argument. Is it that we can only prove sex with a cheek swab? That a body provably designed for the production of one type of gamete isn't enough?
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions
Replying to @ChoralSymphony
@ChoralSymphony @fofo475 Caster Semenya has the SRY gene. We know this because of the presence of testes, which could not have developed without it. A man whose genitalia are underdeveloped is not a woman. Internal testes are not ovaries.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Sport, Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces
Replying to @ChoralSymphony
@ChoralSymphony @fofo475 Caster Semenya has internal testes, ie, atypical sperm-producing equipment. Testes, whether functional or not, are organised to produce sperm, not eggs. What point are you trying to make here?
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Sport, Language & definitions
Replying to @ChoralSymphony
@ChoralSymphony @fofo475 If you are born with egg-producing equipment, even if faulty, it's proof you are a woman.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions
Replying to @ChoralSymphony
@ChoralSymphony @Jonforris If a person has gone through menopause, it's proof she is a woman.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces
These are the posts classified trans-related. Search all 16,714 collected tweets, read the year-by-year analysis, or read the report on her campaign against trans rights.