The Rowling Record

J.K. Rowling’s trans-related posts from 2025

Page 3 of 11. Posts 201–300 of the 1,011 J.K. Rowling wrote about trans people in 2025, newest first.

29 June 2025 to 7 August 2025. Posts are reproduced in full from the archive; the stance, intensity and topic labels come from the research classifications. How the labels are defined. Search within 2025.

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Sport

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @ChoralSymphony

@ChoralSymphony Stating that a person is male or female by virtue of observable features of their bodies isn't 'bringing in reproductive capabilities.' An infertile man is still a man. A woman with a DSD remains a woman. The presence or absence of the SRY gene at conception causes us to be male or female, but in 99.9% of cases, the equipment we develop is proof of whether it's present or absent.

61 replies177 retweets4,647 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Being a woman isn't an essence, it's a material, provable fact. I'm not a female human being because society or history made me one, or because I picked the 'woman' category on some metaphysical spreadsheet. I'm a woman because I was born with the equipment to produce large gametes. My biology isn't my destiny unless I'm unfortunate enough to live in a society like Afghanistan where my femaleness is punished from birth. My biology does, however, mean I am likely to have experiences no man ever will. If I'd been raised by robots in outer space who had no understanding of social categories or gendered norms I'd still provably be a woman, not a man. I'd certainly suffer some deprivation from not associating with other humans, but on the upside, I'd never have to listen to pseudo-intellectual drivel like this.

1,908 replies8,103 retweets58,095 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals, Law & gender recognition

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Once again, I marvel at how many men think the only issue with a man offering to help a teenage girl with her bra is that the girl refused. They tweet this stuff under their own names and pictures. It's astounding.

975 replies2,994 retweets26,754 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Western society is currently divided between people who know this is a man and are prepared to say so and those who know this is a man but lie out of obedience to an ideology. There is no third option. Literally nobody on earth thinks "Roxanne Tickle" is actually a woman. https://t.co/xLbzcOfKmJ

5,082 replies30,621 retweets145,398 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Specific individuals, Language & definitions, Law & gender recognition

Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Free speech & cancellation

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @AlexSmith90014

@AlexSmith90014 @fem_mb @ForWomenScot In my experience, this is overwhelmingly the case with older people. They assume trans women have had full sex reassignment surgery and an androphillic orientation and are genuinely incredulous at the idea that a straight man might claim a trans identification, or that gender identify ideology supports the admission of fully intact, gynephillic males into female spaces. It's so far outside their experience they think it's a far-fetched scare story.

31 replies107 retweets1,130 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation

Classified defensive · Intensity 0/4 · Other

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @fem_mb

@fem_mb @ForWomenScot Why, you're a mere stripling! I don't love saying this, but I suspect that once the fight's been won your friends will slide easily into opining that it was always obvious this was a dangerous anti-woman, homophobic ideology, and they'll be performatively horrified to learn that the transitioning of minors, which they insisted was a far-right invention, was done without an evidence base and has caused real and irreversible harm.

10 replies62 retweets1,258 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @fem_mb

@fem_mb @ForWomenScot I’m entitled to say this, because I just turned 60. A lot of older liberals (in both the US and the UK) have brought very old-fashioned sensibilities to this debate. They’re still locked into the idea that all trans women are, or were, effeminate gay men, and they’re perplexed that any woman would see them as a threat. These are people who’ve never met an AGP in the wild, don’t understand online cultures, know nothing about trends in porn, aren’t on TikTok where ‘gender-affirming’ surgeons advertise directly to minors, and they’ve aged out of having kids at school, so have no notion that social contagion might be at play. They look round at all their similarly aged dinner party friends, none of whom are aware of any of these things either, and adopt a vibe-based position: this is gay rights 2.0, anyone who opposes it must be far-right, and thank goodness Our Sort are kinder, better, and (most importantly) far more sophisticated.

Read the full post
286 replies1,501 retweets9,185 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Language & definitions, Media & institutions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @ForWomenScot

@ForWomenScot We may think parts of the UK media have been cowardly on this issue, but Joyce Carol Oates is exhibit A in how it's possible for liberals in America to remain oblivious to what's happening to vulnerable minors and women's rights, as long as they keep to certain news outlets.

56 replies216 retweets2,550 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Single-sex spaces, Media & institutions, Child safeguarding

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Single-sex spaces

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

All those people who tell me support for women's single sex spaces means I must support Reform (which I don't) appear to share exactly the same opinion on women's single-sex spaces as Reform.

