Replying to @ChoralSymphony
@ChoralSymphony @fofo475 If a person has ovaries to remove, it's proof they are a woman.
Page 3 of 11. Posts 201–300 of the 1,011 J.K. Rowling wrote about trans people in 2025, newest first.
29 June 2025 to 7 August 2025. Posts are reproduced in full from the archive; the stance, intensity and topic labels come from the research classifications. How the labels are defined. Search within 2025.
Replying to @ChoralSymphony
@ChoralSymphony @fofo475 If a person has ovaries to remove, it's proof they are a woman.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Sport
Replying to @SkinningroveBF
@SkinningroveBF @ChoralSymphony I believe it was 1971 and I hear a lot of SRY possessors worked there, because they are traditionally associated with heavy industry. I believe I've just completed my gender studies degree.
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions
Replying to @ChoralSymphony
@ChoralSymphony @fofo475 If a human has a uterus to remove, it's proof she's a woman.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces
Replying to @ChoralSymphony
@ChoralSymphony Stating that a person is male or female by virtue of observable features of their bodies isn't 'bringing in reproductive capabilities.' An infertile man is still a man. A woman with a DSD remains a woman. The presence or absence of the SRY gene at conception causes us to be male or female, but in 99.9% of cases, the equipment we develop is proof of whether it's present or absent.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions
Being a woman isn't an essence, it's a material, provable fact. I'm not a female human being because society or history made me one, or because I picked the 'woman' category on some metaphysical spreadsheet. I'm a woman because I was born with the equipment to produce large gametes. My biology isn't my destiny unless I'm unfortunate enough to live in a society like Afghanistan where my femaleness is punished from birth. My biology does, however, mean I am likely to have experiences no man ever will. If I'd been raised by robots in outer space who had no understanding of social categories or gendered norms I'd still provably be a woman, not a man. I'd certainly suffer some deprivation from not associating with other humans, but on the upside, I'd never have to listen to pseudo-intellectual drivel like this.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions
AI's getting too good. This cannot be real. Even Willoughby wouldn't say this.
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions
Man thinks he’s stumbled on a genius argument by revealing he can tell a man from a woman at a glance and that he knows a trans woman is a man. https://t.co/lm9l2VZJQ2
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals
Replying to @donelkins
@donelkins This man's already persuaded a court that women don't have the right to exclude him from a women-only app. He's relentlessly persecuted @salltweets in the hope that the Australian judicial situation will make an example of her for saying 'no' to him. He's not the victim here.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals, Law & gender recognition
Yet more proof that no predatory man would EVER claim to be a woman (no paywall) https://t.co/BpGPeluoP9
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces
Once again, I marvel at how many men think the only issue with a man offering to help a teenage girl with her bra is that the girl refused. They tweet this stuff under their own names and pictures. It's astounding.
Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals
"Jenny Niven’s book festival is as difficult and edgy as an Ocado delivery. Its hand-wringing theme of “repair” studiously ignores the damage wrought on the literary world by the activist views and behaviour of many of those booked to participate." https://t.co/blWcSUMHuA
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions
Western society is currently divided between people who know this is a man and are prepared to say so and those who know this is a man but lie out of obedience to an ideology. There is no third option. Literally nobody on earth thinks "Roxanne Tickle" is actually a woman. https://t.co/xLbzcOfKmJ
Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Specific individuals, Language & definitions, Law & gender recognition
Let me make this really easy for you, India. Lesbians belong in the women's changing room because they're women. Cross-dressing men who offer to fit bras on teenage girls belong in a police interview room. https://t.co/6CsghFIqIE
Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding
Yes, men who have to use the men’s bathroom at theme parks really do put Nelson Mandela’s struggles into perspective. https://t.co/P0Qg4qAbCR
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions
Replying to @a_bindoff
@a_bindoff @AlexSmith90014 @fem_mb @ForWomenScot Never underestimate the self-congratulatory naiveté of comfortably off, privately educated people who've never moved through the world without the means to summon a lawyer, a taxi or a private therapist.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals
