It has come to my notice (I'm a continent away) that Nicola Sturgeon has again claimed I'm obsessed with her. This is, of course, true. I hereby repost my adoring review of her magnum opus, in which I attempted to convey the full magnificence of La Sturge. https://t.co/ztLqUqYPZY
10 July 2026 to 10 August 2026. Posts are reproduced in full from the archive; the stance, intensity and topic labels come from the research classifications. How the labels are defined. Search within 2026.
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions
RT @irenebritusa: Those who say we should not exclude anyone from sports are quiet when women and girls are permanently excluded after gett…
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Sport, Single-sex spaces
Replying to @AndrewMercado
@AndrewMercado So the information you think proves your point that men ought to be competing against girls is that an abusive man is pretending to be women? You really sure you want to run with that argument, champ?
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Sport, Single-sex spaces
Replying to @Illcallhimdon
@Illcallhimdon @shes_ella_rishe @vcrqueenjen @AndrewMercado I'm no more 'hitching a wagon' to White than I am to Marla-Svenja Liebich, whose very public adoption of a female identity likewise revealed the absurdity and the danger of an ideology that preaches 'people are whatever they say they are.' https://t.co/sw6hu1qK20
Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Law & gender recognition, Language & definitions, Specific individuals, Child safeguarding
Replying to @shes_ella_rishe
@shes_ella_rishe @vcrqueenjen @AndrewMercado Two abusive men identify as women. How do we know which one's 'really' trans? And as all available evidence show that trans-identified men have the same pattern of criminality as other men, why should women care?
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces, Sport, Language & definitions
Replying to @vcrqueenjen
@vcrqueenjen @AndrewMercado Great, you can clear something up for me. What makes this particular abusive man not a woman, whereas this child-abusing 'openly transgender' legislator, who was referred to as a woman throughout his trial, is? https://t.co/w2YgirgB89
Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions, Specific individuals, Child safeguarding
Replying to @vcrqueenjen
@vcrqueenjen @AndrewMercado I'm shocked to hear that a man who identifies as a woman could be a danger to women and children. I've been told ad nauseam that this simply never happens. Surely it's transphobic to suggest that predators or abusers might identify as trans?
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals
Replying to @vcrqueenjen
@vcrqueenjen @AndrewMercado Great, so we can test this scientifically! If a 6’8” male basketball player really, really believes he’s a woman, any woman he runs into will experience the collision as a soft touch of thistledown, whereas if he doesn’t really believe it, she’ll suffer a major concussion.
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Sport, Single-sex spaces
.@AndrewMercado You say some men ‘sincerely’ identify as women, but that these two men aren’t sincere. Do sincere men injure fewer women and girls than the insincere ones? How do we test for sincerity? What if a Sincerity Jury is split? Very much looking forward to your answers.
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Sport, Language & definitions
Then the lawsuits will keep coming. Should any female patient or member of staff require funding to fight this assault on their legal rights, apply to https://t.co/iyohnrgVZN
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition, Media & institutions
RT @intel_lady: Some MPs go on holiday & not feel the need to make performative outrage videos about Women's spaces being protected, but 'S…
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals, Media & institutions
RT @akuareindorf: Here we have a transactivist calling me "it" and presuming I play "the male role" in my (nonexistent) "married relationsh…
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals
RT @roisinmurphy: This is what we have allowed to fester and grow without examination or criticism in the last ten years. How far should we…
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions
‘He was admitted to a psychiatric ward as a teenager, where he was diagnosed with depression. During his admission, he mentioned to a doctor that he had been looking into transgender communities online…’ Free to read. https://t.co/XrIFExiU3G
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding
RT @irenebritusa: In all seriousness, female athletes have been injured competing against men and boys. Some have been permanently excluded…
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Sport, Single-sex spaces
It’s not a new phenomenon. This is all about vibes and fashion and narcissism, a commitment to never challenging the tribal view, a love of simplistic talking points packaged as sophistication, a preference for an easy life and total indifference to serious consequences felt by the less privileged,
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Other
Personally, I think stuff like this should be preserved in a Museum of Female Treachery so that schoolgirls of the future can watch in horror, then offer up a silent prayer of thanks for their rebellious, thoroughly TERFy great-grandmothers. https://t.co/wztg0elOBa
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions, Specific individuals
I’m astonished that Sturgeon turns out to be not only a world-class misogynist, the blindest wife ever to enjoy the fruits of a fraudster husband’s theft, but also profoundly disloyal to the party and the political allies who once revered her. 🧵
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Single-sex spaces
@PeterGresham @MinModulation Or as cowardly, slogan-chanting sheep whose primary motivation is terror of finding themselves out of step with the flock.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Other
@moo11625 Please, teach me the error of my ways. Explain why my faithful recitation of your arguments is wrong. Become the hero the gender identity crowd have been waiting for all these years. Here I am, waiting to be schooled, and you're choosing to walk away. #sad
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Language & definitions
Genuinely confused here. I'm often told that it's an intellectual failure on my part not to understand that men like this are women if they say they are. How can what I wrote be childish, when I've repeated your own arguments? You agree that he's "as valid as any other trans woman", right? Does it not then follow that he should have all the rights and protections of biological women, including admission to all female-only spaces, or have I missed part of the sophisticated adult argument you're making?