267 replies656 retweets5,831 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals

Classified neutral · Intensity 0/4 · Other

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

I promise you this: in ten years time, a load of women who're currently riding the gender identity bandwagon will claim they were always TERFs. They'll be like the fakers who pretend to have survived terrorist attacks they were never even near.

1,315 replies4,432 retweets50,948 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Media & institutions, Specific individuals

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals, Sport

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions, Other

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Those who argue for the chemical sterilisation of minors, who campaign for the eradication of single-sex rape crisis centres and who support male sex offenders in women's prisons have done more damage to the left's credibility than Farage could achieve in 100 years. Own that.

444 replies4,544 retweets31,690 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

@_joeby_x In fairness, that's more coherent than 99% of liberal politicians who've been faking a belief that women can have dicks can manage, now they've sniffed the changing Zeitgeist and need to realign themselves with reality.

23 replies78 retweets1,900 likes

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Media & institutions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions, Language & definitions

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Media & institutions, Adult healthcare, Language & definitions

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Sport, Specific individuals, Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

This shift in attitudes shown below isn't because of increased intolerance, but of an increase in understanding, and trans activists themselves bear the greatest responsibility for the change. Five years ago, a lot of medical bodies (and trans activist organisations, lobby groups and virtue-signalling celebrities) were united in telling us that puberty blockers were completely reversible and harmless. As more and more evidence accrues showing actual and potential harm, public opinion, unlike trans activism, has shifted in line with the data. Five years ago, the sophisticated, fashionable line was that sex difference didn't really matter in sport. Trans activists demanded that the women's category be destroyed to accommodate men who claim to be female, but the public wasn't willing to pretend they couldn't see the injustice right in front of their faces. Five years ago, trans activists and professional lanyard- wearers were chiding us all to use preferred pronouns, because that was kind. Now the public see convicted rapists described as 'she' and 'her' by news outlets and are rightly enraged that journalists are feeding us ideological fiction instead of facts. Five years ago, a lot of people, especially older ones, were under the impression that trans-identified men had all had full sex reassignment surgery and were sexually orientated towards other men. They didn't know that cross-dressing straight men were now asserting the right to enter all women's reserved spaces. They didn't know how few trans women have had 'bottom surgery.' They know now. Trans activists are to blame for the hounding and persecution of non-believers, which has spilled into British courts. Women have had to fight all over again for rights they thought they'd have forever. The Cass Review brought shame on all who lobbied to continue a broadly unresearched and unevidenced medical experiment on minors. Trust in institutions, in academia, the media and the medical profession has been severely undermined. Politicians have beclowned themselves, willing to parrot self-contradictory slogans and outright absurdities rather than defend truth and freedom of speech. The stark change in attitudes over the past five years is the direct consequence of the way trans activists set out to 'educate' us all. Giddy with the power they'd been handed by people in authority, they've tried to impose a quasi-religious, elitist, minority belief upon the whole of society. They can't complain (although, of course, they will) that the public has decided it doesn't want to buy what they're selling.

Read the full post
860 replies4,761 retweets25,217 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Sport, Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions, Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @rejserin

@rejserin I'm fine with gender ideologues getting to say what they like, publish what they like and campaign for whatever they like. Unfortunately the same courtesy is not extended to those of us who know what a woman is and why women's rights matter.

58 replies126 retweets2,448 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Language & definitions

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals, Other

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Media & institutions, Specific individuals

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @jk_rowling

Tell me again that there’s no class discrimination here. The professional class doesn’t have to strip off during their working day, but working class women must act in accordance with their betters’ luxury beliefs and do so front of men. 2/2

176 replies1,323 retweets15,022 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

‘I find it suspicious that you, a working class woman, managed to find the money to defend yourself in court, because this is usually something only the wealthy can afford. I wouldn’t ask a rich person where they got their money, of course. That would be terribly rude.’ 1/2

477 replies2,358 retweets19,355 likes

Classified defensive · Intensity 0/4 · Specific individuals, Free speech & cancellation

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Law & gender recognition, Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition, Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @lutzebroom

@descartesbeard @NoSecretLessons I'm not sure I agree. I don't think anyone feels less revulsion for men wearing fetishwear around kids than they did before gender identity ideology arrived to justify and excuse it. The 80s were full of gender-bending clothes etc and nobody pretended it meant dress-and-make-up-wearing men were women. This movement has been imposed top-down, not at a grassroots level. Certain very dubious men have been gifted a fabulous opportunity not only to indulge their kink in daily life, but to cry victimhood if opposed. They're getting away with it because so many captured institutions and lobby groups have got their backs, not because the general public has decided grown men putting on lipstick and invading women's single-sex spaces is great.

