Think I might be having a cigar later. #SupremeCourt #WomensRights
13 March 2025 to 16 April 2025. Posts are reproduced in full from the archive; the stance, intensity and topic labels come from the research classifications. How the labels are defined. Search within 2025.
Classified neutral · Intensity 1/4 · Law & gender recognition, Single-sex spaces
Replying to @jk_rowling
🚨News update: man 'literally numb' with shock and 'shaking' to discover he hasn't got women's rights.🚨 The Fiat 500 appears to be stationary. More as we get it. https://t.co/Fo7HpqkDu6
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions
Replying to @jk_rowling
The fact that so many UK trans activists are shrieking about injustice says it all. You never had the rights you claim you've now lost; you had demands. Your sense of entitlement grew unchecked because cowards and idiots bowed down to your campaign of intimidation. No longer. 2/2
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Law & gender recognition, Free speech & cancellation
Winners in the UK Supreme Court today: Women and girls, including trans-identified women (continue to benefit from maternity rights etc) Gay people Freedom of speech Freedom of association Those at risk of discrimination for a belief in the material reality of sex. 1/2
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Law & gender recognition, Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions
The court clarified that UK women have sex-based rights. You and your fellow activists' meltdowns are laying bare what has been obvious to a lot of us for years: when you say 'equality' you mean 'women have no right, under any circumstances, to draw boundaries that exclude men.' https://t.co/k1OE3leiIT
Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition, Language & definitions
The Supreme Court upheld the rights of women and gay people today. Now they're getting a 'kicking' from the man who tried and failed to sue a gay rights charity out of existence. I'm guessing they'll sleep just fine.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Law & gender recognition, Specific individuals, Single-sex spaces
Replying to @DalgetySusan
@DalgetySusan @maggiemellon There’s a party in TERF heaven tonight.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions
We toasted you, @ForWomenScot. Neil says it’s TERF VE Day 🤣 #SupremeCourt #WomensRights https://t.co/0szVVM5Han
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition
Replying to @Marcisissy
@Marcisissy Wrong. The Supreme Court ruling didn't make new law, it clarified existing law.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Law & gender recognition, Language & definitions
Well, James, we had to choose between between male rapists being locked up with women and the eradication of women's single-sex spaces, even down to homeless shelters and rape crisis centres, and knowing we share a single opinion with Donald Trump. I'm comfortable with my choice.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals, Media & institutions
Spare a thought today for the UK employers, government departments, health boards, academic institutions and sporting bodies who've been breaking equality law to appease activist groups. So many HR manuals to pulp. So many out-of-court settlements to pay. #SupremeCourt
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition, Media & institutions
I can hear the rubbing of UK lawyers' hands from here and I'm an ocean away.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Law & gender recognition, Single-sex spaces, Other
An ominous rumble of distant thunder. Storm clouds blot out the sun, songbirds fall silent, the very air seems to be holding its breath. The mother of all front-seat-of-the-car videos is brewing. #SupremeCourt https://t.co/cwF3ncNOV1
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Law & gender recognition, Media & institutions
HK Rowling has never given @ForWomenScot money. JK definitely has. https://t.co/6qY9L2bArI
Classified defensive · Intensity 0/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions
Replying to @folieaphoebe_
@folieaphoebe_ @SEAConsv @AidanCTweets Misogyny is not 'based off the gender others perceive you as.' Prejudice against trans-identified men is real, but it isn't and never has been rooted in a belief that such men are actually women. Quite the reverse.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals
Replying to @DutchLGB
@DutchLGB Those reaping fat profits from the sterilisation and surgical mutilation of minors aren't going to voluntarily leave the gravy train.
Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding
'Little ladies' fumbling with their pearls -> female prisoners locked up with male rapists, ill women requiring intimate care, girls forced to share changing rooms with males, sportswomen cheated out of their life's goal, lesbians under attack for being same sex attracted.
Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Sport, Adult healthcare, Law & gender recognition
It took three extraordinary, tenacious Scottish women with an army behind them to get this case heard by the Supreme Court and, in winning, they’ve protected the rights of women and girls across the UK. @ForWomenScot, I’m so proud to know you 🏴💜🏴💚🏴🤍🏴
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Law & gender recognition, Single-sex spaces
@LooseLeafLuci @antonjk30 @SEAConsv @AidanCTweets As I said above, it’s irrelevant whether a woman has children, wants children or can have children. Women’s bodies are organised to produce eggs and bear children and consequently differ from men’s in myriad important ways. Sewing a uterus into a man would not make him female.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Other
Please show me where I’ve spread disinformation. Is it by sharing well-evidenced detriments to women and girls in sport? By quoting medical studies showing proven harms to children? By pointing out that sexual predators are capitalising on the movement you champion?