Replying to @AlexSmith90014
@AlexSmith90014 @fem_mb @ForWomenScot Agreed. There's a reason trans activists want to argue about public bathrooms rather than rape crisis centres, domestic abuse shelters and hospital wards.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Free speech & cancellation
Replying to @AlexSmith90014
@AlexSmith90014 @fem_mb @ForWomenScot In my experience, this is overwhelmingly the case with older people. They assume trans women have had full sex reassignment surgery and an androphillic orientation and are genuinely incredulous at the idea that a straight man might claim a trans identification, or that gender identify ideology supports the admission of fully intact, gynephillic males into female spaces. It's so far outside their experience they think it's a far-fetched scare story.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Language & definitions
Replying to @AristideOana
@AristideOana @fem_mb @ForWomenScot We're living in a world of echo chambers. If you read only what confirms your biases, and associate only with people who share them, you have no hope of escaping your bubble. I've read loads on the gender identity ideology side. I wanted to understand what they were arguing.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation
Replying to @cynicalyetfun
@cynicalyetfun @fem_mb @ForWomenScot I'm so sorry. That's awful. I know it might not be much consolation, but I've come through this shitshow with a) more friends than I lost and b) a significantly higher quality of friend. May you be as fortunate x
Classified defensive · Intensity 0/4 · Other
Replying to @BradRTorgersen
@BradRTorgersen @fem_mb @ForWomenScot My Boomer mother-in-law's jaw dropped when I told her how many trans-identifying kids were at my children's school. Then I told her we were out for dinner with ten friends and between us, we knew (truly knew, not just vague aware of) twenty-five trans-identified kids.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding
Replying to @fem_mb
@fem_mb @ForWomenScot Why, you're a mere stripling! I don't love saying this, but I suspect that once the fight's been won your friends will slide easily into opining that it was always obvious this was a dangerous anti-woman, homophobic ideology, and they'll be performatively horrified to learn that the transitioning of minors, which they insisted was a far-right invention, was done without an evidence base and has caused real and irreversible harm.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Language & definitions
Replying to @fem_mb
@fem_mb @ForWomenScot I’m entitled to say this, because I just turned 60. A lot of older liberals (in both the US and the UK) have brought very old-fashioned sensibilities to this debate. They’re still locked into the idea that all trans women are, or were, effeminate gay men, and they’re perplexed that any woman would see them as a threat. These are people who’ve never met an AGP in the wild, don’t understand online cultures, know nothing about trends in porn, aren’t on TikTok where ‘gender-affirming’ surgeons advertise directly to minors, and they’ve aged out of having kids at school, so have no notion that social contagion might be at play. They look round at all their similarly aged dinner party friends, none of whom are aware of any of these things either, and adopt a vibe-based position: this is gay rights 2.0, anyone who opposes it must be far-right, and thank goodness Our Sort are kinder, better, and (most importantly) far more sophisticated.
Read the full postClassified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Language & definitions, Media & institutions
Replying to @ForWomenScot
@ForWomenScot We may think parts of the UK media have been cowardly on this issue, but Joyce Carol Oates is exhibit A in how it's possible for liberals in America to remain oblivious to what's happening to vulnerable minors and women's rights, as long as they keep to certain news outlets.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Single-sex spaces, Media & institutions, Child safeguarding
It's time for women to vote with their wallets. If stores like M&S continue to flout the Supreme Court ruling on women-only spaces, prioritising the wishes of men who want to undress near, or help fit bras on teenage girls, a boycott seems appropriate. https://t.co/9RsUetLEVA
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding
Replying to @nancychatter
@nancychatter @LindsayMLand Stolen valour means pretending to have exhibited bravery you didn't. For instance, screaming 'transphobic bigot' at every woman who's currently standing up for women's rights isn't remotely brave, but I'm sure you see yourself as nothing short of heroic.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Single-sex spaces
All those people who tell me support for women's single sex spaces means I must support Reform (which I don't) appear to share exactly the same opinion on women's single-sex spaces as Reform.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals
Replying to @HazelAppleyard
@HazelAppleyard_ Transphobia. Duh.