23 replies30 retweets532 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Language & definitions, Media & institutions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @MaureenWRC

@MaureenWRC @NoSecretLessons Moral injury has a specific meaning that rests on forced compliance. I dislike seeing men performing a degrading or hypersexualised version of what they think a woman is and I object strongly to men parading their fetishes in front of kids. However, even if society agrees that there are forms of dress that are highly inappropriate in, for instance, a classroom, setting out to police dress and beliefs outside certain clearly defined contexts is a very slippery slope.

14 replies51 retweets790 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @NoSecretLessons

@NoSecretLessons I still think people should dress however they please. I still think people should be free to say whatever they like about themselves. Trying to outlaw or suppress other people's beliefs is as dangerously authoritarian as trying to force everyone else to pretend to share those beliefs. No moral injury is done to me if a man wants to wear a dress and make up. It's the forced compliance with his belief he's a now a woman that causes moral injury. Totalitarianism is not beaten by more totalitarianism.

184 replies813 retweets10,273 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation, Other

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

A large number of people (mostly men, in my experience) who're sympathetic to some of women's opposition to gender identity ideology, nevertheless think it's cruel to point out that a trans-identified man looks like a man, and unkind not to 'respect' his pronouns. They think these are 'compromises' women should be prepared to make. 'What does it matter?' they say. 'How does it hurt you?' The psychological effects of being coerced, manipulated or pressured into doing something that is against a person's own beliefs or values are well known. 'Moral injury' occurs when a person is forced to betray deep-held convictions, or stand in silence while those convictions are being betrayed. The individual feels transgressed at a core level. The inevitable consequences are stress, anxiety and anger. Workplaces across the west have imposed a Kafkaesque situation on women. A belief system most people consider nonsensical, but which, in elite circles, has become almost a religion, has been imposed from on high. Women are being persecuted and punished for not pretending they think men can change sex. The policing of pronouns, and the harassment and shaming of women who won't pretend they can't recognise a man when they see one, is merely the tip of genderism's gigantic, threatening iceberg. Any man who seeks to force women to play along with the fantasy that he's female is engaging in a typically male power play. At worst, he will suffer narcissistic injury from her non-compliance, but that doesn't make him objectively vulnerable. The non-compliant woman, though, suffers lasting moral injury by being forced to participate daily in a lie - a lie, moreover, that constitutes a fundamental threat to her own rights to privacy, dignity and safety. It has been profoundly illuminating to see how many people - possibly because their own values spring, not from a place of rationality or true conviction, but from fashion and self-interest - see male narcissistic injury as so very much more worthy of compassion than the moral injuries suffered by women.

Read the full post
1,911 replies7,941 retweets36,550 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation, Other

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Four 'ordinary' women who've fought for women's and girls' rights to safety, privacy and dignity at immense personal cost, taking on well-funded lobby groups, ideologically captured public bodies and a political class that treats women with contempt. Actual, real life heroines 🔥

402 replies3,738 retweets28,313 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals, Media & institutions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Media & institutions, Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Other

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

IMO, any or all of the following: a) It's the fashionable position in their echo chamber. b) Naivety/lack of information. c) Fear of ostracisation/persecution. d) Child who's trans. e) Lends itself to low effort virtue-signalling. f) Great stick to batter other women with.

371 replies1,050 retweets8,429 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Other

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @Dis_Critic

@Dis_Critic The worst consequences of these insane policies are always suffered by those with less power, money and status. Searle and Bumba aren't stripping off or dealing with menstrual issues with Upton present, but pride themselves on the fact that they forced other women to do so.