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation
@moo11625 I haven't commented once on this individual's personality. I've simply made your argument: this is a woman, it is wrong to suggest they're not a woman, they should be treated exactly as if they were a woman and if you don't think they're a woman, you are a horrible human being.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions
@moo11625 So you do indeed think this man should be treated as a biological woman in being allowed in all female-only spaces, including prison cells and rape crisis centres? If so, I'm at a loss to see what you're complaining about. I literally said as much in my original post.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals
@moo11625 *"who should therefore", not "and should therefore".
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions
@moo11625 I've literally listed your own arguments. You say this is a completely valid trans woman and should therefore be given all rights, protections and services owed to women. Have I got that wrong? Do you not think this individual should be treated in all contexts as a woman?
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions
Replying to @moo11625
@moo11625 What do you mean by "posting positive videos about trans people too"? Are you implying this is a negative video? The video was made by an individual who, in your own words, is "as valid as any other trans woman" and who wanted to share it publicly. What's the problem?
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions
Replying to @moo11625
@moo11625 So what's the problem with me commenting on a publicly posted video by someone who's "as valid as any trans woman"?
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals
Replying to @moo11625
@moo11625 In what ways do you feel this individual isn’t a valid member of the trans community?
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Specific individuals, Language & definitions
Replying to @RichardAngwin
@RichardAngwin Thanks for providing a perfect example of the deflections and defences listed in paragraph two.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions
Replying to @MinModulation
@MinModulation He’s a man and so are the men who complain he’s shaming them by not looking feminine enough. He’s just as much of a woman as any feminine-looking man is a woman, ie, not at all.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces
Replying to @tamarashapiro
@tamarashapiro DM me a pic. I can’t promise anything, because I’m quite backed up at the moment. Weighing testicles in my left hand as I type.
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Single-sex spaces
If you don’t think he’s a woman, you’re transphobic. When he claimed to be a woman, he became a woman. He now belongs in women’s changing rooms, bathrooms, hospital wards, prison cells and rape support centres. If you try and differentiate between him and a trans woman who looks more convincing as a woman, you are promoting patriarchal beauty norms. If you admit to seeing an aggressive and possibly unbalanced man in this video, you’re saying all trans people are mentally ill predators. If you refuse to let him into female-only spaces, you’re removing his right to exist. If you suggest he could comfortably use male facilities, you secretly want him assaulted. If you refuse to call him ‘she’, you are guilty of unpardonable cruelty. If you’re a woman who wouldn’t want to share a locker room with him, or a man who wouldn’t want your daughter, sister or mother to get undressed in close proximity to him, you belong to the far-right. If you point out that there is no objective difference between his claim to be a woman and that of any other biological male claiming a trans identity, you are too stupid to understand the circular arguments explaining why he’s not really trans whereas other men who say they’re women are really trans. If you’re righteous, you must argue that this man’s self-declared identity overrides any consideration of the safety and rights of females. To be godly, you must agree he’s as ‘valid’ as every other trans woman, because people are who they say they are. No matter what your eyes, ears and common sense are telling you, if you don’t want to end up on the wrong side of history, you must pretend to believe that this angry, intimidating man is actually a vulnerable, oppressed woman.