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Sport, Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Free speech & cancellation
Man continues to insist that women must redefine their own sex class to include his fellow men, and sincerely believes this makes him a progressive hero. https://t.co/5dd7eypIB1
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces
I'm no more denying a trans-identified man's 'humanity' by calling him a man than I dehumanise a white person by accurately naming their skin colour. You appear to believe it's every woman's duty to set aside their own interests to affirm and validate such men, but I disagree.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces
Replying to @PierreJouet
@PierreJouet @SEAConsv @AidanCTweets I wonder what it was about Berns - a fiercely intelligent lesbian who couldn't be bullied into agreeing that men should transgress literally all women's boundaries - that angered Aidan so much he was still obsessively denigrating her, even after her early death?
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals, Free speech & cancellation
@LooseLeafLuci @SEAConsv @AidanCTweets Can you point to what I’ve ever said that shows I think trans people are ‘subhuman’? I’ve just acknowledged that trans-identified men experience prejudice. It’s just not misogyny.
Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals
@LooseLeafLuci @SEAConsv @AidanCTweets Pretty sure I can talk about being a woman better than any man can.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces
@LooseLeafLuci @SEAConsv @AidanCTweets Trans women don’t suffer misogyny, although some claim to experience it because they think it’s proof they’re women. Trans-identified men do experience prejudice, but that stems from some people’s dislike of effeminate/fetishistic men. Such prejudice is not misogyny.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals
@LooseLeafLuci @SEAConsv @AidanCTweets No trans-identified man experiences misogyny, which, by definition, is hatred of females. Trans-identified men may experience prejudice due to perceived effeminacy or for assumed deviance, but that isn’t misogyny.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals
@LooseLeafLuci @SEAConsv @AidanCTweets It’s irrelevant whether she has a rare disorder of sexual development or chooses not to have children. Her body is still observably organised to produce eggs, not sperm. A woman is a human being whose body is geared towards producing large, not small, gametes.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions
@LooseLeafLuci @SEAConsv @AidanCTweets She has a female body - a body organised to produce large gametes - something no man, trans-identified or not, can ever experience. She lives life while inhabiting a female body. That’s all there is to it.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions
I’m reliably informed that this is something that simply never happens. And if it happens, it’s incredibly rare. And even if it wasn’t rare, only nasty people would make these men sad by telling them they’re not women. What’s that you say? Women are being robbed? You bigot.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Sport, Single-sex spaces
@GLGWrites @Annie_Y_Mouse @2n_rodriguez @helenstaniland @maybe_ellen @MrMagspie @SeeksMaria @BigTomBoye @BarbaraPym1 @DGClarke1 @Strobe_Lightly @oglex25 @DuncanHenry78 @coldcoffee23567 What’s stopping them lobbying for their own private, safe space, exactly as women had to do, if they don’t want to share with their fellow men? I know you find this hard to grasp, but women and girls aren’t validation props, comfort animals or bit-part players in male cosplays.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions
Being excluded from spaces where women and girls are undressing does not mean men are forced to live in a cupboard under the stairs. You appear to believe you own me. I got myself where I am and paid my bills with my earnings, you insufferable, entitled prick. https://t.co/oTTGqLtIjf
Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation
Presumably because it will be easier to pretend a large, trans-identified natal male belongs in women’s changing rooms if the public can’t see what he looks like.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals, Media & institutions
Replying to @2n_rodriguez
@2n_rodriguez @Annie_Y_Mouse @SeeksMaria @BigTomBoye @GLGWrites @BarbaraPym1 @helenstaniland @DGClarke1 @Strobe_Lightly @oglex25 @DuncanHenry78 @coldcoffee23567 Pretending safeguarding is segregation is provable nonsense. Trans-identified men are as likely as any other man to commit voyeurism, violence and sexual assault and black women are just as likely to be victims of those male behaviours as white women.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Language & definitions
I’m not the one who needs to reread her own books, muppet. A totalitarian movement infiltrates the establishment, persecutes all who oppose it, threatens rape and violence, strips rights from the vulnerable, and you decide those are the good guys and applaud like a seal. https://t.co/bjgbyxZ11K
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces
This 🧵says it all.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Sport, Media & institutions, Specific individuals
Replying to @HazelAppleyard
@HazelAppleyard_ They lie, we know they're lying, they know we know they're lying, but they have to keep lying, because one single moment of honesty - 'no, I don't really think that tall bearded man is woman' - and their entire ideology falls apart.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals
Replying to @HeidiBriones
@HeidiBriones Bloody right we won't, and the same goes for the vacuous slebs who celebrated and normalised the sterilisation and surgical mutilation of gay and autistic kids because there were photo ops and Insta-likes in it.
Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals
Men who choose to publicly ridicule the idea that there's any harm in women being forced to compete against men, or being imprisoned with males, or losing single-sex spaces, have ripped their credibility to shreds. If they'll lie about this, they'll lie about absolutely anything.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Sport, Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals
Replying to @mara_yamauchi
@mara_yamauchi @simont65 @KingsburyH2O @parkrunUK @parkrun I stand corrected. He’s an aggressive, bullying piece of shit who sends abuse to young women campaigning for fair sport and thinks this makes him the good guy. There’s a lot of them about, all telling women to be nice and shut up while they campaign to give away our rights.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Sport, Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation
Replying to @WillyWoofter
@WillyWoofter @Chrisie_Shaun If you misgender me I will make a two hour video sobbing and shaking with rage in the front seat of my car, obviously, because I literally can't exist unless everyone agrees I'm a woman. #TinkerbellSyndrome
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals
Thread on the shameful dishonesty of John Oliver 👇
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Sport, Media & institutions
Replying to @HazelAppleyard
@HazelAppleyard_ They're still regurgitating Twitter TRA talking points from 2020. I can't imagine anyone being so far up their own backside they haven't noticed that this nonsensical crap is facing a massive grassroots backlash, that it loses elections and that girls and women are being harmed.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces, Other
I understand why men like Oliver, who've consistently mocked anti-science people on the right, sold out initially. They didn't want to blow up their careers. Taking fashionable anti-women's rights positions was the cost of doing business. But it's time to read the fucking room.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Sport, Specific individuals, Media & institutions
Oh look, another of those things that never happen has happened again.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Sport, Single-sex spaces
Replying to @blablafishcakes
@blablafishcakes @BettsCaro @JohnJamesNI At this point, it's quicker to list who isn't under the queer umbrella than who is.
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions
This is obscene. The NHS is about to waste yet more taxpayers' money by trying to vilify a dedicated nurse for knowing a man when she sees one. https://t.co/N6lr8dt25R
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals, Media & institutions
Replying to @JohnBoyne
@johnboyne Refusing to accept that people who don't like sex belong in the gay category is akin to wanting segregated bathrooms in the 1950s, John, as approximately a thousand gender activists will inform you once their hands stop literally shaking.
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals
Replying to @damekatydenise_
@damekatydenise_ ‘Flick knife’ 🙄 Tell the truth. He pulled a cucumber out of his mum’s shopping and said, ‘mate, you dropped your shenis.’ His mum told me the story last night and we laughed so hard I spilled Lambrini all over my freshly printed ‘India Willoughby is A Man’ stickers.
Classified mocking · Intensity 4/4 · Specific individuals, Language & definitions
Leader of the Scottish Greens Patrick Harvie says it is deeply wrong and dangerous politicians to tell doctors what drugs to prescribe. Harvie then says doctors should prescribe puberty blockers because there are good medical reasons to do so. I’ve met more self-aware goldfish. https://t.co/XrKfDeZAMi
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Specific individuals
Replying to @RadiationTDS
@RadiationTDS Careful. You seem to be suggesting there are unalterable anatomical differences between men and women, which, as we all know, makes you Literally Hitler.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation
‘Mediocre sportsman’s desire to cheat should take precedence over the rights of sportswomen, because he gets sad when he’s not pandered to’ part 2753961.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Sport
Replying to @Rob_ThaBuilder
@Rob_ThaBuilder @WillyWoofter You should check out the Blocked and Reported episode about Jeff Younger. That man’s no hero, and putting footage of his child online to score points against his ex-spouse is surely horrible behaviour, no matter the context.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Specific individuals, Child safeguarding, Media & institutions
What a heroine looks like 👇
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Sport, Specific individuals
Replying to @transwidows
@transwidows I'm confident our joint rendition of 'Man, I feel Like a Woman' will become the most popular cover song of all time.