61 replies476 retweets4,467 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Adult healthcare, Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals, Media & institutions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals, Free speech & cancellation

Classified defensive · Intensity 0/4 · Specific individuals, Adult healthcare

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

The Sandie Peggie employment tribunal is currently exposing, as perhaps no court case to date has, the issue of class as it relates to the top-down imposition of gender identity ideology in the workplace. 'Diversity officer' Isla Bumba has now admitted in court that she didn't bother consulting the 1992 regulations guaranteeing single-sex spaces when she told a trans-identified male, Dr Beth Upton, to use the female changing room at the hospital where he was working. Bumba justified this decision with comments that I assume sounded really clever and convincing, inside her own head. 'I don’t know anything about Beth’s body. I didn’t at the time. I don’t now. I don’t need to know. But it wouldn’t be something that I would ever have the information of exactly what she is made of, biologically.' Kate Searle, a consultant in emergency medicine, backed Bumba up, expressing outrage on the witness stand that anyone would be so insensitive as to ask about Upton's chromosomes. ‘I could only imagine how upsetting and invasive a question that would be for Beth, and also not relevant to a colleague to ask another colleague. Beth identifies as female, and it does not matter what her chromosomes are to her.’ In Bumba and Searle's world, a belief that gender identity trumps biological sex is proof you're intellectually and morally superior to women like Sandie Peggie, so I'd imagine it's come as a shock to discover, in a blaze of public and press scrutiny, just how idiotic and cruel they appear to people outside their dinner party circle. When Upton, a 6' tall, 28-year-old ex-rugby playing male, claimed that a petite 50-year-old female nurse was making him feel 'unsafe', his word appears to have been taken as gospel. Searle, Bumba and management fell over themselves to coddle the middle-class doctor who shared their voguish post-modern views on gender. What did Sandie matter? She's just one of those ghastly uninformed bigots who still thinks sex is real and important - so embarrassingly gauche and simplistic! Whisper it - she probably drinks red wine with chicken, too. According to @tribunaltweets, an emotional Searle blurted out on the stand 'I am kind.' This is not something genuinely kind people need to say. Genuinely kind people don't find themselves compelled to explain in court why they helped whip up a witch-hunt against a woman whose only crime was wanting to change her clothes without a man watching. Well, the nurse who was supposed to shuffle off in disgrace wasn't having it. Sandie Peggie refused to be sacrificed on the altar of elitist ideologues who believe themselves to be higher and better than she is. She fought back, for herself and for every other woman who's currently being silenced, persecuted and punished by a smug management class that preens itself on its virtue while imposing rampantly misogynistic policies on its workforce. Sandie Peggie is a heroine. The woman NHS Fife thought they could treat abominably without any consequences to themselves has succeeded in shining the brightest spotlight yet upon the brain rot and compassion deficit suffered by supposedly intelligent people when they embrace gender identity ideology. Women everywhere owe her a debt of thanks. Whatever the outcome of this tribunal, Sandie Peggie has already won.

Read the full post
1,361 replies7,234 retweets34,796 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals, Child safeguarding, Language & definitions, Media & institutions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Adult healthcare, Language & definitions

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Law & gender recognition, Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition, Free speech & cancellation

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Trying to further smear Sandie Peggie's by using false allegations about her relationship with her daughter is a new low, even for this court case. NHS Fife and their legal team appear to have lost their marbles, as well as their moral bearings.

234 replies2,201 retweets16,032 likes

Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals, Media & institutions

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Media & institutions

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Other

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

You appointed men to women's posts. You appointed men to women's posts. You appointed men to women's posts. You appointed men to women's posts. You appointed men to women's posts. You appointed men to women's posts. You appointed men to women's posts.

1,081 replies10,199 retweets102,288 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions, Specific individuals

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions

Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Specific individuals, Free speech & cancellation

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Dr Upton has now been 'misgendered' in court by three of his witnesses and his own lawyer. Will he be suing them? If not, why not? Does he prefer to bully women with less power? Or does he doubt the others can be forced to undress in front of him, so why bother? #NHSFife

356 replies2,783 retweets19,194 likes

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals, Law & gender recognition

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

The patient's needs are irrelevant. Top priority is ensuring the doctor with the five o'clock shadow knows everyone sees him as a real woman, so compliment his lipstick as you hand him the speculum and warn the patient that misgendering means no pain meds. #NHSFife #bestpractice

405 replies1,657 retweets14,470 likes

Classified mocking · Intensity 4/4 · Single-sex spaces, Adult healthcare, Child safeguarding

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals, Media & institutions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Never forget: women can't know for sure they're women unless they've had their chromosomes checked, but if a man says he's a woman he's definitely a woman and it is highly offensive to mention his chromosomes, which are entirely irrelevant to whether or not a person is a woman.

1,855 replies10,596 retweets84,742 likes

Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals, Media & institutions

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals, Child safeguarding

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Gender identity ideology is an unfalsifiable, quasi-religious belief system that demands absurdities of its adherents. Thus we see perfectly intelligent people pretending they’re not sure which sex they are, in the belief that this makes them virtuous.