Read the full postClassified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation
Replying to @miroirdufou
@miroirdufou @AmnestyUK Patriarchy has been a lived reality for millennia. Men enforced it originally through physical strength. Women’s reproductive capabilities have rendered them physically and socially vulnerable, due to the once inescapable necessity of birthing and protecting young. Only a very naive, very young man, oblivious to the realities of adult sexual politics and the biological basis for women’s historic oppression, would be so laughably ignorant as to type out those words. I suspect - and, frankly, hope - you’re no older than seventeen.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces
As it’s my birthday, I’ve taken it easy today: only three penises and just the two vulvas. Apologies to those waiting. Normal service will resume tomorrow. No need to keep everything exposed while queuing. https://t.co/zzK47SWr2O
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding
Replying to @SimonHButler
@SimonHButler The time for Schadenfreude may come, but right now I’m thinking of traumatised women potentially self-excluding from Edinburgh and the Lothians’ sole female-only service and dedicated staff receiving abuse as a direct consequence of Amnesty’s actions.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Media & institutions
I’m often tickled by press articles asserting that I’m furious about things that actually gave me a proper belly laugh. This time, though, knock yourselves out. Amnesty’s attack on Beira’s Place has left me burning with the kind of fury that mounts with every passing hour.
Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions, Single-sex spaces
Replying to @LoveKignak
@LoveKignak Yep, the Death Eaters were famous for protecting women-only rape crisis centres, standing against the medical mutilation of vulnerable young people and believing no gay person should be attacked or shamed for not wanting to sleep with the opposite sex. You really got me there.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Free speech & cancellation
Amnesty UK was already smearing feminists as 'anti-rights' back in May, according to @thetimes. It appears that, far from being an accidental slip up or an editorial error, the latest defamatory report accurately represents Amnesty UK's deep-seated hostility to all organisations that believe sex is real and important in contexts such as same sex attraction and healing after sexual violence and trauma. Those who've been defamed are owed an explanation of why Amnesty claimed to have withdrawn the report because of its 'language' when, per @thetimes article, it had already expressed exactly the same beliefs, in the same language, months previously. Many of the organisations Amnesty has attacked are grassroots campaigners with a tiny fraction of a gigantic, well-funded international NGO's resources. The defamatory report has already had serious consequences for a service supporting women at the most vulnerable time of their lives, as detailed by Beira's Place lawyers in the legal letter sent two days ago. The withdrawing of the report cannot undo the harm it has already done and is continuing to do. If Amnesty is under the illusion that the women's, children's and gay rights organisations it has attacked will be unwilling to go to court, they have made yet another massive error of judgement. They underestimate both the solidarity that exists between the targeted organisations and my willingness to support legal action, not just on behalf of Beira's Place, but for all women's and LGB organisations falsely branded 'anti-rights.'
Read the full postClassified defensive · Intensity 2/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions, Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals
Replying to @IanGee2023
@IanGee2023 @CaraPac46808618 @BigSpud7 Strange, isn't it, that if you add up all their assertions about constitutes normal female behaviour, you'd have a tidy list of male fantasies and fetishes.
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals
Replying to @CaraPac46808618
@CaraPac46808618 @BigSpud7 I repeat: nobody wants to silence Amnesty. On the contrary, I think it's great they've nailed their colours to the mast so publicly. I'm hoping to hear lots more from them, as they explain why they're against female rape survivors accessing female-only support.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions
RT @akuareindorf: And again: The @EHRC Code of Practice coming into force on 5 Aug makes not a jot of difference. Single sex toilets shoul…
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Media & institutions
RT @SexMattersOrg: “Those of us who campaign for women’s rights won’t be bullied out of doing so by toxic, abusive trans-identifying men.”…
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals
RT @sharrond62: This 👇🏼 is what women have been pushing back against for years now. ‘Do what we say or we’ll make your life impossible’ (ph…
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation
I hope everyone reads the report. Nothing could better demonstrate how far Amnesty has fallen than their demonisation of gay rights charities for refusing to adopt Amnesty’s approved gender beliefs, or their attack on a rape crisis centre because it is run by women, for women. https://t.co/Xsp3PZcc9A
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions, Media & institutions, Free speech & cancellation
Replying to @NotThatDragonD
@NotThatDragonD @rejserin A female body is observably organised to produce large gametes. There is nothing metaphysical about this definition. The presence of the equipment to produce eggs = female. It is irrelevant whether those gametes have ever been fertilised, irrelevant whether there is a biological anomaly that means gametes cannot be fertilised, or the female is too young or old to produce viable eggs. If the body is provably configured to produce eggs rather than sperm, the possessor of the body is female. All mammalian bodies are arranged to produce either eggs or sperm. There is no third gamete and there are no human hermaphrodites.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions
RT @ForWomenScot: "In the Supreme Court last year after the [FWS] judgment, I saw a gaggle of bemused-looking people. It was the Amnesty te…
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Law & gender recognition, Media & institutions
Taking our clothes off in public when we don't get our own way is totally something we women do, so this definitely isn't something that would only occur to a narcissistic male bully. https://t.co/UaKtca6rq3
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals
Replying to @miroirdufou
@miroirdufou @peterjukes And you spend hours a day arguing for women to lose the rights to the single-sex spaces and services they fought for.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces
Replying to @goueeik
@goueeik The legal basis for single-sex spaces and services is based on biology, as the Supreme Court ruling made clear.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition
Another letter to add to @AmnestyUK's overflowing mail box, this one from women-only rape support service, Beira's Place. 1/3 https://t.co/iVqyLfNjzZ
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Media & institutions, Specific individuals
And what do you propose women’s rights should be based on instead of our sex, dear guru? Special lady feels? Spinny skirts and lipstick? Candyfloss coloured souls? https://t.co/tREPc1H69b
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions
Replying to @rejserin
@rejserin A woman is an adult human female. A female is a member of the sex class whose bodies are organised to produce large gametes (eggs).
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions
🧵👇
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Media & institutions, Free speech & cancellation
Replying to @ForWomenScot
@ForWomenScot @AmnestyUK First rule of trans activism: everything they do is good and pure, right up to calling for the deaths of their opponents and trying to take down rape support centres. Everything their opponents do is malicious, nefarious and proves they're secretly liquidising puppies.
Classified critical · Intensity 3/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Single-sex spaces, Media & institutions
Bizarre. I thought the condition of being trans was innate and present from birth? So why are you talking about these women's husbands 'becoming trans'? https://t.co/qiR8cv3ZNu
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals
Replying to @Englishrose4444
@Englishrose4444 No one's a no one. Women like you have had my back in the last five years. Messages like yours have made all the difference when things have seemed a bit bleak. A huge part of my anger around this issue is that a lot of very privileged, lanyard-class people have attempted (and often succeeded) in imposing an ideology across our institutions for which poorer women (and gay men, lesbians and the disabled) are paying the heaviest price. That's why those who can afford to stand up need to do it.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Language & definitions, Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions, Other
Jolyon has upset the trans activists. It'd take a heart of stone not to laugh. https://t.co/FC28a5Jgdu
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Free speech & cancellation
Shout out to all trans activists sharing the blacklist of women's and gay rights organisations published by @AmnestyUK! You're demonstrating very effectively that in spite of their hasty backtrack it can be easily accessed forevermore, increasing legal liability. Thank you!❤️ https://t.co/DZWcynJ6W7
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions, Specific individuals
Replying to @adammcarter
@adammcarter In fairness, those fishnets were under the kind of strain the manufacturer never tested for.
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals
Replying to @jk_rowling
Gay men's organisations named on the list are welcome to contact me through my website. While the JK Rowling's Fund was set up to support women, JK Rowling herself is more than happy to donate to your legal fighting fund.
Classified neutral · Intensity 0/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition, Specific individuals
Should any of the women's organisations targeted by @AmnestyUK's recent 'anti-rights' blacklist wish to take legal action, applications can be made to the JK Rowling Women's Fund. https://t.co/iyohnrgVZN
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions
RT @SafeSchools_UK: We were also libelled alongside @jk_rowling’s @beirasplace in this poorly researched & defamatory hit piece from disgra…
Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Media & institutions, Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals
UK law never said what you asserted it did. The Supreme Court ruled that 'women' in the Equality Act means, and has always meant, biological women. For years, well-funded lobbying groups subverted the law by misrepresenting it, to women's detriment. *That* is corruption. https://t.co/t9Ng0zmgyM
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Law & gender recognition, Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions
Replying to @iowntheterf
@iowntheterf No, but the money’s already in my bank account. The only person who’s out of pocket here is him. Of course, he’s also associated himself proudly with book burners and art destroyers throughout history, and as we know, those were always the good guys.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Specific individuals
Beira’s Place hasn’t sent anything. Yet.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Media & institutions, Specific individuals
Che Guevara would be proud.