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Other
Replying to @BilliCodes
@BilliCodes Really difficult to choose just one thing, but if you put me on the spot I'd say, how to achieve the very delicate and feminine mix of rage and resentment that appears to consume India at all times. Also contouring.
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals
Thrilled to announce I'll be appearing alongside India Willoughby in an exciting new BBC documentary: 'Why Men Make Better Women Than Women.' India will be coaching me on where I've been going wrong all these years and the whole thing will be filmed inside India's Fiat 500 ❤️🏳️⚧️
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions, Language & definitions
Replying to @sarahw1971
@sarahw1971 I always find it funny that you imagine actual women care about being told they look like men. It's such a tell.
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces
You're right. It's that simple. They're not real girls. Orwell said: 'freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.' Politicians too scared to state out loud that males have a physical advantage cannot defend women's rights. https://t.co/La8NWjlnD0
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Sport, Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions
Replying to @TerfTerfington
@RecipesKet14060 @GrumpyOW Great premise for a horror movie. 'Please... it keeps making me lock myself in Fiats and ranting at the wing mirrors... by night I wake myself by screaming "I AM A REAL WOMAN"... please, get this thing out of me...'
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Language & definitions
This is totalitarian insanity. If you think small children should be punished for being able to recognise sex, you are a dangerous zealot who should be nowhere near kids or in any position of authority over them. https://t.co/IZI0sP58ss
Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Child safeguarding, Language & definitions
@THETRANSLOBBY1 @stopthebus101 @macjama @CV_Dalcher Kath Stock’s views and actions were entirely reasonable and lawful. You appear to be arguing that if 500 people join a witch hunt, the hunted person must be a witch.
Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals
I feel nothing but sympathy for some of those who kept silent while the gender wars raged around them. I’ve had literally thousands of emails on this subject and some of the most desperate have been from people who risk their livelihoods and face persecution and harassment if they speak up. That said, I have zero sympathy for academics who did nothing to prevent illiberal and authoritarian activism stifling debate, freedom of speech and academic enquiry at their place of work. Defending those values is fundamental to academic life and you didn’t just fall short, you disgraced yourselves. Your inaction and cowardice enabled a campaign of persecution against one of your own that shamed @SussexUni. There are times in life where we are confronted by clear moral choices, when there is no middle route. Either you stand up for freedom of speech and belief - yes, even up to the point of causing offence - or you bow down to a totalitarian culture that relies on intimidation and threats to sustain itself. It’s deeply depressing to think that a university requires a punitive fine to make it wake up to the fact that it’s abandoned basic liberal values, but the OfS has at last drawn a much needed line in the sand. I wouldn’t bet against more monster fines to come, though. The University of Sussex is far from the only institute of learning where a culture of fear has been allowed to flourish.
Read the full postClassified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions, Specific individuals
Replying to @MStemberg1
@MStemberg1 Misogynoir is alive and well among the white TRAs who think comparing black women to men is a brilliant argument.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals, Other
.@IndiaWilloughby I know facts aren't your strong point, but your assertion that trans-identified men aren't winning medals in the female category 'because we're rubbish at sport' is bollocks in every possible sense. https://t.co/MOWKOrksDV
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Sport, Specific individuals
'The University of Sussex is facing a record £585,000 fine from England's higher education regulator over alleged failures to uphold free speech and academic freedom. The Office for Students found "significant and serious breaches" at the university."'🔥 https://t.co/GmUADePeZ1
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions
Replying to @jk_rowling
Ah, I've just see the car video. According to @IndiaWilloughby, black women are more likely to fail sex testing than white women. Please do share your source for that particular nugget of 'information', India.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Sport, Specific individuals
As of October 2024, trans-identified men had taken nearly 900 medals from women in female sporting categories. And why exactly would black female athletes suffer more from giving a cheek swab, India? https://t.co/a1aKKVqmgT
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Sport, Specific individuals
Or, to put it another way: 'a cheek swab will be introduced to ensure fair sport for women and girls. Trans-identified men remain free to play sport in the male category.'