Classified neutral · Intensity 0/4 · Other
Replying to @B_bex_a
@B_bex_a @HazelAppleyard_ Don't worry, we're still offering Elite Membership to those who join now, given that women are still having to fight in court for basic rights.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition
Replying to @HazelAppleyard
@HazelAppleyard_ We need OG TERF membership cards, franked by an authorised notary.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals
I promise you this: in ten years time, a load of women who're currently riding the gender identity bandwagon will claim they were always TERFs. They'll be like the fakers who pretend to have survived terrorist attacks they were never even near.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation
Alternatively: Dr Upton is a 6' tall, heterosexual, ex-rugby-playing married man whose choice to invade a women only changing room has garnered him media attention.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Media & institutions, Specific individuals
Replying to @salltweets
@salltweets Good luck, Sall. May the best woman (haha) win x
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals, Sport
Replying to @geraldposner
@geraldposner Leftists who've been too cowardly to stand up to this madness continue to prefer shooting the messenger to looking in the mirror. They were warned they were offering the right an open goal, but it's so much easier to call the public Nazis.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions, Other
Those who argue for the chemical sterilisation of minors, who campaign for the eradication of single-sex rape crisis centres and who support male sex offenders in women's prisons have done more damage to the left's credibility than Farage could achieve in 100 years. Own that.
Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals
@_joeby_x In fairness, that's more coherent than 99% of liberal politicians who've been faking a belief that women can have dicks can manage, now they've sniffed the changing Zeitgeist and need to realign themselves with reality.
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces
Replying to @Hush9Hush
@Hush9Hush @RandyMcTigerFan They were being told this was 'progressive' and they rushed to sign up, no doubt, but my sympathy is limited. Those who pushed gender identity ideology from the top of corporations and institutions were almost never exposed to the real life consequences of their decisions.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Media & institutions
Replying to @RandyMcTigerFan
@RandyMcTigerFan The ideology was always elitist and imposed top-down. Resistance to the ideology has been truly grassroots: regular people, especially women and gay people, pushing back against powerful institutions and well-funded lobby groups seeking to impose luxury beliefs on the hoi polloi.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions, Language & definitions
Replying to @IrisThinksMeh
@IrisThinksMeh @CaptainVirgilx I'll be giving away a free copy of Sally Hines 'Is Gender Fluid?' with every gift shop purchase. People will need a good laugh after they've been through the WPATH Hall of Infamy.
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Media & institutions, Adult healthcare, Language & definitions
Replying to @CaptainVirgilx
@CaptainVirgilx Might leave a bequest in my will to set up a Museum of Gender Ideology Batshittery. Pink and blue baseball bats and black balaclavas in glass cases, life-size waxworks of Laurel Hubbard and Lia Thomas, a tank of clownfish, India Willoughby car rants playing on a loop...
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Sport, Specific individuals, Language & definitions
This shift in attitudes shown below isn't because of increased intolerance, but of an increase in understanding, and trans activists themselves bear the greatest responsibility for the change. Five years ago, a lot of medical bodies (and trans activist organisations, lobby groups and virtue-signalling celebrities) were united in telling us that puberty blockers were completely reversible and harmless. As more and more evidence accrues showing actual and potential harm, public opinion, unlike trans activism, has shifted in line with the data. Five years ago, the sophisticated, fashionable line was that sex difference didn't really matter in sport. Trans activists demanded that the women's category be destroyed to accommodate men who claim to be female, but the public wasn't willing to pretend they couldn't see the injustice right in front of their faces. Five years ago, trans activists and professional lanyard- wearers were chiding us all to use preferred pronouns, because that was kind. Now the public see convicted rapists described as 'she' and 'her' by news outlets and are rightly enraged that journalists are feeding us ideological fiction instead of facts. Five years ago, a lot of people, especially older ones, were under the impression that trans-identified men had all had full sex reassignment surgery and were sexually orientated towards other men. They didn't know that cross-dressing straight men were now asserting the right to enter all women's reserved spaces. They didn't know how few trans women have had 'bottom surgery.' They know now. Trans activists are to blame for the hounding and persecution of non-believers, which has spilled into British courts. Women have had to fight all over again for rights they thought they'd have forever. The Cass Review brought shame on all who lobbied to continue a broadly unresearched and unevidenced medical experiment on minors. Trust in institutions, in academia, the media and the medical profession has been severely undermined. Politicians have beclowned themselves, willing to parrot self-contradictory slogans and outright absurdities rather than defend truth and freedom of speech. The stark change in attitudes over the past five years is the direct consequence of the way trans activists set out to 'educate' us all. Giddy with the power they'd been handed by people in authority, they've tried to impose a quasi-religious, elitist, minority belief upon the whole of society. They can't complain (although, of course, they will) that the public has decided it doesn't want to buy what they're selling.