Classified mocking · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Media & institutions
The issuer of that vile statement is a man, as anyone with even 1% vision could tell you. Specifically, he’s a man who said he hoped she died handcuffed to a bed and screaming in agony. https://t.co/6uH5TpMp90
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Language & definitions
RT @ForWomenScot: We have written to @AmnestyUK @amnesty @AmnestyScotland about the report which defamed our organisation and others. https…
Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Media & institutions, Free speech & cancellation
Read this. Understand who you’re harming by propping up this pernicious ideology. Young gay people are undergoing modern-day conversion therapy. You’re cheering on irreversible body alterations for vulnerable people who were perfect as they were.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Adult healthcare, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals
RT @Transgendertrd: Last week Amnesty published a report entitled 'A growing threat: the anti-rights movement in the UK.' Transgender Tren…
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Media & institutions, Free speech & cancellation
RT @LabWomenDec: We also emailed @amnesty last week following their libellous characterisation of LWD & other feminist, LGB, parent & clini…
Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Youth healthcare, Media & institutions, Free speech & cancellation
RT @AllianceLGB: LGB Alliance have written to Amnesty UK about its bizarre report “A Growing Threat: The Anti-Rights Movement in the UK”.…
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions
RT @JournalismSEEN: We have also written to @amnesty about our inclusion in their recent report ⬇️ Re: Amnesty International UK publicati…
Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Media & institutions, Free speech & cancellation
RT @SEENinHealth: Our letter to Amnesty International Dear Ms Moscogiuri, Ms Horton and Mr Ruthven, Seen in Health is a network of clinici…
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Youth healthcare, Adult healthcare, Media & institutions
RT @CanSG_org: CAN-SG has written to Amnesty International UK to demand a retraction and an apology for their characterisation of our organ…
Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Media & institutions
RT @FondOfBeetles: We wrote to Amnesty @amnesty @AmnestyUK about their reports containing defamatory slurs against Sex Matters and others.
Classified defensive · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions
RT @jo_bartosch: Latest! Amnesty resembles the very forces it was created to oppose. It spreads the misinformation, smears grassroots campa…
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Media & institutions, Free speech & cancellation
Replying to @miroirdufou
@miroirdufou @HJoyceGender Please show me where I've categorised all trans-identified men as violent. Available data shows they are as violent as any other kind of man. I am not arguing for the removal of rights from trans-identified men. I'm arguing for women to retain the rights they fought for.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Language & definitions
Replying to @Buttj63
@Buttj63 @miroirdufou @HJoyceGender It's insanity, it really is.
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions
RT @genspect: Human rights depend on truth. Today Genspect sent a formal legal letter to Amnesty International UK challenging its false al…
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Youth healthcare, Media & institutions, Language & definitions
Replying to @veritasalways1
@veritasalways1 @DrLwyd @miroirdufou @HJoyceGender Of course he terrifies you. He's a large, aggressive man who's made his fetish the centre of his life and has proven there are few limits to his desire to punish women who won't validate him.👇 https://t.co/eErn3UwCaq
Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Specific individuals, Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces
Replying to @miroirdufou
@miroirdufou @HJoyceGender No, this is not how slut-shaming works. Fred is a man, a man who has a kink that he flaunts publicly, including on stage while being filmed. He dresses that way because he gets an erotic charge out of it. He enjoys performing a sexualised parody of what a woman is. If a woman sat on stage during a serious debate, flashing her crotch at the audience while getting steadily drunker and shouting about having sex in nightclubs, that would also be worthy of public comment. The difference is that nobody would feel intimidated by the woman, because she wouldn't be indulging in the obvious power play of a large male fetishist.
Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Specific individuals, Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions
Replying to @miroirdufou
@miroirdufou @HJoyceGender A male who gets off on flashing his groin at an audience is not the same as a female rape or sexual harassment victim. I genuinely never dreamed that I'd have to point out that difference to anyone of normal cognitive abilities.
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Language & definitions
Replying to @miroirdufou
@miroirdufou @HJoyceGender Again: Fred was free to wear whatever he wanted to that filmed debate. Curiously, I've never yet seen any middle-aged women participating in debates on gender donning fishnets and leather miniskirts to do it, or boasting onstage about how fuckable they are, but I'm sure you'd draw a discreet veil over such behaviour if they did. Many, many trans-identified men delight in wearing their paraphilia in public. Fred Wallace is one of them.
Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Specific individuals, Language & definitions
Translation: oops, didn’t realise people outside our ideological bubble are THIS pissed off about the loss of sex-based rights. We remain implacably opposed to any organisation fighting to retain them, but shove in the words ‘rights of women’ to keep the bigots happy. https://t.co/BBpJbCt4gB
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Language & definitions, Media & institutions
Replying to @Skelloween
@Skelloween @miroirdufou @HJoyceGender @Sheehuurthem This is who you’re defending. A man who doxxes women and attempts to strip them of their careers. https://t.co/mvBODQhebl
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Specific individuals, Free speech & cancellation
Replying to @miroirdufou
@miroirdufou @HJoyceGender Fred was at a public event that was filmed with all participants’ knowledge. Fred chose the fishnets and miniskirt. Fred boasted on stage about what he does with his female penis. You may feel squeamish about this picture, but Fred is a paraphilic exhibitionist who was having the time of his life.
Classified hostile · Intensity 4/4 · Specific individuals, Language & definitions
Amnesty tangled with the wrong gay men. Good on you, @MensNetwork1 👏👏👏
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions
RT @DPUK26: “I Thought Transition Would Fix What Was Wrong” Sydney shares her powerful detransition story with DPUK. Struggling with quest…
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Youth healthcare, Adult healthcare, Specific individuals
Replying to @jk_rowling
Sadly, Fred's refusing to debate me. To prove I have no hard feelings, and that Fred does engage with some lucky women, here's a picture of him debating @HJoyceGender. I hear he left an indelible impression on the audience. And the chair. https://t.co/GVIYZ86xxP
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Specific individuals, Free speech & cancellation
Fred still has me blocked, so I rebut his opening statement thus: I am not an idiot. Very shocked he hasn't asked me how I identify before calling me a woman, though. Highly transphobic. https://t.co/dDdlZdXvJa
Classified mocking · Intensity 1/4 · Language & definitions, Specific individuals
‘Advocating for women’s rights and for women’s legal right to same-sex spaces is, according to Amnesty, hateful.’ — ✍️@alexmassie Free to read. https://t.co/NOmiJp6PlD
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions
RT @JohnCleese: I was once a major fund-raiser for Amnesty But in those days it was about preventing torture Not about sexual identity I…
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Free speech & cancellation, Media & institutions
RT @Jebadoo2: @LucyHunterB @newsandpics @mbmpolicy @fancyhatslady One might say the withdrawal of a report that is: 1. Libellous 2. Recom…
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Media & institutions, Child safeguarding
The reason Hothersall, and people like him, can't abide women and gay people who say 'no' to the removal of rights from female rape victims and the chemical castration of gender-confused children is that they're completely insulated from the harms they're cheering on. https://t.co/jtyStSYsZO
Classified hostile · Intensity 3/4 · Youth healthcare, Child safeguarding, Single-sex spaces, Specific individuals
RT @NoraTheBora: Ann Widdecombe has possibly been murdered, and @SkyNews thinks it’s appropriate to have a man discussing whether she was a…
Classified mocking · Intensity 2/4 · Media & institutions, Specific individuals
RT @ForWomenScot: “FWS is only ‘anti-rights’ if you don’t consider women to be entitled to any rights in law or public life. It’s a sad sta…
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Single-sex spaces, Law & gender recognition
RT @JohnBoyne: I rarely post on here anymore, but I have to say to @PeterTatchell: It shouldn't take the news that an elderly woman was mu…
Classified critical · Intensity 2/4 · Single-sex spaces, Child safeguarding, Specific individuals
Replying to @akuareindorf
@akuareindorf @AmnestyUK The populist right understands these people far, far better than they understand why they're handing open goals to the populist right.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Media & institutions, Free speech & cancellation
Maybe they’ve decided to belatedly seek legal advice. Unless they’re even more reckless and arrogant than Stonewall, they must surely have anticipated that the organisations they targeted would do so.
Classified critical · Intensity 1/4 · Media & institutions, Free speech & cancellation
These are the posts classified trans-related. Search all 16,714 collected tweets, read the year-by-year analysis, or read the report on her campaign against trans rights.