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Sport, Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions
Replying to @Andreia_O_Nobre
@Andreia_O_Nobre Doctors, social workers, youth leaders, babysitters, priests, teachers, charity workers, cuddly celebrities: yes, sexual predators might lurk in those professions/roles, but they’d definitely NEVER identify as women and we’re crazy for thinking that happens.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces
But remember, there's no evidence any man would ever pretend to be a woman to enable sexual predation. Except for all these men, obviously... 🧵
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals
Joss demonstrates the well-reasoned and empathetic attitude that makes his strain of trans activism so very effective. Thanks for playing, Joss. https://t.co/C0IXlPwFTG
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals, Free speech & cancellation
'Too many organisations continue to labour under the misapprehension that they must behave as though sex is immaterial or unimportant... A course correction is much needed and long overdue.' Amen 🙏 https://t.co/hLSR8d90gb
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions
Replying to @Nymne
@Nymne @damekatydenise_ It's easy. For a brief and traumatic period of my life, I worked for Dame Katy at her charity, which donates chairs to trans women who'd otherwise be tragically forced to sprawl on the floor. The Dame, who is definitely not a parody, whatever haters say, pursues an online vendetta against me, though she likes to pretend the size twelve neon pink pump is on the other foot. I sometimes forget who sued first, and who counter-sued, but suffice it to say, our legal wrangles are unlikely to be concluded before one or both of us die.
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions
Replying to @scotlibdems
@scotlibdems @agcolehamilton is a big fan of this activist, though, isn't he? He name-checked Beth in adulatory terms many times when he was ushering through the failed gender recognition bill. Maybe violent threats are fine as long as you've painted your axe handle pink and blue? https://t.co/rK0F5M2dok
Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Law & gender recognition, Specific individuals, Child safeguarding, Free speech & cancellation
I always enjoy @sarahditum’s reviews and this is one of her best. ‘This book isn’t a manifesto for change. It’s a set of talking points for people who never want to be in the uncomfortable position of realising that they’re wrong.’ https://t.co/utMKq4fQi3
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Media & institutions, Language & definitions
Gender identity ideology has embedded itself in the UK’s institutions over the wishes of the majority and is causing provable, significant harm. Article by @JournalistJill https://t.co/o3SDbmjsh7
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Media & institutions, Language & definitions, Child safeguarding
The left across the west needs to return to sanity and reality with regard to sex-based rights and safeguarding. The choice is between pandering to gender activists or listening to voters’ well-founded concerns. Sticking with the former will just hand the right more easy wins.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Language & definitions, Media & institutions
‘The cheap victories won by trans activism have left it exposed and without allies… the damage to the LGBT movement is done and will take much work to unpick. In both cases, the best time to start the return to sanity is right now.’ ✍️ @sarahditum https://t.co/ZCm23wWLwd
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Media & institutions, Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation
This man doesn’t think beaten and abused women are deserving of a male-free space when they’re at their most vulnerable and at risk. Ironically, this man, who claims not to be a man, is an example of the very worst kind of man.
Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals, Language & definitions
Replying to @damekatydenise_
@damekatydenise_ You forget, I was the one who opened your 23 & Me results. 95% Anglo-Saxon, 3% Neanderthal, 2% unidentifiable, 75% odds of diabetes, 86% chance of male pattern baldness. Crazy that you were right about the DSD, though. I didn't know it was possible to have YYY chromosomes.
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals, Language & definitions
I’d remove my daughter instantly from that school, then go full Nemesis.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding
Replying to @BrianD253
@BrianD253 Me too, but then neither of us have a kink that involves transgressing women’s boundaries.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces
Yes, the reason women don’t want him in their single sex spaces is because they’re threatened by his femininity 🙄 https://t.co/gIqXlvNDas
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces
Replying to @2n_rodriguez
@2n_rodriguez @GLGWrites @oglex25 @Annie_Y_Mouse @DuncanHenry78 @DGClarke1 @frailstate_xo @coldcoffee23567 @helenstaniland These statistics that remain stable across nationalities. A significant number of trans-identified men are straight fetishists with a cross-dressing paraphilia. You can keep telling yourself this is about a fragile gender dysphoric population, but facts tell a different story.
Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Specific individuals, Language & definitions, Other
Replying to @GLGWrites
@GLGWrites @2n_rodriguez @oglex25 @Annie_Y_Mouse @DuncanHenry78 @DGClarke1 @frailstate_xo @coldcoffee23567 @helenstaniland Proportionally speaking, more trans-identified man are currently imprisoned in the UK for sex offences than in the general male prison population. Care to explain this?
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Child safeguarding, Specific individuals, Single-sex spaces
Replying to @2n_rodriguez
@2n_rodriguez @oglex25 @Annie_Y_Mouse @DuncanHenry78 @DGClarke1 @frailstate_xo @coldcoffee23567 @helenstaniland And your assumption is that any such person is harmless to women and girls?