Read the full postClassified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Sport, Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions, Language & definitions
Replying to @rejserin
@rejserin I'm fine with gender ideologues getting to say what they like, publish what they like and campaign for whatever they like. Unfortunately the same courtesy is not extended to those of us who know what a woman is and why women's rights matter.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Language & definitions
Replying to @bindelj
@bindelj @damekatydenise_ She’s grooming you, Julie, ffs. Once she’s lulled you into a false sense of security you’ll start noticing stuff disappearing from your house. Bras. Chairs. I lost six pairs of slingbacks and a full set of nesting tables before I realised what was going on.
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals, Other
Every word 👇
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Media & institutions, Specific individuals
Gender critical is just this: 🐌 : hello butterfly, I’m a butterfly as well. 🦋 : no, snail, you are a snail. 🐌 : I am a butterfly 🦋 : you’ve got a shell 🐌 : it’s a butterfly shell. 🦋: and no wings 🐌 : stop genociding me. https://t.co/WlPC0aLLsj
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions
Replying to @jk_rowling
Tell me again that there’s no class discrimination here. The professional class doesn’t have to strip off during their working day, but working class women must act in accordance with their betters’ luxury beliefs and do so front of men. 2/2
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces
‘I find it suspicious that you, a working class woman, managed to find the money to defend yourself in court, because this is usually something only the wealthy can afford. I wouldn’t ask a rich person where they got their money, of course. That would be terribly rude.’ 1/2
Classified defensive · Intensity 0/4 · Specific individuals, Free speech & cancellation
Congratulations, @SarahSurviving! A fabulous result, even if it's shameful that women are currently having to fight in court to reestablish services and spaces they built/campaigned for decades ago.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces
Steph, I’m a woman. You’re a trans-identified man. Instead of celebrating that difference, you spend half your life persecuting women who point it out. https://t.co/uHZTRWdi27
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces
Replying to @PompeySteph
@PompeySteph If you're claiming nobody knew Upton was a man until I said it, I would refer you to your own eyes.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Language & definitions
Replying to @NoSecretLessons
@NoSecretLessons @descartesbeard So we both agree 'cross-dressing per se' shouldn't be illegal, neither of us thinks cross-dressers have changed sex and I assume you're happy the Supreme Court confirmed a Gender Recognition Certificate doesn't make men legally female. How exactly have I angered you?
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Law & gender recognition, Language & definitions
Replying to @NoSecretLessons
@NoSecretLessons @descartesbeard Are you proposing laws that prohibit men from dressing in women's clothes, or women dressing in men's clothes? If so, it's obvious that we have very different ideas about what kind of society each of us wants to live in.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition, Language & definitions
Replying to @lutzebroom
@descartesbeard @NoSecretLessons I'm not sure I agree. I don't think anyone feels less revulsion for men wearing fetishwear around kids than they did before gender identity ideology arrived to justify and excuse it. The 80s were full of gender-bending clothes etc and nobody pretended it meant dress-and-make-up-wearing men were women. This movement has been imposed top-down, not at a grassroots level. Certain very dubious men have been gifted a fabulous opportunity not only to indulge their kink in daily life, but to cry victimhood if opposed. They're getting away with it because so many captured institutions and lobby groups have got their backs, not because the general public has decided grown men putting on lipstick and invading women's single-sex spaces is great.
Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Language & definitions, Media & institutions
Replying to @MaureenWRC
@MaureenWRC @NoSecretLessons Moral injury has a specific meaning that rests on forced compliance. I dislike seeing men performing a degrading or hypersexualised version of what they think a woman is and I object strongly to men parading their fetishes in front of kids. However, even if society agrees that there are forms of dress that are highly inappropriate in, for instance, a classroom, setting out to police dress and beliefs outside certain clearly defined contexts is a very slippery slope.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions
Replying to @NoSecretLessons
@NoSecretLessons I still think people should dress however they please. I still think people should be free to say whatever they like about themselves. Trying to outlaw or suppress other people's beliefs is as dangerously authoritarian as trying to force everyone else to pretend to share those beliefs. No moral injury is done to me if a man wants to wear a dress and make up. It's the forced compliance with his belief he's a now a woman that causes moral injury. Totalitarianism is not beaten by more totalitarianism.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation
I find it offensive to be pressured into calling him ‘she’. See how that works? It’s his narcissistic injury versus my moral injury, but only one of us is demanding the dismantlement of the other one’s rights. https://t.co/tZveU5DWGI
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation
Replying to @suunasolkija
@suunasolkija Honestly, someone calling themselves 'elite individual' defending the most elitist ideology ever to pretend to be a civil rights issue is just too perfect. https://t.co/0L5UTC2N3t
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation, Other
A large number of people (mostly men, in my experience) who're sympathetic to some of women's opposition to gender identity ideology, nevertheless think it's cruel to point out that a trans-identified man looks like a man, and unkind not to 'respect' his pronouns. They think these are 'compromises' women should be prepared to make. 'What does it matter?' they say. 'How does it hurt you?' The psychological effects of being coerced, manipulated or pressured into doing something that is against a person's own beliefs or values are well known. 'Moral injury' occurs when a person is forced to betray deep-held convictions, or stand in silence while those convictions are being betrayed. The individual feels transgressed at a core level. The inevitable consequences are stress, anxiety and anger. Workplaces across the west have imposed a Kafkaesque situation on women. A belief system most people consider nonsensical, but which, in elite circles, has become almost a religion, has been imposed from on high. Women are being persecuted and punished for not pretending they think men can change sex. The policing of pronouns, and the harassment and shaming of women who won't pretend they can't recognise a man when they see one, is merely the tip of genderism's gigantic, threatening iceberg. Any man who seeks to force women to play along with the fantasy that he's female is engaging in a typically male power play. At worst, he will suffer narcissistic injury from her non-compliance, but that doesn't make him objectively vulnerable. The non-compliant woman, though, suffers lasting moral injury by being forced to participate daily in a lie - a lie, moreover, that constitutes a fundamental threat to her own rights to privacy, dignity and safety. It has been profoundly illuminating to see how many people - possibly because their own values spring, not from a place of rationality or true conviction, but from fashion and self-interest - see male narcissistic injury as so very much more worthy of compassion than the moral injuries suffered by women.
Read the full postClassified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation, Other
Four 'ordinary' women who've fought for women's and girls' rights to safety, privacy and dignity at immense personal cost, taking on well-funded lobby groups, ideologically captured public bodies and a political class that treats women with contempt. Actual, real life heroines 🔥
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals, Media & institutions
Trust in mainstream media has never been lower, but the management class has decreed that violent and sexual crimes committed by men must be reported as female crimes if that's how the perpetrators identify. A strategy that's sure to rebuild credibility. https://t.co/c5IFLAEJpj
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Media & institutions, Language & definitions
Replying to @MrTCHarris
@MrTCHarris @nhsfife It's like complaining your opponent hasn't agreed that that the earth's flat, midway through a debate about whether anyone's ever fallen off the edge of the earth.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Other
IMO, any or all of the following: a) It's the fashionable position in their echo chamber. b) Naivety/lack of information. c) Fear of ostracisation/persecution. d) Child who's trans. e) Lends itself to low effort virtue-signalling. f) Great stick to batter other women with.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Other
Replying to @Dis_Critic
@Dis_Critic The worst consequences of these insane policies are always suffered by those with less power, money and status. Searle and Bumba aren't stripping off or dealing with menstrual issues with Upton present, but pride themselves on the fact that they forced other women to do so.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals
Replying to @AAT514239395330
@AAT514239395330 @nhsfife I agree. She’s also the only witness who’s entered that court I’d trust in a medical context. The willingness of medics like Searle to rip their credibility to shreds rather than renounce their luxury beliefs is astounding.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Adult healthcare, Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals, Media & institutions
Replying to @Jebadoo2
@Jebadoo2 Hard agree. Plus baseless smears of homophobia. They appear to subscribe to the Nicola Sturgeon school of logic: unless you agree a man becomes a woman if he says he is, you’re a racist gay-basher.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals, Free speech & cancellation
Replying to @francesbarber13
@francesbarber13 I’m married to one such doctor. He’s 100% supportive of Sandie and disgusted by how she’s been treated.