782 replies3,930 retweets28,576 likes

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Other

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

You accuse me of claiming that all trans-identified people are predators, and of never acknowledging or mentioning that other groups also harbour sex offenders. Me, in the Sunday Times in 2022: 'Sex offenders have historically been found amongst social workers, teachers, priests, doctors, babysitters, school caretakers, celebrities and charity fundraisers, yet no matter how often the scandals break, the lesson appears never to be learned: it is dangerous to assert that any category of people deserves a blanket presumption of innocence.' Me on X in 2025: 'Doctors, social workers, youth leaders, babysitters, priests, teachers, charity workers, cuddly celebrities: yes, sexual predators might lurk in those professions/roles, but they’d definitely NEVER identify as women and we’re crazy for thinking that happens.' You: "you will not do this (admit that different types of people are trans-identified) for the tiny minority of people who suffer from gender identity disorders. You do not distinguish between them and the predators that hide amongst them in your narratives…" Me on my website, https://t.co/FHrFPl0M8F, 2020: 'The writings of young trans men reveal a group of notably sensitive and clever people.  The more of their accounts of gender dysphoria I’ve read, with their insightful descriptions of anxiety, dissociation, eating disorders, self-harm and self-hatred, the more I’ve wondered whether, if I’d been born 30 years later, I too might have tried to transition.' Me in the Sunday Times, 2022: 'This shouldn’t need saying, but in the current climate, it does: literally no feminist I’ve ever met claims all trans women are predators, any more than we believe that all men are predators. As I’ve already stated publicly, I believe that some trans people are truly vulnerable.' Me on X, 2024: 'Some people feel strongly that they should have been, or wish to be seen as, the sex class into which they weren't born. Gender dysphoria is a real and very painful condition and I feel nothing but sympathy for anyone who suffers from it. I want them to be free to dress and present themselves however they like and I want them to have exactly the same rights as every other citizen regarding housing, employment and personal safety.' You begin by denying that trans activists deflect from the trans movement's predator problem by claiming those naming the problem are evil. You conclude by telling me that what I'm saying is evil. Thank you for so perfectly proving my point.

Read the full post
451 replies2,308 retweets18,082 likes

Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation

Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions

Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Law & gender recognition

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Reposting this for the benefit of people in my mentions who're still pushing the fantastically original arguments 'Why do you care about a tiny fraction of people?' 'Why can't you just be kind?' 'What harm is it doing you?' etc etc etc.

494 replies2,527 retweets18,053 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Free speech & cancellation, Language & definitions, Media & institutions

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @FemCondition

@FemCondition 98% of sex offenders are male, irrespective of how the men 'identify'. In the UK, a higher proportion of convicted sex offenders are found among trans-identifying men than in the general male prison population. Time and again, some of the loudest and most aggressive activists in what you call the 'trans movement' have turned out to be dangerous and/or depraved. Sarah Jane Baker. Stephen Ireland. Peter Bright. Eric Joyce. Gordon Pike. Lexi Secker. David Challenor. Aiden Bunag. How many more rotten apples need to turn up before you accept that you've got a problem? Every rational person can see that gender identity ideology offers predatory men opportunities and camouflage. If you genuinely cared about vulnerable people, especially children, you'd be sorting out your movement's very poor track record on rooting out the abusers lurking in your ranks, and stop pretending that pro-safeguarding people are the enemy.

Read the full post
114 replies389 retweets3,051 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals, Other

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @FemCondition

@FemCondition A movement that campaigns to keep children in a pre-pubescent state and attracts large numbers of vulnerable kids is an abuser’s dream, but to also be protected by an army of enablers who’ll shriek ‘bigot’ at anyone who raises safeguarding concerns is paedophile paradise.

73 replies507 retweets7,580 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Free speech & cancellation

Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces

J.K. RowlingJ.K. Rowling@jk_rowling

Replying to @wesyang

@wesyang I've got a list as long as your arm. Take trans-identified musician Darren Agee Merager, who released a music track called TERF Killer, with a “special dedication to JK Rowling and gender critical fuqs [sic].” He's the WiSpa guy who turned out to be a convicted sex offender.

26 replies142 retweets979 likes

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces

Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals, Child safeguarding

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition, Child safeguarding

Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Law & gender recognition

These are the posts classified trans-related. Search all 16,714 collected tweets, read the year-by-year analysis, or read the report on her campaign against trans rights.