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding
Replying to @2n_rodriguez
@2n_rodriguez @oglex25 @Annie_Y_Mouse @DuncanHenry78 @DGClarke1 @frailstate_xo @coldcoffee23567 @helenstaniland So you think if a man says he's a woman, he should be allowed into all spaces where a woman might be partially or wholly unclothed.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces
Replying to @2n_rodriguez
@2n_rodriguez @oglex25 @Annie_Y_Mouse @DuncanHenry78 @DGClarke1 @frailstate_xo @coldcoffee23567 @helenstaniland You're misrepresenting me. It's a well-documented fact that unisex spaces are more dangerous for women, so should women welcome their single-sex spaces including men? https://t.co/x5XW5H9PXh
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces
Replying to @2n_rodriguez
@2n_rodriguez @oglex25 @Annie_Y_Mouse @DuncanHenry78 @DGClarke1 @frailstate_xo @coldcoffee23567 @helenstaniland So your position is, it doesn't matter if women feel unsafe around men in public spaces where they're unclothed or otherwise vulnerable, because women are mostly raped or killed by intimate partners?
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding
Replying to @2n_rodriguez
@2n_rodriguez @oglex25 @Annie_Y_Mouse @DuncanHenry78 @DGClarke1 @frailstate_xo @coldcoffee23567 @helenstaniland Trans-identified men have committed voyeurism and assault in what were formerly women's single sex spaces. Is it your position that women must forget that and welcome trans-identified men into those spaces?
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding
Replying to @2n_rodriguez
@2n_rodriguez @Annie_Y_Mouse @DuncanHenry78 @DGClarke1 @frailstate_xo @coldcoffee23567 @helenstaniland Your attitude;s fascinating, though. You think women shouldn't feel fear or discomfort when vulnerable/undressed in the vicinity of men. They must centre the men's wishes, or stay home. You can see why I'm interested, can't you?
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces
Replying to @oglex25
@oglex25 @2n_rodriguez @Annie_Y_Mouse @DuncanHenry78 @DGClarke1 @frailstate_xo @coldcoffee23567 @helenstaniland The novelist in me is interested. Why are men like him so eager to tell women they have to suck up fear and discomfort? Is it giving him a kick? Is it revenge? Because the good men I know don't need to be instructed on why women want single-sex spaces. They get it, instantly.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces
@FediliaKraven13 @AngelaH58 @edthetechie @sharrond62 I know honest politicians, @RosieDuffield1 and @joannaccherry, to name just two. Women prepared to defy their parties and sacrifice personal ambition to stand up for women's rights. They're heroines.
Classified neutral · Intensity 0/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals, Law & gender recognition
Don't let them gaslight you into thinking you're the mad one. The New Endarkenment will not win if there are still people are brave enough to stand up for objective, scientific truth and the rights of women and children. This quasi-religious bullshit is just that: bullshit. ⚔️⚔️
Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation, Child safeguarding
Every single person who supports, normalises, justifies and celebrates child transition should be forced to listen to this woman. Never, ever claim you couldn't have known what you were so enthusiastically enabling. The evidence was right there in front of you.
Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding
Replying to @preta_6
@preta_6 I know it doesn't feel like it right now, Amy, but sometimes a loss is really a win. By fighting the case you've been responsible for a whole new slew of people waking up to the absolute insanity of all this. So much bullying and discrimination against women is happening behind closed doors. Every single time a woman is brave enough to drag it all out into daylight, and employers and professional bodies are forced to show their hand and declare openly what batshit conditions they're imposing on staff, more people rally in defence of free speech, common sense and women's rights. You're a heroine and your case will be a landmark. It's Friday. Raise a glass to the Terven tonight, as we'll all be doing to you 🧙♀️🔥💜🤍💚
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals
The Vagina Museum, which is currently begging for funds to remain open, has blocked me, so I can't tell them directly why many former supporters' reaction is 'good riddance.' Here's something that might help them understand: https://t.co/ZJTyvyO1u1 https://t.co/6u9mFMsDg9
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions, Media & institutions
Replying to @preta_6
@preta_6 It's one battle lost, not the whole war. Millions of women stand with you, Amy. ⚔️⚔️
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals
Spot on. Such people double down because doubting themselves means admitting the possibility that they've been cheering on the surgical maiming and chemical sterilisation of minors, all in service of a trendy, unfalsifiable, quasi-religious ideology.
Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Language & definitions
These are the posts classified trans-related. Search all 16,714 collected tweets, read the year-by-year analysis, or read the report on her campaign against trans rights.