Classified defensive · Intensity 0/4 · Specific individuals, Adult healthcare
The Sandie Peggie employment tribunal is currently exposing, as perhaps no court case to date has, the issue of class as it relates to the top-down imposition of gender identity ideology in the workplace. 'Diversity officer' Isla Bumba has now admitted in court that she didn't bother consulting the 1992 regulations guaranteeing single-sex spaces when she told a trans-identified male, Dr Beth Upton, to use the female changing room at the hospital where he was working. Bumba justified this decision with comments that I assume sounded really clever and convincing, inside her own head. 'I don’t know anything about Beth’s body. I didn’t at the time. I don’t now. I don’t need to know. But it wouldn’t be something that I would ever have the information of exactly what she is made of, biologically.' Kate Searle, a consultant in emergency medicine, backed Bumba up, expressing outrage on the witness stand that anyone would be so insensitive as to ask about Upton's chromosomes. ‘I could only imagine how upsetting and invasive a question that would be for Beth, and also not relevant to a colleague to ask another colleague. Beth identifies as female, and it does not matter what her chromosomes are to her.’ In Bumba and Searle's world, a belief that gender identity trumps biological sex is proof you're intellectually and morally superior to women like Sandie Peggie, so I'd imagine it's come as a shock to discover, in a blaze of public and press scrutiny, just how idiotic and cruel they appear to people outside their dinner party circle. When Upton, a 6' tall, 28-year-old ex-rugby playing male, claimed that a petite 50-year-old female nurse was making him feel 'unsafe', his word appears to have been taken as gospel. Searle, Bumba and management fell over themselves to coddle the middle-class doctor who shared their voguish post-modern views on gender. What did Sandie matter? She's just one of those ghastly uninformed bigots who still thinks sex is real and important - so embarrassingly gauche and simplistic! Whisper it - she probably drinks red wine with chicken, too. According to @tribunaltweets, an emotional Searle blurted out on the stand 'I am kind.' This is not something genuinely kind people need to say. Genuinely kind people don't find themselves compelled to explain in court why they helped whip up a witch-hunt against a woman whose only crime was wanting to change her clothes without a man watching. Well, the nurse who was supposed to shuffle off in disgrace wasn't having it. Sandie Peggie refused to be sacrificed on the altar of elitist ideologues who believe themselves to be higher and better than she is. She fought back, for herself and for every other woman who's currently being silenced, persecuted and punished by a smug management class that preens itself on its virtue while imposing rampantly misogynistic policies on its workforce. Sandie Peggie is a heroine. The woman NHS Fife thought they could treat abominably without any consequences to themselves has succeeded in shining the brightest spotlight yet upon the brain rot and compassion deficit suffered by supposedly intelligent people when they embrace gender identity ideology. Women everywhere owe her a debt of thanks. Whatever the outcome of this tribunal, Sandie Peggie has already won.
Read the full postClassified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals, Child safeguarding, Language & definitions, Media & institutions
Replying to @AshwiniRoopesh
@AshwiniRoopesh I wouldn't trust anyone in a medical context who places an unfalsifiable, untestable ideology over objective, provable facts. You might as well go straight to a shaman.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Adult healthcare, Language & definitions
Replying to @jk_rowling
However, Dr Searle's a doctor, which makes her automatically trustworthy, the same way her male colleague, Dr Upton, became automatically trustworthy in the female changing rooms the moment he said he was a woman. #IStandWithSadiePeggie 3/X https://t.co/Dc8jEY9ZBR
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals
Just another day of lunacy in the Scottish courts. Dr Kate Searle, a consultant in emergency medicine, says she knows she's female because it says so on her birth certificate, but she personally isn't an expert on recognising a baby's sex. 1/3 https://t.co/Mv1u7OCXau
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Law & gender recognition, Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions
Replying to @SeanDubIreland
@SeanDubIreland Elected representatives who’ve remained silent while their female constituents have been hounded, defamed and threatened with loss of livelihood do not deserve head pats for belatedly supporting a Supreme Court ruling that proved their constituents were in the right all along.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition, Free speech & cancellation
Replying to @bindelj
@bindelj @joefattorini @DreyfusJames I'm here for you at this difficult time, Julie, but let us hope and pray that his close embrace with @damekatydenise_ was nothing more than an expression of friendship.
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals
They were waiting for the tide to turn, Rosie, so they could wriggle right to the front of the shoal, current behind them, and shout, 'follow me!'
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions
Trying to further smear Sandie Peggie's by using false allegations about her relationship with her daughter is a new low, even for this court case. NHS Fife and their legal team appear to have lost their marbles, as well as their moral bearings.
Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals, Media & institutions
Obviously it would take time away from tweeting vapid slogans and hiring men to be women's representatives, but perhaps @UN_Women might consider addressing the desperate situation of women in Afghanistan.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Media & institutions
Replying to @alexmassie
@alexmassie Fine, I'll donate the fee to @ForWomenScot 😉
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Other
You appointed men to women's posts. You appointed men to women's posts. You appointed men to women's posts. You appointed men to women's posts. You appointed men to women's posts. You appointed men to women's posts. You appointed men to women's posts.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions, Specific individuals
Replying to @bindelj
@bindelj You were the one who pressured me to let @damekatydenise_ cater the party. I do not call fifty Greggs sausage rolls and an Iceland king prawn ring fine dining, nor did I expect to find what looked like a dead Pekinese in the toilet. (It turned out to be her second-best wig.)
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions
I’m naturally 5’8” as long as I’m wearing four inch heels. https://t.co/TxqvEZEeGG
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions
Replying to @joannaccherry
@joannaccherry @BBCRadioScot To paraphrase FDR, Jo, I’m happy to be judged by the enemies I’ve made, and same goes for you.
Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Specific individuals, Free speech & cancellation
Dr Upton has now been 'misgendered' in court by three of his witnesses and his own lawyer. Will he be suing them? If not, why not? Does he prefer to bully women with less power? Or does he doubt the others can be forced to undress in front of him, so why bother? #NHSFife
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals, Law & gender recognition
Replying to @SwipeWright
@SwipeWright And I saw you baking a cake, you obvious girl.
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions
The patient's needs are irrelevant. Top priority is ensuring the doctor with the five o'clock shadow knows everyone sees him as a real woman, so compliment his lipstick as you hand him the speculum and warn the patient that misgendering means no pain meds. #NHSFife #bestpractice
Classified mocking · Intensity 4/4 · Single-sex spaces, Adult healthcare, Child safeguarding
This is Nicola Sturgeon's legacy: a government that publicly backs the hapless, unprofessional, ideologically captured health board that's persecuting a nurse for asserting her legal right to a single-sex changing room. https://t.co/PKjKyxz5lh
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals, Media & institutions
Never forget: women can't know for sure they're women unless they've had their chromosomes checked, but if a man says he's a woman he's definitely a woman and it is highly offensive to mention his chromosomes, which are entirely irrelevant to whether or not a person is a woman.
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces
'To anyone outside NHS Fife’s boardroom or trans activist cliques, it’s obvious: a woman spoke up against an entitled man, and her employers punished her for it.' 🎯 by @jo_bartosch. https://t.co/2TQ8u7p8i2
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals, Media & institutions
'However, if you're a female nurse who objects to the presence of the six-foot tall heterosexual male we've encouraged to use your changing room, call a lawyer. Your despair and distress are about to get a whole lot worse.' #IStandWithSandiePeggie https://t.co/zb1a5NiwF9
Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals, Child safeguarding
Gender identity ideology is an unfalsifiable, quasi-religious belief system that demands absurdities of its adherents. Thus we see perfectly intelligent people pretending they’re not sure which sex they are, in the belief that this makes them virtuous.
Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Other
You accuse me of claiming that all trans-identified people are predators, and of never acknowledging or mentioning that other groups also harbour sex offenders. Me, in the Sunday Times in 2022: 'Sex offenders have historically been found amongst social workers, teachers, priests, doctors, babysitters, school caretakers, celebrities and charity fundraisers, yet no matter how often the scandals break, the lesson appears never to be learned: it is dangerous to assert that any category of people deserves a blanket presumption of innocence.' Me on X in 2025: 'Doctors, social workers, youth leaders, babysitters, priests, teachers, charity workers, cuddly celebrities: yes, sexual predators might lurk in those professions/roles, but they’d definitely NEVER identify as women and we’re crazy for thinking that happens.' You: "you will not do this (admit that different types of people are trans-identified) for the tiny minority of people who suffer from gender identity disorders. You do not distinguish between them and the predators that hide amongst them in your narratives…" Me on my website, https://t.co/FHrFPl0M8F, 2020: 'The writings of young trans men reveal a group of notably sensitive and clever people. The more of their accounts of gender dysphoria I’ve read, with their insightful descriptions of anxiety, dissociation, eating disorders, self-harm and self-hatred, the more I’ve wondered whether, if I’d been born 30 years later, I too might have tried to transition.' Me in the Sunday Times, 2022: 'This shouldn’t need saying, but in the current climate, it does: literally no feminist I’ve ever met claims all trans women are predators, any more than we believe that all men are predators. As I’ve already stated publicly, I believe that some trans people are truly vulnerable.' Me on X, 2024: 'Some people feel strongly that they should have been, or wish to be seen as, the sex class into which they weren't born. Gender dysphoria is a real and very painful condition and I feel nothing but sympathy for anyone who suffers from it. I want them to be free to dress and present themselves however they like and I want them to have exactly the same rights as every other citizen regarding housing, employment and personal safety.' You begin by denying that trans activists deflect from the trans movement's predator problem by claiming those naming the problem are evil. You conclude by telling me that what I'm saying is evil. Thank you for so perfectly proving my point.
Read the full postClassified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals
Useful idiots who screech 'you're evil for saying that any perverts or predators are hiding under the trans umbrella!' are the whole reason some perverts and predators have rushed to hide under the trans umbrella. https://t.co/4wfBjCxa3j
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation
Replying to @damekatydenise_
@damekatydenise_ So you keep telling me, but when your mangy cockapoo's humping my lower leg I'm damned if I'm going to call it Sheila.
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions
I find it particularly insane that a vet - A VET - discriminated against Allison for the crime of knowing the difference between male and female.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Law & gender recognition
Reposting this for the benefit of people in my mentions who're still pushing the fantastically original arguments 'Why do you care about a tiny fraction of people?' 'Why can't you just be kind?' 'What harm is it doing you?' etc etc etc.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Free speech & cancellation, Language & definitions, Media & institutions
Replying to @FemCondition
@FemCondition 98% of sex offenders are male, irrespective of how the men 'identify'. In the UK, a higher proportion of convicted sex offenders are found among trans-identifying men than in the general male prison population. Time and again, some of the loudest and most aggressive activists in what you call the 'trans movement' have turned out to be dangerous and/or depraved. Sarah Jane Baker. Stephen Ireland. Peter Bright. Eric Joyce. Gordon Pike. Lexi Secker. David Challenor. Aiden Bunag. How many more rotten apples need to turn up before you accept that you've got a problem? Every rational person can see that gender identity ideology offers predatory men opportunities and camouflage. If you genuinely cared about vulnerable people, especially children, you'd be sorting out your movement's very poor track record on rooting out the abusers lurking in your ranks, and stop pretending that pro-safeguarding people are the enemy.
Read the full postClassified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals, Other
Replying to @FemCondition
@FemCondition A movement that campaigns to keep children in a pre-pubescent state and attracts large numbers of vulnerable kids is an abuser’s dream, but to also be protected by an army of enablers who’ll shriek ‘bigot’ at anyone who raises safeguarding concerns is paedophile paradise.
Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Free speech & cancellation
Replying to @Serena_Partrick
@Serena_Partrick Are you suggesting sexual predators would stampede to embrace a movement intent on removing protections for women and children? Can't see it, myself. https://t.co/K7Ub6Q67lC
Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces
Replying to @wesyang
@wesyang I've got a list as long as your arm. Take trans-identified musician Darren Agee Merager, who released a music track called TERF Killer, with a “special dedication to JK Rowling and gender critical fuqs [sic].” He's the WiSpa guy who turned out to be a convicted sex offender.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces
Replying to @wesyang
@wesyang He follows in the footsteps of trans-identified man Lexi Secker, who also sent me reams of abuse on here, especially for my belief that women should have single-sex spaces and rape crisis centres. Mr Secker has since been sentenced to six and a half years in jail for rape. https://t.co/HZTWqQmUG7
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals, Child safeguarding
Stephen Ireland, who targeted me with endless abuse on here because I oppose the chemical castration of children and the removal of protected spaces for women and girls, has just been sentenced to 30 years in jail for child rape. https://t.co/0HHctRocB4
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals
Replying to @FemCondition
@FemCondition Everyone has the right to say and believe whatever they like about themselves. I simply disagree that society should abandon all sex-based safeguarding and rights in favour of laws and norms based on subjective, unfalsifiable feelings.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition, Child safeguarding
Replying to @FemCondition
@FemCondition This isn’t about how anyone looks, it’s about a fundamental right to acknowledge and describe reality. I don’t personally believe in gendered souls or brains that find themselves in the ‘wrong’ body, but I don’t deny that people who have that belief exist.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Law & gender recognition
These are the posts classified trans-related. Search all 16,714 collected tweets, read the year-by-year analysis, or read the report on her campaign against trans rights.